-
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Jun 2023Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern... (Review)
Review
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Vancomycin; Linezolid; Bacteremia; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci; Anti-Infective Agents; Sepsis; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 37067406
DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Oct 2023Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant . (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant .
METHODS
In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed.
RESULTS
Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI, -6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI, -2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole.
CONCLUSIONS
Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Treatment Outcome; Double-Blind Method; Administration, Intravenous; Aztreonam
PubMed: 37754204
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300220 -
Microbiology and Molecular Biology... Jun 2023Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus infections presents a challenge due to the high incidence, considerable virulence, and emergence of drug resistance... (Review)
Review
Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus infections presents a challenge due to the high incidence, considerable virulence, and emergence of drug resistance mechanisms. The treatment of drug-resistant strains, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is further complicated by the development of tolerance and persistence to antimicrobial agents in clinical use. To address these challenges, membrane disruptors, that are not generally considered during drug discovery for agents against S. aureus, should be explored. The cell membrane protects S. aureus from external stresses and antimicrobial agents, but membrane-targeting antimicrobial agents are probably less likely to promote bacterial resistance. Nontypical linear cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), highly modified AMPs such as daptomycin (lipopeptide), bacitracin (cyclic peptide), and gramicidin S (cyclic peptide), are currently in clinical use. Recent studies have demonstrated that AMPs and small molecules can penetrate the cell membrane of S. aureus, inhibit phospholipid biosynthesis, or block the passage of solutes between the periplasm and the exterior of the cell. In addition to their primary mechanism of action (MOA) that targets the bacterial membrane, AMPs and small molecules may also impact bacteria through secondary mechanisms such as targeting the biofilm, and downregulating virulence genes of S. aureus. In this review, we discuss the current state of research into cell membrane-targeting AMPs and small molecules and their potential mechanisms of action against drug-resistant physiological forms of S. aureus, including persister cells and biofilms.
Topics: Humans; Staphylococcus aureus; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Antimicrobial Peptides; Anti-Infective Agents; Peptides, Cyclic; Cell Membrane; Biofilms; Staphylococcal Infections
PubMed: 37129495
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00037-22 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2023Biofilms are a common survival strategy employed by bacteria in healthcare settings, which enhances their resistance to antimicrobial and biocidal agents making... (Review)
Review
Biofilms are a common survival strategy employed by bacteria in healthcare settings, which enhances their resistance to antimicrobial and biocidal agents making infections difficult to treat. Mechanisms of biofilm-induced antimicrobial resistance involve reduced penetration of antimicrobial agents, increased expression of efflux pumps, altered microbial physiology, and genetic changes in the bacterial population. Factors contributing to the formation of biofilms include nutrient availability, temperature, pH, surface properties, and microbial interactions. Biofilm-associated infections can have serious consequences for patient outcomes, and standard antimicrobial therapies are often ineffective against biofilm-associated bacteria, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Novel strategies, including antibiotics combination therapies (such as daptomycin and vancomycin, colistin and azithromycin), biofilm-targeted agents (such as small molecules (LP3134, LP3145, LP4010, LP1062) target c-di-GMP), and immunomodulatory therapies (such as the anti-PcrV IgY antibodies which target Type IIIsecretion system), are being developed to combat biofilm-induced antimicrobial resistance. A multifaceted approach to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention is necessary to address this emerging problem in healthcare settings.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Azithromycin; Biofilms; Colistin
PubMed: 38188636
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1327069 -
Microbiology Spectrum Aug 2023Enterococcus faecium is a difficult-to-treat pathogen with emerging resistance to most clinically available antibiotics. Daptomycin (DAP) is the standard of care, but...
