-
American Journal of Respiratory and... Dec 2023Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg ( < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time ( < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).
Topics: Humans; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Sleep; Polysomnography; Fatigue; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Muscarinic Antagonists
PubMed: 37812772
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1036OC -
Medicina Sep 2023Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder of biological origin with a 70 to 80% genetic basis, which affects 5% of children and... (Review)
Review
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder of biological origin with a 70 to 80% genetic basis, which affects 5% of children and adolescents and 2.5% of adults, whose main symptoms are inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. For many years it was thought that it only affected children; currently in the DSM 5 it is accepted that it can be diagnosed in adolescents and adults. Treatment must be individualized, the main objectives are to improve the core symptoms of people with ADHD, and their quality of life. The therapeutic approach is psychological, behavioral, and pharmacological. Medications are classified as stimulants and nonstimulants, with stimulants such as methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and dexamphetamine being the first line. Non-stimulants include guanfacine and atomoxetine. Treatment is essential because it improves the quality of life of the person at the family, educational, work, and social levels.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Quality of Life; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Educational Status; Guanfacine
PubMed: 37714121
DOI: No ID Found -
CNS Drugs Jul 2023In our outpatient pediatric and adult psychiatry centers, we reserve psychostimulants for predominantly inattentive attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) due...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
In our outpatient pediatric and adult psychiatry centers, we reserve psychostimulants for predominantly inattentive attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) due to the potential for appetite and growth suppression, insomnia, wear off, exacerbation of mood, anxiety, and tics, or misuse. We utilize extended-release (ER) alpha-2 agonists primarily for hyperactivity/impulsivity but find them less effective for inattention, and they can cause sedation and hypotension. Oftentimes, we need to combine an alpha-2 agonist for behavior with psychostimulants for inattention. We employ atomoxetine or viloxazine ER (VER) for combined ADHD. However, our patients' insurers mandate a trial of generic atomoxetine prior to covering branded VER. The objective of this study was to determine whether pediatric and adult patients taking atomoxetine for DSM-5-TR ADHD combined type would experience improvement in ADHD symptoms following voluntary, open-label switch to VER.
METHODS
50 patients (35 children) received mean doses of atomoxetine 60 mg (25-100 mg once daily) followed by VER 300 mg (100-600 mg once daily) after a 5-day atomoxetine washout. Both atomoxetine and VER were flexibly titrated according to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. The pediatric ADHD-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and the Adult Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) were completed prior to starting atomoxetine, and 4 weeks after treatment with atomoxetine or upon earlier response or discontinuation due to side effects, whichever occurred first; the same protocol was used after treatment with VER. We conducted a blinded, de-identified, retrospective review of charts from these 50 patients in the regular course of outpatient practice. Statistical analysis was performed using a within-subject, 2-tailed t-test with significance level of p < 0.05.
RESULTS
From the baseline total ADHD-RS-5 mean score (40.3 ± 10.3), improvements were greater on VER (13.9 ± 10.2) than atomoxetine (33.1 ± 12.1; t = - 10.12, p < 0.00001) in inattention (t = - 8.57, p < 0.00001) and in hyperactivity/impulsivity (t = - 9.87, p < 0.00001). From the baseline total AISRS mean score (37.3 ± 11.8), improvements were greater on VER (11.9 ± 9.4) than atomoxetine (28.8 ± 14.9; t = - 4.18, p = 0.0009) in inattention (t = - 3.50, p < 0.004) and in hyperactivity/impulsivity (t = - 3.90, p < 0.002). Of patients on VER, 86% reported positive response by 2 weeks versus 14% on atomoxetine. A total of 36% discontinued atomoxetine for side effects, including gastrointestinal (GI) upset (6 patients), irritability (6), fatigue (5), and insomnia (1), versus 4% who discontinued VER due to fatigue. A total of 96% preferred VER over atomoxetine, with 85% (22 out of 26) choosing to taper psychostimulants following stabilization on VER.
