-
American Journal of Nephrology 2024Renal anemia is treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), even though epoetin alfa and darbepoetin increase the risk of cardiovascular death and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Mechanistic and Clinical Comparison of the Erythropoietic Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Renal Anemia.
Renal anemia is treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), even though epoetin alfa and darbepoetin increase the risk of cardiovascular death and thromboembolic events, including stroke. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (HIF-PHD) inhibitors have been developed as an alternative to ESAs, producing comparable increases in hemoglobin. However, in advanced chronic kidney disease, HIF-PHD inhibitors can increase the risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure, and thrombotic events to a greater extent than that with ESAs, indicating that there is a compelling need for safer alternatives. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, and they increase hemoglobin, an effect that is related to an increase in erythropoietin and an expansion in red blood cell mass. SGLT2 inhibitors increase hemoglobin by ≈0.6-0.7 g/dL, resulting in the alleviation of anemia in many patients. The magnitude of this effect is comparable to that seen with low-to-medium doses of HIF-PHD inhibitors, and it is apparent even in advanced chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, HIF-PHD inhibitors act by interfering with the prolyl hydroxylases that degrade both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, thus enhancing both isoforms. However, HIF-2α is the physiological stimulus to the production of erythropoietin, and upregulation of HIF-1α may be an unnecessary ancillary property of HIF-PHD inhibitors, which may have adverse cardiac and vascular consequences. In contrast, SGLT2 inhibitors act to selectively increase HIF-2α, while downregulating HIF-1α, a distinctive profile that may contribute to their cardiorenal benefits. Intriguingly, for both HIF-PHD and SGLT2 inhibitors, the liver is likely to be an important site of increased erythropoietin production, recapitulating the fetal phenotype. These observations suggest that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors should be seriously evaluated as a therapeutic approach to treat renal anemia, yielding less cardiovascular risk than other therapeutic options.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoiesis; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline Dioxygenases; Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 37231827
DOI: 10.1159/000531084 -
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Sep 2023In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Higher hemoglobin levels using darbepoetin alfa and kidney outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PREDICT trial.
BACKGROUND
In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower hemoglobin target (9-11 g/dl) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) without diabetes. Prespecified secondary analyses were performed to further study the effects of targeting higher hemoglobin levels on renal outcomes.
METHODS
Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 8-20 ml/min/1.73 m without diabetes were randomly assigned 1:1 to the high- and low-hemoglobin groups. The differences between the groups were evaluated for the following endpoints and cohort sets: eGFR and proteinuria slopes, assessed using a mixed-effects model in the full analysis set and the per-protocol set that excluded patients with off-target hemoglobin levels; the primary endpoint of composite renal outcome, evaluated in the per-protocol set using the Cox model.
RESULTS
In the full analysis set (high hemoglobin, n = 239; low hemoglobin, n = 240), eGFR and proteinuria slopes were not significantly different between the groups. In the per-protocol set (high hemoglobin, n = 136; low hemoglobin, n = 171), the high-hemoglobin group was associated with reduced composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96) and an improved eGFR slope (coefficient: + 1.00 ml/min/1.73 m/year; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.63), while the proteinuria slope did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In the per-protocol set, the high-hemoglobin group demonstrated better kidney outcomes than the low-hemoglobin group, suggesting a potential benefit of maintaining higher hemoglobin levels in patients with advanced CKD without diabetes.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT01581073).
Topics: Humans; Darbepoetin alfa; Anemia; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Kidney; Hemoglobins; Proteinuria; Neoplasms; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37289335
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02362-w -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Sep 2023Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors such as vadadustat may provide an oral alternative to injectable erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for treating... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors such as vadadustat may provide an oral alternative to injectable erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for treating anemia in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. In two randomized (1:1), global, phase 3, open-label, sponsor-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled noninferiority trials in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (INNO2VATE), vadadustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to cardiovascular safety and hematological efficacy. Vadadustat's effects in patients receiving only peritoneal dialysis is unclear.
METHODS
We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients in the INNO2VATE trials receiving peritoneal dialysis at baseline. The prespecified primary safety endpoint was time to first major cardiovascular event (MACE; defined as all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke). The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the primary evaluation period (Weeks 24-36).
