-
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a commonly used biomarker for acute inflammation that often rises during sepsis, making it a valuable diagnostic indicator... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a commonly used biomarker for acute inflammation that often rises during sepsis, making it a valuable diagnostic indicator for clinical practice. However, no consensus has been reached on the prognostic value of NLR for predicting the prognosis and mortality risk in adult sepsis patients. In light of this controversy, we conducted a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic significance of NLR in adult sepsis patients. The meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42023433143).
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Springer databases, using retrieval terms "" or "" and "" or "" for studies published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2023. Children and neonates with sepsis were excluded from our research. Two independent researchers conducted the literature search and data extraction. Consensus was reached when discrepancies occurred, and in case of persistent discrepancies, the final decision was made by the research supervisor. The hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were extracted from each study included in the analysis. A random-effects model was used to synthesize all HRs and their 95% CIs. Sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify studies that had a significant impact on the overall results of the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Egger's test was also used to investigate publication bias in this meta-analysis.
RESULTS
After a comprehensive literature search and screening, we included 12 studies comprising 10,811 patients for the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that patients with a higher NLR level were associated with a poor prognosis (Random-effects model, HR: 1.6273, 95% CI: 1.3951-1.8981). Heterogeneity testing showed significant heterogeneity (I 87.2%, 95% CI: 79.5-92, p<0.0001). Sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity, which revealed that the omission of one highly sensitive study significantly reduced the I value. After removing this study, a strong association was found between a higher NLR level and poor prognosis and risk of death in adult sepsis patients (Random-effects model, HR: 1.6884, 95% CI: 1.4338-1.9882). Both subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the study design and testing time of NLR were sources of heterogeneity. Egger's test showed no obvious publication bias in this meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
NLR is a reliable and valuable biomarker for predicting prognosis and the risk of death in adult sepsis patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023433143] PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42023433143].
Topics: Child; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Neutrophils; Leukocyte Count; Lymphocytes; Prognosis; Biomarkers; Sepsis
PubMed: 38562922
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336456 -
PeerJ 2023Although lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a potential prognostic biomarker in many tumor indications, a doubt occurs around its association with head and neck squamous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Although lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a potential prognostic biomarker in many tumor indications, a doubt occurs around its association with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of LMR in patients with HNSCC.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database from inception to May 8, 2023 for systematic review and meta-analysis on LMR and outcomes related to HNSCC development. STATA software was used to estimate the correlation between LMR and prognosis. The risk ratio (hazard ratio, HR) and 95% confidence interval l (CI) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated, and the association between LMR and OS was further validated by subgroup analysis. The source of heterogeneity with the results of subgroup analysis was analyzed by meta-regression analysis. This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023418766).
RESULTS
After a comprehensive exploration, the results of 16 selected articles containing 5,234 subjects were evaluated. A raised LMR was connected to improved OS (HR = 1.36% CI [1.14-1.62] = 0.018), DFS (HR = 0.942, 95% CI [0.631-1.382], = 0.02), and PFS (HR = 0.932, 95% CI [0.527-1.589], < 0.022). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with a low LMR level had a poor prognosis with a critical value of ≥4. The LMR was found to be prognostic for cases with an LMR of <4. The meta-regression analysis showed that the cut-off values and treatment methods were the primary sources of high heterogeneity in patients with HNSCC.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggested that an elevated LMR is a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with HNSCC and could be used to predict patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Monocytes; Prognosis; Lymphocytes; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Biomarkers
PubMed: 37719125
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16014 -
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology... Apr 2024Intra-uterine infusion treatments were reported to be beneficial to embryo implantation and pregnancy outcomes, and considered as potential therapies for infertile... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intra-uterine infusion treatments were reported to be beneficial to embryo implantation and pregnancy outcomes, and considered as potential therapies for infertile patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Nevertheless, their efficiencies were controversial and there lack of consensus on which intrauterine treatment is the most effective.
