-
Cureus Aug 2023Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a condition that accounts for a high percentage of cardiovascular fatalities, with ventricular tachyarrhythmias being the most common... (Review)
Review
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a condition that accounts for a high percentage of cardiovascular fatalities, with ventricular tachyarrhythmias being the most common cause. There are signs and symptoms of SCD that occur spontaneously without any warning and are deadly. Despite preventative efforts focusing on the use of subcutaneous implanted cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) in the highest-risk population categories, a high number of SCDs occur in the normal population and in people who do not have a documented cardiac condition. Therefore, primary prevention for SCD should be a more viable strategy for the general population, considering measures in the form of preventive medicine such as knowing more about any genetic predisposition, family history of any fatal arrhythmia, continuous surveillance after any syncope with unknown causes, etc. However, little data about SCD risk factors are known in comparison with other well-known diseases like ischemic heart disease and stroke. In search of medical databases for relevant medical literature, we looked at PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Thirteen publications were discovered after the papers were located, assessed, and qualifying criteria were applied. The finished articles were done to give an overview of SCD. Some others have shown that the major predisposition for SCD is related to the male gender, which increases the incidence if they have a family history of SCD. We described the importance of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as a comorbid condition. Patients with S-ICD and young athletes with a history of ventricular arrhythmia showed us that the predisposition for SCD can be higher than in the normal population. Based on the above, we concluded that more study is required to establish the most important approach for each of the risk factors mentioned in this systematic review in order to apply them in daily practice and have more knowledge about how to apply preventive and therapeutic medicine to the population at risk and the ones that already develop the disease.
PubMed: 37664320
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42859 -
Systematic Reviews Mar 2024Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a rare and yet unexplained condition. The most frequent cause is myocardial infarction, while a small proportion is due to arrhythmogenic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a rare and yet unexplained condition. The most frequent cause is myocardial infarction, while a small proportion is due to arrhythmogenic syndromes (e.g., channelopathies). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence and risk factors associated with SCD in workers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A search for eligible studies was performed utilizing three databases (PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus). The inclusion criteria were fulfilled if sudden cardiac death due to channelopathy in workers was mentioned.
RESULTS
Out of the 1408 articles found across three databases, 6 articles were included in the systematic review but the meta-analysis was conducted on 3 studies The total sample included was 23,450 participants. The pooled prevalence of channelopathies in employees was 0.3% (95% CI 0.07-0.43%), of sudden cardiac death in employees was 2.8% (95% CI 0.37-5.20%), and of sudden cardiac death in employees with a diagnosis of cardiac channelopathies was 0.2% (95% CI 0.02- 0.30%).
CONCLUSIONS
SCD is a serious and potentially preventable condition that can occur among workers. By identifying and addressing work-related risk factors, providing appropriate screening and interventions, and promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, we can work to reduce the incidence of SCD and improve the cardiovascular health and well-being of workers.
Topics: Humans; Channelopathies; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Risk Factors; Myocardial Infarction; Incidence
PubMed: 38461297
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02504-5 -
Indian Journal of Community Medicine :... 2024Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and, in recent years, has become an urgent public health concern in low- and middle-income countries... (Review)
Review
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and, in recent years, has become an urgent public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Data from LMICs, however, remains limited. As such, the aim of this article is to systematically review the current literature on the incidence of SCD in LMICs to inform policymakers and identify potential research gaps. A search of PubMed and Embase was utilized to capture the targeted condition, outcome, and setting. Only peer-reviewed cohort studies in LMICs reporting SCD incidence estimates in the general population of individuals aged ≥1 year were eligible for selection. Papers providing incidence data for specific types of SCD, including sudden coronary death or death from sudden cardiac arrest, were also included. After deduplication, 1941 citations were identified and screened. Seven studies representing four countries-Cameroon, China, India, and Iran-met the criteria for inclusion and were considered in our analysis. The crude incidence rate for SCD ranged from 19.9 to 190 cases per 100,000 person-years, while age-adjusted rates ranged from 33.6 to 230 cases per 100,000 person-years. There was notable variability in methods utilized to ascertain SCD cases. These findings suggest that the incidence of all-cause SCD in LMICs and may exceed that of high-income countries; however, observed disparities may be partly attributable to differences in case ascertainment methods. Additional research is needed to better understand the true incidence of SCD in developing countries. It is crucial that future studies across regions utilize standard diagnostic criteria and methodology for identifying SCD, which would provide a framework by which to compare outcomes between settings.
