-
Cells Oct 2023E-cigarette use has been reported to affect cell viability, induce DNA damage, and modulate an inflammatory response resulting in negative health consequences. Most... (Review)
Review
E-cigarette use has been reported to affect cell viability, induce DNA damage, and modulate an inflammatory response resulting in negative health consequences. Most studies focus on oral and lung disease associated with e-cigarette use. However, tissue damage can be found in the cardio-vascular system and even the bladder. While the levels of carcinogenic compounds found in e-cigarette aerosols are lower than those in conventional cigarette smoke, the toxicants generated by the heat of the vaping device may include probable human carcinogens. Furthermore, nicotine, although not a carcinogen, can be metabolized to nitrosamines. Nitrosamines are known carcinogens and have been shown to be present in the saliva of e-cig users, demonstrating the health risk of e-cigarette vaping. E-cig vape can induce DNA adducts, promoting oxidative stress and DNA damage and NF-kB-driven inflammation. Together, these processes increase the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This creates a microenvironment thought to play a key role in tumorigenesis, although it is too early to know the long-term effects of vaping. This review considers different aspects of e-cigarette-induced cellular changes, including the generation of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, DNA repair, inflammation, and the possible tumorigenic effects.
Topics: Humans; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Vaping; Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets; Carcinogens; Epithelial Cells; Nitrosamines; Carcinogenesis; Inflammation; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37947630
DOI: 10.3390/cells12212552 -
Molecular Cell Dec 2023Reactive aldehydes are abundant endogenous metabolites that challenge homeostasis by crosslinking cellular macromolecules. Aldehyde-induced DNA damage requires repair to...
Reactive aldehydes are abundant endogenous metabolites that challenge homeostasis by crosslinking cellular macromolecules. Aldehyde-induced DNA damage requires repair to prevent cancer and premature aging, but it is unknown whether cells also possess mechanisms that resolve aldehyde-induced RNA lesions. Here, we establish photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking (PAR-CL) as a model system to study RNA crosslinking damage in the absence of confounding DNA damage in human cells. We find that such RNA damage causes translation stress by stalling elongating ribosomes, which leads to collisions with trailing ribosomes and activation of multiple stress response pathways. Moreover, we discovered a translation-coupled quality control mechanism that resolves covalent RNA-protein crosslinks. Collisions between translating ribosomes and crosslinked mRNA-binding proteins trigger their modification with atypical K6- and K48-linked ubiquitin chains. Ubiquitylation requires the E3 ligase RNF14 and leads to proteasomal degradation of the protein adduct. Our findings identify RNA lesion-induced translational stress as a central component of crosslinking damage.
Topics: Humans; RNA; Ubiquitination; Ubiquitin; Ribosomes; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases; Aldehydes; Protein Biosynthesis
PubMed: 37951216
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.012 -
Chemical Research in Toxicology Jul 2023Aldehydes are widespread in the environment, with multiple sources such as food and beverages, industrial effluents, cigarette smoke, and additives. The toxic effects of... (Review)
Review
Aldehydes are widespread in the environment, with multiple sources such as food and beverages, industrial effluents, cigarette smoke, and additives. The toxic effects of exposure to several aldehydes have been observed in numerous studies. At the molecular level, aldehydes damage DNA, cross-link DNA and proteins, lead to lipid peroxidation, and are associated with increased disease risk including cancer. People genetically predisposed to aldehyde sensitivity exhibit severe health outcomes. In various diseases such as Fanconi's anemia and Cockayne syndrome, loss of aldehyde-metabolizing pathways in conjunction with defects in DNA repair leads to widespread DNA damage. Importantly, aldehyde-associated mutagenicity is being explored in a growing number of studies, which could offer key insights into how they potentially contribute to tumorigenesis. Here, we review the genotoxic effects of various aldehydes, focusing particularly on the DNA adducts underlying the mutagenicity of environmentally derived aldehydes. We summarize the chemical structures of the aldehydes and their predominant DNA adducts, discuss various methodologies, and , commonly used in measuring aldehyde-associated mutagenesis, and highlight some recent studies looking at aldehyde-associated mutation signatures and spectra. We conclude the Review with a discussion on the challenges and future perspectives of investigating aldehyde-associated mutagenesis.
Topics: Humans; Aldehydes; DNA Adducts; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Mutagens; DNA
PubMed: 37363863
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00045 -
Cancers Aug 2023Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by several genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal translocations, genomic deletions and gains, and... (Review)
Review
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by several genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal translocations, genomic deletions and gains, and point mutations. DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair mechanisms are altered in MM to allow for tumor development, progression, and resistance to therapies. Damaged DNA rarely induces an apoptotic response, given the presence of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated () loss-of-function or mutations, as well as deletions, mutations, or downregulation of tumor protein p53 (TP53) and tumor protein p73 (TP73). Moreover, DNA repair mechanisms are either hyperactive or defective to allow for rapid correction of the damage or permissive survival. Medications used to treat patients with MM can induce DNA damage, by either direct effects (mono-adducts induced by melphalan), or as a result of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib. In this review, we will describe the mechanisms of DDR and DNA repair in normal tissues, the contribution of these pathways to MM disease progression and other phenotypes, and the potential therapeutic opportunities for patients with MM.
