-
Medicine Sep 2023The study aimed to evaluate survival rates and prognosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) using meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The study aimed to evaluate survival rates and prognosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) using meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wan-Fang Database, and Chinese biomedical database were searched. Information and data were screened and extracted by 2 researchers. The obtained data were analyzed using the R software meta package. Quality assessment was conducted using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The causes of heterogeneity were analyzed using subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using Begger funnel plots and Egger test.
RESULTS
The search strategy yielded a total of 21 studies involving 875 patients included in the final analysis. The pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with SLE-PH were 0.9020 (95%CI: 0.8576; 0.9397), 0.8363 (96%CI: 0.7813; 0.8852), 0.7301 (95%CI: 0.6327; 0.8181). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of echocardiography subgroup were 0.9000 (95%CI: 0.8480; 0.9551), 0.8435 (95%CI: 0.7744; 0.9187), 0.6795 (95%CI: 0.5746; 0.8035), respectively; and there were 0.9174 (95%CI: 0.8951; 0.9402), 0.8529 (95%CI: 0.8255; 0.8812), 0.7757 (95%CI: 0.7409; 0.8121) at right heart catheterization subgroup in the meantime. Multivariate analysis for predicting mortality in SLE-PH patients revealed that diminishing left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association classification, lupus nephritis, lower cardiac index, and higher red blood cell distribution width level were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate. Treatment with huge doses of cyclophosphamide, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and Raynaud phenomenon signaled favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSION
The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of SLE-PH patients in recent years (0.9020, 0.8363, 0.7301) were estimated in this study. SLE-PH patients diagnosed by echocardiography have a worse long-term prognosis than those diagnosed by right heart catheterization. Studies after 2015 have shown significantly better survival than earlier studies.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Prognosis; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
PubMed: 37682181
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034947 -
American Journal of Cancer Research 2023Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) is a targeted antibody-drug conjugate that specifically targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In 2019, it was... (Review)
Review
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) is a targeted antibody-drug conjugate that specifically targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In 2019, it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, ongoing research is exploring its potential efficacy in other solid tumors, such as non-small-cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer, as well as in tumors with low HER2 levels. It is important to examine the safety and effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in these various types of solid tumors, as some studies have raised concerns about potential serious adverse events associated with its use. In this meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in solid tumors. We used RevMan 5.4 software to perform a meta-analysis, calculating odds ratios (OR), risk ratios (RR), and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After an exhaustive search, we identified three articles that met our inclusion criteria, which included a total of 1268 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the treatment group had significantly higher overall survival (WMD=5.12, 95% CI (2.79, 7.44), P<0.0001), progression-free survival (WMD=3.45, 95% CI (0.8, 6.1), P=0.01), overall response rate (OR=6.49, 95% CI (4.90, 8.58), P<0.00001), and disease control rate (OR=4.68, 95% CI (2.78, 7.89), P<0.00001), TRAEs (RR=6.93, 95% CI (2.06, 23.25), P=0.002). However, there was no significant difference in TRAEs≥3 (RR=1.08, 95% CI (0.75, 1.56), P=0.68) between the trials. Based on the available evidence, trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to be an effective and safe treatment option for HER2-positive solid tumors. Although the number of studies included in this analysis is limited, ongoing trials are being conducted, further evaluating its potential in various solid tumors. The results of these trials will enhance our understanding of trastuzumab deruxtecan and potentially expand its applications, bringing hope to more patients with solid tumors.
PubMed: 37693138
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Surgery... Sep 2023The present study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.
BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (MI-RNTT) with open radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (O-RNTT).
METHODS
This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to December 2022. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis.
