-
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Jun 2024Raynaud disease of the hands is a complex disorder resulting in inappropriate constriction and/or insufficient dilation in microcirculation. There is an emerging role...
BACKGROUND
Raynaud disease of the hands is a complex disorder resulting in inappropriate constriction and/or insufficient dilation in microcirculation. There is an emerging role for botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the treatment armamentarium for refractory Raynaud disease. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the management of primary and secondary Raynaud disease treated with BTX-A intervention.
METHODS
We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of clinical studies assessing treatment of primary or secondary Raynaud disease with BTX-A by searching Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception to first August 2023. The review protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022312253).
RESULTS
Our search strategy identified 288 research articles, of which 18 studies [four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two non-RCTs, five case series, and seven retrospective cohort studies] were eligible for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the probability of pain visual analog scale score improvement with BTX-A intervention was 81.95% [95% confidence interval (74.12-87.81) = 0.19, heterogeneity = 26%] and probability of digital ulcer healing was 79.37% [95% confidence interval (62.45-89.9) = 0.02, heterogeneity = 56%].
CONCLUSIONS
Delivery of BTX-A to digital vessels in the hand may be an effective management strategy for primary and secondary Raynaud disease. A definitive, appropriately-powered RCT with objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures is required to accurately assess and quantify the efficacy of BTX-A in Raynaud disease of the hands.
PubMed: 38881966
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005885 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1169405.].
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1169405.].
PubMed: 37645412
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1238758 -
Cureus Jan 2024Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is becoming increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the development of ischemic heart diseases. Without... (Review)
Review
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is becoming increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the development of ischemic heart diseases. Without obstructive coronary artery disease, the physiological function of the coronary microcirculation can be altered by structural, functional, and molecular factors, leading to myocardial ischemia. CMD can significantly impact the quality of life and prognosis and imposes a huge financial burden on healthcare systems and people. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) for treating CMD. A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ACEIs with placebo in CMD patients. Review Manager, 5.3 for Windows, was utilized. Using the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method, improvement in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and systolic blood pressure events was pooled as mean difference (MD) in a meta-analysis model with a fixed effect model, whereas the number of chest pain episodes was pooled as MD with a random effect model. Five randomized controlled trials involving 209 patients were included in the analysis. The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in CFR in the ACEIs group compared to the placebo group (MD -0.3, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.01, P = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of chest pain episodes between the ACEIs and placebo groups (MD 1.79, 95% CI -3.99 to 7.58, P = 0.54). Similarly, no significant difference in blood pressure change was observed between the two groups (MD 4.02, 95% CI -3.25 to 11.28, P = 0.28). In conclusion, the appropriate treatment for CMD is a source of contention because adequate data is lacking. Our findings suggest that ACEIs may have a positive effect on improving CFR in patients with microvascular angina. However, ACEIs did not demonstrate a significant impact on the number of chest pain episodes or systolic blood pressure in this patient population. Further research, including RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations, is warranted to provide more conclusive evidence on the role of ACEIs in CMD management.
PubMed: 38260109
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52684 -
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and... Feb 2024Microvascular dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is increasingly being recognized as an important health issue. This systematic review...
Ranolazine for improving coronary microvascular function in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Microvascular dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is increasingly being recognized as an important health issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of ranolazine, an antianginal agent, in improving coronary microvascular function.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and gray literature databases until September 30, 2023. The included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English or Chinese languages that screened for eligibility using two independent investigators. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane) and Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp).
RESULTS
From 1,470 citations, 8 RCTs involving 379 participants were included in this analysis. Our findings showed that ranolazine increased coronary flow reserve (CFR) over an 8 to 12-week follow-up period [standardized mean difference =1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-1.89; P=0.002]. Ranolazine increased the global myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) [weighted mean difference (WMD) =0.18; 95% CI: 0.07-0.29; P=0.002] and the midsubendocardial MPRI (WMD =0.10; 95% CI: 0.02-0.19; P=0.02). Moreover, ranolazine improved 3 of the 5 Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, namely, physical functioning (WMD =4.89; 95% CI: 0.14 to 9.64; P=0.04), angina stability (WMD =17.31; 95% CI: 7.13-27.49; P=0.0009), and quality of life (WMD =10.11; 95% CI: 3.57-16.65; P=0.0003). Trial sequential analysis showed that the meta-analysis of angina stability and quality of life scores had a sufficient sample size and statistical power.
CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis suggests that ranolazine is associated with improvements in CFR, myocardial perfusion, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. However, further large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-up are recommended to validate these findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of ranolazine on coronary microvascular function.
PubMed: 38415135
DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1029 -
Cardiology 2024The main aim of this study was to investigate the impact of isolated coronary microvascular disease (CMD) as diagnosed via various modalities on prognosis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The main aim of this study was to investigate the impact of isolated coronary microvascular disease (CMD) as diagnosed via various modalities on prognosis.
METHODS
A systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to March 2023. Included studies were required to measure coronary microvascular function and report outcomes in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or any other cardiac pathological characteristics. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Pooled effects were calculated using random effects models.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies comprising 18,204 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Indices of coronary microvascular function measurement included coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR), hyperemic microcirculatory resistance (HMR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and so on. Patients with isolated CMD exhibited a significantly higher risk of mortality (OR: 2.97, 95% CI, 1.91-4.60, p < 0.0001; HR: 3.38, 95% CI, 1.77-6.47, p = 0.0002) and MACE (OR: 5.82, 95% CI, 3.65-9.29, p < 0.00001; HR: 4.01, 95% CI, 2.59-6.20, p < 0.00001) compared to those without CMD. Subgroup analysis by measurement modality demonstrated consistent and robust pooled effect estimates in various subgroups.
CONCLUSION
CMD is significantly associated with an elevated risk of mortality and MACE in patients without obstructive CAD or any other identifiable cardiac pathologies. The utilization of various measurement techniques may have potential advantages in the management of isolated CMD.
Topics: Humans; Coronary Angiography; Microcirculation; Coronary Artery Disease; Prognosis
PubMed: 37708863
DOI: 10.1159/000533670