CONCLUSIONS
Pediatric and adult ADHD patients who have experienced less than optimal response to atomoxetine demonstrate rapid improvement in inattention and in hyperactivity/impulsivity with greater tolerability on extended-release viloxazine.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Viloxazine; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Retrospective Studies; Propylamines; Treatment Outcome; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37430151
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01023-6 -
Psychopharmacology Oct 2023Working memory deficits and associated neurofunctional abnormalities are frequently reported in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
RATIONALE
Working memory deficits and associated neurofunctional abnormalities are frequently reported in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate and atomoxetine improve working memory performance and increase activation of regions under-functioning in ADHD. Additionally, methylphenidate has been observed to modulate functional networks involved in working memory. No research, however, has examined the effects of atomoxetine or compared the two drugs.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to test methylphenidate and atomoxetine effects on functional connectivity during working memory in boys with ADHD.
METHODS
We tested comparative effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on functional connectivity during the n-back task in 19 medication-naïve boys with ADHD (10-15 years old) relative to placebo and assessed potential normalisation effects of brain dysfunctions under placebo relative to 20 age-matched neurotypical boys. Patients were scanned in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over design under single doses of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo. Controls were scanned once, unmedicated.
RESULTS
Patients under placebo showed abnormally increased connectivity between right superior parietal gyrus (rSPG) and left central operculum/insula. This hyperconnectivity was not observed when patients were under methylphenidate or atomoxetine. Furthermore, under methylphenidate, patients showed increased connectivity relative to controls between right middle frontal gyrus (rMFG) and cingulo-temporo-parietal and striato-thalamic regions, and between rSPG and cingulo-parietal areas. Interrogating these networks within patients revealed increased connectivity between both rMFG and rSPG and right supramarginal gyrus under methylphenidate relative to placebo. Nonetheless, no differences across drug conditions were observed within patients at whole brain level. No drug effects on performance were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows shared modulating effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on parieto-insular connectivity but exclusive effects of methylphenidate on connectivity increases in fronto-temporo-parietal and fronto-striato-thalamic networks in ADHD.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Methylphenidate; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Brain; Frontal Lobe; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 37500785
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06422-7 -
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications and Work Disability and Mental Health Outcomes.JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often have comorbid psychiatric conditions. Relatively little is known about how specific ADHD...
IMPORTANCE
Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often have comorbid psychiatric conditions. Relatively little is known about how specific ADHD medications are associated with overall treatment outcomes among these patients.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association of the use of specific ADHD medications with hospitalization outcomes and work disability among adolescents and adults with ADHD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This nationwide register-based cohort study identified individuals (aged 16-65 years) with ADHD from Swedish nationwide registers of inpatient health care, specialized outpatient health care, sickness absence, and disability pension during the years 2006 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to August 2023.
EXPOSURE
Use of specific ADHD medications.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The main outcome measure was psychiatric hospitalization, and secondary outcomes were suicide attempt and/or death by suicide, nonpsychiatric hospitalization, and work disability (ie, sickness absence or disability pension). The risk of outcomes between use vs nonuse periods of ADHD medications was compared in a within-individual design, where a person acts as their own control, and was analyzed with stratified Cox models.
RESULTS
A total of 221 714 persons with ADHD were included in the study cohort (mean [SD] age, 25.0 [11.2] years; 120 968 male individuals [54.6%]). Methylphenidate was the most commonly used ADHD medication (151 837 individuals [68.5%]), followed by lisdexamphetamine (78 106 individuals [35.2%]) during the follow-up (mean [SD], 7.0 [4.7] years). The following medications were associated with a decreased risk of psychiatric hospitalization: amphetamine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), lisdexamphetamine (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.82), ADHD drug polytherapy (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88), dexamphetamine (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94), and methylphenidate (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95). No associations were found for modafinil, atomoxetine, clonidine, and guanfacine. Decreased risk of suicidal behavior was associated with the use of dexamphetamine (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89), lisdexamphetamine (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), and methylphenidate (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98). None of the medications was associated with increased risk of nonpsychiatric hospitalization; instead, use of amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, polytherapy, dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine were associated with decreased risk of nonpsychiatric hospitalization. The results regarding work disability were significant only for the use of atomoxetine (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97), especially among adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 29 years, (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this nationwide cohort study of adolescents and adults with ADHD, the use of ADHD medication was associated with fewer hospitalizations for both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric morbidity and lower suicidal behavior.
Topics: Adolescent; Young Adult; Humans; Male; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Cohort Studies; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Methylphenidate; Amphetamine
PubMed: 38506810
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2859 -
BMJ Mental Health Apr 2024Use of psychostimulants and relative drugs has increased worldwide in treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents and adults. Recent...
