-
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice May 2024For anemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis, darbepoetin alfa (DA), which has a shorter half-life but is more inexpensive than...
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa once every 4 weeks versus continuous erythropoietin receptor activator once every 4 weeks for anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.
BACKGROUND
For anemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis, darbepoetin alfa (DA), which has a shorter half-life but is more inexpensive than continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), is preferred in Korea. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of once-in-4-weeks DA compared with once-in-4-weeks CERA in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.
METHODS
In this randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study, 40 erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis were randomized 1:1 to the DA group and CERA group. They received the study drug once in 4 weeks during 10- or 12-week correction period and 24-week efficacy evaluation period. The primary outcomes were the mean difference in the changes in hemoglobin levels between baseline and efficacy evaluation period and hemoglobin response rates during the correction period. The secondary outcomes included differences in adverse events and costs.
RESULTS
DA was non-inferior to CERA for anemia correction; the mean difference in the change in hemoglobin levels between the groups was -0.070 g/dL (95% confidence interval, -0.730 to 0.590 g/dL). Hemoglobin response rates were 100% with DA and 94.1% with CERA. Adverse events were comparable. The mean cost of DA was approximately one-third that of CERA (34,100 ± 7,600 Korean won/4 weeks vs. 115,500 ± 23,600 Korean won/4 weeks; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Once-in-4-weeks DA safely corrects anemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis and is more cost-effective than once-in-4-weeks CERA.
PubMed: 38268126
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.074 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Jul 2023The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs...
Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials.
BACKGROUND
The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs darbepoetin in patients with anaemia of CKD. This concern was not observed in dialysis patients in ASCEND-D (NCT02879305).
METHODS
ASCEND-ND randomized 3872 patients to daprodustat or darbepoetin. ASCEND-D randomized 2964 patients to daprodustat or conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). In both studies ESA comparators used different dosing intervals (3/week, 1/week, every 2 or every 4 weeks). The prespecified on-treatment approach examined relative risks for cancer AEs up to the last dose date + 1 day. In these analyses, owing to different dosing intervals between arms, Cox models were used to estimate the daprodustat effect by various follow-up periods (censoring at last dose date, last dose date + dosing intervals, or end of study).
RESULTS
In ASCEND-ND, the safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin on cancer-related AEs depended on the duration of follow-up after last dose date: hazard ratio (HR) 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.40] at end of study [HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.81, 1.56) for last dose date + dosing interval; HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.04, 2.15) for last dose date + 1 day]. In ASCEND-D, no excess risk of cancer-related AEs was observed with any model examined.
CONCLUSIONS
Prespecified on-treatment analyses for cancer-related AEs appeared to result in biased risk estimates in ASCEND-ND by preferentially under-counting events from patients assigned to darbepoetin. Analyses accounting for longer darbepoetin dosing intervals, or extending follow-up, resulted in attenuation of effect estimates towards neutrality, similar to ASCEND-D, where ESA comparator dosing intervals are closer to daprodustat.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The ASCEND-ND trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02876835); the ASCEND-D trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02879305).
Topics: Humans; Hematinics; Erythropoietin; Erythropoiesis; Renal Dialysis; Darbepoetin alfa; Neoplasms; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Hemoglobins
PubMed: 36565721
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac342 -
Qatar Medical Journal 2024Chronic kidney disease (CKD) often results in renal anemia, impacting the well-being of patients and causing various negative consequences. Erythropoiesis-stimulating...
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) often results in renal anemia, impacting the well-being of patients and causing various negative consequences. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) offer promising solutions for managing anemia in CKD. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness of short-acting (Eprex) and long-acting (Aranesp) ESAs.
