-
BMC Urology Jan 2024The incidence rate of malignant tumors after solid organ transplantation is higher than the normal population. The aim of our study is to identify the risk of renal cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The incidence rate of malignant tumors after solid organ transplantation is higher than the normal population. The aim of our study is to identify the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation, respectively, and suggest that transplant patients can be screened early for tumors to avoid risk.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception until August 16,2023. Retrospective and cohort studies which focus on the statistical data of standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of RCC after solid organ transplantation (SOT) more than one year have been included and extracted. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD4202022343633.
RESULTS
Sixteen original studies have been included for meta-analysis. Liver transplantation could increase the risk of RCC (SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93) with no heterogeneity(P = 0.594, I = 0.0%). And kidney transplantation could increase the risk of RCC(8.54, 6.68 to 10.40; 0.000,90.0%). Besides, heart and lung transplantation also could increase the risk of RCC(SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93; SIR = 1.61, 95%CI:0.50 to 2.71). Moreover, significance could also be found in most subgroups, especially the European group and retrospective study group. What's more, after removing studies which have a greater impact on the overall outcome in RCC rate after kidney transplantation, heterogeneity did not solve and significant different was also observed in the European group (7.15, 5.49 to 8.81; 0.000, 78.6%).
CONCLUSION
Liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation patients have an increased risk of processing RCC compared to the general population and most subgroups, especially in geographic location of European subgroup, which suggested that patients should be screened frequently after transplantation.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Incidence; Retrospective Studies; Kidney Transplantation; Kidney Neoplasms
PubMed: 38184525
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01389-1 -
Hepatology Communications Oct 2023Graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation is a serious and usually fatal complication. Data identifying the risk factors and specifying the diagnosis and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation is a serious and usually fatal complication. Data identifying the risk factors and specifying the diagnosis and treatment options of the disease are scarce and contentious. Moreover, recommendations for therapeutic approaches are similarly sparse.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature from 1988 to 2020 on graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Medical subject headings, such as graft-versus-host disease and GvHD were used in combination with solid organ transplant, transplantation, or liver transplant. Following duplicate removal, 9298 articles were screened for suitability. A total of 238 full-text articles were analyzed for eligibility, resulting in 130 eligible articles for meta-analysis. Two hundred twenty-five patients developing graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation reported herein were mainly published in case reports and case series.
RESULTS
Graft-versus-host disease occurred with an incidence of 1.2%. 85% developed following deceased donor liver transplant and 15% following living-related donor liver transplantation. The median follow-up period following liver transplantation was 84 days (interquartile range, 45-180). The median time from liver transplantation to graft-versus-host disease onset was 30 days (interquartile range, 21-42). The main clinical features included skin rash (59%), fever (43%), diarrhea (36%), and pancytopenia (30%). The overall mortality rate was 71%. Neither univariate (HR = 0.999; 95% CI, 0.493-2.023; p = 1.0) nor multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between adaptation of immunosuppression and survival probability (HR = 1.475; 95% CI, 0.659-3.303; p = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review suggests that an increase in immunosuppressive regimen does not yield any survival benefit in patients suffering from graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation.
Topics: Humans; Liver Transplantation; Living Donors; Graft vs Host Disease; Immunosuppressive Agents; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37755878
DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000260 -
JAMA Network Open Sep 2023Adult trauma centers (ATCs) have been shown to decrease injury mortality and morbidity in major trauma, but a synthesis of evidence for pediatric trauma centers (PTCs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Adult trauma centers (ATCs) have been shown to decrease injury mortality and morbidity in major trauma, but a synthesis of evidence for pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) is lacking.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of PTCs compared with ATCs, combined trauma centers (CTCs), or nondesignated hospitals in reducing mortality and morbidity among children admitted to hospitals following trauma.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through March 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies comparing PTCs with ATCs, CTCs, or nondesignated hospitals for pediatric trauma populations (aged ≤19 years).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. A meta-analysis was conducted if more than 2 studies evaluated the same intervention-comparator-outcome and controlled minimally for age and injury severity. Subgroup analyses were planned for age, injury type and severity, trauma center designation level and verification body, country, and year of conduct. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence.
MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S)
Primary outcomes were mortality, complications, functional status, discharge destination, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were resource use and processes of care, including computed tomography (CT) and operative management of blunt solid organ injury (SOI).
RESULTS
A total of 56 studies with 286 051 participants were included overall, and 34 were included in the meta-analysis. When compared with ATCs, PTCs were associated with a 41% lower risk of mortality (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76), a 52% lower risk of CT use (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89) and a 64% lower risk of operative management for blunt SOI (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57). The OR for complications was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.41-1.56). There was no association for mortality for older children (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.06), and the association was closer to the null when PTCs were compared with CTCs (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99). Results remained similar for other subgroup analyses. GRADE certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, results suggested that PTCs were associated with lower odds of mortality, CT use, and operative management for SOI than ATCs for children admitted to hospitals following trauma, but certainty of evidence was very low. Future studies should strive to address selection and confounding biases.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Adolescent; Trauma Centers; Quality of Life; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Patient Discharge; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37721752
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34266 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2024The burden of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients has not been systematically explored. Here, we discern... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for mortality, infection and colonization associated with CRGNB in adult solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The burden of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients has not been systematically explored. Here, we discern the risk factors associated with CRGNB infection and colonization in SOT recipients.
METHODS
This study included observational studies conducted among CRGNB-infected SOT patients, which reported risk factors associated with mortality, infection or colonization. Relevant records will be searched in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for the period from the time of database construction to 1 March 2023.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies with 13,511 participants were included, enabling the assessment of 27 potential risk factors. The pooled prevalence of 1-year mortality among SOT recipients with CRGNB was 44.5%. Prolonged mechanical ventilation, combined transplantation, reoperation and pre-transplantation CRGNB colonization are salient contributors to the occurrence of CRGNB infections in SOT recipients. Renal replacement therapy, post-LT CRGNB colonization, pre-LT liver disease and model for end-stage liver disease score increased the risk of infection. Re-transplantation, carbapenem use before transplantation and ureteral stent utilization increaesd risk of CRGNB colonization.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that SOT recipients with CRGNB infections had a higher mortality risk. Invasive procedure may be the main factor contribute to CRGNB infection.
Topics: Adult; Humans; End Stage Liver Disease; Severity of Illness Index; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Carbapenems; Organ Transplantation; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38442299
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2314236 -
Injury Dec 2023Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication of trauma. Currently, there are few studies summarising the evidence for prophylaxis in trauma settings. This review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication of trauma. Currently, there are few studies summarising the evidence for prophylaxis in trauma settings. This review provides evidence for the use of VTE prophylactic interventions in trauma patients to produce evidence-based guidelines.
METHODS
A PRISMA-compliant review was conducted from Sep 2021 to June 2023, using Embase, Medline and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were: randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in English published after 2000 of adult trauma patients comparing VTE prophylaxis interventions, with a sample size higher than 20. The network analysis was conducted using RStudio. The results of the pairwise comparisons were presented in the form of a league table. The quality of evidence and heterogeneity sensitivity were assessed. The primary outcome focused on venous thromboembolism (VTE), and examined deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) as separate entities. The secondary outcomes included assessments of bleeding and mortality. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021266393.
RESULTS
Of the 7,948 search results, 23 studies with a total of 21,312 participants fulfilled screening criteria, which included orthopaedic, spine, solid organ, brain, spinal cord, and multi-region trauma. Of the eight papers comparing chemical prophylaxis medications in patients with hip or lower limb injuries, fondaparinux and enoxaparin were found to be significantly superior to placebo in respect of prevention of DVT, with no increased risk of bleeding. Regarding mechanical prophylaxis, meta-analysis of two studies of inferior vena cava filters failed to provide significant benefits to major trauma patients.
