-
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Jan 2024Different oral motor appliances have been used in connection with speech therapy to improve oral motor function and speech development, but no consensus has been reached... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Different oral motor appliances have been used in connection with speech therapy to improve oral motor function and speech development, but no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of the appliances. The objective was to systematically review the effectiveness of oral motor appliances on oral motor function and speech in children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) or oral motor dysfunctions.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted up to February 2023 in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria were prospective randomized or case-control clinical trials investigating the effect of intraoral appliances on orofacial function and/or speech. The risk of bias was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration's Robins-I tool.
RESULTS
Nine publications of three individual studies met the inclusion and search criteria. Six of the publications were conducted in children with Down Syndrome (DS) and three publications were conducted in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). No meta-analysis was made due to the limitations of the publications. Selected studies reported some beneficial effects of intraoral appliances on oral motor function in children with DS and CP, although the evidence is low. Due to the study design in selected studies and confounding factors, the overall risk of bias was categorized as moderate or high.
DISCUSSION
Intraoral appliances may improve oral motor function in children with DS and CP. Due to lack of studies this review limited to children with DS and CP. The initial question concerning SSDs was not answered. Well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed, especially among non-syndromic children with SSDs. The level of evidence was considered very low.
Topics: Child; Humans; Speech; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 37615355
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2249547 -
Heliyon May 2024Interventions to pandemic outbreaks are often associated with the use of fear-appeal to trigger behavioral change, especially in public health issues. However, no... (Review)
Review
Interventions to pandemic outbreaks are often associated with the use of fear-appeal to trigger behavioral change, especially in public health issues. However, no systematic review exists in the literature on the effectiveness of fear appeal strategies in the context of pandemic compliance. This paper aims at providing systematic literature review that answers the following thought-provoking research questions: (1) What is the standard measurement of fear in relation to pandemics in the existing literature? (2) What are the fear appeal strategies used in the empirical literature? (3) How effective are fear appeal strategies in changing behavior toward adopting pandemic preventive measures? A total of 22 studies were selected from 455 potential studies, following a comprehensive literature search and assessment in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The findings show that nearly all the available studies on fear measurement used the Likert scale (as the standard approach) with different points of degree and fear appeal strategies such as fear triggers in media channels, print advertisements, and verbal descriptions. Furthermore, most studies conclude that fear appeal is effective in making participants adopt pandemic preventive measures; hence, it is effective for positive behavioral change (the degree of effectiveness depends on gender, population group, etc.), especially when combined with self-efficacy and socio-cultural considerations. Very few studies, however, find an insignificant association, arguably due to the kind and intensity of the fear appeal messages and strategies used.
PubMed: 38742070
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30383 -
CoDAS 2023There are several types of approaches that can be used to achieve therapeutic goals in disorders related to the functions of mastication, swallowing, speech, and...
There are several types of approaches that can be used to achieve therapeutic goals in disorders related to the functions of mastication, swallowing, speech, and breathing. However, the literature lacks evidence to support their use in speech-language clinical practice. The objective of this review was to map the syntheses of evidence on speech-language pathology intervention in the areas of breathing, mastication, swallowing and speech in adults and the elderly. Only studies classified by their authors as a systematic review, studies that addressed therapy for orofacial disorders in individuals over 18 years of age were included. The procedures performed included: electronic and manual search; selection of studies; data extraction; evaluation of the quality of studies and data analysis. It was possible to observe different types of interventions mainly aimed at the swallowing function, ranging from traditional therapy to the use of devices. However, due to the limitations of the studies, the data must be interpreted with caution.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Aged; Deglutition; Mastication; Speech-Language Pathology; Speech; Communication Disorders
PubMed: 38126592
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022339pt