PubMed: 38665450
DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_468_23 -
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia :... May 2024Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and is associated with both morbidity and mortality. OSA has also been linked... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and is associated with both morbidity and mortality. OSA has also been linked to arrhythmias and sudden death.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether OSA increases the risk of sudden death in the non-cardiac population.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of the literature. The descriptors "sudden death" and "sleep apnea" and "tachyarrhythmias" and "sleep apnea" were searched in the PubMed/Medline and SciELO databases.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles that addressed the relationship between OSA and the development of tachyarrhythmias and/or sudden death with prevalence data, electrocardiographic findings, and a relationship with other comorbidities were selected. The airway obstruction observed in OSA triggers several systemic repercussions, e.g., changes in intrathoracic pressure, intermittent hypoxia, activation of the sympathetic nervous system and chemoreceptors, and release of catecholamines. These mechanisms would be implicated in the appearance of arrhythmogenic factors, which could result in sudden death.
CONCLUSION
There was a cause-effect relationship between OSA and cardiac arrhythmias. In view of the pathophysiology of OSA and its arrhythmogenic role, studies have shown a higher risk of sudden death in individuals who previously had heart disease. On the other hand, there is little evidence about the occurrence of sudden death in individuals with OSA and no heart disease, and OSA is not a risk factor for sudden death in this population.
Topics: Humans; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Death, Sudden; Risk Factors; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 38309430
DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2024.01.003 -
Clinical Cardiology Jan 2024Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common contemporary, treatable, genetic disorder that can be compatible with normal longevity. While current medical therapies are... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common contemporary, treatable, genetic disorder that can be compatible with normal longevity. While current medical therapies are ubiquitous, they are limited by a lack of solid evidence, are often inadequate, poorly tolerated, and do not alter the natural disease course. As such, there has long been a need for effective, evidence-based, and targeted disease-modifying therapies for HCM. In this review, we redefine HCM as a treatable condition, evaluate current strategies for therapeutic intervention, and discuss novel myosin inhibitors. The majority of patients with HCM have elevated left ventricular outflow tract gradients, which predicts worse symptoms and adverse outcomes. Conventional pharmacological therapies for symptomatic HCM can help improve symptoms but are often inadequate and poorly tolerated. Septal reduction therapies (surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation) can safely and effectively reduce refractory symptoms and improve outcomes in patients with obstructive HCM. However, they require expertise that is not universally available and are not without risks. Currently, available therapies do not alter the disease course or the progressive cardiac remodeling that ensues, nor subsequent heart failure and arrhythmias. This has been regarded as an unmet need in the care of HCM patients. Novel targeted pharmacotherapies, namely cardiac myosin inhibitors, have emerged to reverse key pathophysiological changes and alter disease course. Their favorable outcomes led to the early Food and Drug Administration approval of mavacamten, a first-in-class myosin modulator, changing the paradigm for the pharmacological treatment of HCM.
Topics: United States; Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Disease Progression; Heart Failure; Myosins
PubMed: 38269637
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24207 -
Radiology. Cardiothoracic Imaging Apr 2024Purpose To perform a systematic review to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac MRI after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Materials and Methods PubMed and...
Purpose To perform a systematic review to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac MRI after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Materials and Methods PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies investigating cardiac MRI after SCA in adult patients (≥18 years of age). The time frame of the encompassed studies spans from January 2012 to January 2023. The study protocol was preregistered in OSF Registries , and the systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 1367 individuals, 1257 (91.9%) of whom underwent cardiac MRI, were included. Inconsistent findings were reported on the diagnostic value of cardiac MRI-specific findings. The included studies demonstrated the following main findings: cardiac MRI led to a new or alternative diagnosis in patients with SCA; cardiac MRI identified pathologic or arrhythmogenic substrates; cardiac MRI helped detect myocardial edema (potentially reversible); cardiac MRI provided evidence for the occurrence of adverse events; and functional markers or ventricular dimensions were considered prognostically relevant in a few studies. Relevant challenges in this systematic review were the lack of comparators and reference standards relative to cardiac MRI as the index test and patient selection bias. Conclusion Cardiac MRI following SCA can contribute to the diagnostic process and offer supplementary information essential for treatment planning. Limitations of the review include studies with insufficient comparators and potential bias in patient selection. Systematic review registration link: osf.io/nxaev Cardiac MRI, Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiomyopathy, Ischemia, Myocardial Edema, Sudden Cardiac Arrest © RSNA, 2024.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiography; Databases, Factual; Edema
PubMed: 38634744
DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230216 -
Cureus Aug 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease and is a prevalent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This study aims to establish the... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease and is a prevalent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This study aims to establish the benefits and therapeutic value metoprolol or verapamil offer to patients who suffer from symptoms caused by HCM, with regard to resolving left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), as well as improving a patient's quality of life and reducing symptoms. We conducted a systematic review to find clinical studies that described the use of metoprolol or verapamil in the management of HCM. Three databases were analyzed for studies, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. We discovered 6,260 potentially eligible records across all the databases. According to our eligibility criteria, we included four studies in this review. Metoprolol showed median left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients of 25 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg (P = 0.007) at rest, 28 mm Hg versus 62 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at peak exercise, and 45 mm Hg versus 115 mm Hg (P < 0.001) post-exercise. Verapamil also showed a statistically significant increase in exercise capacity. Both drugs have been shown to be safe to use with a good side effect profile; however, metoprolol was better tolerated in the patient population that was tested in the studies collected. In this study, metoprolol was effective in reducing LVOT and improving the quality of life in patients, while verapamil showed variable effects on both exercise capacity and baseline hemodynamics.
