-
PeerJ 2024To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the prognosis of down-staging human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using cetuximab combined with radiotherapy instead of cisplatin combined with radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV OPSCC).
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic evaluation.
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to June 8, 2023, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov Clinical Trials Registry, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Wiprojournal.com.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Randomized controlled trials reporting results of standard regimens of cetuximab + radiotherapy vs cisplatin + radiotherapy in treating HPV OPSCC were included. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local regional failure rate (LRF), distant metastasis rate (DM), and adverse events (AE).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The HR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for survival analysis, while the OR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for dichotomous variables. These statistics were extracted by the reviewers and aggregated using a fixed-effects model to synthesise the data.
RESULTS
A total of 874 relevant papers were obtained from the initial search, and five papers that met the inclusion criteria were included; a total of 1,617 patients with HPV OPSCC were enrolled in these studies. Meta-analysis showed that OS and PFS were significantly shorter in the cetuximab + radiotherapy group of patients with HPV OPSCC compared with those in the conventional cisplatin + radiotherapy group (HR = 2.10, 95% CI [1.39-3.15], = 0.0004; HR = 1.79, 95% CI [1.40-2.29], < 0.0001); LRF and DM were significantly increased (HR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.58-3.11], < 0.0001; HR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.07-2.58], = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in overall grade 3 to 4, acute and late AE overall (OR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.65-1.13], = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Cisplatin + radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for HPV OPSCC. According to the 7th edition AJCC/UICC criteria, low-risk HPV OPSCC patients with a smoking history of ≤ 10 packs/year and non-pharyngeal tumors not involved in lymphatic metastasis had similar survival outcomes with cetuximab/cisplatin + radiotherapy. However, further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether cetuximab + radiotherapy can replace cisplatin + radiotherapy for degraded treatment in individuals who meet the aforementioned characteristics, particularly those with platinum drug allergies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023445619.
Topics: Humans; Cetuximab; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Cisplatin; Chemoradiotherapy; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Neoplasm Staging; Papillomaviridae; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Progression-Free Survival; Human Papillomavirus Viruses
PubMed: 38784388
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17391 -
Medicine Feb 2024A high incidence of anatomical variations in the origin of the branches of the aortic arch has been reported, Nowadays, this variation is considered the most frequent in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A high incidence of anatomical variations in the origin of the branches of the aortic arch has been reported, Nowadays, this variation is considered the most frequent in the aortic arch, its prevalence being estimated between 0.5% and 2.5% of the population. To understand its origin, knowledge of embryonic development is necessary.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Latin-American literature and caribean of health sciences databases with dates ranging from their inception to June 2023. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality were assessed with the guaranteed tool for anatomical studies (Anatomical Quality Assurance). Finally, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were found that met the eligibility criteria. Twenty studies with a total of 41,178 subjects were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of an ARSA variant was 1% (95% confidence interval = 1%-2%), the clinical findings found are that if ARSA is symptomatic it could produce changes in the hemodynamic function of the thoracocervical region in addition to other associated symptomatic complications in surrounding structures.
CONCLUSIONS
ARSA can cause several types of alterations in the cervical or thoracic region, resulting in various clinical complications, such as lusory dysphagia. Hence, knowing this variant is extremely important for surgeons, especially those who treat the cervico-thoracic region. The low prevalence of ARSA means that many professionals are completely unaware of its existence and possible course and origin. Therefore, this study provides detailed knowledge of ARSA so that professionals can make better diagnoses and treatment of ARSA.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Subclavian Artery; Cardiovascular Abnormalities; Deglutition Disorders; Aorta, Thoracic; Uterine Cervical Diseases
PubMed: 38394517
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036856 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Aug 2023Zero-profile anchored spacers (ZAS) and plate-cage constructs (PCC) are currently employed when performing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Nevertheless,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Zero-profile anchored spacers (ZAS) and plate-cage constructs (PCC) are currently employed when performing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of both devices in bilevel ACDF remain controversial. The goal of our meta-analysis is to assess the overall long-term efficacy and security among ZAS and PCC in bilevel ACDF.
