-
BMJ Open Ophthalmology Apr 2024Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder that requires surgical intervention for treatment. Conjunctival autografts are preferred over simple excision due to lower... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder that requires surgical intervention for treatment. Conjunctival autografts are preferred over simple excision due to lower recurrence rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the modified sutureless glue-free (MSGF) method with conventional sutures (CS) for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MSGF and CS conjunctival autografts. Outcome measures included operation time, recurrence and postoperative complications. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS
11 RCTs involving 833 participants were included. The analysis revealed that MSGF had a significantly shorter operation time compared with CS (SMD -3.704, 95% CI -5.122 to -2.287, p<0.001). CS was associated with a higher risk of foreign body sensation (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.74, p=0.01). MSGF was associated with a higher risk of graft dehiscence (RR 9.01, 95% CI 2.74 to 29.68, p=0.000) and graft retraction (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.77, p=0.02). No significant differences were found in recurrence, graft haemorrhage, granuloma, Dellen and conjunctival oedema.
CONCLUSION
Using the MSGF technique in conjunctival autograft fixation for pterygium surgery reduces operation time by relying solely on the patient's blood for fixation. However, it increases the risk of graft dehiscence and retraction. However, CS is linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing foreign body sensations. Understanding the learning curve and surgeon familiarity with novel techniques is crucial for optimising patient care and surgical outcomes, while individualised decision-making is necessary considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Further research is warranted to minimise complications and optimise surgical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Pterygium; Autografts; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive; Recurrence; Conjunctiva; Sutures; Foreign Bodies
PubMed: 38565231
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001621 -
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Oct 2023Nonabsorbable sutures are still the main choice for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) repair due to strength provided. However, the rerupture rates, infection risks,...
BACKGROUND
Nonabsorbable sutures are still the main choice for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) repair due to strength provided. However, the rerupture rates, infection risks, foreign body reaction, and postsurgical recovery differences between absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials in AATR repair have not been carefully reviewed.
METHODS
A systematic review was done on PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase to find research studies in relation to complications associated with AATR repair using the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias from each study included will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized study (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for nonrandomized study.
RESULTS
Five studies with a total of 255 patients, 105 in the absorbable suture group and 150 in the nonabsorbable suture group, were included for analysis. Risk of rerupture, infection, and foreign body reaction shown no significant difference between groups, and the mean difference of recovery scores were similar.
CONCLUSION
Existing literature shows that absorbable sutures appear to be associated with similar outcomes to nonabsorbable sutures regarding rates of rerupture, infection, foreign body reaction, and outcomes grading following surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon repair.
PubMed: 37859827
DOI: 10.1177/24730114231201842 -
Chinese Journal of Traumatology =... Jan 2024Traumatic lumbar hernia (TLH) constitutes a protrusion of content through a defect in the posterior abdominal wall, as a result of injury. This rare entity has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Traumatic lumbar hernia (TLH) constitutes a protrusion of content through a defect in the posterior abdominal wall, as a result of injury. This rare entity has been described in limited number of cases.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. The English literature from 1990 until 2021 was reviewed, using PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar bibliographic databases, to identify case reports and case series with patients that were diagnosed with TLH. For each eligible study, demographics, clinical presentation, hernia characteristics, preoperative imaging investigations, operation details, and postoperative data were extracted for assessment. Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS, version 20.0.
RESULTS
A total of 62 studies were included for review, with 164 patients with TLH. Mean age was (42.6 ± 14.3) years (47.6% males, 31.1% females, gender not specified in 35 cases). Mean diameter of hernia neck was (6.3 ± 3.1) cm, while the triangles of Petit and Grynfeltt were affected in 74.5% and 14.6%, respectively. Patients diagnosed in the emergency setting account for 54.2%, with CT scan establishing diagnosis in all but one case (97.7%). A delayed diagnosis was made in 45.8%, at a mean 1 year following trauma. Flank bulging (82.8%) and chronic back pain (34.3%) were the most frequent symptoms. In both delayed and acute group, open surgery (63.6% and 92.3%, respectively) was the preferred surgical approach. Postoperative complications were reported in 11.4% of acute and 15.0% of delayed patients. Hernia recurrence was 7%.
CONCLUSIONS
TLH is uncommon with 164 cases described since 1990. CT scan is the gold standard in diagnosis. Open surgery is generally the preferred approach, particularly in the emergency setting. Acute TLH can be treated either by primary suture repair or mesh, depending on the local conditions, whereas delayed cases usually require a mesh.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Herniorrhaphy; Surgical Mesh; Hernia, Abdominal; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 37507292
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.05.006 -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Mar 2024Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) is a bailout procedure that is undertaken when it is not safe to proceed with a laparoscopic total cholecystectomy owing to...