METHODS
All prospective trials (in Chinese or English) were searched in Databases PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CNKI from July 2013 to July 2023. We included studies that investigated various uterine infusions, including chorionic gonadotropin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, monocytes, platelet-rich plasma, etc. during IVF treatment and reported subsequent pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS
We finally included 56 researches, including 40 randomized controlled trials, 14 non-randomized controlled trials, and 3 prospective cohort studies. This study included a total of 11 uterine perfusion methods: Placebo, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC), Growth hormone (GH), dexamethasone (DEX), Embryo culture supernatant (ESC), PRP combined with G-CSF (PRP + G-CSF), RPR combined with subcutaneous injection of G-CSF (RPR + G-CSFsc), G-CSF combined with subcutaneous injection of AXaIU (G-CSF + AXaIUsc). Intrauterine infusion of HCG, PBMC, G-CSF, and PRP significantly improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure compared with blank controls or placebo, and PRP improved the clinical pregnancy and live birth most. GH and ESC infusion might improve the pregnancy outcomes, but uterine infusion of DEX was shown with high miscarriage. The combination therapy did not show a significant advantage over the mono-therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Intrauterine infusion of HCG, PBMC, G-CSF, and PRP are promising strategies for improving pregnancy outcomes for infertile patients with recurrent implantation failure. Among these treatments, PRP may be the best. More researches are required to explore the effect of drug combinations and less commonly used drugs as well.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Our study was registered in PROSPERO and the ID was CRD42023467188.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Network Meta-Analysis; Embryo Implantation; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Infertility, Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Pregnancy Rate
PubMed: 38627790
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01221-x -
Gynecological Endocrinology : the... Dec 2024To compare the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcomes of four common immunomodulatory therapies for patients with thin endometrium. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBEJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcomes of four common immunomodulatory therapies for patients with thin endometrium.
METHOD
This systematic review and network meta-analysis using a literature search up to January 2024, to identify relevant trials comparing endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcomes of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (IG-CSF), and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) for patients with thin endometrium. We used surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) to ranked four common immunomodulatory therapies on endometrium thickness, implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR). RoB2 and ROBINS-I were used to assess the certainty of evidence.
RESULTS
The pooled results of 22 studies showed that hCG (mean difference [MD]: 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-4.64) and PRP (MD: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.20-1.76) significantly increase endometrium thickness. The hCG was the best among the IG-CSF (MD = -2.56, 95% CI = -4.30 to -0.82), PBMC (MD = -2.75, 95% CI = -5.49 to -0.01), and PRP (MD = -2.07, 95% CI = -3.84 to -0.30) in increasing endometrium thickness. However, IG-CSF and PRP significantly improved IR (IG-CSF: risk ratio (RR; IG-CSF: RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.06-1.67; PRP: RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.19-2.23), and LBR (IG-CSF: RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.16-2.02; PRP: RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.08-2.36).
CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence reveals that hCG and subcutaneous or intrauterine CSF (SG-CSF) may be the best treatment options for current thin endometrium patients. However, future high-quality and large-scale studies are necessary to validate our findings.
Topics: Humans; Female; Endometrium; Pregnancy; Network Meta-Analysis; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Pregnancy Rate; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Embryo Implantation
PubMed: 38835267
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2024.2360072 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Jun 2024Presently, ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death in gynecological malignancies. The survival rate of these patients is low, which might be caused by early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Presently, ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death in gynecological malignancies. The survival rate of these patients is low, which might be caused by early metastases and delayed diagnosis. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate novel practical markers that provide early prognostic value which helps construct individualized treatment.
METHODS
A thorough investigation of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in ovarian cancer patients was conducted using article selection from PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. The outcomes and hazard ratio (HR) were obtained using Review Manager 5.4, and the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) result was calculated. The chief endpoints of interest in this study include overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
Sixteen studies with 3,862 patients were included with a mean age of 50.6 years and a mean follow-up of 45.84 months. Multivariate studies demonstrated that a higher NLR is associated with worse PFS and OS, HR 1.35;95% CI [1.05-1.74] and HR 1.46; 95% CI [1.16-1.83] respectively. Similar results are observed with PLR and poorer PFS and OS, HR 1.62; 95% CI [1.09-2.43] and HR 1.66; 95% CI [1.12-2.46].