METHODS
A search of four electronic databases was conducted to identify researches that compared ZAS with PCC for bilevel ACDF. Stata MP 17.0 software was used for this meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Nine researches with a total of 580 patients were involved. In comparison to PCC, ZAS significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding and postoperative dysphagia rates. No significant differences were found concerning operation time, JOA score, NDI score, cervical Cobb angle, fusion rates, the incidence of adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD) and implant sinking rates at last follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Compared to PCC, ZAS achieved similar efficacy and security in bilevel ACDF with respect to operative time, JOA score, NDI score, cervical Cobb angle, fusion rates, implant sinking rates and ASD rates at final follow-up. It is worth noting that ZAS offered considerable benefits over conventional PCC for the reduction of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative dysphagia. Therefore, for patients requiring bilevel ACDF, ZAS seems superior to PCC. Given the limitations of our study, larger prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to establish reliable proof to consolidate our conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Bone Plates; Deglutition Disorders; Diskectomy; Prospective Studies; Postoperative Complications; Cervical Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 37653510
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04134-4 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Jun 2024The systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-art regarding the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-art regarding the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics, specifically investigating FEES feasibility, safety, diagnostic accuracy, and protocols.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched for original studies on the pediatric population that instrumentally assessed swallowing function using FEES. A hand-search of the references of included studies was performed. Data on the population, feasibility of endoscope insertion and bolus trials, adverse events, sensitivity and specificity, and FEES equipment and protocol were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the checklists of the Johanna Briggs Institute. Selection of the studies, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent researchers.
RESULTS
Eighty-two reports from 81 studies were included. The mean overall quality of the studies was 80 % (17-100 %). The feasibility of endoscope insertion was high (89%-100 %), while the feasibility of bolus trials varied from 40 % to 100 %. Adverse events were excessive crying (8 studies), irritability or agitation (4 studies), transitory oxygen desaturations (3 studies, 1.2-6.7 % of the patients), epistaxis (3 studies, 0.8-3.3 % of the patients), increased heart rate (1 study, 1 patient), vomiting (1 study, 1 patient), hypertonia (1 study), and hypersalivation (1 study). No major complications were reported. Using VFSS as the reference standard, FEES was generally found to be less sensitive (25-94 %) but more specific (75-100 %) for aspiration, whereas the reverse was true for penetration (sensitivity 76-100 %, specificity 44-83 %). FEES protocols were highly heterogeneous with poor reporting.
CONCLUSION
FEES is a safe, accurate, and generally feasible examination in the pediatric population with suspected dysphagia. However, a consensus on the best FEES protocol for clinical practice and research is currently lacking.
Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Child; Fiber Optic Technology; Deglutition; Endoscopy; Child, Preschool; Infant; Pediatrics; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 38796943
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111983 -
European Archives of... Nov 2023Second primary cancers (SPCs) after nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are rare, but have an impact on the follow-up of this patient population. The aim of this study is to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Second primary cancers (SPCs) after nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are rare, but have an impact on the follow-up of this patient population. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature to determine the prevalence and most typical sites of SPCs after NPC.
METHODS
We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles on SPCs after NPC. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
This review includes data on 89 168 patients with NPC from 21 articles. The mean occurrence for SPCs was 6.6% and varied from 4.9% in endemic areas to 8.7% in non-endemic areas. The most frequent locations of SPCs were oral cavity, pharynx, nose and paranasal sinuses, esophagus and lung.
CONCLUSION
There is an increased risk for a SPC after NPC management, especially in non-endemic areas. However, their mean rate is lower than after other head and neck carcinomas.
Topics: Humans; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37495725
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08144-0 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region.
METHODS
This study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O'Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review's eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized.
RESULTS
A total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients' QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC.
CONCLUSION
Compared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Tonsillitis; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 38408988
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04035-w -
Technology in Cancer Research &... 2024Exploring the relationship between the hOGG1 rs1052133 polymorphism and the occurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Exploring the relationship between the hOGG1 rs1052133 polymorphism and the occurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfangdata, and VIP were used to search for studies and the NOS evaluation scale was used to evaluate the quality. All studies were grouped according to different genotypes. The Cochrane's Q test and I test were used for heterogeneity evaluations. If heterogeneity was small, the fixed effects model was used, and conversely, the random effects model was used. Publication bias was also detected. P < .05 in all results indicated statistically significant. We ultimately included 6 studies with 2021 NPC patients in the study group and 2375 healthy populations in the control group. After meta-analysis, it was found that the total OR value of the "Ser/Cys (CG) vs Ser/Ser (CC)" group was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85-1.18) and the "Cys/Cys (GG) vs Ser/Ser (CC)" group was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.87-1.28). These results were not statistically significant (P > .05). Furthermore, the integrated total OR values of each group were not statistically significant with or without the smoking history, even in other genotype models (Allele, Dominant, Recessive, and Additive) (P > .05). There is no clear correlation between the hOGG1 rs1052133 polymorphism and the occurrence of NPC, even with or without the smoking history.
Topics: Humans; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; DNA Glycosylases; Genotype; Alleles; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Genetic Association Studies; Publication Bias; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 38836311
DOI: 10.1177/15330338241246457 -
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2024To study the mechanisms of injury, clinical manifestations, radiological findings, management, and outcomes of traumatic retropharyngeal hematoma (RH).
OBJECTIVES
To study the mechanisms of injury, clinical manifestations, radiological findings, management, and outcomes of traumatic retropharyngeal hematoma (RH).
METHODS
We used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews guidelines to carry out a systematic literature review to identify all published cases of traumatic RH by searching the PubMed database. Articles published between 1988 and 2022 that reported traumatic RH were included. However, articles that reported non-traumatic RHs and non-English articles were excluded from this study.
RESULTS
Of the 62 articles screened, 56 were included. Most patients (55%) were above the mean age of 61.7. The majority of patients were male (69.7%). The main symptom was dyspnea (66.6%) and symptoms usually presented within 24 hours. Among the patients, 90.9% did not take anticoagulants or have coagulation disorders, and the main injury mechanism was falling (54.5%). Most of the computed tomography findings reported retropharyngeal (38%) and prevertebral (15%) hematoma. Meanwhile, magnetic resonance imaging revealed 2 masses in the retropharyngeal space and 2 RHs. With several treatment modalities, more than 50% of the cases were only observed (44 cases), and endotracheal intubation was the most commonly used airway management method (n=35).
CONCLUSION
Traumatic RH is often caused by falls, particularly in elderly patients. Dyspnea is the primary symptom, usually appearing within 24 hours. Cervical vertebral fractures are the leading cause, and observation is the most common treatment approach..
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Dyspnea; Hematoma; Pharyngeal Diseases; Spinal Fractures; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 38220242
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230565 -
European Archives of... Jan 2024Radiation sinusitis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma occupies a large proportion and affects the subsequent therapeutic process as well as diagnosis,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Radiation sinusitis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma occupies a large proportion and affects the subsequent therapeutic process as well as diagnosis, which can be improved by traditional Chinese medicine treatments.
METHODS
Based on the relevant clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from eight databases, a network meta-analysis (NMA) in a frequentist framework was constructed after study selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation of the included studies. The outcomes included total effect, the Lund Kennedy score of nasal endoscopy and the Lund Mackay score of sinus CT.
RESULTS
For total effect, the order of probability for the effect is: external herbal medicine + herbal medicine orally > nasal saline + herbal medicine orally > herbal medicine orally > external herbal medicine > external herbal medicine + nasal saline > nasal saline + western medicine orally > none > nasal saline. For the Lund Kennedy score, the order of probability for the effect is: nasal saline + herbal medicine orally > herbal medicine orally > external herbal medicine > none > nasal saline. For Lund Mackay score, the order of probability for the effect is: herbal medicine orally > nasal saline + western medicine orally > nasal saline + herbal medicine orally > nasal saline > external herbal medicine.
CONCLUSIONS
Herbal medicine taken orally and through nasal cavities combined with nasal saline has a better clinical effect than a single intervention for total effect and Lund Kennedy score. As the classification of this research is relatively macro and the sample size is insufficient, further higher-quality studies are needed to verify the conclusion.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO ID: CRD42022384113, 2022-12-25.
Topics: Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Network Meta-Analysis; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Plant Extracts; Chronic Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37707613
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08221-4 -
Public Health Feb 2024To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of Clinical Prediction Rules (CPRs) developed to detect group A Beta-haemolytic streptococci in people with acute... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of Clinical Prediction Rules (CPRs) developed to detect group A Beta-haemolytic streptococci in people with acute pharyngitis (or sore throat).
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science (inception-September 2022) for studies deriving and/or validating CPRs comprised of ≥2 predictors from an individual's history or physical examination. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in included studies. A meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. Instead we compared the performance of CPRs when they were validated in the same study population (head-to-head comparisons). We used a modified grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations (GRADE) approach to assess certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS
We included 63 studies, all judged at high risk of bias. Of 24 derived CPRs, 7 were externally validated (in 46 external validations). Five validation studies provided data for head-to-head comparison of four pairs of CPRs. Very low certainty evidence favoured the Centor CPR over the McIsaac (2 studies) and FeverPain CPRs (1 study) and found the Centor CPR was equivalent to the Walsh CPR (1 study). The AbuReesh and Steinhoff 2005 CPRs had a similar poor discriminative ability (1 study). Within and between study comparisons suggested the performance of the Centor CPR may be better in adults (>18 years).
CONCLUSION
Very low certainty evidence suggests a better performance of the Centor CPR. When deciding about antibiotic prescribing for pharyngitis patients, involving patients in a shared decision making discussion about the likely benefits and harms, including antibiotic resistance, is recommended. Further research of higher rigour, which compares CPRs across multiple settings, is needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Clinical Decision Rules; Pharyngitis; Bias; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Physical Examination
PubMed: 38241903
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.12.004