CONCLUSION
Enoxaparin and fondaparinux are safe and effective options for VTE prevention in trauma patients, with fondaparinux being a cheaper and easier administration option between the two. Inconclusive results were found in mechanical prophylaxis, requiring more larger-scale RCTs.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Venous Thromboembolism; Enoxaparin; Fondaparinux; Network Meta-Analysis; Anticoagulants; Pulmonary Embolism; Hemorrhage; Multiple Trauma
PubMed: 37865011
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111078 -
Microorganisms Apr 2024(1) Background: We aim to systematically review the current evidence on immunity against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in adult solid organ transplantation (SOT)... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: We aim to systematically review the current evidence on immunity against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in adult solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients, either through natural infection or vaccination. (2) Methods: This systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I and summarized the findings narratively due to the heterogeneity of the studies. (3) Results: Of the 315 screened articles, 11 were included. Tetanus immunity varied between 55% and 86%, diphtheria immunity from 23% to 75%, and pertussis immunity was between 46% and 82%. Post-vaccination immunity showed variation across the studies, with some indicating reductions and others no change, with antibody responses influenced by transplanted organs, gender, age, and immunosuppressive regimens. The single randomized study exhibited a low risk of bias, while of the ten non-randomized studies, six showed moderate and four serious risks of bias, necessitating cautious interpretation of results. (4) Conclusions: SOT recipients exhibit considerable immunity against tetanus and diphtheria at transplantation, but this immunity decreases over time. Although vaccination can enhance this immunity, the response may be suboptimal, and the increased antibody levels may not persist, underscoring the need for tailored vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population.
PubMed: 38792678
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12050847 -
Transplantation Reviews (Orlando, Fla.) Apr 2024We aimed to identify the condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to measure quality of life (QoL) in solid organ... (Review)
Review
Assessing quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures.
PURPOSE
We aimed to identify the condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to measure quality of life (QoL) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, examine their development and content, and critically appraise the quality of their measurement properties, to inform recommendations for clinical and research use.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to 27th January 2023. Search hits were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers; papers reporting the development and/or validation of condition- and transplant-specific PROMs measuring QoL in adult SOT recipients were considered eligible. We abstracted and synthesised data on PROM characteristics, development (item generation and/or reduction), and content (QoL dimensions). Quality appraisal and synthesis were informed by the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, and included methodological and quality assessment of measurement properties, GRADE levels of evidence, feasibility and interpretability.
RESULTS
We identified 33 papers reporting 26 QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients (kidney n = 10 PROMs; liver n = 6; lung n = 3; heart n = 2; pancreas n = 1; multiple organs n = 4). Patient discussions (n = 17 PROMs) and factor analysis (n = 11) were the most common item generation and reduction techniques used, respectively. All PROMs measured ≥3 of nine QoL dimensions (all measured emotional functioning); KDQoL-SF and NIDDK-QA measured all nine. Methodological quality was variable; no PROM had low evidence or better for all measurement properties. All PROMs were COSMIN recommendation category 'B', primarily because none had sufficient content validity.