RESULTS
Of the 3923 patients randomized in the two INNO2VATE trials, 309 were receiving peritoneal dialysis (vadadustat, n = 152; darbepoetin alfa, n = 157) at baseline. Time to first MACE was similar in the vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa groups [hazard ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62, 1.93]. In patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, the difference in mean change in hemoglobin concentrations was -0.10 g/dL (95% CI -0.33, 0.12) in the primary evaluation period. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 88.2% versus 95.5%, and serious TEAEs was 52.6% versus 73.2% in the vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
In the subgroup of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis in the phase 3 INNO2VATE trials, safety and efficacy of vadadustat were similar to darbepoetin alfa.
Topics: Humans; Darbepoetin alfa; Renal Dialysis; Anemia; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Peritoneal Dialysis; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Erythropoietin
PubMed: 37096396
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad074 -
Kidney Medicine Jul 2023In the PROTECT trials, vadadustat was found to be noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in hematologic efficacy but not for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE;...
Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With NonDialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE
In the PROTECT trials, vadadustat was found to be noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in hematologic efficacy but not for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). We investigated the regional differences in MACE in the PROTECT trials.
STUDY DESIGN
Phase 3, global, open-label, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS
A total of 1,725 erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-treated patients with anemia and NDD-CKD.
INTERVENTION
1:1 randomization to receive vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa.
OUTCOMES
The primary safety end point was the time to first MACE.
RESULTS
At baseline, patients in Europe (n=444) were primarily treated with darbepoetin alfa, showed higher proportions on low ESA doses (<90 U/kg/wk epoetin alfa equivalents) with a hemoglobin concentration of ≥10 g/dL compared with patients in the US (n=665) and non-US/non-Europe (n=614) regions. The MACE rates per 100 person-years in the 3 vadadustat groups across regions were 14.5 in the US, 11.6 in Europe, and 10.0 in the non-US/non-Europe groups, whereas event rates in the darbepoetin alfa group were considerably lower in Europe than in the US and non-US/non-Europe groups (6.7 vs 13.3 and 10.5, respectively). The overall hazard ratio for MACE for vadadustat vs darbepoetin alpha was 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.45, but varied by geographical region, with a greater hazard ratio seen in Europe (US, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78-1.46; Europe, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.24-3.39; non-US/non-Europe, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.60-1.37); interaction between study treatment and geographical region, = 0.07). In Europe, ESA rescue was associated with a higher risk of MACE in both groups.
LIMITATIONS
Several analyses are exploratory.
CONCLUSIONS
In this trial, there was a low risk of MACE in the darbepoetin alfa group in Europe. Patients in Europe were generally on low doses of ESA, with hemoglobin already within target range. The low risk of MACE may have been related to a limited need to switch and titrate darbepoetin alfa compared with the non-US/non-Europe group.
FUNDING
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02680574.
PubMed: 37427292
DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100667 -
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice May 2024For anemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis, darbepoetin alfa (DA), which has a shorter half-life but is more inexpensive than...
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa once every 4 weeks versus continuous erythropoietin receptor activator once every 4 weeks for anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.
BACKGROUND
For anemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis, darbepoetin alfa (DA), which has a shorter half-life but is more inexpensive than continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), is preferred in Korea. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of once-in-4-weeks DA compared with once-in-4-weeks CERA in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.
METHODS
In this randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study, 40 erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis were randomized 1:1 to the DA group and CERA group. They received the study drug once in 4 weeks during 10- or 12-week correction period and 24-week efficacy evaluation period. The primary outcomes were the mean difference in the changes in hemoglobin levels between baseline and efficacy evaluation period and hemoglobin response rates during the correction period. The secondary outcomes included differences in adverse events and costs.
RESULTS
DA was non-inferior to CERA for anemia correction; the mean difference in the change in hemoglobin levels between the groups was -0.070 g/dL (95% confidence interval, -0.730 to 0.590 g/dL). Hemoglobin response rates were 100% with DA and 94.1% with CERA. Adverse events were comparable. The mean cost of DA was approximately one-third that of CERA (34,100 ± 7,600 Korean won/4 weeks vs. 115,500 ± 23,600 Korean won/4 weeks; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Once-in-4-weeks DA safely corrects anemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis and is more cost-effective than once-in-4-weeks CERA.