PubMed: 37627183
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164155 -
DNA Repair Aug 2023DNA adducts and strand breaks are induced by various exogenous and endogenous agents. Accumulation of DNA damage is implicated in many disease processes, including... (Review)
Review
DNA adducts and strand breaks are induced by various exogenous and endogenous agents. Accumulation of DNA damage is implicated in many disease processes, including cancer, aging, and neurodegeneration. The continuous acquisition of DNA damage from exogenous and endogenous stressors coupled with defects in DNA repair pathways contribute to the accumulation of DNA damage within the genome and genomic instability. While mutational burden offers some insight into the level of DNA damage a cell may have experienced and subsequently repaired, it does not quantify DNA adducts and strand breaks. Mutational burden also infers the identity of the DNA damage. With advances in DNA adduct detection and quantification methods, there is an opportunity to identify DNA adducts driving mutagenesis and correlate with a known exposome. However, most DNA adduct detection methods require isolation or separation of the DNA and its adducts from the context of the nuclei. Mass spectrometry, comet assays, and other techniques precisely quantify lesion types but lose the nuclear context and even tissue context of the DNA damage. The growth in spatial analysis technologies offers a novel opportunity to leverage DNA damage detection with nuclear and tissue context. However, we lack a wealth of techniques capable of detecting DNA damage in situ. Here, we review the limited existing in situ DNA damage detection methods and examine their potential to offer spatial analysis of DNA adducts in tumors or other tissues. We also offer a perspective on the need for spatial analysis of DNA damage in situ and highlight Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD) as an in situ DNA adduct technique with the potential to integrate with spatial analysis and the challenges to be addressed.
Topics: Humans; DNA Adducts; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Mutagenesis; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37390674
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103529 -
The FEBS Journal Sep 2023RNA polymerase II moves along genes to decode genetic information stored in the mammalian genome into messenger RNA and different forms of non-coding RNA. However, the... (Review)
Review
RNA polymerase II moves along genes to decode genetic information stored in the mammalian genome into messenger RNA and different forms of non-coding RNA. However, the transcription process is frequently challenged by DNA lesions caused by exogenous and endogenous insults, among which helix-distorting DNA lesions and double-stranded DNA breaks are particularly harmful for cell survival. In response to such DNA damage, RNA polymerase II transcription is regulated both locally and globally by multi-layer mechanisms, whereas transcription-blocking lesions are repaired before transcription can recover. Failure in DNA damage repair will cause genome instability and cell death. Although recent studies have expanded our understanding of RNA polymerase II regulation confronting DNA lesions, it is still not always clear what the direct contribution of RNA polymerase II is in the DNA damage repair processes. In this review, we focus on how RNA polymerase II and transcription are both repressed by transcription stalling lesions such as DNA-adducts and double strand breaks, as well as how they are actively regulated to support the cellular response to DNA damage and favour the repair of lesions.
Topics: Animals; RNA Polymerase II; Transcription, Genetic; DNA Repair; DNA Damage; DNA; Mammals
PubMed: 35731652
DOI: 10.1111/febs.16561 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023Cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent with proven efficacy in treating various malignancies, including testicular, ovarian, cervical, breast, bladder, head... (Review)
Review
Cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent with proven efficacy in treating various malignancies, including testicular, ovarian, cervical, breast, bladder, head and neck, and lung cancer. Cisplatin is also used to treat tumors in children, such as neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, and hepatoblastoma. However, its clinical use is limited by severe side effects, including ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and retinal toxicity. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity manifests as irreversible, bilateral, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss in 40-60% of adults and in up to 60% of children. Hearing loss can lead to social isolation, depression, and cognitive decline in adults, and speech and language developmental delays in children. Cisplatin causes hair cell death by forming DNA adducts, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation, culminating in programmed cell death by apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, or ferroptosis. Contemporary medical interventions for cisplatin ototoxicity are limited to prosthetic devices, such as hearing aids, but these have significant limitations because the cochlea remains damaged. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first therapy, sodium thiosulfate, to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss in pediatric patients with localized, non-metastatic solid tumors. Other pharmacological treatments for cisplatin ototoxicity are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. This narrative review aims to highlight the molecular mechanisms involved in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, focusing on cochlear inflammation, and shed light on potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapeutic interventions to prevent or mitigate the ototoxic effects of cisplatin. We conducted a comprehensive literature search (Google Scholar, PubMed) focusing on publications in the last five years.
