-
Translational Lung Cancer Research Jul 2023This review will provide an overview of and mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a focus on recent clinical approvals. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
This review will provide an overview of and mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a focus on recent clinical approvals.
METHODS
We obtained data from the literature in accordance with narrative review reporting guidelines.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
mutations are present in up to 15-20% of all NSCLCs; amongst these, 10% correspond to kinase domain insertions in exon 20. Structurally similar, () mutations occurs in 1-4% of NSCLCs, mostly consisting of insertions or point mutations. The majority of exon 20 insertions occur within the loop following the regulatory C-helix and activate the kinase domain of EGFR without generating a therapeutic window to gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib or osimertinib. Mobocertinib represents a novel class of covalent EGFR inhibitors with a modest therapeutic window to these mutants and induces anti-tumor responses in a portion of patients [at 160 mg/day: response rate of <30% with duration of response (DoR) >17 months and progression-free survival (PFS) of >7 months] albeit with mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicities. The bi-specific EGFR-MET antibody amivantamab-vmjw has modest but broad preclinical activity in EGFR-driven cancers and specifically for exon 20 insertion-mutated NSCLC has response rates <40% and PFS of <8.5 months at the cost of both infusion-related plus on-target toxicities. Both drugs were approved in 2021. The clinical development of kinase inhibitors for -mutated NSCLC has been thwarted by mucocutaneous/gastrointestinal toxicities that preclude a pathway for drug approval, as the case of poziotinib. However, the activation of ERBB2 has allowed for repurposing of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that target ERBB2 with cytotoxic payloads. The FDA approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in 2022 for NSCLC based on response rate of >55%, DoR >9 months, PFS >8 months and manageable adverse events (including cytopenias, nausea and less commonly pneumonitis). Other therapies in clinical development include sunvozertinib and zipalertinib, among others. In addition, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy has some activity in these tumors.
CONCLUSIONS
The approvals of mobocertinib, amivantamab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan represent the first examples of precision oncology for exon 20 insertion-mutated and -mutated NSCLCs.
PubMed: 37577308
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-23-98 -
Cancer Medicine Jul 2023Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)...
BACKGROUND
Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. However, dacomitinib often causes skin toxicities, resulting in treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate a prophylactic strategy for skin toxicity induced by dacomitinib.
METHODS
We performed a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial for comprehensive skin toxicity prophylaxis. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations were enrolled and received dacomitinib with comprehensive prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of skin toxicity (Grade ≥2) in the initial 8 weeks.
RESULTS
In total, 41 Japanese patients participated between May 2019 and April 2021 from 14 institutions (median age 70 years; range: 32-83 years), 20 were male, and 36 had a performance status of 0-1. Nineteen patients had exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation. More than 90% of patients were perfectly compliant with prophylactic minocycline administration. Skin toxicities (Grade ≥2) occurred in 43.9% of patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 31.2%-56.7%). The most frequent skin toxicity was acneiform rash in 11 patients (26.8%), followed by paronychia in five patients (12.2%). Due to skin toxicities, eight patients (19.5%) received reduced doses of dacomitinib. The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.6 months) and median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 17.0 months-not reached).
CONCLUSION
Although the prophylactic strategy was ineffective, the adherence to prophylactic medication was quite good. Patient education regarding prophylaxis is important and can lead to improved treatment continuity.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; ErbB Receptors; Mutation
PubMed: 37269194
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6184 -
Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2023Gastrointestinal (GIT) mucositis is a common problem associated with chemotherapy. Dacomitinib is a chemotherapeutic drug that treats nonsmall cell lung cancer. It...
INTRODUCTION
Gastrointestinal (GIT) mucositis is a common problem associated with chemotherapy. Dacomitinib is a chemotherapeutic drug that treats nonsmall cell lung cancer. It irreversibly binds to the receptors at the ileal epithelial cells, leading to mucosal injury. Baicalin (BA) is a flavonoid with anti-inflammatory, antifibrosis, and antibarrier disruption properties.