RESULTS
In total, eight retrospective trials with a total of 563 patients were included. Compared to O-RNTT, MI-RNTT had shorter hospitalization time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.58 days, 95% CI: -4.56 to -2.59; P <0.00001), lower volumes of blood loss (WMD -663.32 ml, 95% CI: -822.22 to -504.42; P <0.00001), fewer transfusion rates (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09-0.35; P <0.00001), fewer overall complications (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.49; P <0.00001), and fewer major complications s (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-1.00; P =0.05). However, operative time, intraoperative complications, mortality rate (intraoperative, within 30 days, and total mortality), overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
MI-RNTT possesses more benefits than O-RNTT in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, and complications and provides comparable mortality rates and oncologic outcomes. However, more comprehensive and rigorous research is warranted to further validate the outcomes, which should include a larger sample size and comprehensive data from high-volume medical centers.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Veins; Kidney Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37526108
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000405 -
Renal Failure Dec 2024To explore the effect of lupus nephritis (LN) on graft survival in renal transplant patients. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus database for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To explore the effect of lupus nephritis (LN) on graft survival in renal transplant patients. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies. The target population of interest was adult patients (aged >18 years) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and no history of previous renal transplants. Primary outcomes of interest were graft survival and patient survival. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 15 studies were included. Compared to patients with ESRD due to other causes, patients with LN undergoing kidney transplant had lower patient survival rate (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.31; = 15, I=34.3%) and worse graft survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11; = 16, I=0.0%), especially when studies with deceased donor were pooled together. Studies with a larger sample size (>200) showed that LN was strongly associated with lower graft and patient survival rates. Elevated risk of mortality in LN patients was detected in case-control studies, but not RCTs. On the other hand, RCTs, but not case-control studies, showed an increased risk of poor graft survival in LN patients. The findings suggest that the presence of LN might have a negative impact on both the graft survival and the overall patient survival of post-transplant ESRD patients. Further studies that account for factors such as study methodology, donor characteristics, and sample size are needed to reach definitive conclusions. Renal transplant patients with LN should undergo regular follow-up examinations.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Case-Control Studies; Graft Survival; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Lupus Nephritis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38178546
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2296000 -
American Journal of Clinical Oncology Nov 2023To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
OBJECTIVES
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in treating patients with NSCLC were comprehensively retrieved from electronic databases, eligible studies, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, guidelines, and conference abstracts. The meta-analysis was performed by the Stata/SE 12.0 software.
RESULTS
Eleven randomized controlled trials were eventually included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy significantly improved the objective response rate compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT; 62.46% vs 41.88%, P = 0.003), but the objective response rate of neoadjuvant double-immunotherapy was roughly comparable to that of neoadjuvant single-immunotherapy (15.74% vs 10.45%, P = 0.387). Major pathologic response (MPR) rate and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant double-immunotherapy were significantly superior to neoadjuvant CT alone and neoadjuvant single-immunotherapy, respectively. Compared with neoadjuvant CT alone, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy increased the down-staging rate (40.16% vs 26.70%, P = 0.060), the surgical resection rate (83.69% vs 73.07%, P = 0.231), and R0 resection rate (86.19% vs 77.98%, P = 0.502), but there were no statistically significant differences. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy did not increase the postoperative complications rate than neoadjuvant CT alone (40.20% vs 41.30%, P = 0.920). In terms of safety, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant double-immunotherapy did not increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and the grade 3 or higher TRAEs.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy had better clinical efficacy than neoadjuvant CT for patients with NSCLC. MPR rate and pCR rate of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant double-immunotherapy were significantly superior to neoadjuvant CT and neoadjuvant single-immunotherapy, respectively, for patients with NSCLC, showing that MPR rate and pCR rate were probably considered as alternative endpoints for survival benefit. TRAEs were comparable between the corresponding groups. The long-term survival outcome of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC needs to be further confirmed to better guide clinical practice.
PubMed: 37749786
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001046 -
Urology Research & Practice Jan 2024Prostate cancer is the second- leading cause of cancer death among men. We aimed to evaluate high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), open radical prostatectomy (ORP),...