Enterococcus faecium is a difficult-to-treat pathogen with emerging resistance to most clinically available antibiotics. Daptomycin (DAP) is the standard of care, but even high DAP doses (12 mg/kg body weight/day) failed to eradicate some vancomycin-resistant strains. Combination DAP-ceftaroline (CPT) may increase β-lactam affinity for target penicillin binding proteins (PBP); however, in a simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model, DAP-CPT did not achieve therapeutic efficacy against a DAP-nonsusceptible (DNS) vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE) isolate. Phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) have been proposed for resistant high-inoculum infections. We aimed to identify PAC with maximum bactericidal activity and prevention/reversal of phage and antibiotic resistance in an SEV PK/PD model against DNS isolate R497. Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) was evaluated with modified checkerboard MIC and 24-h time-kill analyses (TKA). Human-simulated antibiotic doses of DAP and CPT with phages NV-497 and NV-503-01 were then evaluated in 96-h SEV PK/PD models against R497. Synergistic and bactericidal activity was identified with the PAC of DAP-CPT combined with phage cocktail NV-497-NV-503-01, demonstrating a significant reduction in viability down to 3-log CFU/g (-Δ, 5.77-log CFU/g; 0.001). This combination also demonstrated isolate resensitization to DAP. Evaluation of phage resistance post-SEV demonstrated prevention of phage resistance for PACs containing DAP-CPT. Our results provide novel data highlighting bactericidal and synergistic activity of PAC against a DNS E. faecium isolate in a high-inoculum SEV PK/PD model with subsequent DAP resensitization and prevention of phage resistance. Our study supports the additional benefit of standard-of-care antibiotics combined with a phage cocktail compared to antibiotic alone against a daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) E. faecium isolate in a high-inoculum simulated endocardial vegetation PK/PD model. E. faecium is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Daptomycin is considered the first-line therapy for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE), but the highest published doses have failed to eradicate some VRE isolates. The addition of a β-lactam to daptomycin may result in synergistic activity, but previous data demonstrate that daptomycin plus ceftaroline failed to eradicate a VRE isolate. Phage therapy as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy has been proposed as a salvage therapy for high-inoculum infections; however, pragmatic clinical comparison trials for endocarditis are lacking and difficult to design, reinforcing the timeliness of such analysis.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Enterococcus faecium; Vancomycin; beta-Lactams; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Ceftaroline
PubMed: 37338375
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00340-23 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2023Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common complication of diabetes; however, there is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal antimicrobial selection. The aim of... (Review)
Review
Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common complication of diabetes; however, there is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal antimicrobial selection. The aim of this review was to critically evaluate the recent systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of systemic (parenteral or oral) antimicrobials for DFI. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases and the PROSPERO register were searched from January 2015 to January 2023. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses on systemic antimicrobials for DFI, with outcomes of clinical infection resolution or complications, were included. Of the 413 records identified, 6 systematic reviews of 29 individual studies were included. Heterogeneity of individual studies precluded meta-analysis, except for ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam (RR 1.07, 95% CI [0.96-1.19]) and fluoroquinolones versus piperacillin-tazobactam (RR 1.03, 95% CI [0.89-1.20]) in one review. The application of the AMSTAR-2 tool determined two reviews to be of high quality. There was no statistical difference in the clinical resolution of infections for 24 different antimicrobial regimens (penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, vancomycin, metronidazole, clindamycin, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline). However, tigecycline did not meet non-inferiority against ertapenem ± vancomycin (absolute difference -5.5%, 95% CI [-11.0-0.1]) and was associated with a higher incidence of adverse drug events. There is minimal systematic review evidence to suggest one regimen is superior to another for DFI.
PubMed: 37370360
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061041 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2023Biofilm-forming bacterial infections result in clinical failure, recurring infections, and high health care costs. The antibiotic concentrations needed to eradicate...