BACKGROUND
Use of psychostimulants and relative drugs has increased worldwide in treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents and adults. Recent studies suggest a potential association between use of psychostimulants and psychotic symptoms. The risk may not be the same between different psychostimulants.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether amphetamine or atomoxetine use is associated with a higher risk of reporting symptoms of psychosis than methylphenidate use in adolescents and adults, particularly in patients with ADHD.
METHODS
Using VigiBase, the WHO's pharmacovigilance database, disproportionality of psychotic symptoms reporting was assessed among adverse drug reactions related to methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamines, from January 2004 to December 2018, in patients aged 13-25 years. The association between psychotic symptoms and psychostimulants was estimated through the calculation of reporting OR (ROR).
FINDINGS
Among 13 863 reports with at least one drug of interest, we found 221 cases of psychosis with methylphenidate use, 115 with atomoxetine use and 169 with a prescription of an amphetamine drug. Compared with methylphenidate use, amphetamine use was associated with an increased risk of reporting psychotic symptoms (ROR 1.61 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.06)]. When we restricted the analysis to ADHD indication, we found a close estimate (ROR 1.94 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.64)). No association was found for atomoxetine.
CONCLUSION
Our study suggests that amphetamine use is associated with a higher reporting of psychotic symptoms, compared with methylphenidate use.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The prescription of psychostimulants should consider this potential adverse effect when assessing the benefit-risk balance.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Amphetamine; Methylphenidate; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Psychotic Disorders; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
PubMed: 38609318
DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300876 -
Current Journal of Neurology Jul 2023Recent research shows that most of the patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have cognitive-like disorders. Due to the beneficial effects of atomoxetine on improving...
Recent research shows that most of the patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have cognitive-like disorders. Due to the beneficial effects of atomoxetine on improving cognition in limited animal and human surveys, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the atomoxetine on improving cognitive disorders of MS. This study was a parallel, randomized clinical trial, designed to investigate the effect of atomoxetine drug on the improvement of cognitive impairment (CI) in MS, from April 2021 to March 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 52 participants were involved in the study and then randomly divided in two groups of 26. Experimental group was treated with atomoxetine and the control group was treated with placebo. The Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) test was performed for assessment at the beginning and after 3 months. The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), the CVLT-delay, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) were used to evaluate the CI and changes following medication. Finally, data were analyzed by SPSS software at significance level of 0.05. The mean age of patients in the experimental group was 37.7 ± 8.5 and in the placebo group was 37.8 ± 7.6 (P = 0.32). The results showed significant changes in cognitive levels before and after the use of atomoxetine and also in comparison to the placebo group (P < 0.05). This study showed that atomoxetine improved the cognitive domains after administration compared to placebo.
PubMed: 38011451
DOI: 10.18502/cjn.v22i3.13792 -
Molecular Psychiatry Jan 2024The stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant atomoxetine (ATX) are frequently used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD);...
The stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant atomoxetine (ATX) are frequently used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, the function of these drugs in different types of brain cells and their effects on related genes remain largely unknown. To address these questions, we built a pipeline for the simultaneous examination of the activity behavior and transcriptional responses of Drosophila melanogaster at single-cell resolution following drug treatment. We selected the Drosophila with significantly increased locomotor activities (hyperactivity-like behavior) following the administration of each drug in comparison with the control (same food as the drug-treated groups with 5% sucrose, yeast, and blue food dye solution) using EasyFlyTracker. Subsequently, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNASEQ) was used to capture the transcriptome of 82,917 cells, unsupervised clustering analysis of which yielded 28 primary cell clusters representing the major cell types in adult Drosophila brain. Indeed, both neuronal and glial cells responded to MPH and ATX. Further analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed distinct transcriptional changes associated with these two drugs, such as two well-studied dopamine receptor genes (Dop2R and DopEcR) were responsive to MPH but not to ATX at their optimal doses, in addition to genes involved in dopamine metabolism pathways such as Syt1, Sytalpha, Syt7, and Ih in different cell types. More importantly, MPH also suppressed the expression of genes encoding other neurotransmitter receptors and synaptic signaling molecules in many cell types, especially those for Glu and GABA, while the responsive effects of ATX were much weaker. In addition to monoaminergic neuronal transmitters, other neurotransmitters have also shown a similar pattern with respect to a stronger effect associated with MPH than with ATX. Moreover, we identified four distinct glial cell subtypes responsive to the two drugs and detected a greater number of differentially expressed genes associated with ensheathing and astrocyte-like glia. Furthermore, our study provides a rich resource of candidate target genes, supported by drug set enrichment analysis (P = 2.10E-4; hypergeometric test), for the further exploration of drug repurposing. The whole list of candidates can be found at ADHDrug ( http://adhdrug.cibr.ac.cn/ ). In conclusion, we propose a fast and cost-efficient pipeline to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of ADHD drug treatment in Drosophila brain at single-cell resolution, which may further facilitate drug repurposing applications.