Topics: Humans; Child; Cisplatin; Antineoplastic Agents; Ototoxicity; Hearing Loss; Osteosarcoma; Deafness; Bone Neoplasms; Inflammation
PubMed: 38003734
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216545 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023This overview discusses the role of imprinting in the development of an organism, and how exposure to environmental chemicals during fetal development leads to the... (Review)
Review
This overview discusses the role of imprinting in the development of an organism, and how exposure to environmental chemicals during fetal development leads to the physiological and biochemical changes that can have adverse lifelong effects on the health of the offspring. There has been a recent upsurge in the use of chemical products in everyday life. These chemicals include industrial byproducts, pesticides, dietary supplements, and pharmaceutical products. They mimic the natural estrogens and bind to estradiol receptors. Consequently, they reduce the number of receptors available for ligand binding. This leads to a faulty signaling in the neuroendocrine system during the critical developmental process of 'imprinting'. Imprinting causes structural and organizational differentiation in male and female reproductive organs, sexual behavior, bone mineral density, and the metabolism of exogenous and endogenous chemical substances. Several studies conducted on animal models and epidemiological studies provide profound evidence that altered imprinting causes various developmental and reproductive abnormalities and other diseases in humans. Altered metabolism can be measured by various endpoints such as the profile of cytochrome P-450 enzymes (CYP450's), xenobiotic metabolite levels, and DNA adducts. The importance of imprinting in the potentiation or attenuation of toxic chemicals is discussed.
Topics: Animals; Male; Humans; Female; Reproductive Health; Estrogens; Reproduction; Neurosecretory Systems; Sexual Behavior; Endocrine Disruptors
PubMed: 38068882
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316559 -
Science Advances Dec 2023The catalytic cycle of topoisomerase 2 (TOP2) enzymes proceeds via a transient DNA double-strand break (DSB) intermediate termed the TOP2 cleavage complex (TOP2cc), in...
The catalytic cycle of topoisomerase 2 (TOP2) enzymes proceeds via a transient DNA double-strand break (DSB) intermediate termed the TOP2 cleavage complex (TOP2cc), in which the TOP2 protein is covalently bound to DNA. Anticancer agents such as etoposide operate by stabilizing TOP2ccs, ultimately generating genotoxic TOP2-DNA protein cross-links that require processing and repair. Here, we identify RAD54 like 2 (RAD54L2) as a factor promoting TOP2cc resolution. We demonstrate that RAD54L2 acts through a novel mechanism together with zinc finger protein associated with tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2) and TOP2 (ZATT/ZNF451) and independent of TDP2. Our work suggests a model wherein RAD54L2 recognizes sumoylated TOP2 and, using its ATPase activity, promotes TOP2cc resolution and prevents DSB exposure. These findings suggest RAD54L2-mediated TOP2cc resolution as a potential mechanism for cancer therapy resistance and highlight RAD54L2 as an attractive candidate for drug discovery.
Topics: Humans; DNA Adducts; DNA-Binding Proteins; Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases; DNA Topoisomerases, Type II; DNA; Genomic Instability; DNA Helicases
PubMed: 38055822
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl2108 -
Nucleic Acids Research Jun 2023Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are DNA lesions created under normal growth conditions that result in cytotoxicity, replication-blocks, and mutations. AP sites are...
Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are DNA lesions created under normal growth conditions that result in cytotoxicity, replication-blocks, and mutations. AP sites are susceptible to β-elimination and are liable to be converted to DNA strand breaks. HMCES (5-hydroxymethylcytosine binding, ES cell specific) protein interacts with AP sites in single stranded (ss) DNA exposed at DNA replication forks to generate a stable thiazolidine protein-DNA crosslink and protect cells against AP site toxicity. The crosslinked HMCES is resolved by proteasome-mediated degradation; however, it is unclear how HMCES-crosslinked ssDNA and the resulting proteasome-degraded HMCES adducts are processed and repaired. Here, we describe methods for the preparation of thiazolidine adduct-containing oligonucleotides and determination of their structure. We demonstrate that the HMCES-crosslink is a strong replication blocking adduct and that protease-digested HMCES adducts block DNA replication to a similar extent as AP sites. Moreover, we show that the human AP endonuclease APE1 incises DNA 5' to the protease-digested HMCES adduct. Interestingly, while HMCES-ssDNA crosslinks are stable, the crosslink is reversed upon the formation of dsDNA, possibly due to a catalytic reverse reaction. Our results shed new light on damage tolerance and repair pathways for HMCES-DNA crosslinks in human cells.
Topics: Humans; DNA Adducts; Thiazolidines; DNA Repair; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA, Single-Stranded; DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase
PubMed: 37021581
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad246