-
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Sep 2023Oldest-old is the fastest growing segment of society. A substantial number of these individuals are cognitively impaired or demented. Given the lack of a cure, attention... (Review)
Review
Oldest-old is the fastest growing segment of society. A substantial number of these individuals are cognitively impaired or demented. Given the lack of a cure, attention is directed to lifestyle interventions that could help alleviate the stress in patients, their families, and society. The aim of this review was to identify lifestyle factors with important roles in dementia prevention in oldest-old. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science. We identified 27 observational cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that eating a healthy diet with plenty of fruits and vegetables, and participation in leisure and physical activities may protect against cognitive decline and cognitive impairment among oldest-old regardless of the APOE genotype. Combined lifestyles may generate multiplicative effects than individual factors. This is the first review known to systematically examine the association between lifestyle and cognitive health in oldest-old. Lifestyle interventions for diet, leisure, or a combination of lifestyles could be beneficial for cognitive function in oldest-old. Interventional studies are warranted to strengthen the evidence.
Topics: Humans; Aged, 80 and over; Dementia; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cognition; Life Style; Diet
PubMed: 37321363
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105286 -
The Lancet. Healthy Longevity Jan 2024Cognitive impairment and dementia are highly prevalent among stroke survivors and represent a major burden for patients, carers, and health-care systems. We studied the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cognitive impairment and dementia are highly prevalent among stroke survivors and represent a major burden for patients, carers, and health-care systems. We studied the risk factors for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and dementia (PSD) beyond the well established risk factors of age and stroke severity.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis we conducted a systematic literature search from database inception until Sept 15, 2023. We selected prospective and retrospective cohort studies, post-hoc analyses from randomised controlled trials, and nested case-control studies of patients with acute stroke (ischaemic, haemorrhagic, and transient ischaemic attack), exploring associations between risk factors at baseline and PSCI or PSD over a follow-up period of at least 3 months. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) with random-effects meta-analyses and performed subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses. This study was preregistered with PROSPERO, CRD42020164959.
FINDINGS
We identified 162 eligible articles for our systematic review, of which 113 articles (89 studies, 160 783 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. Baseline cognitive impairment was the strongest risk factor for PSCI (RR 2·00, 95% CI 1·66-2·40) and PSD (3·10, 2·77-3·47). We identified diabetes (1·29, 1·14-1·45), presence or history of atrial fibrillation (1·29, 1·04-1·60), presence of moderate or severe white matter hyperintensities (WMH; 1·51, 1·20-1·91), and WMH severity (1·30, 1·10-1·55, per SD increase) as treatable risk factors for PSCI, independent of age and stroke severity. For PSD, we identified diabetes (1·38, 1·10-1·72), presence of moderate or severe WMH (1·55, 1·01-2·38), and WMH severity (1·61, 1·20-2·14, per SD increase) as treatable risk factors. Additional risk factors included lower educational attainment, previous stroke, left hemisphere stroke, presence of three or more lacunes, brain atrophy, and low baseline functional status. Associations of risk factors with PSD were weaker in studies conducted and published more recently. We found substantial interstudy heterogeneity and evidence of reporting bias.
INTERPRETATION
Our results highlight the importance of cognitive impairment in the acute phase after stroke for long-term prediction of PSCI and PSD. Treatable risk factors include diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and markers of cerebral small vessel disease (ie, white matter hyperintensities and lacunes). Future trials should explore these risk factors as potential targets for prevention of PSCI and PSD.
FUNDING
German Research Foundation.
Topics: Humans; Brain Ischemia; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Atrial Fibrillation; Stroke; Cognitive Dysfunction; Risk Factors; Dementia; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38101426
DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00217-9 -
Alzheimer's & Dementia : the Journal of... Jul 2023Operationalized research criteria for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) were published in 2020. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Operationalized research criteria for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) were published in 2020. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review the evidence for the diagnostic clinical features and biomarkers in MCI-LB set out in the criteria.
METHODS
MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched on 9/28/22 for relevant articles. Articles were included if they presented original data reporting the rates of diagnostic features in MCI-LB.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven articles were included. The meta-analysis supported the inclusion of the current clinical features in the diagnostic criteria. Evidence for striatal dopaminergic imaging and meta-iodobenzylguanidine cardiac scintigraphy, though limited, supports their inclusion. Quantitative electroencephalogram (EEG) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) show promise as diagnostic biomarkers.
