-
Jornal de Pediatria 2023To map available scientific evidence about the pediatric population with spina bifida submitted to transanal irrigation to manage signs and symptoms of neurogenic bowel. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To map available scientific evidence about the pediatric population with spina bifida submitted to transanal irrigation to manage signs and symptoms of neurogenic bowel.
SOURCE OF DATA
This research was developed according to recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were carried out in the databases: CINAHL, Medline/Pubmed, Scielo, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, Proquest, and the CAPES catalog of theses and dissertations. Quantitative and qualitative studies on the topic were included, as long as they dealt with this population. There was no predetermined time frame.
SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS
The authors found 1.020 studies, selected 130 for close reading, and included 23 in the review, all of which had been published from 1989 to 2021. The authors mapped the characteristics of the studies, including their definitions of concepts and use of scales, criteria for the indication of transanal irrigation, training to carry out the procedure, devices and solutions used, number and frequency of transanal irrigations, health care actions, time spent, associated complications, complementary exams, adherence rate, follow-up, and outcomes, focusing on the benefits for bowel management.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the variability of evaluation parameters and term definitions, evidence suggests that transanal irrigation is a safe and effective method to manage fecal incontinence. Studies in the field are likely to grow, using standardized scales and longitudinal follow-ups. The authors suggest further research on transanal irrigation in the pediatric population with spina bifida in the Latin American context.
Topics: Humans; Child; Neurogenic Bowel; Constipation; Therapeutic Irrigation; Fecal Incontinence; Spinal Dysraphism
PubMed: 36852756
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.02.001 -
Journal of Infection in Developing... Dec 2023Systematic evaluation of the diagnostic value of next generation sequencing (NGS) in sepsis etiology. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Systematic evaluation of the diagnostic value of next generation sequencing (NGS) in sepsis etiology.
METHODOLOGY
We conducted a systematic search on four databases (Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase) and compiled diagnostic experiments using NGS to evaluate sepsis etiology. Two researchers conducted research and obtained data independently.
RESULTS
Nine documents were included comprising 747 patients, 988 blood samples, 175 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples, 16 cerebrospinal fluid samples, and one urine sample. The combined sensitivity of each study was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95). The combined specificity was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.25-0.55). The combined positive likelihood ratio was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.18-1.98). The combined negative likelihood ratio was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.48). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.38 (95% CI: 2.53-15.32) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84, (95% CI: 0.62-0.94).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data we collected, we found that compared with the blood culture technology, NGS has the advantages of high sensitivity and wide detection range, but its specificity was low. Further study is needed to confirm the value of NGS in the etiological diagnosis of patients with sepsis.
Topics: Humans; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Sepsis; Area Under Curve; Blood Culture; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
PubMed: 38252719
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.18235 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision,... (Review)
Review
Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision, irrigation and debridement, and resection arthroplasty. With our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare one- and two-stage revisions for periprosthetic shoulder joint infections and determine the most appropriate therapeutic procedure. We performed an extensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL and filtered out all relevant studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, heterogeneity was analyzed using I, and publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. A total of 8 studies with one-stage revisions, 36 studies with two-stage revisions, and 12 studies with both one-stage and two-stage revisions were included. According to the random-effects model, the reinfection rate for the entirety of the studies was 12.3% (95% Cl: 9.6-15.3), with a low-to-moderate heterogeneity of I = 47.72%. The reinfection rate of the one-stage revisions was 10.9%, which was significantly lower than the reinfection rate of the two-stage revisions, which was 12.93% ( = 0.0062). The one-stage revision rate was significantly lower with 1.16 vs. 2.25 revisions in the two-stage revision group ( < 0.0001). The postoperative functional outcome in one-stage-revised patients was comparable but not statistically significant ( = 0.1523). In one- and two-stage revisions, most infections were caused by . In summary, our systematic review and meta-analysis show the superiority of single-stage revision regarding reinfection and revision rates in periprosthetic shoulder joint infection.