OBJECTIVE
Prostate cancer is the second- leading cause of cancer death among men. We aimed to evaluate high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), open radical prostatectomy (ORP), robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS
We searched bibliographic databases for case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled studies. We used MeSH subject headings and free text terms for prostate cancer, HIFU, ORP, RARP, RT, failure-free survival (FFS), biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS), urinary incontinence (UI), and erectile dysfunction (ED).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included in the review, for a total of 34 927 participants. Among the 8 studies of HIFU as the primary treatment of localized low- and intermediate- risk prostate cancer, 4 studies reported 5-year FFS rates ranging from 67.8% to 97.8%, 3 studies reported 5-year BDFS ranging from 58% to 85.4%, 5 studies reported 1-year UI rates ranging from 0% to 6%, and 4 studies reported 1-year ED rates ranging from 11.4% to 38.7%. Furthermore, our search revealed a 5-year FFS benefit favoring ORP compared to RT, a 1-year UI rate favoring ORP compared to RARP, and a 1-year ED rate favoring ORP compared to RARP.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed lack of studies with active comparators comparing HIFU to standard of care (ORP, RARP, or RT) in primary treatment of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Open radical prostatectomy has favorable efficacy outcomes compared to RT, while RARP has beneficial functional outcomes compared to ORP, respectively.
PubMed: 38451125
DOI: 10.5152/tud.2024.23123 -
International Journal of Implant... Jul 2023The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis on the long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants (ZI). ZI success, prostheses... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis on the long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants (ZI). ZI success, prostheses survival and success, sinus pathology and patient reported outcomes were also investigated.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Embase and OvidMedline databases were searched alongside the grey literature. The systematic review was recorded in PROSPERO (CRD42022358024). Studies reporting titanium/titanium alloy ZI survival data, ZI-supported prosthesis data, ZIs directly compared to any other implant therapy including grafted sites, a minimum follow-up time of 3 years and a minimum number of 10 patients were included. All study designs were considered if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies not involving ZIs, ZIs not made from titanium/titanium alloy, a follow-up time of < 3 years or < 10 patients, animal studies and in vitro studies were excluded. Long-term follow-up has not been defined in the literature. A minimum of 3 years follow-up was considered acceptable to capture survival after initial healing, alongside in-function prosthesis data via delayed or immediate load protocols. ZI success, was predominantly defined as ZI survival without biological or neurological complications. Meta-analyses were performed for ZI survival, ZI failure incidence, ZI success, loading protocol, prosthesis survival, and prevalence of sinusitis using random effects models. Descriptive analysis was used for ZI success, prosthesis success and patient reported outcome measures.
RESULTS
Five hundred and seventy-four titles were identified, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies included 1349 ZIs in 623 patients. Mean follow-up period was 75.4 months (range 36-141.6). The mean survival of ZIs was 96.2% [95% CI: 93.8; 97.7] at 6 years. Mean survival for delayed loading was 95% [95% CI: 91.7; 97.1] and 98.1% [95% CI: 96.2; 99.0] for immediate loading (p = 0.03). Annual incidence rate of ZI failure was 0.7% [95% CI 0.4; 1.0]. Mean ZI success was 95.7% [95% CI 87.8; 98.6]. Mean prosthesis survival was 94% [95% CI 88.6; 96.9]. Sinusitis prevalence was 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] at 5 years. Patients' reported increased satisfaction with ZIs.
CONCLUSIONS
ZIs have long-term survival comparable to conventional implants. Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Prosthesis survival was similar to that of prostheses supported by conventional implants, with similar complications. Sinusitis was the most frequently encountered biological complication. Patients reported improved outcome measures with ZI use.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Prosthesis Failure; Titanium; Treatment Outcome; Alloys
PubMed: 37405545
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023With the increasing incidence of diabetes, diabetic foot ulcer(DFU) has become one of the most common and serious complications in people with diabetes. DFU is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
With the increasing incidence of diabetes, diabetic foot ulcer(DFU) has become one of the most common and serious complications in people with diabetes. DFU is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and can also result in significant economic, social and public health burdens. Due to peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, hyperglycemic environment, inflammatory disorders and other factors, the healing of DFU is impaired or delayed, resulting in the formation of diabetic chronic refractory ulcer. Because of these pathological abnormalities in DFU, it may be difficult to promote wound healing with conventional therapies or antibiotics, whereas platelet-rich plasma(PRP) can promote wound healing by releasing various bioactive molecules stored in platelets, making it more promising than traditional antibiotics. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and analyze the efficacy of PRP in the treatment of DFU.