CONCLUSIONS
There are many condition- and transplant-specific QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients, particularly kidney. These findings can help inform PROM selection for clinicians and researchers. However, caution is required when adopting measures, due to the substantial heterogeneity in development, content, and quality. Each PROM has potential but requires further research to be recommendable. Greater consideration of patient and professional involvement in PROM development in this setting is needed to ensure sufficient content validity.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Quality of Life; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Consensus; Pancreas; Organ Transplantation
PubMed: 38359538
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100836 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Apr 2024The relationship between sarcopenia and prognosis in solid organ transplantation recipients (SOTr) remains unverified. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The relationship between sarcopenia and prognosis in solid organ transplantation recipients (SOTr) remains unverified. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of pretransplant sarcopenia and its effect on patient and graft survival in SOTr. We used PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science to search relevant studies published in English (from inception to December 31, 2021). Prospective and retrospective cohort studies that reported the prevalence of sarcopenia before transplant or the association between sarcopenia and clinical outcomes in SOTr were included. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of sarcopenia and its impact on patient and graft survival. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, acute rejection, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS) and early readmission. Thirty-nine studies involving 5792 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of sarcopenia amongst SOTr candidates was 40 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 34%-47 % and I = 97 %). Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.46-2.41 and I = 60 %), poor graft survival (HR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.16-2.54 and I = 57 %) and increased liver graft loss (HR = 1.43, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.99 and I = 38 %). Patients with sarcopenia demonstrated increased incidence of perioperative complications (risk ratio [RR] = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.17-1.53 and I = 40 %), long ICU LOS (mean difference = 2.31 days, 95 % CI: 0.58-4.04 and I = 97 %) and decreased risk of acute rejection (RR = 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.42-0.89 and I = 0 %). In Conclusion, sarcopenia is prevalent in SOTr candidates and associated with death and graft loss. Identifying sarcopenia before transplantation and intervening may improve long-term outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Sarcopenia; Graft Survival; Organ Transplantation
PubMed: 38169165
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.118 -
Biomechanics and Modeling in... Feb 2024The gastrointestinal (GI) organs of the human body are responsible for transporting and extracting nutrients from food and drink, as well as excreting solid waste.... (Review)
Review
The gastrointestinal (GI) organs of the human body are responsible for transporting and extracting nutrients from food and drink, as well as excreting solid waste. Biomechanical experimentation of the GI organs provides insight into the mechanisms involved in their normal physiological functions, as well as understanding of how diseases can cause disruption to these. Additionally, experimental findings form the basis of all finite element (FE) modelling of these organs, which have a wide array of applications within medicine and engineering. This systematic review summarises the experimental studies that are currently in the literature (n = 247) and outlines the areas in which experimentation is lacking, highlighting what is still required in order to more fully understand the mechanical behaviour of the GI organs. These include (i) more human data, allowing for more accurate modelling for applications within medicine, (ii) an increase in time-dependent studies, and (iii) more sophisticated in vivo testing methods which allow for both the layer- and direction-dependent characterisation of the GI organs. The findings of this review can also be used to identify experimental data for the readers' own constitutive or FE modelling as the experimental studies have been grouped in terms of organ (oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine or rectum), test condition (ex vivo or in vivo), number of directions studied (isotropic or anisotropic), species family (human, porcine, feline etc.), tissue condition (intact wall or layer-dependent) and the type of test performed (biaxial tension, inflation-extension, distension (pressure-diameter), etc.). Furthermore, the studies that investigated the time-dependent (viscoelastic) behaviour of the tissues have been presented.
Topics: Animals; Cats; Humans; Swine; Gastrointestinal Tract; Stomach; Biomechanical Phenomena; Stress, Mechanical; Finite Element Analysis
PubMed: 37935880
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01773-8 -
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Jun 2024Mucormycosis is an emerging disease primarily affecting the immunocompromised host, but scarce evidence is available for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We... (Review)
Review
Mucormycosis is an emerging disease primarily affecting the immunocompromised host, but scarce evidence is available for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We systematically reviewed 183 cases occurring in SOTRs, exploring epidemiology, clinical characteristics, causative pathogens, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes. Kidney transplants accounted for half of the cases, followed by heart (18.6%), liver (16.9%), and lung (10.4%). Diagnosis showed a dichotomous distribution, with 63.7% of cases reported within 100 days of transplantation and 20.6% occurring at least 1 year after transplant. The 90-day and 1-year mortality rates were 36.3% and 63.4%, respectively. Disseminated disease had the highest mortality at both time points (75% and 93%). Treatment with >3 immunosuppressive drugs showed a significant impact on 90-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.02-5.66; = .0493), as did a disseminated disease manifestation (OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 2.20-36.71; = .0027) and the presence of diabetes (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01-5.65; = .0497). Notably, prophylaxis was administered to 12 cases with amphotericin B. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings and to evaluate the potential implementation of prophylactic regimens in SOTRs at high risk.
PubMed: 38887489
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae043