-
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Nov 2023Advanced Parkinson's disease is characterized by periods of poor mobility, dyskinesia and progressive decline in functional independence of the affected person despite... (Review)
Review
Advanced Parkinson's disease is characterized by periods of poor mobility, dyskinesia and progressive decline in functional independence of the affected person despite the manipulation of levodopa doses and the introduction of supplemental therapies such as catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors and dopamine agonists. The implementation of drug delivery systems allows to bypass problems related to irregular and often unpredictable intestinal absorption of oral levodopa, which significantly affects its bioavailability and contributes to the development and persistence of motor complications. Subcutaneous apomorphine and levodopa/carbidopa jejunal infusion systems have been available for many years and their efficacy is confirmed by randomized studies and long-term experience in many centers worldwide. Recently, a new formulation of levodopa/carbidopa infusion gel that includes the catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor Entacapone has been introduced to the market. The use of entacapone allows to reduce total daily dose of administered levodopa. Two different soluble formulations of levodopa/carbidopa (ND0612 and ABBV-951) have completed clinical development, and both can ensure subcutaneous delivery by a portable pump infusion system. ABBV-951 uses a foslevodopa/foscarbidopa formulation, both prodrugs to improve absorption and tolerability. Both systems provide effective improvement of motor complications and are likely to expand the therapeutic options in advanced patients. Future efforts should focus on the earlier detection of patients who are candidates for device-aided therapies, increasing appropriate referral and broadening the availability of these treatments globally.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Levodopa; Carbidopa; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechols; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Combinations
PubMed: 37672049
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02693-8 -
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Nov 2023Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many... (Review)
Review
Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many decades. Two of the oldest drugs used appear more effective than others-levodopa and apomorphine-but the reasons for this are seldom discussed and this may be one cause for a lack of progress. This short review questions current thinking on drug action and looks at whether adopting the philosophy of ex-US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld reveals 'unknown' aspects of the actions of levodopa and apomorphine that provide clues for a way forward. It appears that both levodopa and apomorphine have a more complex pharmacology than classical views would suggest. In addition, there are unexpected facets to the mechanisms through which levodopa acts that are either forgotten as 'known unknowns' or ignored as 'unknown unknowns'. The conclusion reached is that we may not know as much as we think about drug action in PD and there is a case for looking beyond the obvious.
Topics: Humans; Apomorphine; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine
PubMed: 37210460
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02655-0 -
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Nov 2023Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion is a device-aided therapy for Parkinson's disease that can be considered when motor fluctuations become persistent and are no longer... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion is a device-aided therapy for Parkinson's disease that can be considered when motor fluctuations become persistent and are no longer adequately controlled by oral/transdermal medication. Apomorphine infusion is less invasive than enteral levodopa, deep brain stimulation or focused ultrasound, and is often indicated even when neurosurgical approaches are contraindicated. This article aims to provide practical guidance for doctors and nurses initiating and treating patients with apomorphine infusion, and is based on both trial data and clinical experience from movement disorders specialists. A post hoc analysis of data from the TOLEDO randomized clinical trial of apomorphine infusion was conducted along with an analysis of 'real world' experience from 13 movement disorders specialists using a questionnaire that focused on starting patients on apomorphine infusion. Practical guidelines for starting treatment with apomorphine infusion are provided taking into consideration the regional disparities in healthcare. Apomorphine infusion is straightforward to administer but to be successful it requires concordance from the patient and family, and clinical support from an experienced team of doctors and nurses, particularly in the early months of treatment.