METHOD
This comparative prospective cohort cost-effectiveness study was carried out over 6 months among adult Egyptian hemodialysis patients of either gender. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the type of ESA administered: the Eprex group, receiving epoetin alfa, and the Aranesp group, receiving darbepoetin alfa. These two treatment groups' efficacy, safety, and cost were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS
Of 127 hemodialysis patients, 60 (47.2%) received Eprex, while 67 (52.8%) were treated with Aranesp. Target hemoglobin (Hb) was achieved by 50.6% of patients in the Eprex group versus 63.4% in the Aranesp group, with a significant difference ( < 0.001). Both treatment groups exhibited a similar safety profile, while Aranesp was considered the cost-saving protocol.
CONCLUSION
In hemodialysis Egyptian patients, Aranesp with extended dosing intervals proved to be more effective in achieving target Hb with comparable adverse effect profiles, a substantial cost-saving strategy, and offered time-saving advantages for medical staff workload compared to Eprex.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The Clinicaltrial.gov registration ID is NCT05699109 (26/01/2023).
PubMed: 38567102
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2024.16 -
Chronic Diseases and Translational... Mar 2024[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.13.].
Corrigendum: Darbepoetin alfa injection versus epoetin alfa injection for treating anemia of Chinese hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney failure: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase III trail.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.13.].
PubMed: 38450310
DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.93 -
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023Clinically, glaucoma is a serious problem because it is asymptomatic until a relatively late stage in most cases, which can lead to delays in the diagnosis and treatment...
PURPOSE
Clinically, glaucoma is a serious problem because it is asymptomatic until a relatively late stage in most cases, which can lead to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify the rank-order of the association of glaucoma with the causative drugs using a spontaneous reporting system database.
METHODS
Data were extracted from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (Japan). Based on reports of glaucoma caused by all drugs, we calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for glaucoma.
RESULTS
Among 609 reports of adverse events corresponding to glaucoma (46%, women), the most frequently implicated drug were steroids (prednisolone, betamethasone sodium phosphate, triamcinolone acetonide, and fluorometholone), pregabalin, ranibizumab, crizotinib, tacrolimus hydrate, darbepoetin alfa, and foscarnet sodium hydrate. Among 207 reports involved in angle-closure glaucoma (86%, women), anticholinergic drug and antidepressants ranked high and showed signals. Signals were also detected in bromazepam (ROR, 69.7; 95% CI, 30.9-157.5), oral brotizolam (ROR, 16.6; 95% CI, 6.18-44.8), and oral milnacipran hydrochloride (ROR, 22.8; 95% CI, 8.46-61.4) for angle-closure glaucoma.
CONCLUSION
A national pharmacovigilance database enabled us to identify the drugs that frequently induce glaucoma. The likelihood of the reporting of glaucoma varied among the drugs, which should be used carefully in clinical practice to avoid it.
PubMed: 38050555
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S439255 -
BMC Nephrology Jun 2023Appropriate management of anemia in patients with hemodialysis (HD) involves the administration of iron supplementation and erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), in...
BACKGROUND
Appropriate management of anemia in patients with hemodialysis (HD) involves the administration of iron supplementation and erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), in addition to monitoring the response. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment of anemia in patients with HD and describe the factors associated with it and its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
METHODS
The study was cross-sectional in design. The patients were included from three dialysis centers in Palestine from June to September 2018. The data collection instrument consisted of two portions; the initial portion contained demographic and clinical information on the patients, while the second consisted of the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Scale (EQ-5D-5 L) and the visual analog scale EQ (EQ-VAS).
RESULTS
The study included 226 patients. Their mean age (± SD) was 57 ± 13.9 years. The mean level of hemoglobin (Hb) (± SD) was 10.63 ± 1.71 g/dl, and 34.1% of the patients had a Hb level of 10-11.5 g/dl. All patients who required iron supplementation received it intravenously with a dose of 100 mg of iron sucrose. Almost 86.7% of the patients received darbepoetin alfa intravenously at 0.45 mcg/kg a week, and 24% had a Hb level > 11.5 g/dl. There were significant associations between the level of Hb and the number of comorbid diseases and the ESA that was received. However, other demographics and clinical factors did not significantly affect Hb levels. Certain variables, such as exercise, were a predictor of a higher quality of life. It should be noted that there is a significant impact of a low Hb value on the EQ-VAS scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study found that more than half of the patients had a Hb level below the recommended goal of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Furthermore, a significant association was found between patients' Hb level and HRQOL. Therefore, the appropriate treatment of anemia in patients with HD should be followed by adherence to the guideline recommendations, which consequently improves the HRQOL of HD patients, in addition to obtaining optimal therapy.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Quality of Life; Cross-Sectional Studies; Anemia; Renal Dialysis; Iron
PubMed: 37391687
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03254-7 -
Nutrients Feb 2024Since zinc is involved in many aspects of the hematopoietic process, zinc supplementation can reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients undergoing...