Biofilm-forming bacterial infections result in clinical failure, recurring infections, and high health care costs. The antibiotic concentrations needed to eradicate biofilm require further research. We aimed to model an prosthetic joint infection (PJI) to elucidate the activity of traditional systemic concentrations versus supratherapeutic concentrations to eradicate a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm PJI. We evaluated S. epidermidis high-biofilm-forming (ATCC 35984) and low-biofilm-forming (ATCC 12228) isolates in an pharmacodynamic biofilm reactor model with chromium cobalt coupons to simulate prosthetic joint infection. Vancomycin, daptomycin, levofloxacin, and minocycline were used alone and combined with rifampin to evaluate the effect of biofilm eradication. We simulated three exposures: (i) humanized systemic dosing alone, (ii) supratherapeutic doses (1,000× MIC), and (iii) and dosing in combination with rifampin. Resistance development was monitored throughout the study. Simulated humanized systemic doses of a lipoglycopeptide (daptomycin), a fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin), a tetracycline (minocycline), and a glycopeptide (vancomycin) alone failed to eradicate a formed S. epidermidis biofilm. Supratherapeutic doses of vancomycin (2,000 μg/mL) and minocycline (15 μg/mL) with or without rifampin (15 μg/mL) failed to eradicate biofilms. However, a levofloxacin supratherapeutic dose (125 μg/mL) with rifampin eradicated the high-biofilm-producing isolate by 48 h. Interestingly, supratherapeutic-dose exposures of daptomycin (500 μg/mL) alone eradicated high- and low-biofilm-forming isolates in established biofilms. The concentrations needed to eradicate biofilms on foreign materials are not obtained with systemic dosing regimens. The failure of systemic dosing regimens to eradicate biofilms validates clinical findings with recurring infections. The addition of rifampin to supratherapeutic dosing regimens does not result in synergy. Supratherapeutic daptomycin dosing may be effective at the site of action to eradicate biofilms. Further studies are needed.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Vancomycin; Minocycline; Rifampin; Levofloxacin; Biofilms; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37154699
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00108-23 -
BMC Nephrology Sep 2023Few drug dosing recommendations for patients receiving home hemodialysis (HHD) have been published which has hindered the adoption of HHD. HHD regimens vary widely and...
BACKGROUND
Few drug dosing recommendations for patients receiving home hemodialysis (HHD) have been published which has hindered the adoption of HHD. HHD regimens vary widely and differ considerably from conventional, thrice weekly, in-center hemodialysis in terms of treatment frequency, duration and blood and dialysate flow rates. Consequently, vancomycin and daptomycin clearances in HHD are also likely to be different, consequently HHD dosing regimens must be developed to ensure efficacy and minimize toxicity when these antibiotics are used. Many HHD regimens are used clinically, this study modeled ten common HHD regimens and determined optimal vancomycin and daptomycin dosing for each HHD regimen.
METHODS
Monte Carlo simulations using pharmacokinetic data derived from the literature and demographic data from a large HHD program treating patients with end stage kidney disease were incorporated into a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Virtual vancomycin and daptomycin doses were administered post-HHD and drug exposures were determined in 5,000 virtual patients receiving ten different HHD regimens. Serum concentration monitoring with subsequent dose changes was incorporated into the vancomycin models. Pharmacodynamic target attainment rates were determined for each studied dose. The lowest possible doses that met predefined targets in virtual patients were chosen as optimal doses.
RESULTS
HHD frequency, total dialysate volumes and HHD durations influenced drug exposure and led to different dosing regimens to meet targets. Antibiotic dosing regimens were identified that could meet targets for 3- and 7-h HHD regimens occurring every other day or 4-5 days/week. HHD regimens with 3-day interdialytic periods required higher doses prior to the 3-day period. The addition of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring allowed for calculation of necessary dosing changes which increased the number of virtual subjects meeting pharmacodynamic targets.
CONCLUSIONS
Doses of vancomycin and daptomycin that will meet desired pharmacodynamic targets in HHD are dependent on patient and HHD-specific factors. Doses used in conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis are unlikely to meet treatment goals. The antibiotic regimens paired with the HHD parameters studied in this analysis are likely to meet goals but require clinical validation.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Daptomycin; Hemodialysis, Home; Monte Carlo Method; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dialysis Solutions
PubMed: 37710245
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03314-y