-
International Wound Journal Apr 2024The primary objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of various regenerative medicine approaches, such as platelet-rich plasma, cell therapy, stromal... (Review)
Review
A systematic review of the efficacy, safety and satisfaction of regenerative medicine treatments, including platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction and stem cell-conditioned medium for hypertrophic scars and keloids.
The primary objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of various regenerative medicine approaches, such as platelet-rich plasma, cell therapy, stromal vascular fraction, exosomes and stem cell-conditioned medium, in the process of healing hypertrophic and keloid scars. Major databases including PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched, and based on the content of the articles and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight articles were selected. Out of these eight articles, there were two non-randomized clinical trial studies (25%), one randomized, single-blinded comparative study (12.5%), one retrospective clinical observational study (12.5%) and four randomized clinical trial studies (50%). We employed EndNote X8 and Google Sheets to conduct article reviews and extract relevant data. Following the review phase, the studies underwent analysis and categorization. In all eight reviewed studies, the effectiveness of regenerative medicine in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids has been proven. Out of these studies, five (62.5%) focused on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, two study (25%) examined the effectiveness of stromal vascular fraction and one study (12.5%) explored the efficacy of stem cell-conditioned medium. In two studies (25%), the treatment methods were added to standard treatment, while in six studies (75%), regenerative medicine was used as the sole treatment method and compared with standard treatment. The use of these treatment methods did not result in any serious side effects for the patients. Regenerative medicine is an effective method with minimal side effects for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. It can be used as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatment methods. However, further studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of all sub-branches of this method.
Topics: Humans; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic; Culture Media, Conditioned; Keloid; Personal Satisfaction; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Regenerative Medicine; Stromal Vascular Fraction; Treatment Outcome; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38126221
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14557 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2023Despite numerous measures used to prevent pressure ulcers, their growing prevalence in recent years is expected to continue as the population ages. This review aims to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite numerous measures used to prevent pressure ulcers, their growing prevalence in recent years is expected to continue as the population ages. This review aims to report the outcomes of the regenerative potential of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers, assessing the effectiveness of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers.
METHODS
A computerized search for articles on animal models that use MSCs as primary therapy to treat pressure ulcers, published from conception to present, was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Our search yielded 52 articles, narrowed to 44 after excluding duplicates.
RESULTS
Out of 52 articles collected from four databases, 11 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 11 articles published between 2008 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were observational descriptive papers in animal models, and three were prospective. Six studies used autologous MSCs, while five used allogenic MSCs. Three studies were conducted in humans, and the remaining eight were conducted in animals. The most common method of cell delivery was an intradermal injection in the margins of the ulcer. All studies reported positive results, including improved wound healing, reduced inflammation, and improved tissue regeneration.
CONCLUSIONS
MSCs have shown promising results in treating pressure ulcers in animal and clinical trials. The combination of MSCs and scaffold materials has also been studied and found to be effective in wound healing. A standardized human wound model has been proposed further to investigate the efficacy of cell-based therapies for chronic wounds. However, more research is needed to determine the best quantity of cells to apply for pressure ulcers and to ensure the safety and efficacy of these treatments in clinical settings.
PubMed: 38137625
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247545 -
Human Reproduction Open 2023To what extent does regenerative medicine with stem cell therapy help to address infertility issues for future clinical application? (Review)
Review
STUDY QUESTION
To what extent does regenerative medicine with stem cell therapy help to address infertility issues for future clinical application?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Regenerative medicine using different stem cell sources is yielding promising results in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve from damage and senescence, and improving fertility potential in various preclinical settings.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Regenerative medicine using stem cell therapy is emerging as a potential strategy to address a number of issues in the field of human reproduction. Indeed, different types of adult and fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been tested with promising results, owing to their ability to differentiate into different tissue lineages, move toward specific injured sites (homing), and generate a secretome with wound-healing, proangiogenic, and antioxidant capacities.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION
Guided by the checklist for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases until June 2023 using the following keywords: 'mesenchymal stem cells' AND 'ovarian follicles' OR 'ovarian tissue culture' OR 'ovarian follicle culture' OR 'cumulus oocyte complex'. Only peer-reviewed published articles written in English were included.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS
The primary outcome for the experimental strategies was evaluation of the ovarian reserve, with a focus on follicle survival, number, and growth. Secondary outcomes involved analyses of other parameters associated with the follicle pool, such as hormones and growth factors, ovarian tissue viability markers including oxidative stress levels, oocyte growth and maturation rates, and of course pregnancy outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Preclinical studies exploring MSCs from different animal origins and tissue sources in specific conditions were selected (n = 112), including: culture of granulosa cells, ovarian tissue and isolated ovarian follicles; ovarian tissue transplantation; and systemic or intraovarian injection after gonadotoxic or age-related follicle pool decline. Protecting the ovarian reserve from aging and gonadotoxic damage has been widely tested and using murine models and is now yielding initial data in the first ever case series of patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Use of MSCs as feeder cells in ovarian tissue culture was found to improve follicle outcomes and oocyte competence, bringing us one step closer to future clinical application. MSCs also have proved effective at boosting revascularization in the transplantation site when grafting ovarian tissue in experimental animal models.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION
While preclinical results look promising in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve in different experimental models (especially those using various mammal experimental models and using murine models), there is still a lot of work to do before this approach can be considered safe and successfully implemented in a clinical setting.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
All gathered data on the one hand show that regenerative medicine techniques are quickly gaining ground among innovative techniques being developed for future clinical application in the field of reproductive medicine. After proving MSC effectiveness in preclinical settings, there is still a lot of work to do before MSCs can be safely and effectively used in different clinical applications.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS
This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS-PDR T.0077.14, FNRS-CDR J.0063.20, and grant 5/4/150/5 awarded to Marie-Madeleine Dolmans), Fonds Spéciaux de Recherche, and the Fondation St Luc. None of the authors have any competing interest to disclose.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.
