-
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice Dec 2023Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, affects one per 100 000 births, increasing lifetime cancer risk by 9 - 50%. Around 40-60% of JPS... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, affects one per 100 000 births, increasing lifetime cancer risk by 9 - 50%. Around 40-60% of JPS cases are caused by disease-causing variants (DCV) in SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, of which SMAD4 accounts for 20-30%.
OBJECTIVES
To characterise genotype-phenotype correlations between sites and types of variants within SMAD4 to JPS phenotypes, to inform diagnosis, screening, and management of JPS.
SEARCH METHODS
Online search databases utilised included Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic + Embase and PubMed, using search terms classified by MeSH on Demand. Adjacency operators, word truncation and Boolean operators were employed. 110 articles were included in the review, collating 291 variants from the literature.
RESULTS
In SMAD4 + JPS patients, most variants are located around SMAD4's MH2 domain (3' end). Extracolonic involvement, massive gastric polyposis and a more aggressive phenotype have been associated with SMAD4 + JPS, predisposing to gastric cancer. This has contributed to an overall higher incidence of GI cancers compared to other genes causing JPS, with DCVs mostly all within the MH2 domain. Genetically related allelic disorders of SMAD4 also have variants in this region, including hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) alongside SMAD4 + JPS, and Myhre syndrome, independent of JPS. Similarly, with DCVs in the MH2 domain, Ménétrier's disease, hypertrophic osteoarthropathy and juvenile idiopathic arthritis have been seen in this population, whereas cardiac pathologies have occurred both alongside and independently of SMAD4 + JPS with DCVs in the MH1 domain.
CONCLUSION
Truncating and missense variants around the MH2 region of SMAD4 are most prevalent and pathogenic, thus should undergo careful surveillance. Given association with extracolonic polyposis and higher GI cancer risk, endoscopic screening should occur more frequently and at an earlier age in SMAD4 + JPS patients than in patients with other causative genes, with consideration of Ménétrier's disease on upper GI endoscopy. In addition, HHT should be evaluated within 6 months of diagnosis, alongside targeted clinical examination for extraintestinal manifestations associated with SMAD4 + JPS. This review may help modify clinical diagnosis and management of SMAD4 + JPS patients, and aid pathogenicity classification for SMAD4 DCVs through a better understanding of the phenotypes.
PubMed: 38066625
DOI: 10.1186/s13053-023-00267-z -
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Oct 2023
-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023Disorders of immunity are poorly recognised in some rare multisystem genetic conditions. We aim to describe syndromic features and immunological defects in children with...
BACKGROUND
Disorders of immunity are poorly recognised in some rare multisystem genetic conditions. We aim to describe syndromic features and immunological defects in children with syndromic primary immunodeficiencies (sPIDs).
METHODS
This is a retrospective descriptive study of children aged 0-18 years with sPIDs under the care of the paediatric immunology service at the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, United Kingdom, from January 2006 to September 2021.
RESULTS
sPIDs were identified in 36 patients. Genetic diagnoses which are not commonly associated with PIDs and not included in the International Union of Immunological Societies classification were present in 7/36 (19%): Trisomy 22, Arboleda-Tham syndrome, 2p16.3 deletion syndrome, supernumerary ring chromosome 20 syndrome, Myhre syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy/Cockayne syndrome complex. Recurrent and/or severe infections were the most common clinical features (n = 33, 92%). Approximately half had combined immunodeficiency or antibody deficiency. The most common extra-immunological manifestations include dysmorphism (72%), disorders of nervous (78%), musculoskeletal (69%), haematology/lymphatic (58%), and gastrointestinal, hepatic/pancreatic (58%) systems.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with sPIDs often have multiorgan involvement and some are non-immunologically mediated. There should be a low threshold to clinically assess and investigate for disorders of immunity in any patients with syndromic features especially when they present with recurrent/severe/opportunistic infections, features of immune dysregulation, autoinflammation or lymphoproliferation.
PubMed: 37568366
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154964