METHODS
A literature search was undertaken in PubMed, CNKI, EMB-ASE, the Cochrane Library, the WanFang Database and the WeiPu Database by computer. Included controlled studies evaluating the efficacy of PRP in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The data extraction and assessment are on the basis of PRISMA.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were evaluated, and nineteen measures for the evaluation of the efficacy of PRP in DFU treatment were introduced by eliminating relevant duplicate measures. The efficacy measures that were repeated in various studies mainly included the rate of complete ulcer healing, the percentage of ulcer area reduction, the time required for ulcer healing, wound complications (including infection rate, amputation rate, and degree of amputation), the rate of ulcer recurrence, and the cost and duration of hospitalization for DFU, as well as subsequent survival and quality of life scores. One of the most important indicators were healing rate, ulcer area reduction and healing time. The meta-analysis found that PRP was significantly improve the healing rate(OR = 4.37, 95% CI 3.02-6.33, P < 0.001) and shorten the healing time(MD = -3.21, 95% CI -3.83 to -2.59,P < 0.001)of patients with DFU when compared to the conventional treatment, but there was no significant difference in reducing the of ulcer area(MD = 5.67, 95% CI -0.77 to 12.11,P =0.08>0.05 ).
CONCLUSION
The application of PRP to DFU can improve ulcer healing rate and shorten ulcer healing time, but more clinical data are needed to clarify some efficacy measures. At the same time, a standardized preparation process for PRP is essential.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Quality of Life; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Wound Healing; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38169990
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256081 -
United European Gastroenterology Journal Oct 2023Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may improve access to curative therapies, treat portal hypertension...
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may improve access to curative therapies, treat portal hypertension (PH)-related complications without worsening liver function, and increase overall survival. Data on the efficacy and safety of TIPS to treat PH complications in HCC patients, as well as the HCC treatment response, were evaluated.
METHODS
Studies reporting efficacy in controlling bleeding/ascites or response to HCC therapy, safety, and survival in patients with HCC and TIPS were searched systematically on PubMed and Embase. An extraction of articles using predefined data fields and quality indicators was used.
RESULTS
We selected 19 studies and found 937 patients treated for ascites/bleeding and 177 evaluating HCC treatment response. Over half were under 5 cm and solitary lesions, and most studies included tumours with portal vein thrombosis. Regarding PH studies, TIPS resolved bleeding/ascites in >60% of patients, more effective for bleeding. There were no lethal complications reported and procedural bleeding occurred in <5%. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 15%-30% within three months. In the HCC treatment-response studies, major complication rates were low with no mortality. In the studies that evaluated the response to transarterial chemoembolization, complete response rate of patients with TIPS varied from 16% to 75%. Liver transplantation rate varied from 8% to 80%, with >40% rate in half of the studies.
CONCLUSIONS
In the published studies, TIPS is effective in treating PH complications in patients with HCC. Prospective studies on TIPS placement in patients with HCC are urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIPS in this setting.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic; Liver Neoplasms; Ascites; Prospective Studies; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Treatment Outcome; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Hypertension, Portal
PubMed: 37736854
DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12454 -
Transplant Immunology Dec 2023Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.
METHODS
Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).
RESULTS
The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; ABO Blood-Group System; Living Donors; Quality of Life; Renal Dialysis; Blood Group Incompatibility; Antibodies; Graft Survival; Graft Rejection
PubMed: 37648033
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101921