-
Chromosoma Jan 2024Genome stability is key for healthy cells in healthy organisms, and deregulated maintenance of genome integrity is a hallmark of aging and of age-associated diseases... (Review)
Review
Genome stability is key for healthy cells in healthy organisms, and deregulated maintenance of genome integrity is a hallmark of aging and of age-associated diseases including cancer and neurodegeneration. To maintain a stable genome, genome surveillance and repair pathways are closely intertwined with cell cycle regulation and with DNA transactions that occur during transcription and DNA replication. Coordination of these processes across different time and length scales involves dynamic changes of chromatin topology, clustering of fragile genomic regions and repair factors into nuclear repair centers, mobilization of the nuclear cytoskeleton, and activation of cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we provide a general overview of cell cycle regulation and of the processes involved in genome duplication in human cells, followed by an introduction to replication stress and to the cellular responses elicited by perturbed DNA synthesis. We discuss fragile genomic regions that experience high levels of replication stress, with a particular focus on telomere fragility caused by replication stress at the ends of linear chromosomes. Using alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) in cancer cells and ALT-associated PML bodies (APBs) as examples of replication stress-associated clustered DNA damage, we discuss compartmentalization of DNA repair reactions and the role of protein properties implicated in phase separation. Finally, we highlight emerging connections between DNA repair and mechanobiology and discuss how biomolecular condensates, components of the nuclear cytoskeleton, and interfaces between membrane-bound organelles and membraneless macromolecular condensates may cooperate to coordinate genome maintenance in space and time.
Topics: Humans; Telomere Homeostasis; DNA Replication; DNA Repair; DNA; DNA Damage; Telomere
PubMed: 37581649
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-023-00807-5 -
Nature Jan 2024DNA replication enables genetic inheritance across the kingdoms of life. Replication occurs with a defined temporal order known as the replication timing (RT) programme,...
DNA replication enables genetic inheritance across the kingdoms of life. Replication occurs with a defined temporal order known as the replication timing (RT) programme, leading to organization of the genome into early- or late-replicating regions. RT is cell-type specific, is tightly linked to the three-dimensional nuclear organization of the genome and is considered an epigenetic fingerprint. In spite of its importance in maintaining the epigenome, the developmental regulation of RT in mammals in vivo has not been explored. Here, using single-cell Repli-seq, we generated genome-wide RT maps of mouse embryos from the zygote to the blastocyst stage. Our data show that RT is initially not well defined but becomes defined progressively from the 4-cell stage, coinciding with strengthening of the A and B compartments. We show that transcription contributes to the precision of the RT programme and that the difference in RT between the A and B compartments depends on RNA polymerase II at zygotic genome activation. Our data indicate that the establishment of nuclear organization precedes the acquisition of defined RT features and primes the partitioning of the genome into early- and late-replicating domains. Our work sheds light on the establishment of the epigenome at the beginning of mammalian development and reveals the organizing principles of genome organization.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Blastocyst; Chromatin; DNA Replication Timing; Epigenome; Genome; RNA Polymerase II; Zygote; Embryo, Mammalian
PubMed: 38123678
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06872-1 -
Journal of Biomedical Science Jun 2023Sotorasib is the first KRAS inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating KRAS-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials on the...
BACKGROUND
Sotorasib is the first KRAS inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating KRAS-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials on the therapeutic use of sotorasib for cancer have reported promising results. However, KRAS-mutant cancers can acquire resistance to sotorasib after treatment. We incidentally discovered that sotorasib-resistant (SR) cancer cells are addicted to this inhibitor. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms underlying sotorasib addiction.
METHODS
Sotorasib-resistant cells were established using KRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer and NSCLC cell lines. Cell viability in the presence or absence of sotorasib and in combination with multiple inhibitors was assessed through proliferation assay and annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) flow cytometry assays. The mechanisms underlying drug addiction were elucidated through 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay, immunofluorescence staining, time-lapse microscopy, and comet assay. Furthermore, a subcutaneous xenograft model was used to demonstrate sotorasib addiction in vivo.
RESULTS
In the absence of sotorasib, the sotorasib-resistant cells underwent p21/-mediated cell cycle arrest and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Sotorasib withdrawal resulted in robust activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, inducing severe DNA damage and replication stress, which activated the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. Persistent MAPK pathway hyperactivation with DDR exhaustion led to premature mitotic entry and aberrant mitosis, followed by micronucleus and nucleoplasmic bridge formation. Pharmacologic activation of the MAPK pathway with a type I BRAF inhibitor could further enhance the effects of sotorasib withdrawal on sotorasib-resistant cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS
We elucidated the mechanisms underlying the sotorasib addiction of cancer cells. Sotorasib addiction appears to be mediated through MAPK pathway hyperactivity, DNA damage, replication stress, and mitotic catastrophe. Moreover, we devised a therapeutic strategy involving a type I BRAF inhibitor to strengthen the effects of sotorasib addiction; this strategy may provide clinical benefit for patients with cancer.