PubMed: 37565181
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43197 -
International Journal of Public Health 2024Identification of SCD risk is important in the general population from a public health perspective. The objective is to summarize and appraise the available prediction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Identification of SCD risk is important in the general population from a public health perspective. The objective is to summarize and appraise the available prediction models for the risk of SCD among the general population. Data were obtained searching six electronic databases and reporting prediction models of SCD risk in the general population. Studies with duplicate cohorts and missing information were excluded from the meta-analysis. Out of 8,407 studies identified, fifteen studies were included in the systematic review, while five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in thirteen studies (96.67%). Study locations were limited to Europe and the United States. Our pooled meta-analyses included four predictors: diabetes mellitus (ES = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.93, 3.76), QRS duration (ES = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.26), spatial QRS-T angle (ES = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.27, 1.69) and factional shortening (ES = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.15, 1.64). Risk prediction model may be useful as an adjunct for risk stratification strategies for SCD in the general population. Further studies among people except for white participants and more accessible factors are necessary to explore.
Topics: Humans; United States; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Europe; Risk Factors; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38572495
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606913 -
Journal of Korean Medical Science Aug 2023We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to analyze the effect of circulating vitamin D level on the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to analyze the effect of circulating vitamin D level on the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
METHODS
Prospective cohort studies evaluating the association between circulating vitamin D and risk of SCD and CVD mortality were systematically searched in the PubMed and Embase. Extracted data were analyzed using a random effects model and results were expressed in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Restricted cubic spline analysis was used to estimate the dose-response relationships.
RESULTS
Of the 1,321 records identified using the search strategy, a total of 19 cohort studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of HR (95% CI) for low vs. high circulating vitamin D level was 1.75 (1.49-2.06) with I² value of 30.4%. In subgroup analysis, strong effects of circulating vitamin D were observed in healthy general population (pooled HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.38) and the clinical endpoint of SCD (pooled HRs, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.48-4.83). The dose-response analysis at the reference level of < 50 nmol/L showed a significant negative association between circulating vitamin D and risk of SCD and CVD mortality.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies showed that lower circulating vitamin D level significantly increased the risk of SCD and CVD mortality.
Topics: Humans; Vitamin D; Prospective Studies; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Health Status; PubMed
PubMed: 37605499
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e260 -
Clinical Hypertension Sep 2023In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, hypertension is common but often inadequately controlled. The prevalence of hypertension varies... (Review)
Review
In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, hypertension is common but often inadequately controlled. The prevalence of hypertension varies widely among studies because of differences in the definition of hypertension and the methods of used to measure blood pressure (BP), i.e., peri-dialysis or ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Recently, ABPM has become the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension in dialysis patients. Home BP monitoring can also be a good alternative to ABPM, emphasizing BP measurement outside the hemodialysis (HD) unit. One thing for sure is pre- and post-dialysis BP measurements should not be used alone to diagnose and manage hypertension in dialysis patients. The exact target of BP and the relationship between BP and all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality are unclear in this population. Many observational studies with HD cohorts have almost universally reported a U-shaped or even an L-shaped association between BP and all-cause mortality, but most of these data are based on the BP measured in HD units. Some data with ABPM have shown a linear association between BP and mortality even in HD patients, similar to the general population. Supporting this, the results of meta-analysis have shown a clear benefit of BP reduction in HD patients. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the optimal target BP in the dialysis population, and for now, an individualized approach is appropriate, with particular emphasis on avoiding excessively low BP. Maintaining euvolemia is of paramount importance for BP control in dialysis patients. Patient heterogeneity and the lack of comparative evidence preclude the recommendation of one class of medication over another for all patients. Recently, however, β-blockers could be considered as a first-line therapy in dialysis patients, as they can reduce sympathetic overactivity and left ventricular hypertrophy, which contribute to the high incidence of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Several studies with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have also reported promising results in reducing mortality in dialysis patients. However, safety issues such as hyperkalemia or hypotension should be further evaluated before their use.
PubMed: 37653470
DOI: 10.1186/s40885-023-00240-x