Topics: Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Methylphenidate; Drosophila melanogaster; Drug Repositioning; Brain; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Single-Cell Analysis; Neurons; Transcriptome; Drosophila; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Male; Neuroglia; Locomotion; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 37957291
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02314-6 -
European Review For Medical and... Feb 2024Aripiprazole, risperidone, atomoxetine, and methylphenidate are drugs commonly prescribed for many psychiatric conditions and can be used alone or in combination in...
OBJECTIVE
Aripiprazole, risperidone, atomoxetine, and methylphenidate are drugs commonly prescribed for many psychiatric conditions and can be used alone or in combination in children and adolescents. This study aimed to investigate comparatively the possible genotoxic effects or genoprotective potentials of these drugs on human lymphocytes and HepG2 cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cytotoxicity analysis was performed with the cell viability test on human lymphocytes and HepG2 cells, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of the drugs were determined, and three different doses (¼ IC50, ½ IC50, and IC50) were applied for genetic analysis. For the determined doses, cells with and without DNA damage were examined by comet analysis.
RESULTS
In lymphocytes, aripiprazole and risperidone increased DNA damage at moderate and maximum doses, whereas atomoxetine increased DNA damage only at the maximum dose. In HepG2 cells, risperidone reduced DNA damage at all doses, while atomoxetine increased DNA damage at all doses. On the other hand, in the DNA-damaged cells induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), DNA damage decreased at all concentrations of all drugs in both lymphocytes and HepG2 cells.
CONCLUSIONS
As a result, the genotoxicity of the drugs was found to be dose-dependent, and all drugs showed a genoprotective effect on DNA-damaged cells.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Risperidone; Aripiprazole; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Methylphenidate; Hep G2 Cells; Hydrogen Peroxide; DNA Damage; Lymphocytes; DNA
PubMed: 38436168
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35456 -
The British Journal of Psychiatry : the... Mar 2024Although attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often comorbid with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (SZSPD), concerns about an increased...
BACKGROUND
Although attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often comorbid with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (SZSPD), concerns about an increased risk of psychotic events have limited its treatment with either psychostimulants or atomoxetine.
AIMS
To examine whether the risk of hospital admission for psychosis in people with SZSPD was increased during the year following the introduction of such medications compared with the year before.
METHOD
This was a retrospective cohort study using Quebec (Canada) administrative health registries, including all Quebec residents with a public prescription drug insurance plan and a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, defined by relevant ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes, who initiated either methylphenidate, amphetamines or atomoxetine, between January 2010 and December 2016, in combination with antipsychotic medication. The primary outcome was time to hospital admission for psychosis within 1 year of initiation. State sequence analysis was also used to visualise admission trajectories for psychosis in the year following initiation of these medications, compared with the previous year.
RESULTS
Out of 2219 individuals, 1589 (71.6%) initiated methylphenidate, 339 (15.3%) amphetamines and 291 (13.1%) atomoxetine during the study period. After adjustment, the risk of hospital admission for psychosis was decreased during the 12 months following the introduction of these medications when used in combination with antipsychotics (adjusted HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.24-0.54; < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that, in a real-world setting, when used concurrently with antipsychotic medication, methylphenidate, amphetamines and atomoxetine may be safer than generally believed in individuals with psychotic disorders.
Topics: Humans; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Antipsychotic Agents; Clinical Deterioration; Retrospective Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Methylphenidate; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Psychotic Disorders; Amphetamines
PubMed: 38044665
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.149