Topics: Humans; Apomorphine; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Levodopa; Infusions, Parenteral
PubMed: 37658155
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02686-7 -
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2023A high burden of motor and non-motor parkinsonian symptoms is known to have a significant negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of people with Parkinson's disease... (Review)
Review
A high burden of motor and non-motor parkinsonian symptoms is known to have a significant negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Effective control of these symptoms with therapies that enable patients to maintain a good QoL is therefore a key treatment goal in PD management. When symptom control can no longer be accomplished with oral or transdermal PD treatment regimens, device-aided therapies (DAT), namely levodopa and apomorphine infusion therapies, and deep brain stimulation, are valuable options to consider. DAT options may also help reduce pill burden and thereby improve compliance with treatment. Since PD therapy relies on symptomatic management, the efficacy and tolerability of any intervention is undoubtedly important, however the impact of different therapies on patient-related outcome measures, in particular health-related QoL, is also a critical consideration for those living with a chronic and disabling condition. This review discusses clinical evidence and ongoing research regarding the QoL benefits of levodopa and apomorphine infusion therapies from studies that have used validated QoL outcome measures. The data suggest that timing of these interventions is important to achieve optimal treatment effects, and that early initiation onto infusion therapies at the point when motor fluctuations emerge, and before patient QoL and functioning have significantly declined, may provide the best long-term outcomes. Healthcare professionals caring for people with PD should therefore discuss all available DAT options with them at an early stage in the course of their disease so they can make informed and timely choices that best suit them, their families and care network.
PubMed: 37727253
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S422717 -
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Nov 2023Device-aided therapies (DAT), which include deep brain stimulation and pump-based continuous dopaminergic stimulation with either levodopa or apomorphine, are among the... (Review)
Review
Device-aided therapies (DAT), which include deep brain stimulation and pump-based continuous dopaminergic stimulation with either levodopa or apomorphine, are among the major advances in the clinical management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although DAT are being increasingly offered earlier in the disease course, their classical indication remains advanced PD. Theoretically, every patient should be offered transition to DAT when faced with refractory motor and nonmotor fluctuations and functional decline. Worldwide clinical reality is far from these ideal, and, therefore, question the "real-world" equal opportunity of access to DAT for PD patients with advanced PD-even within a single health care system. Differences in access to care, referral pattern (timing and frequency), as well as physician biases (unconscious/implicit or conscious/explicit bias), and patients' preferences or health-seeking behaviour are to be considered. Compared to DBS, little information is available concerning infusion therapies, as well as neurologists' and patients' attitudes towards them. This viewpoint aims to be thought-provoking and to assist clinicians in moving through the process of DAT selection, by including in their decision algorithm their own biases, patient perspective, ethical concerns as well as the current unknowns surrounding PD prognosis and DAT-related long-term side effects for a given patient.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Prognosis; Patient Preference; Uncertainty; Levodopa; Deep Brain Stimulation
PubMed: 37436446
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02668-9 -
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Jun 2023Comparative studies assessing outcomes with the three device-assisted therapies could help to individualise treatment for patients living with Parkinson's disease. We...
Comparative studies assessing outcomes with the three device-assisted therapies could help to individualise treatment for patients living with Parkinson's disease. We designed a single-centre non-randomised prospective observational study assessing the quality of life (QoL), motor and non-motor outcomes at 6 and 12-months in patients treated with subcutaneous apomorphine continuous 16-hours infusion (APO), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) or subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). In this study, 66 patients were included (13 APO; 19 LCIG; 34 STN-DBS). At baseline, cognitive, non-motor and motor scores were significantly less severe in the STN-DBS group, whereas the LCIG group had a longer disease duration and higher non-motor scores. In the APO group, there were no statistically significant changes in non-motor, motor and QoL scales. The LCIG group had significant changes in QoL and motor scales that were significant after multiple comparison analysis at 6 and 12-months. The STN-DBS group showed improvement in QoL scores and non-motor and motor scores at 6 and 12-months after multiple comparison analysis. In this real-life prospective study, device-assisted therapies showed differences in their effects on QoL and motor and non-motor function at 12-months. However, there were also differences in baseline characteristics of the patient groups that were not based on pre-determined selection criteria. Differences in characteristics of patients offered and/or treatment with different device-assisted therapies may reflect within-centre biases that may, in turn, influence perceptions of treatment efficacy or outcomes. Treatment centres should be aware of this potential confounder when assessing and offering device-assisted treatment options to their patients and potential baseline differences need to be taken into consideration when comparing the results of non-randomised studies.