DISCUSSION
The available evidence largely supports the current diagnostic criteria for MCI-LB. Further evidence will help refine the diagnostic criteria and understand how best to apply them in clinical practice and research.
HIGHLIGHTS
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic features of MCI-LB was carried out. The four core clinical features were more common in MCI-LB than MCI-AD/stable MCI. Neuropsychiatric and autonomic features were also more common in MCI-LB. More evidence is needed for the proposed biomarkers. FDG-PET and quantitative EEG show promise as diagnostic biomarkers in MCI-LB.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Lewy Bodies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Cognitive Dysfunction; Biomarkers; Lewy Body Disease
PubMed: 37096339
DOI: 10.1002/alz.13105 -
Annals of Family Medicine 2024We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate clinically meaningful benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid in patients with Alzheimer dementia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate clinically meaningful benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid in patients with Alzheimer dementia.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and 5 trial registries, as well as the reference lists of identified studies. We included randomized controlled trials comparing a monoclonal antibody with placebo at a dose consistent with that used in phase 3 trials or for Food and Drug Administration approval. Studies had to report at least 1 clinically relevant benefit or harm. Data were extracted independently by at least 2 researchers for random effects meta-analysis. Changes in cognitive and functional scales were compared between groups, and each difference was assessed to determine if it met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).
RESULTS
We identified 19 publications with 23,202 total participants that evaluated 8 anti-amyloid antibodies. There were small improvements over placebo in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-Cog-11 to -14 score (standardized mean difference = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04), Mini Mental State Examination score (0.32 points; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50), and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score (mean difference =-0.18 points; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), and the combined functional scores (standardized mean difference = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the changes, including those for lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab, exceeded the MCID. Harms included significantly increased risks of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-edema (relative risk [RR] = 10.29; number needed to harm [NNH] = 9), ARIA-hemorrhage (RR = 1.74; NNH = 13), and symptomatic ARIA-edema (RR = 24.3; NNH = 86).
CONCLUSIONS
Although monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid provide small benefits on cognitive and functional scales in patients with Alzheimer dementia, these improvements are far below the MCID for each outcome and are accompanied by clinically meaningful harms.
Topics: United States; Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Edema; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 38253509
DOI: 10.1370/afm.3050 -
European Journal of Medical Research Nov 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a worldwide public health problem and is difficult to cure. Drugs aimed at slowing the progression of the disease have been developed, with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a worldwide public health problem and is difficult to cure. Drugs aimed at slowing the progression of the disease have been developed, with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granting accelerated approval for aducanumab on June 21, 2021 and a new accelerated approval for lecanemab on January 22, 2023. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mabs) for the treatment of AD.
METHOD
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 2023. Efficacy outcomes included Aβ, neuroimaging, and biomarker outcomes. Safety outcomes included amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema or effusions (ARIA-E) and ARIA with cerebral microhemorrhages, cerebral macrohemorrhages, or superficial siderosis (ARIA-H). Review Manager 5.4 software was used to assess the data. The standard mean differences (SMDs) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were analyzed and calculated with a random effect model or a fixed effect model.
RESULT
Overall, 4471 patients from 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with 2190 patients in the treatment group and 2281 patients in the placebo group meeting the inclusion criteria. FDA-approved anti-Aβ mabs showed statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including CDR-SB (P = 0.01), ADCS-ADL-MCI (P = 0.00003), ADCOMS (P < 0.00001), ADAS-Cog (P < 0.00001). Moreover, FDA-approved anti-Aβ mabs increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1-42 (P = 0.002) and plasma Aβ42/40 ratios (P = 0.0008). They also decreased CSF P-Tau (P < 0.00001), CSF T-Tau (P < 0.00001), and plasma p-tau181 (P < 0.00001). FDA-approved anti-Aβ mabs perform neuroimaging changes in amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Standardized Uptake Value ratio (PET SUVr) (P < 0.00001). However, compared with placebo, FDA-approved anti-Aβ mabs had higher risk of ARIA-E (P < 0.00001) and ARIA-H (P < 0001).
CONCLUSION
FDA-approved anti-Aβ mabs have a role in slowing disease progression in patients with AD, at the cost of an increased probability of side effects.