PubMed: 37954935
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad040 -
Cells Jun 2024Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions involving the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory... (Review)
Review
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions involving the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles, and associated structures. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising therapy for TMJ repair. This systematic review aims to consolidate findings from the preclinical animal studies evaluating MSC-based therapies, including MSCs, their secretome, and extracellular vesicles (EVs), for the treatment of TMJ cartilage/osteochondral defects and osteoarthritis (OA). Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. A total of 23 studies involving 125 , 149 , 470 , and 74 were identified. Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines was evaluated for quality assessment, while the SYRCLE risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for the studies. Generally, MSC-based therapies demonstrated efficacy in TMJ repair across animal models of TMJ defects and OA. In most studies, animals treated with MSCs, their derived secretome, or EVs displayed improved morphological, histological, molecular, and behavioral pain outcomes, coupled with positive effects on cellular proliferation, migration, and matrix synthesis, as well as immunomodulation. However, unclear risk in bias and incomplete reporting highlight the need for standardized outcome measurements and reporting in future investigations.
Topics: Animals; Temporomandibular Joint; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Extracellular Vesicles; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 38891122
DOI: 10.3390/cells13110990 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Numerous challenges remain within conventional cell-based therapy despite the growing trend of stem cells used to treat various life-debilitating diseases. These... (Review)
Review
Numerous challenges remain within conventional cell-based therapy despite the growing trend of stem cells used to treat various life-debilitating diseases. These limitations include batch-to-batch heterogeneity, induced alloreactivity, cell survival and integration, poor scalability, and high cost of treatment, thus hindering successful translation from lab to bedside. However, recent pioneering technology has enabled the isolation and enrichment of small extracellular vesicles (EVs), canonically known as exosomes. EVs are described as a membrane-enclosed cargo of functional biomolecules not limited to lipids, nucleic acid, and proteins. Interestingly, studies have correlated the biological role of MSC-EVs to the paracrine activity of MSCs. This key evidence has led to rigorous studies on MSC-EVs as an acellular alternative. Using EVs as a therapy was proposed as a model leading to improvements through increased safety; enhanced bioavailability due to size and permeability; reduced heterogeneity by selective and quantifiable properties; and prolonged shelf-life via long-term freezing or lyophilization. Yet, the identity and potency of EVs are still relatively unknown due to various methods of preparation and to qualify the final product. This is reflected by the absence of regulatory strategies overseeing manufacturing, quality control, clinical implementation, and product registration. In this review, the authors review the various production processes and the proteomic profile of MSC-EVs.
Topics: Humans; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Extracellular Vesicles; Proteomics; Umbilical Cord; Exosomes; Proteome
PubMed: 38791378
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105340 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024This meta-analysis includes the systematic literature review and meta-analysis involving clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis includes the systematic literature review and meta-analysis involving clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation for treating T1DM and T2DM.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library for "published" research from their inception until November 2023. Two researchers independently reviewed the studies' inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis included 13 studies on MSC treatment for diabetes.
RESULTS
The MSC-treated group had a significantly lower HbA1c at the last follow-up compared to the baseline (MD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.33 to 1.57, -value: 0.003< 0.05), their insulin requirement was significantly lower (MD: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.31, -value: 0.002< 0.05), the level of FBG with MSC transplantation significantly dropped compared to baseline (MD: 1.78, 95% CI: -1.02 to 4.58, -value: 0.212), the FPG level of the MSC-treated group was significantly lower (MD: -0.77, 95% CI: -2.36 to 0.81, -value: 0.339 > 0.05), and the fasting C-peptide level of the MSC-treated group was slightly high (MD: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.02, value: 0.231 > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The transplantation of MSCs has been found to positively impact both types of diabetes mellitus without signs of apparent adverse effects.
Topics: Humans; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Treatment Outcome; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38800472
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1380443 -
Cureus Nov 2023Osteosarcoma (OS) is a debilitating cancer of the bone that commonly afflicts the young and old. This may be de novo or associated with tumorigenic syndromes. However,... (Review)
Review
Osteosarcoma (OS) is a debilitating cancer of the bone that commonly afflicts the young and old. This may be de novo or associated with tumorigenic syndromes. However, many molecular mechanisms are still being uncovered and may offer greater avenues for screening and therapy. Cadherins, including E-cadherin and N-cadherin/vimentin, are involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transmission (EMT), which is key for tumor invasion. A study reviewing the relationship between OS and cadherins might elucidate a potential target for therapy and screening. A robust literature review was conducted by searching PubMed with the keywords "osteosarcoma", "cadherin", "e-cadherin" and "n-cadherin". Of a preliminary 266 papers, 25 were included in the final review. Review articles and those without primary data were excluded. Loss of E-cadherin is noted in metastatic cell lines of osteosarcoma. Overexpression of E-cadherin or knockout of N-cadherin/vimentin results in loss of metastatic potential. There are several methods of gene knockout, including CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, viral vector insertion with micro RNA complementary to long noncoding RNA within gene segments, or proteomic editing. Screening for EMT and genetic treatment of EMT is a possible avenue for the treatment of refractory osteosarcoma. Several studies were conducted ex vivo. Further testing involving in vitro therapy is necessary to validate these methods. Limitations of this study involve a lack of in vivo trials to validate methods.
PubMed: 38156135
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49521 -
Dentistry Journal Oct 2023The aim of this systematic review is to describe and identify the prospects of β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) as an alveolar bone grafting (ABG) material in cleft... (Review)
Review
The aim of this systematic review is to describe and identify the prospects of β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) as an alveolar bone grafting (ABG) material in cleft lip/palate (CL/P) or alveolar bone cleft defects. A systematic review protocol based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) was drafted. The literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science/ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, with English as the inclusion criterion and no publication year limits. The keywords yielded a total of 5824 publications. After removing duplicates and non-English articles, there were 3196 suitable articles available for evaluation. Subsequently, 1315 studies remained after reviewing titles and abstracts. Furthermore, 85 full articles were assessed for eligibility. After reading the complete texts of those papers, 20 were eventually selected that matched the inclusion requirements. Thirteen out of the twenty studies included in this systematic review were deemed to have a low risk of bias; one had a high risk of bias; and six had a moderate risk of bias due to not reporting randomization. β-TCP, when used as an ABG material, is biocompatible, visible, practical, offers a less invasive procedure, and does not interfere with orthodontic treatment. Synthetic β-TCP for ABG can be an alternative to autologous bone grafts under certain terms and conditions. The efficacy of β-TCP for ABG in CL/P or alveolar bone cleft defects can be enhanced through a tissue engineering approach that combines β-TCP with growth factors, mesenchymal stem cells, or other graft materials, along with modifications to β-TCP's physical properties.
PubMed: 37886919
DOI: 10.3390/dj11100234 -
BMC Neurology Jan 2024This meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
METHOD
We conducted a manual search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with a search deadline set for February 1, 2023. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 15.0.
RESULT
A total of 9 randomized controlled studies were included, involving a total of 316 people, including 159 mesenchymal stem cells and 147 control groups. Results of meta-analysis: Compared to a placebo group, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a significant reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores among patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke [SMD=-0.99,95% CI (-1.93, -0.05)]. Compared to placebo, barthel index [SMD = 0.48,95% CI (-0.55,1.51)], modified rankin score [SMD = 0.45, 95% CI (1.11, 0.21)], adverse events (RR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.40, 1.17)] the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
Based on current studies, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can ameliorate neurological deficits in patients with ischemic stroke to a certain extent without increasing adverse reactions. However, there was no significant effect on Barthel index and Modified Rankin score.
Topics: United States; Humans; Stroke; Ischemic Stroke; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 38287288
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03542-1 -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2023Tissue engineering and cell therapy for regenerative medicine have great potential to treat chronic disorders. In musculoskeletal disorders, mesenchymal stromal cells... (Review)
Review
Tissue engineering and cell therapy for regenerative medicine have great potential to treat chronic disorders. In musculoskeletal disorders, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been identified as a relevant cell type in cell and regenerative strategies due to their multi-lineage potential, although this is likely to be a result of their trophic and immunomodulatory effects on other cells. This PRISMA systematic review aims to assess whether the age of the patient influences the chondrogenic potential of MSCs in regenerative therapy. We identified a total of 3027 studies after performing a search of four databases, including Cochrane, Web of Science, Medline, and PubMed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 14 papers were identified that were reviewed, assessed, and reported. Cell surface characterization and proliferation, as well as the osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation, were investigated as part of the analysis of these studies. Most included studies suggest a clear link between aged donor MSCs and diminished clonogenic and proliferative potential. Our study reveals a heterogeneous and conflicting range of outcomes concerning the chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic potential of MSCs in relation to age. Further investigations on the in vitro effects of chronological age on the chondrogenic potential of MSCs should follow the outcomes of this systematic review, shedding more light on this complex relationship.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Cell Differentiation; Osteogenesis; Adipogenesis; Tissue Engineering; Cells, Cultured; Chondrogenesis
PubMed: 37895174
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015494