-
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Using Circulating DNA and RNA: Advances, Challenges, and Possibilities.Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science Aug 2023Prenatal screening using sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA has transformed obstetric care over the past decade and significantly reduced the number of invasive... (Review)
Review
Prenatal screening using sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA has transformed obstetric care over the past decade and significantly reduced the number of invasive diagnostic procedures like amniocentesis for genetic disorders. Nonetheless, emergency care remains the only option for complications like preeclampsia and preterm birth, two of the most prevalent obstetrical syndromes. Advances in noninvasive prenatal testing expand the scope of precision medicine in obstetric care. In this review, we discuss advances, challenges, and possibilities toward the goal of providing proactive, personalized prenatal care. The highlighted advances focus mainly on cell-free nucleic acids; however, we also review research that uses signals from metabolomics, proteomics, intact cells, and the microbiome. We discuss ethical challenges in providing care. Finally, we look to future possibilities, including redefining disease taxonomy and moving from biomarker correlation to biological causation.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing; Genetic Testing; Aneuploidy; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; RNA; Premature Birth
PubMed: 37196360
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-094144 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Apr 2024Although the clinical work-up of CMV in pregnancy has gradually become more accurate, counseling for CMV is still challenging. Despite the potential feasibility of... (Review)
Review
Although the clinical work-up of CMV in pregnancy has gradually become more accurate, counseling for CMV is still challenging. Despite the potential feasibility of universal prenatal serological screening, its introduction in prenatal diagnosis continues to raise concerns related to its real cost-effectiveness. Contextually, anticipating the confirmation of fetal infection earlier in pregnancy is one of the most pressing issues to reduce the parental psychological burden. Amniocentesis is still the gold standard and recent data have demonstrated that it could be performed before 20 weeks of gestation, provided that at least 8 weeks have elapsed from the presumed date of maternal seroconversion. New approaches, such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and virome DNA, even if not yet validated as confirmation of fetal infection, have been studied alternatively to amniocentesis to reduce the time-interval from maternal seroconversion and the amniocentesis results. Risk stratification for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and long-term sequelae should be provided according to the prognostic predictors. Nevertheless, in the era of valacyclovir, maternal high-dose therapy, mainly for first trimester infections, can reduce the risk of vertical transmission and increase the likelihood of asymptomatic newborns, but it is still unclear whether valacyclovir continues to exert a beneficial effect on fetuses with positive amniocentesis. This review provides updated evidence-based key counseling points with GRADE recommendations.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Perinatology; Valacyclovir; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Amniocentesis; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Counseling
PubMed: 38310675
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.037 -
American Journal of Perinatology May 2024Approximately, 2% of women who undergo chorionic villi sampling (CVS) will subsequently undergo amniocentesis due to placental mosaicism or sampling/laboratory...
OBJECTIVE
Approximately, 2% of women who undergo chorionic villi sampling (CVS) will subsequently undergo amniocentesis due to placental mosaicism or sampling/laboratory issues. Our objective was to compare obstetric outcomes in women who underwent both procedures with those who had CVS alone.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective case-control study of patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing invasive testing from 2010 to 2020 was performed. All women who underwent CVS followed by amniocentesis were compared with a control group who underwent CVS alone matched (2:1) for age and year of pregnancy. Women with pregnancy loss at <16 weeks were excluded from the control group. Pregnancies terminated for genetic abnormalities were excluded. Obstetric outcomes were compared between cases and controls. Student -test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical comparison.
RESULTS
During the study period 2,539 women underwent CVS, and 66 (2.6%) subsequently underwent amniocentesis. The 66 cases were compared with 132 age-matched controls who underwent CVS alone. Mean maternal age was 36.8 ± 3.4 years, and 43% of women were nulliparous. Amniocentesis was performed due to sampling or laboratory issues in 33% of cases, placental mosaicism in 44%, and further diagnostic testing in 23%. There were no pregnancy losses or stillbirths in either group. Those who had two invasive procedures delivered at similar gestational ages and birthweights and did not have higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those who underwent CVS alone.
CONCLUSION
Patients considering CVS who are concerned about the possibility that a second invasive procedure could be required should be reassured that this does not appear to be associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes. Due to study size, we cannot exclude the possibility of small differences in uncommon outcomes, such as pregnancy loss or stillbirth.
KEY POINTS
· Amniocentesis may be recommended after CVS due to mosaicism, sampling issues, or further testing.. · Amniocentesis after CVS is not associated with pregnancy loss or other adverse outcomes compared.. · Patients who have both CVS and amniocentesis deliver at similar gestational ages and birthweights..