AIM
This work aimed to investigate the possible protective effects of BA on dacomitinib-induced ileal mucositis in rats by histological and immunohistochemical studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
60 Wistar rats (8-12 weeks) were used (180-200 g) and divided into 6 groups (10 rats each). Group 1: Control; Group 2 (dacomitinib): Rats received dacomitinib 7.5 mg/kg/day orally; Group 3 (dacomitinib + carboxyl methylcellulose [CMC]): Rats received dacomitinib 7.5 mg/kg/day and 0.5% CMC orally; Group 4 (dacomitinib + BA low dose): Rats received low-dose BA 30 mg/kg/day and 7.5 mg/kg/day dacomitinib orally; Group 5 (dacomitinib + BA mid dose): Rats received mid-dose BA 60 mg/kg/day and 7.5 mg/kg/day dacomitinib orally; Group 6 (dacomitinib + BA high dose): Rats received high-dose BA 100 mg/kg/day and 7.5 mg/kg/day dacomitinib orally.
RESULTS
Dacomitinib group showed short villi, desquamated epithelium, congested blood vessels, inflammatory cellular infiltrations, dilated lacteals, and wide spaces between the crypts. There is a significant increase in collagen fibers and number of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells. Further, there were lost epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) and epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical reaction. The previous findings were ameliorated by BA in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSION
BA has a protective effect through its anti-inflammatory, antifibrosis, and antibarrier disruption effects. Hence, BA is considered as a promising new drug for the treatment of chemotherapy-associated GIT problems, especially dacomitinib.
PubMed: 38025187
DOI: 10.4103/jmau.jmau_115_20 -
Clinical and Translational Science Dec 2023This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between test tablet dacomitinib and reference product Vizimpro® under fasting and fed conditions and assess their... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between test tablet dacomitinib and reference product Vizimpro® under fasting and fed conditions and assess their pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles for gaining marketing approval of the new generic drug. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted in healthy Chinese subjects. Eligible healthy subjects randomly received a single 45 mg dose of test or reference formulations with an administration sequence of test tablet (T), reference tablet (R), or (RT), under both fasting and fed conditions, and each single administration was followed by a 21-day washout period. Plasma concentrations and corresponding non-compartmental PK parameters of dacomitinib were determined. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) (test/reference) for C , AUC , and AUC , respectively, were 97.75%-119.99%, 101.00%-115.09%, and 100.27%-113.90% under fasting conditions and 95.20%-104.94%, 97.24%-102.23%, and 97.27%-101.88% under fed conditions, which were within the limits of 80%-125%. Under fasting and fed conditions, the PK characteristics of the test dacomitinib tablet and reference Vizimpro® were comparable; the two formulations of dacomitinib were demonstrated to be bioequivalent and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Topics: Humans; Therapeutic Equivalency; Cross-Over Studies; Healthy Volunteers; Fasting; Tablets; China
PubMed: 37786330
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13653 -
Translational Cancer Research Aug 2023Accumulating evidence has shown that dacomitinib has potential activities for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor... (Review)
Review
The treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer carrying uncommon mutations, mutations, or brain metastases: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical findings for dacomitinib.
BACKGROUND
Accumulating evidence has shown that dacomitinib has potential activities for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor () mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 () mutations, or central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
METHODS
This study aimed to give a systematic review on its potential applications in the above settings by searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology.org, European Society for Medical Oncology.org, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 649 publications in total. According to our findings, dacomitinib exhibited promising efficacy in patients with major uncommon mutations (including G719X, S768I, and L861Q). Both exon 20 insertional mutation (Ex20ins) and Ex20ins demonstrated significant internal heterogeneity in response to dacomitinib, among which specific subtypes (including D770delinsGY, A763_Y764insFQEA, and M774delinsWLV) were highly sensitive. Other uncommon mutations including 18del and L747P have also been shown responsive to dacomitinib. Interestingly, limited studies suggested dacomitinib application on certain first or third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)' resistant secondary mutations. Last but not least, both pre-clinical and clinical data indicated that dacomitinib has an encouraging intracranial tumor control ability, regardless of uncommon mutations.