CONCLUSION
Pre-treatment PLR and NLR were found to be prognostic factors in determining PFS and OS in ovarian cancer. High values in pre-treatment PLR and NLR may indicate worse clinical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Ovarian Neoplasms; Neutrophils; Prognosis; Lymphocytes; Biomarkers, Tumor; Blood Platelets; Lymphocyte Count; Survival Rate; Platelet Count
PubMed: 38918652
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.6.1921 -
European Journal of Medical Research Nov 2023The present study aims to review the existing scientific literature on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The present study aims to review the existing scientific literature on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to perform a meta-analysis on the available data.
METHODS
The electronic repositories Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically explored starting from their establishment up until June 9, 2022.
RESULTS
Fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis after multiple screening according to the PRISMA guidelines. The combined findings indicated that individuals with DPN had higher levels of NLR in comparison to those without DPN (SMD = 0.61; CI 95% = 0.40-0.81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup assessment based on ethnicity, it was observed that diabetic patients with DPN exhibited increased NLR levels in contrast to those without DPN in studies conducted in India (SMD = 1.30; CI 95% = 0.37-2.24, p = 0.006) and East Asia (SMD = 0.53; CI 95% = 0.34-0.73, p < 0.001) but not in studies conducted in Turkey (SMD = 0.30; CI 95% = - 0.06-0.67, p = 0.104) and Egypt (SMD = 0.34; CI 95% = -0.14-0.82, p = 0.165). The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.49-0.81), and the pooled specificity was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of NLR were 2.30 (95% CI = 1.71-3.09), 0.45 (95%CI = 0.30-0.67), and 5.06 (95% CI = 3.16-8.12), respectively.
CONCLUSION
NLR serves as a distinct marker of inflammation, and its rise in cases of DPN suggests an immune system imbalance playing a role in the development of the disease.
Topics: Humans; Neutrophils; Diabetic Neuropathies; Lymphocytes; India; Turkey; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37974254
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01479-8 -
PloS One 2024The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) is a clinical indicator of peripheral inflammation that is easily accessible. It is worth noting that the formation of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) is a clinical indicator of peripheral inflammation that is easily accessible. It is worth noting that the formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles has been linked to inflammation and immune dysregulation. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to comprehensively evaluate the existing body of research concerning the NLR in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
METHOD
We conducted a comprehensive online search and included studies that evaluated the NLR in 1) patients with AD or MCI and 2) healthy control (HC) participants. We also pooled mean and standard deviation (SD) data for each group.
RESULTS
Ultimately, 12 studies encompassed 1,309 individuals diagnosed with AD with mean NLR levels of 2.68, 1,929 individuals with MCI with mean NLR levels of 2.42, and 2,064 HC with mean NLR levels of 2.06 were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The mean NLR was 0.59 higher in AD patients compared to HC participants (mean difference (MD) = 0.59 [0.38; 0.80]). Similarly, the mean NLR was higher in AD than MCI patients (MD = 0.23 [0.13; 0.33]). Additionally, the mean NLR was higher in individuals with MCI compared to HC participants (MD = 0.37 [0.22; 0.52]). In the subgroup meta-analysis based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), AD patients with lower MMSE scores (using a cut-off of 20) exhibited significantly higher mean NLR (3.10 vs. 2.70, with a p-value for subgroup differences < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The NLR, which serves as a marker of peripheral inflammation, shows increased levels in individuals with AD and MCI compared to HC participants. Furthermore, our study indicates that NLR levels are significantly higher in AD than MCI. Additionally, our novel finding suggests significantly higher NLR levels among AD patients with more severe cognitive decline compared to AD patients with less severe cognitive decline. So, it can be concluded that the higher cognitive decline in humans is accompanied by higher NLR levels. Further longitudinal researches are needed to explore more details about the relationship between inflammation and dementia.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Humans; Neutrophils; Lymphocytes; Cognitive Dysfunction; Lymphocyte Count
PubMed: 38917167
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305322 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024In people living with HIV (PLHIV), the CD4/CD8 ratio has been proposed as a useful marker for non-AIDS events. However, its predictive ability on mortality over CD4... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In people living with HIV (PLHIV), the CD4/CD8 ratio has been proposed as a useful marker for non-AIDS events. However, its predictive ability on mortality over CD4 counts, and the role of CD8+ T-cell counts remain controversial.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies from 1996 to 2023, including PLHIV on antiretroviral treatment, and reporting CD4/CD8 ratio or CD8+ counts. The primary outcome was non-AIDS mortality or all-cause mortality. We performed a standard random-effects pairwise meta-analysis comparing low versus high CD4/CD8 ratio with a predefined cut-off point of 0.5. (CRD42020170931).
