-
Allergy Jul 2023Biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with rhinitis and/or asthma are urgently needed. Although some biologic biomarkers exist in specialist... (Review)
Review
Biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with rhinitis and/or asthma are urgently needed. Although some biologic biomarkers exist in specialist care for asthma, they cannot be largely used in primary care. There are no validated biomarkers in rhinitis or allergen immunotherapy (AIT) that can be used in clinical practice. The digital transformation of health and health care (including mHealth) places the patient at the center of the health system and is likely to optimize the practice of allergy. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) and EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) developed a Task Force aimed at proposing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as digital biomarkers that can be easily used for different purposes in rhinitis and asthma. It first defined control digital biomarkers that should make a bridge between clinical practice, randomized controlled trials, observational real-life studies and allergen challenges. Using the MASK-air app as a model, a daily electronic combined symptom-medication score for allergic diseases (CSMS) or for asthma (e-DASTHMA), combined with a monthly control questionnaire, was embedded in a strategy similar to the diabetes approach for disease control. To mimic real-life, it secondly proposed quality-of-life digital biomarkers including daily EQ-5D visual analogue scales and the bi-weekly RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAAP). The potential implications for the management of allergic respiratory diseases were proposed.
Topics: Humans; Rhinitis; Asthma; Rhinitis, Allergic; Respiration Disorders; Biomarkers; Patient-Centered Care
PubMed: 37042071
DOI: 10.1111/all.15740 -
Cureus Nov 2023Nasal congestion is a common issue stemming from various factors such as allergies and anatomical variations. Allergic rhinitis frequently leads to nasal congestion. The... (Review)
Review
Nasal congestion is a common issue stemming from various factors such as allergies and anatomical variations. Allergic rhinitis frequently leads to nasal congestion. The pathophysiology involves inflammation, swelling, and mucus production in the nasal mucosa. Multiple treatments are available, including oral phenylephrine, an over-the-counter or prescription option. However, the effectiveness and safety of phenylephrine have been subjects of debate. This systematic review aims to provide an updated perspective on the efficacy of oral phenylephrine versus placebo in addressing nasal congestion in adults. We conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review involving searches on PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were defined to identify high-quality studies. The focus was on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies published in English between 1998 and 2023, involving adult populations. The interventions compared oral phenylephrine with placebo or standard care, with outcomes centering on changes in nasal congestion symptoms and nasal airway resistance. We identified four articles that met the criteria. These studies exhibited varied designs and populations. The findings consistently indicated that phenylephrine was not more effective than a placebo in relieving nasal congestion. This systematic review demonstrates that oral phenylephrine did not offer substantial relief from nasal congestion compared to a placebo in adults. The studies featured diverse designs, yet the prevailing conclusion was that phenylephrine's efficacy was limited. Safety assessments showed no life-threatening adverse events, with common side effects including headaches and mild discomfort. In summary, this systematic review indicates that oral phenylephrine is not significantly more effective than a placebo in alleviating nasal congestion in adults. Clinicians should explore alternative treatment options, considering the review's limitations. Additional research may be needed to clarify the role of oral phenylephrine in managing nasal congestion.
PubMed: 38125218
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49074 -
European Review For Medical and... Oct 2023This paper aims to review biologics in allergic rhinitis (AR). Biologic agents of Omalizumab, Dupilumab, Mepolizumab, Reslizumab, and Benralizumab are reviewed in... (Review)
Review
This paper aims to review biologics in allergic rhinitis (AR). Biologic agents of Omalizumab, Dupilumab, Mepolizumab, Reslizumab, and Benralizumab are reviewed in detail. The search is performed in "Pubmed," "Google," Google Scholar" and EBSCO Academic Search Ultimate (EKUAL) database of Kırıkkale University Library from 2021 to 2000, and randomized and/or placebo-controlled studies, review papers, meta-analysis, and reports are taken into consideration. The search was performed with the keywords of "allergic rhinitis," "biologics," "biologic agents," "Omalizumab," "Dupilumab," "Mepolizumab," "Reslizumab," "Benralizumab," "Anti IgE," "Anti-IL-4/IL-13", "Anti IL-5". Search is also performed in the "U.S. Food and Drug Administration" (FDA) and "European Medicines Agency" (EMA) web systems. Biological agents such as monoclonal antibodies (MAb) in treatment are called biological therapy or biotherapy. Omalizumab is a humanized Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. Omalizumab treatment improved the Daily Nasal Rescue Medication Score (DNSSS) and decreased the use of antiallergic drugs in seasonal and perennial AR and rhino-conjunctivitis. Omalizumab is also used in specific immunotherapy patients with allergic rhinitis and reduced allergic reactions associated with allergen immunotherapy, such as anaphylaxis. Dupilumab is an Anti-IL-4/IL-13 biologic agent. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) total scores in perennial allergic rhinitis. Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies of Mepolizumab, Reslizumab Benralizumab reduce the number of eosinophils in the blood and tissue, corticosteroid addiction and asthma attacks are reduced, and their use in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma has been approved. Biologics, especially Omalizumab, and Dupilumab, may be used more in allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Asthma; Biological Products; Interleukin-13; Omalizumab; Rhinitis, Allergic
PubMed: 37869947
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202310_34069 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023Asthma is a heterogeneous and very complex group of diseases, and includes different clinical phenotypes depending on symptoms, progression, exacerbation patterns, or... (Review)
Review
Asthma is a heterogeneous and very complex group of diseases, and includes different clinical phenotypes depending on symptoms, progression, exacerbation patterns, or responses to treatment, among other characteristics. The allergic phenotype is the most frequent, especially in pediatric asthma. It is characterized by sensitization (the production of specific IgEs) to allergens and frequent comorbidity with rhinitis as well as atopic dermatitis. Given the complexity of allergic asthma, knowledge of it must be approached from different points of view: clinical, histological, physiological, epidemiological, biochemical, and immunological, among others. Since partial approaches do not allow for the understanding of this complexity, it is necessary to have multidimensional knowledge that helps in performing the optimal management of each case, avoiding a "blind men and elephant parable" approach. Allergens are antigens that trigger the production of specific IgE antibodies in susceptible individuals, who present symptoms that will depend on the type and intensity of the allergenic load as well as the tissue where the interaction occurs. Airborne allergens cause their effects in the respiratory tract and eyes, and can be indoor or outdoor, perennial, or seasonal. Although allergens such as mites, pollens, or animal dander are generally considered single particles, it is important to note that they contain different molecules which could trigger distinct specific IgE molecules in different patients. General practitioners, pediatricians, and other physicians typically diagnose and treat asthma based on clinical and pulmonary function data in their daily practice. This nonsystematic and nonexhaustive revision aims to update other topics, especially those focused on airborne allergens, helping the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of allergic asthma and rhinitis.
PubMed: 37762797
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185856