CONCLUSIONS
Dacomitinib demonstrated good disease control on patients with NSCLC harboring major uncommon mutations and specific or mutation subtypes, and selective clinical application of dacomitinib is considerable in this setting, especially for those with intracranial metastases.
PubMed: 37701115
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-95 -
ESMO Open Dec 2023Dacomitinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)...
INTRODUCTION
Dacomitinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in the ARCHER1050 study. However, because that study did not include patients with brain metastases, the efficacy of dacomitinib in patients with brain metastases has not been clarified.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This single-arm phase II study enrolled 30 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations from January 2021 to June 2021 and started them on dacomitinib (45 mg/day). All patients had non-irradiated brain metastases with a diameter of ≥5 mm. The primary endpoint was confirmed intracranial objective response rate (iORR).
RESULTS
Patients had exon 19 deletions (46.7%) and L858R mutations in exon 21 (55.3%). The confirmed iORR was 96.7% (29/30), with an intracranial complete response of 63.3%. Median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was not reached, with 12- and 18-month iPFS rates of 78.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.8% to 95.4%] and 70.4% (95% CI 54.9% to 90.1%), respectively. In the competing risk analysis, the 12-month cumulative incidence of intracranial progression was 16.7%. Regarding the overall efficacy for intracranial and extracranial lesions, the overall ORR was 96.7%, and the median PFS was 17.5 months (95% CI 15.2 months-not reached). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16.7% of patients, and 83.3% required a reduced dacomitinib dose to manage adverse events. However, none permanently discontinued dacomitinib treatment due to treatment-related adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Dacomitinib has outstanding intracranial efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 38016250
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102068 -
Comprehensive mutational scanning of EGFR reveals TKI sensitivities of extracellular domain mutants.Nature Communications Mar 2024The epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, is frequently activated in lung cancer and glioblastoma by genomic alterations including missense mutations. The different...
The epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, is frequently activated in lung cancer and glioblastoma by genomic alterations including missense mutations. The different mutation spectra in these diseases are reflected in divergent responses to EGFR inhibition: significant patient benefit in lung cancer, but limited in glioblastoma. Here, we report a comprehensive mutational analysis of EGFR function. We perform saturation mutagenesis of EGFR and assess function of ~22,500 variants in a human EGFR-dependent lung cancer cell line. This approach reveals enrichment of erlotinib-insensitive variants of known and unknown significance in the dimerization, transmembrane, and kinase domains. Multiple EGFR extracellular domain variants, not associated with approved targeted therapies, are sensitive to afatinib and dacomitinib in vitro. Two glioblastoma patients with somatic EGFR G598V dimerization domain mutations show responses to dacomitinib treatment followed by within-pathway resistance mutation in one case. In summary, this comprehensive screen expands the landscape of functional EGFR variants and suggests broader clinical investigation of EGFR inhibition for cancers harboring extracellular domain mutations.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; ErbB Receptors; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 38548752
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45594-4 -
Pharmaceutics Jan 2024Dacomitinib is an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell...
Dacomitinib is an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR-activating mutations. Proton-pump inhibitors decreased dacomitinib exposure. This analysis summarizes the effect of Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on dacomitinib exposure. A within-patient comparison of the steady-state trough concentrations (C) of dacomitinib and its active metabolite and active moiety with and without concomitant use of H2RAs was conducted using a linear mixed effects model with pooled data from 11 clinical studies in patients with NSCLC. An oral absorption physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed and verified using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data after a single dose of dacomitinib in healthy volunteers to estimate the effect of gastric pH altered by an H2RA on dacomitinib's PKs. The adjusted geometric mean of the dacomitinib C of the dacomitinib parent, metabolite and active moiety following co-administration with an H2RA was approximately 86%, 104% and 100% relative to that following dacomitinib 45 mg administration without an H2RA ( > 0.05). The PBPK modeling showed negligible change in dacomitinib maximum concentration (C) and area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) over 0-24 h after H2RA administration when compared with those administered dacomitinib alone. Co-administration of an H2RA with dacomitinib is not expected to have any clinically relevant effect on dacomitinib exposure.