Topics: United States; Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Lung Neoplasms; DNA Replication
PubMed: 37386628
DOI: 10.1186/s12929-023-00940-4 -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2023Aging is a natural, gradual, and inevitable process associated with a series of changes at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels that can lead to an increased risk... (Review)
Review
Aging is a natural, gradual, and inevitable process associated with a series of changes at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels that can lead to an increased risk of many diseases, including cancer. The most significant changes at the genomic level (DNA damage, telomere shortening, epigenetic changes) and non-genomic changes are referred to as hallmarks of aging. The hallmarks of aging and cancer are intertwined. Many studies have focused on genomic hallmarks, but non-genomic hallmarks are also important and may additionally cause genomic damage and increase the expression of genomic hallmarks. Understanding the non-genomic hallmarks of aging and cancer, and how they are intertwined, may lead to the development of approaches that could influence these hallmarks and thus function not only to slow aging but also to prevent cancer. In this review, we focus on non-genomic changes. We discuss cell senescence, disruption of proteostasis, deregualation of nutrient sensing, dysregulation of immune system function, intercellular communication, mitochondrial dysfunction, stem cell exhaustion and dysbiosis.
Topics: Humans; Aging; Cellular Senescence; Cell Communication; Telomere Shortening; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37895144
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015468 -
Nature Nov 2023In eukaryotes, repetitive DNA sequences are transcriptionally silenced through histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3). Loss of silencing of the repeat elements...
In eukaryotes, repetitive DNA sequences are transcriptionally silenced through histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3). Loss of silencing of the repeat elements leads to genome instability and human diseases, including cancer and ageing. Although the role of H3K9me3 in the establishment and maintenance of heterochromatin silencing has been extensively studied, the pattern and mechanism that underlie the partitioning of parental H3K9me3 at replicating DNA strands are unknown. Here we report that H3K9me3 is preferentially transferred onto the leading strands of replication forks, which occurs predominantly at long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) retrotransposons (also known as LINE-1s or L1s) that are theoretically transcribed in the head-on direction with replication fork movement. Mechanistically, the human silencing hub (HUSH) complex interacts with the leading-strand DNA polymerase Pol ε and contributes to the asymmetric segregation of H3K9me3. Cells deficient in Pol ε subunits (POLE3 and POLE4) or the HUSH complex (MPP8 and TASOR) show compromised H3K9me3 asymmetry and increased LINE expression. Similar results were obtained in cells expressing a MPP8 mutant defective in H3K9me3 binding and in TASOR mutants with reduced interactions with Pol ε. These results reveal an unexpected mechanism whereby the HUSH complex functions with Pol ε to promote asymmetric H3K9me3 distribution at head-on LINEs to suppress their expression in S phase.
Topics: Humans; DNA Replication; Gene Silencing; Histones; Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements; Lysine; Methylation; S Phase
PubMed: 37938774
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06711-3 -
The EMBO Journal Nov 2023Sequences that form DNA secondary structures, such as G-quadruplexes (G4s) and intercalated-Motifs (iMs), are abundant in the human genome and play various physiological...
Sequences that form DNA secondary structures, such as G-quadruplexes (G4s) and intercalated-Motifs (iMs), are abundant in the human genome and play various physiological roles. However, they can also interfere with replication and threaten genome stability. Multiple lines of evidence suggest G4s inhibit replication, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Moreover, evidence of how iMs affect the replisome is lacking. Here, we reconstitute replication of physiologically derived structure-forming sequences to find that a single G4 or iM arrest DNA replication. Direct single-molecule structure detection within solid-state nanopores reveals structures form as a consequence of replication. Combined genetic and biophysical characterisation establishes that structure stability and probability of structure formation are key determinants of replisome arrest. Mechanistically, replication arrest is caused by impaired synthesis, resulting in helicase-polymerase uncoupling. Significantly, iMs also induce breakage of nascent DNA. Finally, stalled forks are only rescued by a specialised helicase, Pif1, but not Rrm3, Sgs1, Chl1 or Hrq1. Altogether, we provide a mechanism for quadruplex structure formation and resolution during replication and highlight G4s and iMs as endogenous sources of replication stress.