PubMed: 38786168
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050440 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Dec 2023Sleep disordered breathing is commonly treated with positive airway pressure therapy. Positive airway pressure therapy is delivered via a tight-fitting mask with common... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Current treatment strategies in managing side effects associated with domiciliary positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for patients with sleep disordered breathing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sleep disordered breathing is commonly treated with positive airway pressure therapy. Positive airway pressure therapy is delivered via a tight-fitting mask with common side effects including: leak, ineffective treatment, residual sleep disordered breathing, eye irritation, nasal congestion, pressure ulcers and poor concordance with therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the effectiveness of current treatment strategies for managing side effects associated with positive airway pressure therapy. Five databases were searched and 10,809 articles were screened, with 36 articles included in the review. Studies investigated: dressings, nasal spray/douche, chin straps, heated humidification and interfaces. No intervention either improved or detrimentally affected: positive airway pressure concordance, Epworth Sleepiness Score, residual apnoea hypopnea index or interface leak. The review was limited by study heterogeneity, particularly for outcome measures. Additionally, patient demographics were not reported, making it difficult to apply the findings to a broad clinical population. This review highlights the paucity of evidence supporting treatment strategies to manage side effects of positive airway pressure therapy.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Hot Temperature; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
PubMed: 37812972
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101850 -
International Wound Journal Aug 2023Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a wound-dressing system that applies sub-atmospheric pressure on the surface of a wound to promote healing. An evolution of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effects of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) versus NPWT or standard of care in orthoplastic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a wound-dressing system that applies sub-atmospheric pressure on the surface of a wound to promote healing. An evolution of this technology, NPWT with solution instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d), is increasingly being used to maximise wound closure and reduce failure rates. However, there is still a lack of evidence concerning its use in orthoplastic surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare NPWTi-d with NPWT and standard of care for wound management in orthoplastic surgery. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 15 March 2022 was performed, including studies describing the outcomes of NPWTi-d for traumatic/orthopaedic injuries. A meta-analysis on the number of surgical debridements, as well as the rate of complete wound closure and complications was carried out, although for other outcomes, a descriptive statistic was applied. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Downs& Black's Checklist for Measuring Quality. Thirteen studies with a total number of 871 patients were included, in which NPWTi-d demonstrated significantly higher primary wound closure and lower complication rates (P < .05). No difference in the number of surgical procedures required for final wound healing was observed. Moreover, five out of six studies showed better results for NPWTi-d when the change of the bioburden and bacterial count of the wound were analysed. A singular study investigating the length of the hospital stay of patients treated with NPWTi-d showed a reduction in the latter. The present meta-analysis proves that NPWTi-d is superior to NPTW or conventional dressings in orthoplastic wound care management, in terms of complete wound closure rate and the reduced number of complications. Still, the limited quality of the studies analysed shows that future randomised studies are needed to confirm the benefits and to identify the most appropriate recommendations for using NPWTi-d in orthoplastic surgery, as well as to investigate the cost-effectiveness of this wound-dressing system.
Topics: Humans; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Standard of Care; Wound Healing; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Bandages; Therapeutic Irrigation
PubMed: 36594491
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14072 -
PloS One 2023The benefits of routine gastric suctioning or lavage in neonates remain uncertain, despite the common practice worldwide. To investigate the potential advantages and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The benefits of routine gastric suctioning or lavage in neonates remain uncertain, despite the common practice worldwide. To investigate the potential advantages and harms, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of these procedures in healthy or meconium-stained neonates at birth. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to February 9, 2023. We included only RCTs assessing the outcomes of gastric suction or lavage in neonates at birth. We calculated risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were gastrointestinal symptoms including vomiting, retching, feeding intolerance, and secondary aspiration. The secondary outcomes included time to initiation of breastfeeding and potential adverse procedure-related events. Twelve RCTs with a total of 4,122 neonates were analyzed. All the studies compared neonates who received gastric suction or lavage with those who received usual care. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly reduced in neonates receiving gastric suction or gastric lavage compared with the control group (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89). Gastric lavage was beneficial for infants with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), while gastric suction had no significant benefit in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in infants without meconium-stained amniotic fluid (RR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.37). Our findings suggest that gastric suction or lavage may reduce gastrointestinal symptoms in neonates; however, these procedures may only benefit infants born with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Vigorous newborns without meconium-stained amniotic fluid may not benefit from these procedures. Furthermore, gastric suction may lead to adverse outcomes such as apnea and bradycardia. Registration: This study was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care (CRD42023247780).
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Infant; Humans; Meconium; Therapeutic Irrigation; Suction; Stomach; Gastric Lavage; Vomiting; Amniotic Fluid
PubMed: 37440527
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288398 -
Health Technology Assessment... Jan 2024Up to 30% of children have constipation at some stage in their life. Although often short-lived, in one-third of children it progresses to chronic functional...
BACKGROUND
Up to 30% of children have constipation at some stage in their life. Although often short-lived, in one-third of children it progresses to chronic functional constipation, potentially with overflow incontinence. Optimal management strategies remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the most effective interventions, and combinations and sequences of interventions, for childhood chronic functional constipation, and understand how they can best be implemented.