Topics: United States; Humans; Alzheimer Disease; United States Food and Drug Administration; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Biomarkers
PubMed: 38017568
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01512-w -
Neurology and Therapy Aug 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a disease continuum from pathophysiologic, biomarker and clinical perspectives. With the advent of advanced technologies, diagnosing and...
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a disease continuum from pathophysiologic, biomarker and clinical perspectives. With the advent of advanced technologies, diagnosing and managing patients is evolving.
METHODS
A systematic literature review (SLR) of practice guidelines for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarize current clinical practice guidelines for screening, testing, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring in the AD continuum. The results of this SLR were used to propose a way forward for practice guidelines given the possible introduction of biomarker-guided technology using blood- or plasma-based assays and disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) targeted for early disease.
RESULTS
53 clinical practice guidelines were identified, 15 of which were published since 2018. Screening for asymptomatic populations was not recommended. Biomarker testing was not included in routine diagnostic practice. There was no consensus on which neurocognitive tests to use to diagnose and monitor MCI or AD dementia. Pharmacologic therapies were not recommended for MCI, while cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine were recommended for AD treatment.
DISCUSSION
The pre-2018 and post-2018 practice guidelines share similar recommendations for screening, diagnosis and treatment. However, once DMTs are approved, clinicians will require guidance on the appropriate use of DMTs in a clinical setting. This guidance should include strategies for identifying eligible patients and evaluating the DMT benefit-to-risk profile to facilitate shared decision-making among physicians, patients and care partners.
CONCLUSION
Regular evidence-based updates of existing guidelines for the AD continuum are required over the coming decades to integrate rapidly evolving technologic and medical scientific advances and bring emerging approaches for management of early disease into clinical practice. This will pave the way toward biomarker-guided identification and targeted treatment and the realization of precision medicine for AD.
PubMed: 37261607
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00504-6 -
JAMA Network Open Sep 2023The utility of antihypertensives and ideal blood pressure (BP) for dementia prevention in late life remains unclear and highly contested. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The utility of antihypertensives and ideal blood pressure (BP) for dementia prevention in late life remains unclear and highly contested.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the associations of hypertension history, antihypertensive use, and baseline measured BP in late life (age >60 years) with dementia and the moderating factors of age, sex, and racial group.
DATA SOURCE AND STUDY SELECTION
Longitudinal, population-based studies of aging participating in the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC) group were included. Participants were individuals without dementia at baseline aged 60 to 110 years and were based in 15 different countries (US, Brazil, Australia, China, Korea, Singapore, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Germany, Spain, Italy, France, Sweden, and Greece).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Participants were grouped in 3 categories based on previous diagnosis of hypertension and baseline antihypertensive use: healthy controls, treated hypertension, and untreated hypertension. Baseline systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were treated as continuous variables. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data reporting guidelines.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The key outcome was all-cause dementia. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between the exposures and the key outcome variable. The association between dementia and baseline BP was modeled using nonlinear natural splines. The main analysis was a partially adjusted Cox proportional hazards model controlling for age, age squared, sex, education, racial group, and a random effect for study. Sensitivity analyses included a fully adjusted analysis, a restricted analysis of those individuals with more than 5 years of follow-up data, and models examining the moderating factors of age, sex, and racial group.