Topics: Humans; DNA; G-Quadruplexes; Genome, Human; Nucleotidyltransferases; DNA Replication
PubMed: 37781931
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2023114334 -
Current Opinion in Structural Biology Aug 2023Eukaryotic DNA replication is performed by the replisome, a large and dynamic multi-protein machine endowed with the required enzymatic components for the synthesis of... (Review)
Review
Eukaryotic DNA replication is performed by the replisome, a large and dynamic multi-protein machine endowed with the required enzymatic components for the synthesis of new DNA. Recent cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) analyses have revealed the conserved architecture of the core eukaryotic replisome, comprising the CMG (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) DNA helicase, the leading-strand DNA polymerase epsilon, the Timeless-Tipin heterodimer, the hub protein AND-1 and the checkpoint protein Claspin. These results bid well for arriving soon at an integrated understanding of the structural basis of semi-discontinuous DNA replication. They further set the scene for the characterisation of the mechanisms that interface DNA synthesis with concurrent processes such as DNA repair, propagation of chromatin structure and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.
Topics: DNA Helicases; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; DNA Replication; DNA; Eukaryota; Cell Cycle Proteins
PubMed: 37244171
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102612 -
Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) Dec 2023In eukaryotic genomes, hundreds to thousands of potential start sites of DNA replication named origins are dispersed across each of the linear chromosomes. During... (Review)
Review
In eukaryotic genomes, hundreds to thousands of potential start sites of DNA replication named origins are dispersed across each of the linear chromosomes. During S-phase, only a subset of origins is selected in a stochastic manner to assemble bidirectional replication forks and initiate DNA synthesis. Despite substantial progress in our understanding of this complex process, a comprehensive 'identity code' that defines origins based on specific nucleotide sequences, DNA structural features, the local chromatin environment, or 3D genome architecture is still missing. In this article, we review the genetic and epigenetic features of replication origins in yeast and metazoan chromosomes and highlight recent insights into how this flexibility in origin usage contributes to nuclear organization, cell growth, differentiation, and genome stability.
Topics: Animals; Replication Origin; DNA Replication; Chromatin; DNA; Saccharomyces cerevisiae
PubMed: 37469113
DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2229642 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023Replicative DNA polymerases are blocked by nearly all types of DNA damage. The resulting DNA replication stress threatens genome stability. DNA replication stress is... (Review)
Review
Replicative DNA polymerases are blocked by nearly all types of DNA damage. The resulting DNA replication stress threatens genome stability. DNA replication stress is also caused by depletion of nucleotide pools, DNA polymerase inhibitors, and DNA sequences or structures that are difficult to replicate. Replication stress triggers complex cellular responses that include cell cycle arrest, replication fork collapse to one-ended DNA double-strand breaks, induction of DNA repair, and programmed cell death after excessive damage. Replication stress caused by specific structures (e.g., G-rich sequences that form G-quadruplexes) is localized but occurs during the S phase of every cell division. This review focuses on cellular responses to widespread stress such as that caused by random DNA damage, DNA polymerase inhibition/nucleotide pool depletion, and R-loops. Another form of global replication stress is seen in cancer cells and is termed oncogenic stress, reflecting dysregulated replication origin firing and/or replication fork progression. Replication stress responses are often dysregulated in cancer cells, and this too contributes to ongoing genome instability that can drive cancer progression. Nucleases play critical roles in replication stress responses, including MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, FEN1, and TATDN2. Several of these nucleases cleave branched DNA structures at stressed replication forks to promote repair and restart of these forks. We recently defined roles for EEPD1 in restarting stressed replication forks after oxidative DNA damage, and for TATDN2 in mitigating replication stress caused by R-loop accumulation in BRCA1-defective cells. We also discuss how insights into biological responses to genome-wide replication stress can inform novel cancer treatment strategies that exploit synthetic lethal relationships among replication stress response factors.
Topics: Humans; DNA Replication; DNA Repair; DNA Damage; Endonucleases; Genomic Instability; DNA; Nucleotides
PubMed: 38069223
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316903 -
Nucleic Acids Research Aug 2023The discovery of reverse transcriptases (RTs) challenged the central dogma by establishing that genetic information can also flow from RNA to DNA. Although they act as...
The discovery of reverse transcriptases (RTs) challenged the central dogma by establishing that genetic information can also flow from RNA to DNA. Although they act as DNA polymerases, RTs are distantly related to replicases that also possess de novo primase activity. Here we identify that CRISPR associated RTs (CARTs) directly prime DNA synthesis on both RNA and DNA. We demonstrate that RT-dependent priming is utilized by some CRISPR-Cas complexes to synthesise new spacers and integrate these into CRISPR arrays. Expanding our analyses, we show that primer synthesis activity is conserved in representatives of other major RT classes, including group II intron RT, telomerase and retroviruses. Together, these findings establish a conserved innate ability of RTs to catalyse de novo DNA primer synthesis, independently of accessory domains or alternative priming mechanisms, which likely plays important roles in a wide variety of biological pathways.
Topics: DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; Introns; Retroviridae; RNA; RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase; DNA Replication
PubMed: 37279911
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad478