-
The Science of the Total Environment Mar 2024Livestock facilities are widely regarded as reservoirs of infectious disease, owing to their abundance in particulate matter (PM) and microbial bioaerosols. Over the... (Review)
Review
Livestock facilities are widely regarded as reservoirs of infectious disease, owing to their abundance in particulate matter (PM) and microbial bioaerosols. Over the past decade, bioaerosol studies have increasingly utilised high throughput sequencing (HTS) to achieve superior throughput, taxonomic resolution, and the detection of unculturable organisms. However, the prevailing focus on amplicon sequencing has limited the identification of viruses and microbial taxa at the species-level. Herein, a literature search was conducted to identify methods capable of overcoming the aforementioned limitations. Screening 1531 international publications resulted in 29 eligible for review. Metagenomics capable of providing rich insights were identified in only three instances. Notably, long-read sequencing was not utilised for metagenomics. This review also identified that sample collection methods lack a uniform approach, highlighted by the differences in sampling equipment, flow rates and durations. Further heterogeneity was introduced by the unique sampling conditions, which makes it challenging to ground new findings within the established literature. For instance, winter was associated with increased microbial abundance and antimicrobial resistance, yet less alpha diversity. Researchers implementing metagenomics into the livestock environment should consider season, the microclimate, and livestock growth stage as influential upon their findings. Considering the increasing accessibility of long-read sequencing, future research should explore its viability within a novel uniform testing protocol for bioaerosol emissions.
Topics: Animals; Livestock; Metagenomics; Particulate Matter; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Aerosols
PubMed: 38331298
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170722 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Feb 2024This meta-analysis focused on systematically assessing the clinical value of mNGS for infection in hematology patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis focused on systematically assessing the clinical value of mNGS for infection in hematology patients.
METHODS
We searched for studies that assessed the clinical value of mNGS for infection in hematology patients published in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI from inception to August 30, 2023. We compared the detection positive rate of pathogen for mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs). The diagnostic metrics, antibiotic adjustment rate and treatment effective rate were combined.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies with 2325 patients were included. The positive rate of mNGS was higher than that of CMT (blood: 71.64% vs. 24.82%, P < 0.001; BALF: 89.86% vs. 20.78%, P < 0.001; mixed specimens: 82.02% vs. 28.12%, P < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95%CI: 81-91%) and 59% (95%CI: 43-72%), respectively. The reference standard/neutropenia and research type/reference standard may be sources of heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The pooled antibiotic adjustment rate according to mNGS was 49.6% (95% CI: 41.8-57.4%), and the pooled effective rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 62.4-99.3%).
CONCLUSION
mNGS has high positive detection rates in hematology patients. mNGS can guide clinical antibiotic adjustments and improve prognosis, especially in China.
Topics: Humans; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Neutropenia; Anti-Bacterial Agents; China; Hematology; Sensitivity and Specificity; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38326763
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09073-x -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Jun 2024To determine the diagnostic yield of Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in suspect Primary Immunodeficiencies Diseases (PIDs). This systematic review was conducted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To determine the diagnostic yield of Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in suspect Primary Immunodeficiencies Diseases (PIDs). This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA criteria. Searching Pubmed and Web of Science databases, the following keywords were used in the search: ("Next-generation sequencing") OR "whole exome sequencing" OR "whole genome sequencing") AND ("primary immunodeficiency disease" OR "PIDs"). We used STARD items to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The meta-analysis included 29 studies with 5847 patients, revealing a pooled positive detection rate of 42% (95% CI 0.29-0.54, P < 0.001) for NGS in suspected PID cases. Subgroup analyses based on family history demonstrated a higher detection rate of 58% (95% CI 0.43-0.71) in patients with a family history compared to 33% (95% CI 0.21-0.46) in those without (P < 0.001). Stratification by disease types showed varied detection rates, with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency leading at 58% (P < 0.001). Among 253 PID-related genes, RAG1, ATM, BTK, and others constituted major contributors, with 34 genes not included in the 2022 IUIS gene list. The application of NGS in suspected PID patients can provide significant diagnostic results, especially in patients with a family history. Meanwhile, NGS performs excellently in accurately diagnosing disease types, and early identification of disease types can benefit patients in treatment.
Topics: Humans; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
PubMed: 38890201
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01392-2 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Jan 2024Detecting pathogens in pediatric central nervous system infection (CNSI) is still a major challenge in medicine. In addition to conventional diagnostic patterns,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the detection of pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid in pediatric patients with central nervous system infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Detecting pathogens in pediatric central nervous system infection (CNSI) is still a major challenge in medicine. In addition to conventional diagnostic patterns, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) shows great potential in pathogen detection. Therefore, we systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of mNGS in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in pediatric patients with CNSI.
METHODS
Related literature was searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We screened the literature and extracted the data according to the selection criteria. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool and the certainty of the evidence was measured by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) score system. Then, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odd's ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) were estimated in Stata Software and MetaDisc. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the potential factors that influence the diagnostic performance.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 0.76, I = 66.77%, p < 0.001), and the combined specificity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.95, I = 83.37%, p < 0.001). The AUC of sROC was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.87). The quality level of evidence elevated by the GRADE score system was low.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence shows that mNGS presents a good diagnostic performance in pediatric CNSI. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Topics: Humans; Child; ROC Curve; Central Nervous System Infections; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
PubMed: 38238719
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09010-y -
Narra J Apr 2024Empyema poses a significant global health concern, yet identifying responsible bacteria remains elusive. Recent studies question the efficacy of conventional pleural... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Empyema poses a significant global health concern, yet identifying responsible bacteria remains elusive. Recent studies question the efficacy of conventional pleural fluid culture in accurately identifying empyema-causing bacteria. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic capabilities of next-generation sequencing (NGS) with conventional pleural fluid culture in identifying empyema-causing bacteria. Five databases (Google Scholar, Science Direct, Cochrane, Research Gate, and PubMed) were used to search studies comparing conventional pleural fluid culture with NGS for identifying empyema-causing bacteria using keywords. Positive results identified through conventional pleural fluid culture and NGS were extracted. In addition, bacterial profiles identified by NGS were also documented. Joanna-Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was employed to assess quality of included studies. Descriptive analysis was employed to present outcome of interests. From five databases, three studies, with 354 patients, were included. Findings from three studies showed that NGS outperformed conventional pleural fluid culture in detecting empyema-causing bacteria even in culture-negative samples. Moreover, dominant bacterial profiles identified through NGS included , and anaerobic bacteria. In conclusion, NGS outperforms conventional pleural fluid culture in detection empyema-causing bacteria, yet further studies with larger samples and broader bacterial profiles are needed to increase confidence and urgency in its adoption over conventional pleural fluid culture.
Topics: Humans; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Empyema, Pleural; Bacteria
PubMed: 38798844
DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i1.650