PubMed: 37386050
DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00525-w -
Clinical and Translational Science May 2024Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal solution could offer a non-invasive and user-friendly alternative. This two-part clinical study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dose proportionality of a novel apomorphine hydrochloride oromucosal solution, as well as its relative bioavailability to subcutaneous apomorphine injection and apomorphine sublingual film. In part A of the study, 12 patients with PD received 2 mg oromucosal apomorphine (4% weight/volume) and 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 4 and 8 mg oromucosal apomorphine. In part B of the study, 13 patients with PD received 7 mg oromucosal apomorphine (7% weight/volume) and 30 mg sublingual apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine. Washout between dose administrations in both study parts was at least 2 days. Safety, tolerability, and PK were assessed pre- and post-dose. Both study parts showed that oromucosal apomorphine was generally well-tolerated. Observed side effects were typical for apomorphine administration and included asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, yawning, fatigue, and somnolence. Oromucosal apomorphine exposure increased with dose, although less than dose proportional. The mean (SD) maximum exposure reached with 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine was 753.0 (298.6) ng*min/mL (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) and 8.0 (3.3) ng/mL (maximum plasma concentration). This was comparable to exposure reached after 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine and approximately half of the exposure observed with 30 mg sublingual apomorphine. In summary, clinically relevant plasma concentrations could be reached in PD patients without tolerability issues.
Topics: Humans; Apomorphine; Parkinson Disease; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Aged; Administration, Sublingual; Injections, Subcutaneous; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Administration, Oral; Biological Availability; Antiparkinson Agents; Cross-Over Studies
PubMed: 38712716
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13796 -
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Nov 2023Continuous drug delivery (CDD) has emerged as a feasible and pragmatic therapeutic option for dopamine replacement therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). CDD aims... (Review)
Review
Continuous drug delivery (CDD) has emerged as a feasible and pragmatic therapeutic option for dopamine replacement therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). CDD aims to mimic the physiological tonic dopamine release from striatal dopaminergic neurons and thus reduces the severity and duration of motor and non-motor fluctuations partly related to pulsatile levodopa stimulation. Non-motor symptoms and fluctuations are ubiquitous in PD and include sleep dysfunction, a problem that occurs in over 90% of PD patients across all stages, from prodromal to palliative. In this review, we discuss the currently available and in development non-oral dopaminergic CDD strategies with a focus on their efficacy in the treatment of the burdensome sleep dysfunction in PD.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine; Levodopa; Sleep Wake Disorders; Sleep
PubMed: 37126118
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02640-7 -
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements... 2023Task specific tremor (TST) is a poorly understood entity without any standard treatments, that may subsequently develop tremor during additional tasks, later develop...
BACKGROUND
Task specific tremor (TST) is a poorly understood entity without any standard treatments, that may subsequently develop tremor during additional tasks, later develop postural/kinetic tremor (essential tremor criteria), and later develop Parkinson's disease. The pathophysiology is not understood as it has features of tremor, dystonia, and parkinsonism.
OBJECTIVES
To assess response of TST to apomorphine and thus infer pathophysiology.
METHODS
We administered sublingual apomorphine to 8 patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease based on clinical criteria and dopamine imaging, who all initially presented with TST and later presented other parkinsonian signs and dopamine imaging deficits.
RESULTS
Apomorphine improved TST, which was refractory to oral levodopa and other tremor therapies, in 6/8 subjects.
DISCUSSION
These results offer a treatment option for TST, which is usually refractory to other pharmacologic treatments, in patients with other parkinsonian features, and infers a dopaminergic pathophysiology of TST.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Apomorphine; Tremor; Dopamine; Levodopa
PubMed: 37275945
DOI: 10.5334/tohm.764