METHODS
Key stakeholders, comprising two parents of children with chronic functional constipation, two adults who experienced childhood chronic functional constipation and four health professional/continence experts, contributed throughout the research. We conducted pragmatic mixed-method reviews. For all reviews, included studies focused on any interventions/strategies, delivered in any setting, to improve any outcomes in children (0-18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of chronic functional constipation (excluding studies of diagnosis/assessment) included. Dual reviewers applied inclusion criteria and assessed risk of bias. One reviewer extracted data, checked by a second reviewer. We systematically searched electronic databases (including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) (January 2011 to March 2020) and grey literature, including studies (any design) reporting any intervention/strategy. Data were coded, tabulated and mapped. Research quality was not evaluated. For each different intervention, we included existing systematic reviews judged to be low risk of bias (using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews), updating any meta-analyses with new randomised controlled trials. Where there was no existing low risk of bias systematic reviews, we included randomised controlled trials and other primary studies. The risk of bias was judged using design-specific tools. Evidence was synthesised narratively, and a process of considered judgement was used to judge certainty in the evidence as high, moderate, low, very low or insufficient evidence. Included studies (any design, English-language) detailed intervention-related costs. Studies were categorised as cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit, and reporting quality evaluated using the consensus health economic criteria checklist. Included studies reported data relating to implementation barriers or facilitators. Using a best-fit framework synthesis approach, factors were synthesised around the consolidated framework for implementation research domains.
RESULTS
Stakeholders prioritised outcomes, developed a model which informed evidence synthesis and identified evidence gaps.
SCOPING REVIEW
651 studies, including 190 randomised controlled trials and 236 primary studies, conservatively reported 48 interventions/intervention combinations.
EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
studies explored service delivery models ( = 15); interventions delivered by families/carers ( = 32), wider children's workforce ( = 21), continence teams ( = 31) and specialist consultant-led teams ( = 42); complementary therapies ( = 15); and psychosocial interventions ( = 4). One intervention (probiotics) had moderate-quality evidence; all others had low to very-low-quality evidence. Thirty-one studies reported evidence relating to cost or resource use; data were insufficient to support generalisable conclusions. One hundred and six studies described implementation barriers and facilitators.
CONCLUSIONS
Management of childhood chronic functional constipation is complex. The available evidence remains limited, with small, poorly conducted and reported studies. Many evidence gaps were identified. Treatment recommendations within current clinical guidelines remain largely unchanged, but there is a need for research to move away from considering effectiveness of single interventions. Clinical care and future studies must consider the individual characteristics of children.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019159008.
FUNDING
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 128470) and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Topics: Child; Adult; Humans; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Health Personnel; Constipation
PubMed: 38343084
DOI: 10.3310/PLTR9622 -
Journal of Dentistry May 2024Synthesise evidence on post-endodontic pain (PEP) in adult teeth undergoing primary root canal treatment with the adjunctive use of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) as... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Synthesise evidence on post-endodontic pain (PEP) in adult teeth undergoing primary root canal treatment with the adjunctive use of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) as compared with conventional needle irrigation (CNI) during the first post-operative week.
DATA
An electronic search was performed; no language constraints or restriction on the year of publication were applied.
SOURCES
Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and PubMed on 04 June 2023 STUDY SELECTION: Randomised clinical trials (RaCTs) that evaluated PEP after LAI of endodontic irrgants were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. PEP was analysed at various time intervals until 1 week after treatment, related to the type of LAI used and the need for analgesia.
REULTS
Of the 793 articles identified through the electronic database search, 6 RaCTs were included. Qualitative review was favoured over meta-analysis due to substantial methodological heterogeneity between studies. Five studies were at high risk for bias determined by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool. Diode LAI demonstrated superior efficacy to needle irrigation in reducing pain 6-48 h post-treatment. The impact of LAI by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) was unclear and no difference was observed between PIPS and needle irrigation. However, PIPS mitigated PEP better than manual dynamic activation, sonic and ultrasonic activation. There was no difference in analgesia intake between LAI and needle irrigation groups.
CONCLUSIONS
LAI may help reduce PEP in the first 48 h. Methodological standardisation of future RaCTs on LAI would be beneficial in allowing a more accurate review with the possibility of quantitative synthesis.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
This unique synthesis used stringent criteria to reduce confounding factors and provided valuable evidence regarding PEP with different types of LAI. It helps clinicians choose an appropriate LAI technique as compared with CNI and predicts a time frame for reducing PEP.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Therapeutic Irrigation; Root Canal Therapy; Root Canal Irrigants; Root Canal Preparation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Lasers; Adult; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 38484867
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104928