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) is a bailout procedure that is undertaken when it is not safe to proceed with a laparoscopic total cholecystectomy owing to dense adhesions in Calot's triangle. The main aim of this review was to investigate the early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) morbidity and mortality of LSTC.
METHODS
A literature search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar™ and Embase databases was conducted to identify all studies on LSTC published between 1985 and December 2020. A systematic review was then performed.
RESULTS
Overall, 45 studies involving 2,166 subtotal cholecystectomy patients (51% female) were identified for inclusion in the review. The mean patient age was 55 years (standard deviation: 15 years). Just over half (53%) of the patients had an elective procedure. The conversion rate was 6.2% (=135). The most common indication was acute cholecystitis (49%). Different techniques were used, with the majority having a closed cystic duct/gallbladder stump (71%). The most common closure technique was intracorporeal suturing (53%), followed by endoloop closure (15%). Four patients (0.18%) died within thirty days of surgery. Morbidity within 30 days included bile duct injury (0.23%), bile leak (18%) and intra-abdominal collection (4%). Reoperation was reported in 23 patients (1.2%), most commonly for unresolving intra-abdominal collections and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to control bile leak. Long-term follow-up was reported in 30 studies, the median follow-up duration being 22 months. Late morbidity included incisional hernias (6%), symptomatic gallstones (4%) and common bile duct stones (2%), with 2% of cases requiring completion of cholecystectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
LSTC is an acceptable alternative in patients with a "difficult" Calot's triangle.
Topics: Humans; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cystic Duct; Gallstones; Morbidity
PubMed: 37365939
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0008 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2023Congenital aniridia is a rare, panocular disorder with a main phenotypic characteristic of a partial or complete absence of the iris existing alongside other ocular...
Congenital aniridia is a rare, panocular disorder with a main phenotypic characteristic of a partial or complete absence of the iris existing alongside other ocular morbidities such as cataract, keratopathy, optic nerve and foveal hypoplasia, and nystagmus. The iris abnormality, however, often leads to symptoms such as photophobia, glare, and decreased visual acuity, as well as cosmetic dissatisfaction. Current management options for the iris deficit include colored iris contact lenses, corneal tattooing, and tinted contact lenses. Symptoms arising from small iris defects can be resolved with surgical management using micro-tying suture techniques such as McCannel or Siepser. Currently, larger iris defects can be treated with artificial iris implants. New prosthetic options range from colored intraocular lenses to flexible custom-made silicone iris implants. With a range of therapeutic options available and given the challenges of multiple comorbidities in aniridia, we evaluate the literature relating to the use of artificial iris implants in congenital aniridia, with a focus on the different surgical implantation techniques, the clinical outcomes achieved, complications occurred, and risk of bias of the studies included.
Topics: Humans; Visual Acuity; Aniridia; Iris; Lenses, Intraocular; Prosthesis Implantation; Vision Disorders
PubMed: 36379301
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.11.001 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2024Non-pharmaceutical midwifery techniques, including perineal warm compresses, to improve maternal outcomes remain controversial. The aims of this study are to assess the... (Review)
Review
Effects of Perineal Warm Compresses during the Second Stage of Labor on Reducing Perineal Trauma and Relieving Postpartum Perineal Pain in Primiparous Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Non-pharmaceutical midwifery techniques, including perineal warm compresses, to improve maternal outcomes remain controversial. The aims of this study are to assess the effects of perineal warm compresses on reducing perineal trauma and postpartum perineal pain relief. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched seven bibliographic databases, three RCT register websites, and two dissertation databases for publications from inception to 15 March 2023. Chinese and English publications were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the risk of bias assessment, data extraction, and the evaluation of the certainty of the evidence utilizing the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 assessment criteria, the Review Manager 5.4, and the online GRADEpro tool, respectively. Seven RCTs involving 1362 primiparous women were included. The combined results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the second-, third- and/or fourth- degree perineal lacerations, the incidence of episiotomy, and the relief of the short-term perineal pain postpartum (within two days). There was a potential favorable effect on improving the integrity of the perineum. However, the results did not show a statistically significant supportive effect on reducing first-degree perineal lacerations and the rate of perineal lacerations requiring sutures. In summary, perineal warm compresses effectively reduced the second-, third-/or fourth-degree perineal trauma and decreased the short-term perineal pain after birth.
PubMed: 38610125
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070702 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Apr 2024Despite a recent Cochrane Review demonstrating blunt suture needles are safer for surgeons, the use of blunt suture needles has not become widely adopted. In the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Despite a recent Cochrane Review demonstrating blunt suture needles are safer for surgeons, the use of blunt suture needles has not become widely adopted. In the 'Implant Era', with the value of medical implant companies to surpass $145 billion by 2027, should we re-examine the use of blunt suture needles, especially to reduce infection in implant surgery? We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing whether blunt suture needles reduce risks to surgeons and patients.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the MH method. Random or fixed effects modelling use was based on statistical heterogeneity (I).