PubMed: 38258127
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010118 -
Chinese Medical Journal Nov 2023The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended as the first-line treatment for EGFR -mutated, advanced NSCLC patients. However, intracranial activity varies in different drugs. Thus, brain metastasis (BM) should be considered when choosing the treatment regimens. We conducted this network meta-analysis to explore the optimal first-line therapeutic schedule for advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC patients with different BM statuses.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials focusing on EGFR-TKIs (alone or in combination) in advanced and EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients, who have not received systematic treatment, were systematically searched up to December 2021. We extracted and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A network meta-analysis was performed with the Bayesian statistical model to determine the survival outcomes of all included therapy regimens using the R software. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare intervention measures, and overall rankings of therapies were estimated under the Bayesian framework.
RESULTS
This analysis included 17 RCTs with 5077 patients and 12 therapies, including osimertinib + bevacizumab, aumolertinib, osimertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, standards of care (SoC, including gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), SoC + apatinib, SoC + bevacizumab, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + pemetrexed based chemotherapy (PbCT), PbCT, and pemetrexed free chemotherapy (PfCT). For patients with BM, SoC + PbCT improved PFS compared with SoC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), and osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank first in PFS, with a cumulative probability of 34.5%, followed by aumolertinib, with a cumulative probability of 28.3%. For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib, aumolertinib, SoC + PbCT, dacomitinib, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + bevacizumab, and afatinib showed superior efficacy compared with SoC (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76; HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-1.00), PbCT (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74; HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.64; HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.82; HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.87; HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), and PfCT (HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32; HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.26; HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.29; HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.35; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.31; HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.34) in terms of PFS. And, SoC + apatinib showed relatively superior PFS when compared with PbCT (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92) and PfCT (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39), but similar PFS to SoC (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-1.03). No statistical differences were observed for PFS in patients without BM between PbCT and SoC (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.84-2.64), but both showed favorable PFS when compared with PfCT (PfCT vs. SoC, HR = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.06-4.55; PbCT vs. PfCT, HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32). For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank the first, with cumulative probabilities of 47.1%. For OS, SoC + PbCT was most likely to rank first in patients with and without BM, with cumulative probabilities of 46.8%, and 37.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Osimertinib + bevacizumab is most likely to rank first in PFS in advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC patients with or without BM, and SoC + PbCT is most likely to rank first in OS.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Afatinib; Lung Neoplasms; Bevacizumab; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pemetrexed; ErbB Receptors; Brain Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 37160733
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002468 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2024The irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) afatinib and dacomitinib are approved for first-line treatment of EGFR... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
The difference between dacomitinib and afatinib in effectiveness and safety in first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world observational study.
OBJECTIVES
The irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) afatinib and dacomitinib are approved for first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of afatinib and dacomitinib in this setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between September 2020 and March 2023, we retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with first-line irreversible EGFR-TKIs. The enrolled patients were assigned to two groups based on whether they received afatinib or dacomitinib.
RESULTS
A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (70 to afatinib and 31 to dacomitinib). The partial response rates (PR) for first-line treatment with afatinib and dacomitinib were 85.7 and 80.6% (p = 0.522). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (18.9 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.975) and time to treatment failure (TTF) (22.7 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.324) in patients with afatinib and dacomitinib treatment were similar. There was no significant difference observed in the median PFS (16.1 vs. 18.9 months, p = 0.361) and TTF (32.5 vs. 19.6 months, p = 0.182) between patients receiving the standard dose and those receiving the reduced dose. In terms of side effects, the incidence of diarrhea was higher in the afatinib group (75.8% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001), while the incidence of paronychia was higher in the dacomitinib group (58.1% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.004). The PFS (17.6 vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.663) and TTF (21.3 vs. 25.1 months, p = 0.152) were similar between patients younger than 75 years and those older than 75 years.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that afatinib and dacomitinib had similar effectiveness and safety profiles. However, they have slightly different side effects. Afatinib and dacomitinib can be safely administered to patients across different age groups with appropriate dose reductions.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Afatinib; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; ErbB Receptors; Mutation; Quinazolinones
PubMed: 38373960
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11956-w