PubMed: 38268126
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.074 -
Kidney Medicine Jul 2023Prespecified analyses of the PROTECT trials comparing the safety of the oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor vadadustat with darbepoetin alfa in...
Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Naïve Patients.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE
Prespecified analyses of the PROTECT trials comparing the safety of the oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor vadadustat with darbepoetin alfa in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) found no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; death from any cause or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) among US patients and a higher risk among patients treated with vadadustat outside the United States. We investigated regional differences in MACE in the PROTECT trial that enrolled 1,751 patients previously untreated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
STUDY DESIGN
Phase 3, global, open-label, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-untreated patients with anemia and NDD-CKD.
INTERVENTION
Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa.
OUTCOMES
The primary safety end point was time to first MACE. Secondary safety end points included time to first expanded MACE (MACE plus hospitalization for heart failure or thromboembolic event, excluding vascular access thrombosis).
RESULTS
In the non-US/non-Europe region, there was a higher proportion of patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level of ≤10 mL/min/1.73 m in the vadadustat group [96 (34.7%)] than in the darbepoetin alfa group [66 (24.0%)]. In this region, there were 21 excess MACEs reported in the vadadustat group [78 events (n=276)] versus the darbepoetin alfa [57 events (n=275)], including 13 excess noncardiovascular deaths, largely from kidney failure. Noncardiovascular deaths were concentrated in Brazil and South Africa, which enrolled higher proportions of patients with an eGFR of ≤10 mL/min/1.73 m and who may not have had access to dialysis.
LIMITATIONS
Different regional treatment patterns of patients with NDD-CKD.
CONCLUSIONS
The higher MACE rate in the non-US/non-Europe vadadustat group may have been partly because of imbalances in the baseline eGFR level in countries where dialysis was not uniformly available resulting in many kidney-related deaths.
PubMed: 37427293
DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100666 -
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aug 2023Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard treatment for patients with renal anemia to increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce the need for blood... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard treatment for patients with renal anemia to increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce the need for blood transfusions. However, treatments targeting high Hb levels require high doses of ESAs administered intravenously, which is associated with an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore, there have been some problems such as hemoglobin variability and low achievement of target hemoglobin due to the shorter half-lives of ESAs. Consequently, erythropoietin-promoting medications, such as hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors, have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine version II (TSQM-II) domain scores relative to baseline in each trial, to assess patient satisfaction with molidustat versus darbepoetin alfa.
METHODS
This post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials compared treatment satisfaction with an HIF-PH inhibitor, molidustat, versus a standard ESA, darbepoetin alfa, as part of therapy in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal anemia.
RESULTS
Exploratory outcome data using the TSQM-II showed that both arms in both trials had enhanced treatment satisfaction over the course of the study period, as well as improvements in most TSQM-II domains at week 24 of treatment. Molidustat was associated with convenience domain scores at multiple time points depending on the trial. More patients were highly satisfied with the convenience of molidustat than that of darbepoetin alfa. Patients treated with molidustat had increased global satisfaction domain scores compared with those treated with darbepoetin alfa; however, the differences in global satisfaction domain scores were not significant.
CONCLUSION
These patient-reported satisfaction outcomes support the use of molidustat as a patient-centered treatment option for CKD-related anemia.
REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03350321 (November 22, 2017).
CLINICALTRIALS
gov Identifier: NCT03350347 (November 22, 2017).
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Chronic Disease; Darbepoetin alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Patient Satisfaction; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 37095342
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02353-x -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023: The comparative benefits and acceptability of HIF-PHIs for treating anemia have not been well researched to date. We sought to compare the effectiveness of 6 HIF-PHIs...
Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of HIF prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors for anemia patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
: The comparative benefits and acceptability of HIF-PHIs for treating anemia have not been well researched to date. We sought to compare the effectiveness of 6 HIF-PHIs and 3 ESAs for the treatment of renal anemia patients undergoing dialysis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Twenty-five RCTs (involving 17,204 participants) were included, all of which were designed to achieve target Hb levels by adjusting thee dose of HIF-PHIs. Regarding the efficacy in achieving target Hb levels, no significant differences were found between HIF-PHIs and ESAs in Hb response at the dose-adjusted designed RCTs selected for comparison. Intervention with roxadustat showed a significantly lower risk of RBC transfusion than rhEPO, with an OR and 95% CI of 0.76 (0.56-0.93). Roxadustat and vadadustat had higher risks of increasing the discontinuation rate than ESAs; the former had ORs and 95% CIs of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.21-2.06) for rhEPO, 1.66 (1.16-2.38) for DPO (darbepoetin alfa), and 1.76 (1.70-4.49) for MPG-EPO, and the latter had ORs and 95% CIs of 1.71 (1.09-2.67) for rhEPO, 1.79 (1.29-2.49) for DPO, and 2.97 (1.62-5.46) for MPG-EPO. No differences were observed in the AEs and SAEs among patients who received the studied drugs. Results of a meta-analysis of gastrointestinal disorders among AEs revealed that vadadustat was less effect on causing diarrea than DPO, with an OR of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.9-0.99). Included HIF-PHIs, were proven to be more effective than ESAs in reducing hepcidin levels and increasing TIBC and serum iron level with OR of -0.17 (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.12), OR of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.63-0.95), and OR of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33-0.45), respectively. HIF-PHIs and ESAs have their characteristics and advantages in treating anemia undergoing dialysis. With the selected dose-adjusted mode, some HIF-PHIs appeared to be a potential treatment for DD-CKD patients when ompared with rhEPO, due to its effectiveness in decreasing the risk of RBC transfusion rate or regulating iron or lipid metabolism while achieving target Hb levels. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=306511; Identifier: CRD42022306511.
PubMed: 37521459
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1050412 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and... Sep 2023Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are commonly used in clinical practice to improve anaemia. Despite a number of patients successfully treated without adverse... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are commonly used in clinical practice to improve anaemia. Despite a number of patients successfully treated without adverse events, the complications have been previously reported.
OBJECTIVE
To report and review the characteristics and management of ESA hypersensitivities.
METHODS
Case reports and related articles associated with ESA use, published between January 1999 and December 2018, were retrieved through Electronic databases (MEDLINE® and PubMed®).
RESULTS
Forty-seven ESA patients with various immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions caused by epoetin and pharmaceutical excipients were identified from nineteen studies and one case report in this paper. Fatal hypersensitivity to ESA and ESA-allergic cross-reactivities have been documented. Desensitization or change of EPO molecular structure has been reported as successful methods of re-introducing the drug.
CONCLUSIONS
ESA hypersensitivity in the various allergic reactions and cross-reactivity have been documented. Desensitization and Epoetin structural changes could be successful methods to re-introduce the drug.
Topics: Humans; Epoetin Alfa; Darbepoetin alfa; Hematinics; Anemia; Pruritus; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 32563229
DOI: 10.12932/AP-040719-0592 -
Cureus Jan 2024Anemia is a prevalent and debilitating complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). It presents multifaceted challenges that impact patients' quality of... (Review)
Review
Anemia is a prevalent and debilitating complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). It presents multifaceted challenges that impact patients' quality of life and overall well-being. The advent of darbepoetin alfa (DPO) as a therapeutic alternative to recombinant human erythropoietin alpha (EPO) has revolutionized the management of CKD-associated anemia. This review article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis highlighting the advantages of DPO over EPO in the effective management of anemia, in both predialysis and dialysis-dependent (DD) CKD patients. DPO's distinct pharmacokinetic advantages play a pivotal role in its efficacy and safety. With a significantly longer half-life and several-fold increased biological activity compared to EPO, DPO enables extended dosing intervals. Through an in-depth examination of diverse clinical trials, it becomes evident that DPO consistently demonstrates remarkable efficacy and safety in improving and maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Furthermore, its simplified dosage regimen, coupled with the convenience of less frequent administration, not only improves patient adherence but also translates to reduced healthcare costs and resource utilization. In conclusion, this review provides compelling evidence of the advantages of DPO over conventional recombinant human EPO for managing anemia in CKD patients, both in the predialysis and dialysis-dependent CKD patients. DPO's pharmacokinetic advantages, patient-centered advantages, enhanced compliance, and cost-effectiveness converge to establish DPO as a transformative therapeutic option. In both predialysis and dialysis settings, DPO's superior efficacy and patient-centric attributes collectively redefine the landscape of anemia management in CKD.
PubMed: 38313992
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51613