FINDINGS
We identified 2,479 studies for screening. 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Seven studies found an association between low CD4/CD8 ratio categories and increased mortality risk, with variable cut-off points between 0.4-1. Four studies were selected for meta-analysis, including 12,893 participants and 618 reported deaths. Patients with values of CD4/CD8 ratio below 0.5 showed a higher mortality risk (OR 3.65; 95% CI 3.04 - 4.35; I2 = 0.00%) compared to those with higher values. While the meta-analysis of CD8+ T-cell counts was not feasible due to methodological differences between studies, the systematic review suggests a negative prognostic impact of higher values (>1,138 to 1,500 cells/uL) in the long term.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results support the use of the CD4/CD8 ratio as a prognostic marker in clinical practice, especially in patients with values below 0.5, but consensus criteria on ratio timing measurement, cut-off values, and time to event are needed in future studies to get more robust conclusions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170931, identifier CRD42020170931.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; HIV Infections; CD4-CD8 Ratio; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD4 Lymphocyte Count
PubMed: 38361925
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1343124 -
American Journal of Men's Health 2024The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) by a method of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) by a method of meta-analysis. China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched to collect relevant literature until March 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk of the literature included. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the prognostic value of LMR in PCa. Stata 15.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. A total of six published articles were included in this meta-analysis, containing 1,104 patients with PCa. The results of the meta-analysis indicated better overall survival (OS; HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.73, = .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.58~4.38, < .001) in patients with PCa with low LMR compared with high LMR. In conclusion, compared with low LMR, PCa patients with high LMR have a better prognosis. LMR is an independent risk factor affecting the long-term prognosis of patients with PCa. The detection of LMR before treatment is of certain significance in judging the clinical prognosis of patients with PCa.
Topics: Humans; Male; Monocytes; Prognosis; Lymphocytes; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 38514969
DOI: 10.1177/15579883241234747 -
Haematologica Mar 2024Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Currently, there is a paucity of randomized prospective data to inform on optimal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Currently, there is a paucity of randomized prospective data to inform on optimal front-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and use of consolidative mediastinal radiation (RT). To assess if distinct CIT approaches are associated with disparate survival outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing dose-intensive (DI-CIT) versus standard CIT for the front-line treatment of PMBCL. Standard approach (S-CIT) was defined as R-CHOP-21/CHOP-21, with or without RT. DI-CIT were defined as regimens with increased frequency, dose, and/or number of systemic agents. We reviewed data on 4,068 patients (2,517 DI-CIT; 1,551 S-CIT) with a new diagnosis of PMBCL. Overall survival for DI-CIT patients was 88% (95% CI: 85-90) compared to 80% for the S-CIT cohort (95% CI: 74-85). Meta-regression revealed an 8% overall survival (OS) benefit for the DI-CIT group (P<0.01). Survival benefit was maintained when analyzing rituximab only regimens; OS was 91% (95% CI: 89-93) for the rituximab-DI-CIT arm compared to 86% (95% CI: 82-89) for the R-CHOP-21 arm (P=0.03). Importantly, 55% (95% CI: 43-65) of the S-CIT group received RT compared to 22% (95% CI: 15-31) of DI-CIT patients (meta-regression P<0.01). To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis reporting efficacy outcomes for the front-line treatment of PMBCL. DI-CIT demonstrates a survival benefit, with significantly less radiation exposure, curtailing long-term toxicities associated with radiotherapy. As we await results of randomized prospective trials, our study supports the use of dose-intensive chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of PMBCL.
Topics: Humans; Prospective Studies; Rituximab; B-Lymphocytes; Radiation Exposure; Lymphoma, B-Cell
PubMed: 37646662
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283446