RESULTS
The analysis included 17 studies with 34 519 community dwelling older adults (20 160 [58.4%] female) with a mean (SD) age of 72.5 (7.5) years and a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.3 (4.3) years. In the main, partially adjusted analysis including 14 studies, individuals with untreated hypertension had a 42% increased risk of dementia compared with healthy controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.76; P = .001) and 26% increased risk compared with individuals with treated hypertension (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53; P = .02). Individuals with treated hypertension had no significant increased dementia risk compared with healthy controls (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07). The association of antihypertensive use or hypertension status with dementia did not vary with baseline BP. There was no significant association of baseline SBP or DBP with dementia risk in any of the analyses. There were no significant interactions with age, sex, or racial group for any of the analyses.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This individual patient data meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies found that antihypertensive use was associated with decreased dementia risk compared with individuals with untreated hypertension through all ages in late life. Individuals with treated hypertension had no increased risk of dementia compared with healthy controls.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Male; Blood Pressure; Antihypertensive Agents; Longitudinal Studies; Hypertension; Dementia
PubMed: 37698858
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33353 -
Cureus Nov 2023Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide epidemic that is only increasing as the years progress, and as of 2019, affecting over 37 million. T2DM is a chronic... (Review)
Review
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide epidemic that is only increasing as the years progress, and as of 2019, affecting over 37 million. T2DM is a chronic condition caused by reduced insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance. Due to insulin not operating at optimal conditions, blood glucose rises and remains high, thus disturbing metabolic hemostasis. Many complications can arise from T2DM, such as coronary vascular disease, kidney damage, eye damage, and, quite significantly, dementia. It is theorized that dementia from T2DM stems from the fact that the brain is susceptible to hyperglycemic conditions, which are promoted by the increase in insulin resistance of target cells in the central nervous system. This directly affects cognitive processes and memory, which correlates to decreased temporal and front lobes volume. The risk of diabetic complications can be minimized with therapeutic interventions such as oral-antidiabetic (OAD) agents and insulin. Several OADs are on the market, but the first-line agent is metformin, a biguanide that decreases glucose production and increases insulin sensitivity. This paper aims to determine if currently prescribed OADs can help slow cognitive decline and reduce the risk and incidence of dementia as a complication of T2DM. Studies found that, for the most part, all OADs except sulfonylureas (SU) significantly slowed the decline of cognitive function and reduced the risk and incidence of dementia. SU's were shown to increase the risk of dementia in most studies. Of all the OADs, thiazolidinediones may be the most beneficial drug class for reducing the risk of dementia in T2DM patients. Future research should focus on whether early intervention with specific classes of OADs can not only improve glycemic control, leading to decreased hyperglycemia but also prevent the build-up of damaged brain tissue and help to reduce the risk and incidence of dementia in patients with T2DM.
PubMed: 38152822
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49515 -
Life Sciences Nov 2023A diverse and stable microbiota promotes a healthy state, nevertheless, an imbalance in gut or oral bacterial composition, called dysbiosis, can cause gastrointestinal... (Review)
Review
A diverse and stable microbiota promotes a healthy state, nevertheless, an imbalance in gut or oral bacterial composition, called dysbiosis, can cause gastrointestinal disorders, systemic inflammatory states and oxidative stress, among others. Recently, gut and oral dysbiosis has been linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is considered the most common form of dementia and a public health priority due to its high prevalence and incidence. The aim of this review is to highlight the implications of gut and oral microbiota in the neuroinflammation characteristic of AD pathology and the subsequent cognitive impairment. It is a systematic review of the current literature obtained by searching the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristic intestinal dysbiosis in AD patients leads to increased permeability of the intestinal barrier and activates immune cells in the central nervous system due to translocation of microbiota-derived metabolites and/or bacteria into the circulation leading to increased neuroinflammation and neuronal loss, thus generating the cognitive impairment characteristic of AD. The presence in the central nervous system of Porphyromonas gingivalis can cause an increased neuroinflammation and beta-amyloid peptide accumulation.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Neuroinflammatory Diseases; Dysbiosis; Microbiota; Inflammation; Bacteria; Brain
PubMed: 37793482
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122132 -
Brain Sciences Jul 2023Apathy, a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in aging neurocognitive disorders, has been associated with cognitive decline and functional disability. Therefore, timely... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Apathy, a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in aging neurocognitive disorders, has been associated with cognitive decline and functional disability. Therefore, timely provision of pharmacological interventions for apathy is greatly needed.
DESIGN
A systematical literature review of existing studies was conducted up to 30 May 2023 in several databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane, Google Scholar, etc.) that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses assessing pharmacological treatments for apathy in aging neurocognitive disorders. The quality of the studies was appraised.
RESULTS
In patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD), donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, methylphenidate, and gingko biloba were proven efficacious for apathy, while rivastigmine, cognitive enhancer IRL752 and piribedil were found to be beneficial in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and agomelatine in patients with Frontotemporal Dementia (FD). The extensive proportion of RCTs in which apathy was used as a secondary outcome measure, along with the considerable methodological heterogeneity, did not allow the evaluation of group effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Pharmacological interventions for apathy in aging neurocognitive disorders are complex and under-investigated. The continuation of systematic research efforts and the provision of individualized treatment for patients suffering from these disorders is vital.
PubMed: 37508993
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071061