RESULTS
14 RCTs were identified with 2488 patients. The RCTs included laparotomies, caesarean sections, episiotomies, and orthopaedic surgeries. Blunt suture needles when compared with sharp needles resulted in a significant reduction in glove perforation; RR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.37 to 0.60] and needlestick injuries, RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.26 to 0.97]. Sharp needles caused more wound infections, but the result was not statistically significant; RR: 2.73, 95% CI [0.54 to 13.76], p 0.22. Surgeon's satisfaction decreased with blunt needles compared with sharp (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.37]).
CONCLUSION
Blunt suture needles are safer than sharp needles for surgeons and likely reduce risks to patients. This, however, comes at the cost of decreased ease of use. The authors recommend the routine use of blunt suture needles, especially in implant surgery.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Needles; Needlestick Injuries; Cesarean Section; Laparotomy; Sutures
PubMed: 37951800
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.10.009 -
Surgery Open Science Dec 2023Previous randomized trials evaluated the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures for fascial closure in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). However, available...
BACKGROUND
Previous randomized trials evaluated the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures for fascial closure in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). However, available evidence remains still inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures in fascia closure in preventing postoperative SSI in elective gastrointestinal surgery.
META-ANALYSIS
A meta-analysis included present outcomes, evaluating the advantages of triclosan-coated compared with non-coated sutures in preventing SSIs for fascia closure of laparotomy in abdominal gastrointestinal surgery. To identify prospective randomized trials regarding this topic, we searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) and PubMed with the following search terms: "triclosan or triclosan coated;" "surgical site infection;" and "randomized controlled trial" was searched, respectively. To avoid the evaluation of the heterogenous group of patients, the following studies were excluded; only emergency surgery, or not including gastroenterological surgery. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was performed with R software (CRAN, 3·6·2; https://cran.r-project.org/).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included eleven phase-III and two prospective studies, which comprised 9588 patients. The aggregated phase-III results of the trials demonstrate a significant superiority of triclosan-coated sutures compared with non-coated sutures (random-effect model, OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56-0.90, = 0.0052).
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis showed benefit with triclosan-coated sutures in preventing SSI after gastrointestinal surgery.
PubMed: 37818459
DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.009 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Mar 2024The zipper device is a wound closure device that can be directly applied over the intact skin on either side of the wound edges and does not need anchoring into the skin... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The zipper device is a wound closure device that can be directly applied over the intact skin on either side of the wound edges and does not need anchoring into the skin or subcutaneous plane. The noninvasive nature of the zipper device makes it less time-consuming and less painful, but its effectiveness and related complications need to be studied.
METHODS
Prospective registration of the protocol followed in this study was done. Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles, and their screening was completed, followed by data extraction and analysis. The odds ratio, mean difference, or standardised mean difference were used as an effect measure per the nature of the variables. Surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin closure time, scar score, and patient satisfaction were compared in this study.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies were identified, out of which eight compared zippers with sutures and two compared zippers with stapler devices. Compared to the suture, the zipper device took 4.9 min less to close the incision, and the scar scale outcome reported after one month was inferior, while other results were not significant. Staples showed a lower patient satisfaction level and no difference in complications.
CONCLUSION
The zipper device is a less technically demanding and less time-consuming method of skin closure, with no significant difference in the complication rate compared to conventional methods. The zipper device is an effective measure to use in settings with less expertise or at health institutions after assessing the cost at the local level.
PubMed: 38463064
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001769 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Oct 2023The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing double-button suture... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical outcomes for grades III-V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing double-button suture fixation to hook plate fixation for types III-IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
METHODS
Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all levels 1-3 studies from 2000 to 2022. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and complications were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROB2 tool and ROBINs-I tool. MINORS and modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) were used to assess within study quality. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ and I statistics.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies were included. Three of the four included LOE II and eleven of the LOE III studies had a high risk of bias. Study quality was considered poor and fair for 67% by MINORS criteria and 93% for CMS criteria. The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all clinical outcomes was statistically significant and in favor of button repair (p = 0.0001). The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all VAS pain scores was statistically significant, again in favor of button repair (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated significantly better outcomes of button repair for acute ACJ dislocations when compared to clavicle hook plate. Button repair is also associated with a 2.2 times lower risk for complications. However, risk of bias is high, and study quality within and between studies was low. These results, therefore, must be viewed with caution.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III; systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Clavicle; Acromioclavicular Joint; Shoulder Dislocation; Joint Dislocations; Bone Plates; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36841909
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03492-3