Topics: Humans; Amniocentesis; Female; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Chorionic Villi Sampling; Case-Control Studies; Mosaicism; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 35240697
DOI: 10.1055/a-1787-6785 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Oct 2023Valacyclovir is the only treatment demonstrated to be effective for the prevention of vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus within a clinical randomized,...
BACKGROUND
Valacyclovir is the only treatment demonstrated to be effective for the prevention of vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus within a clinical randomized, placebo-controlled trial and has been reimbursed by the Italian National Health System since December 2020.
OBJECTIVE
This study reported the results of a real-life Italian multicenter observational study on cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy evaluating the effect of the introduction of valacyclovir in the clinical practice for the prevention of vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus.
STUDY DESIGN
The outcomes of women who received valacyclovir treatment and their fetuses or newborns were compared with those of a retrospective cohort observed between 2010 and 2020 who did not receive the antiviral treatment. The inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus primary infection occurring in the periconceptional period or up to 24 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the transmission by the time of amniocentesis. The secondary outcomes were termination of pregnancy, transmission at birth, symptomatic infection at birth, and a composite outcome (termination of pregnancy or transmission at birth).
RESULTS
A total of 447 pregnant women from 10 centers were enrolled, 205 women treated with valacyclovir (called the valacyclovir group, including 1 twin pregnancy) and 242 women not treated with valacyclovir (called the no-valacyclovir group, including 2 twin pregnancies). Valacyclovir treatment was significantly associated with a reduction of the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by the time of amniocentesis (weighted odds ratio, 0.39; 90% confidence interval, 0.22-0.68; P=.005; relative reduction of 61%), termination of pregnancy (weighted odds ratio, 0.36; 90% confidence interval, 0.17-0.75; P=.0021; relative reduction of 64%), symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth (weighted odds ratio, 0.17; 90% confidence interval, 0.06-0.49; P=.006; relative reduction of 83%). The treatment had no significant effect on the rate of diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth (weighted odds ratio, 0.85; 90% confidence interval, 0.57-1.26; P=.500), but the composite outcome (termination of pregnancy or diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth) occurred more frequently in the no-valacyclovir group (weighted odds ratio, 0.62; 90% confidence interval, 0.44-0.88; P=.024). Of note, the only symptomatic newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in the valacyclovir group (n=3) were among those with positive amniocentesis. Moreover, 19 women (9.3%) reported an adverse reaction to valacyclovir treatment, classified as mild in 17 cases and moderate in 2 cases. Lastly, 4 women (1.9%) presented renal toxicity with a slight increase in creatinine level, which was reversible after treatment suspension.
CONCLUSION
Our real-life data confirm that valacyclovir significantly reduces the rate of congenital cytomegalovirus diagnosis at the time of amniocentesis with a good tolerability profile and show that the treatment is associated with a reduction of termination of pregnancy and symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth.
PubMed: 37516151
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101101 -
Viruses Oct 2023Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant health concern affecting numerous expectant mothers across the globe. CMV is the leading cause of health problems and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant health concern affecting numerous expectant mothers across the globe. CMV is the leading cause of health problems and developmental delays among infected infants. Notably, this study examines CMV infection in pregnancy, its management, prevention mechanisms, and treatment options.
METHODS
Specifically, information from the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, Wiley Online, Science Direct, and Taylor Francis databases were reviewed along with additional records identified through the register, the Google Scholar search engine. Based on the search, 21 articles were identified for systematic review.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were utilized for a meta-analytic review. As heterogeneity was substantial, the random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Utilizing the random-effects model, the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach, the estimate of effect size (d = -0.479, 95% CI = -0.977 to 0.019, = 0.060) suggests the results are not statistically significant, so it cannot be inferred that the prevention methods used were effective, despite an inverse relationship between treatment and number of infected cases. The findings indicated that several techniques are used to prevent, diagnose, and manage CMV infection during pregnancy, including proper hygiene, ultrasound examination (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amniocentesis, viremia, hyperimmunoglobulin (HIG), and valacyclovir (VACV).
CONCLUSIONS
The current review has significant implications for addressing CMV infection in pregnancy. Specifically, it provides valuable findings on contemporary management interventions to prevent and treat CMV infection among expectant mothers. Therefore, it allows relevant stakeholders to address these critical health concerns and understand the effectiveness of the proposed prevention and treatment options.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Amniocentesis; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical
PubMed: 38005820
DOI: 10.3390/v15112142