Since zinc is involved in many aspects of the hematopoietic process, zinc supplementation can reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, it remains unclear whether hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have similar reduction effects. HIF-PHI stabilizes HIF, which promotes hematopoiesis, although HIF-1α levels are downregulated by zinc. This study aimed to investigate the effect of zinc supplementation on the hematopoietic effect of HIF-PHI in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Thirty patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis who underwent periods of treatment with roxadustat or darbepoetin alfa during the past 3 years were retrospectively observed. Participants who underwent periods with and without zinc supplementation were selected, with nine treated with darbepoetin alfa and nine treated with roxadustat. Similarly to the ESA responsiveness index (ERI), the hematopoietic effect of zinc supplementation was determined by the HIF-PHI responsiveness index (HRI), which was calculated by dividing the HIF-PHI dose (mg/week) by the patient's dry weight (kg) and hemoglobin level (g/L). Zinc supplementation significantly increased ERI ( < 0.05), but no significant change was observed ( = 0.931) in HRI. Although zinc supplementation did not significantly affect HRI, adequate zinc supplementation is required to alleviate concerns such as vascular calcification and increased serum copper during the use of HIF-PHI.
Topics: Humans; Hematinics; Anemia; Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors; Zinc; Erythropoiesis; Prolyl Hydroxylases; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Darbepoetin alfa; Retrospective Studies; Glycine; Dietary Supplements
PubMed: 38398842
DOI: 10.3390/nu16040520 -
Case Reports in Ophthalmology 2024Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors, used in the treatment of renal anemia, hold the potential to increase the production of vascular...
INTRODUCTION
Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors, used in the treatment of renal anemia, hold the potential to increase the production of vascular endothelial growth factors. Therefore, HIF-PH inhibitors may exacerbate retinal hemorrhage in diseases such as diabetic retinopathy. Here, we present a case involving the administration of an HIF-PH inhibitor, resulting in the exacerbation of retinal hemorrhage in a patient with diabetic retinopathy.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 32-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and renal anemia caused by diabetic nephropathy was referred to our department for ophthalmic examination, revealing diabetic retinopathy with scattered retinal hemorrhages, exudates, and diabetic maculopathy in both eyes. Darbepoetin alfa was initially administered and switched to the HIF-PH inhibitor roxadustat on day 74. By day 88, fresh retinal hemorrhage was observed in the right eye. On day 132, the retinal hemorrhage had further worsened, with new preretinal hemorrhage in both eyes. Roxadustat was discontinued, replaced with darbepoetin alfa, resulting in retinal hemorrhage improvement by day 181 (49 days post-roxadustat cessation). On day 201, fundus hemorrhage further improved, optical coherence tomography showed no macular edema or subretinal fluid, and the retina was thinning. Fluorescein angiography showed neovascular vessels, active fluorescein leakage, and extensive avascular areas in both eyes, prompting pan-retinal photocoagulation. Visual acuity remained stable throughout treatment.
CONCLUSION
Patients with advanced diabetic retinopathy taking HIF-PH inhibitors should be aware of retinal hemorrhage exacerbations. If observed, the treatment plan, including discontinuation of the HIF-PH inhibitor or switching to another agent, should be discussed with a diabetologist, nephrologist, and ophthalmologist.
PubMed: 38529001
DOI: 10.1159/000537913