-
Biomedical Papers of the Medical... Mar 2024Oxidative DNA damage markers (8OHdG, comet assay, gammaH2AX) are becoming widely used in clinical cardiology research. To conduct this review of DNA damage in relation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Oxidative DNA damage markers (8OHdG, comet assay, gammaH2AX) are becoming widely used in clinical cardiology research. To conduct this review of DNA damage in relation to hypertension in humans, we used databases (e.g. PubMed, Web of Science) to search for English-language publications up to June 30, 2022 and the terms: DNA damage, comet assay, gammaH2AX, 8OHdG, strand breaks, and arterial hypertension. Exclusion criteria were: children, absence of relevant controls, extra-arterial hypertensive issues, animal, cell lines. From a total of 79526, 15 human studies were selected. A total of 902 hypertensive patients (pts): (comet: N=418 pts; 8OHdG: N=484 pts) and 587 controls (comet: N=203; 8OHdG: N=384) were included. DNA damage was significantly higher in hypertensive pts than healthy controls (comet 26.6±11.0 vs 11.7±4.07 arbitrary units /A.U./; P<0.05 and="" 8ohdg="" 13="" 1="" 4="" 12="" vs="" 6="" 97="" 2="" 67="" ng="" mg="" creatinine="" i=""> P<0.05) confirmed with meta-analysis for both. Greater DNA damage was observed in more adverse cases (concentric cardiac hypertrophy 43.4±15.4 vs 15.6±5.5; sustained/untreated hypertension 31.4±12.1 vs 14.2±5/35.0±5.0 vs 25.0 ±5.0; non-dippers 39.2±15.5 vs 29.4±11.1 A.U.; elderly 14.9±4.5 vs 9.3±4.1 ng/mg creatinine; without carvedilol 9.1±4.2 vs 5.7±3.9; with coronary heart disease 0.5±0.1 vs 0.2±0.1 ng/mL) (P<0.05) confirmed with meta-analysis. DNA damage correlated strongly positively with serum glycosylated haemoglobin (r=0.670; P<0.05) and negatively with total antioxidant status (r=-0.670 to -0.933; P<0.05). This is the first systematic review with meta-analysis showing that oxidative DNA damage was increased in humans with arterial hypertension compared to controls.
Topics: Child; Animals; Humans; Aged; 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine; Creatinine; DNA Damage; Comet Assay; Hypertension
PubMed: 37916467
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2023.044 -
Mutation Research. Genetic Toxicology... Oct 2023Can human peripheral blood cells be used as a surrogate for bone marrow cells, in evaluating the genotoxic effects of stressors? We searched the Pubmed/Medline and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Can human peripheral blood cells be used as a surrogate for bone marrow cells, in evaluating the genotoxic effects of stressors? We searched the Pubmed/Medline and PubChem databases to identify publications relevant to this question. Micronucleus formation was the genotoxicity endpoint. Three publications comparing exposed vs. non-exposed individuals are included in this analysis; the exposures were to ethylene oxide or ionising radiation (atomic bomb, thorotrast, or radioiodine therapy). Information was extracted on the types of exposure, the numbers of participants, and the micronucleus frequencies. Relative differences (odds ratios) and absolute differences (risk differences) in the numbers of micronuclei between exposed and non-exposed persons were calculated separately for individual cell types (peripheral blood and bone marrow). Random effects meta-analyses for the relative differences in cell abnormalities were performed. The results showed very small differences in the frequencies of micronuclei between exposed and non-exposed individuals, as measured in either peripheral blood or bone marrow cell populations, on both absolute and relative scales. No definite conclusion concerning the relative sensitivities of bone marrow and peripheral blood cells can be made, based on these publications.
Topics: Humans; Bone Marrow; Iodine Radioisotopes; Micronucleus Tests; Blood Cells; Bone Marrow Cells; DNA Damage; Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective
PubMed: 37770146
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503689 -
Brazilian Oral Research 2023The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate published papers regarding the micronucleus assay in oral mucosal cells of patients undergoing orthodontic therapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate published papers regarding the micronucleus assay in oral mucosal cells of patients undergoing orthodontic therapy (OT). A search of the scientific literature was made in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for all data published until November, 2021 using the combination of the following keywords: "fixed orthodontic therapy," "genetic damage", "DNA damage," "genotoxicity", "mutagenicity", "buccal cells", "oral mucosa cells," and "micronucleus assay". The systematic review was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine studies were retrieved. Some authors demonstrated that OT induces cytogenetic damage in oral mucosal cells. Out of the nine studies included, two were classified as strong, five as moderate, and two as weak, according to the quality assessment components of the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). Meta-analysis data revealed no relationship between mutagenicity in oral cells and OT in different months of treatment. At one month, the SMD = 0.65 and p = 0.08; after three months of OT, the SMD = 1.21 and p = 0.07; and after six months of OT, the SMD = 0.56 and p = 0.11. In the analyzed months of OT, I2 values were >75%, indicating high heterogeneity. In summary, this review was not able to demonstrate that OT induces genetic damage in oral cells. The study is important for the protection of patients undergoing fixed OT, given that mutagenesis participates in the multi-step process of carcinogenesis.
Topics: Humans; Micronucleus Tests; DNA Damage; Mouth Mucosa
PubMed: 37970936
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0116