-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2023A panic attack is a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset and reaches a peak within 10 minutes. The main symptoms involve bodily systems, such as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A panic attack is a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset and reaches a peak within 10 minutes. The main symptoms involve bodily systems, such as racing heart, chest pain, sweating, shaking, dizziness, flushing, churning stomach, faintness and breathlessness. Other recognised panic attack symptoms involve fearful cognitions, such as the fear of collapse, going mad or dying, and derealisation (the sensation that the world is unreal). Panic disorder is common in the general population with a prevalence of 1% to 4%. The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants and benzodiazepines.
OBJECTIVES
To compare, via network meta-analysis, individual drugs (antidepressants and benzodiazepines) or placebo in terms of efficacy and acceptability in the acute treatment of panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. To rank individual active drugs for panic disorder (antidepressants, benzodiazepines and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To rank drug classes for panic disorder (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and benzodiazepines (BDZs) and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To explore heterogeneity and inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence in a network meta-analysis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, CENTRAL, CDSR, MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and PsycINFO to 26 May 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people aged 18 years or older of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. We included trials that compared the effectiveness of antidepressants and benzodiazepines with each other or with a placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data and continuous data as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD): response to treatment (i.e. substantial improvement from baseline as defined by the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), total number of dropouts due to any reason (as a proxy measure of treatment acceptability: dichotomous outcome), remission (i.e. satisfactory end state as defined by global judgement of the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), panic symptom scales and global judgement (continuous outcome), frequency of panic attacks (as recorded, for example, by a panic diary; continuous outcome), agoraphobia (dichotomous outcome). We assessed the certainty of evidence using threshold analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
Overall, we included 70 trials in this review. Sample sizes ranged between 5 and 445 participants in each arm, and the total sample size per study ranged from 10 to 1168. Thirty-five studies included sample sizes of over 100 participants. There is evidence from 48 RCTs (N = 10,118) that most medications are more effective in the response outcome than placebo. In particular, diazepam, alprazolam, clonazepam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, clomipramine, fluoxetine and adinazolam showed the strongest effect, with diazepam, alprazolam and clonazepam ranking as the most effective. We found heterogeneity in most of the comparisons, but our threshold analyses suggest that this is unlikely to impact the findings of the network meta-analysis. Results from 64 RCTs (N = 12,310) suggest that most medications are associated with either a reduced or similar risk of dropouts to placebo. Alprazolam and diazepam were associated with a lower dropout rate compared to placebo and were ranked as the most tolerated of all the medications examined. Thirty-two RCTs (N = 8569) were included in the remission outcome. Most medications were more effective than placebo, namely desipramine, fluoxetine, clonazepam, diazepam, fluvoxamine, imipramine, venlafaxine and paroxetine, and their effects were clinically meaningful. Amongst these medications, desipramine and alprazolam were ranked highest. Thirty-five RCTs (N = 8826) are included in the continuous outcome reduction in panic scale scores. Brofaromine, clonazepam and reboxetine had the strongest reductions in panic symptoms compared to placebo, but results were based on either one trial or very small trials. Forty-one RCTs (N = 7853) are included in the frequency of panic attack outcome. Only clonazepam and alprazolam showed a strong reduction in the frequency of panic attacks compared to placebo, and were ranked highest. Twenty-six RCTs (N = 7044) provided data for agoraphobia. The strongest reductions in agoraphobia symptoms were found for citalopram, reboxetine, escitalopram, clomipramine and diazepam, compared to placebo. For the pooled intervention classes, we examined the two primary outcomes (response and dropout). The classes of medication were: SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs. For the response outcome, all classes of medications examined were more effective than placebo. TCAs as a class ranked as the most effective, followed by BDZs and MAOIs. SSRIs as a class ranked fifth on average, while SNRIs were ranked lowest. When we compared classes of medication with each other for the response outcome, we found no difference between classes. Comparisons between MAOIs and TCAs and between BDZs and TCAs also suggested no differences between these medications, but the results were imprecise. For the dropout outcome, BDZs were the only class associated with a lower dropout compared to placebo and were ranked first in terms of tolerability. The other classes did not show any difference in dropouts compared to placebo. In terms of ranking, TCAs are on average second to BDZs, followed by SNRIs, then by SSRIs and lastly by MAOIs. BDZs were associated with lower dropout rates compared to SSRIs, SNRIs and TCAs. The quality of the studies comparing antidepressants with placebo was moderate, while the quality of the studies comparing BDZs with placebo and antidepressants was low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In terms of efficacy, SSRIs, SNRIs (venlafaxine), TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs may be effective, with little difference between classes. However, it is important to note that the reliability of these findings may be limited due to the overall low quality of the studies, with all having unclear or high risk of bias across multiple domains. Within classes, some differences emerged. For example, amongst the SSRIs paroxetine and fluoxetine seem to have stronger evidence of efficacy than sertraline. Benzodiazepines appear to have a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability (incidence of dropouts) over other classes.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Panic Disorder; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Paroxetine; Fluoxetine; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Alprazolam; Clomipramine; Reboxetine; Clonazepam; Desipramine; Network Meta-Analysis; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Benzodiazepines; Diazepam
PubMed: 38014714
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3 -
Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) Sep 2023Desipramine a representative of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) promotes recovery of depressed patients by inhibition of reuptake of neurotransmitters serotonin (SER)...
Desipramine induces eryptosis in human erythrocytes, an effect blunted by nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and N-acetyl-L-cysteine but enhanced by Calcium depletion.
Desipramine a representative of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) promotes recovery of depressed patients by inhibition of reuptake of neurotransmitters serotonin (SER) and norepinephrine (NE) in the presynaptic membrane by directly blocking their respective transporters SERT and NET. To study the effect of desipramine on programmed erythrocyte death (eryptosis) and explore the underlying mechanisms. Phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure on the cell surface as marker of cell death was estimated from annexin-V-binding, cell volume from forward scatter in flow cytometry. Hemolysis was determined photometrically, and intracellular glutathione [GSH] from high performance liquid chromatography. Desipramine dose-dependently significantly enhanced the percentage of annexin-V-binding cells and didn´t impact glutathione (GSH) synthesis. Desipramine-induced eryptosis was significantly reversed by pre-treatment of erythrocytes with either nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The highest inhibitory effect was obtained by using both inhibitors together. Calcium (Ca) depletion aggravated desipramine-induced eryptosis. Changing the order of treatment, i.e. desipramine first followed by inhibitors, could not influence the inhibitory effect of SNP or NAC. Antidepressants-caused intoxication can be treated by SNP and NAC, respectively. B) Patients with chronic hypocalcemia should not be treated with tricyclic anti-depressants or their dose should be noticeably reduced.
Topics: Humans; Nitric Oxide Donors; Nitroprusside; Eryptosis; Calcium; Acetylcysteine; Desipramine; Erythrocytes; Glutathione; Annexins; Phosphatidylserines; Cell Size; Ceramides; Reactive Oxygen Species; Oxidative Stress
PubMed: 37522842
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2234177 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Due to the high prevalence of depression among cancer patients, antidepressant medications are frequently administered as adjuvant treatment. However, the safety of such...
Due to the high prevalence of depression among cancer patients, antidepressant medications are frequently administered as adjuvant treatment. However, the safety of such medications in the development of metastasis is unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of fluoxetine, desipramine, and mirtazapine on the liver metastasis of murine C26 colon carcinoma (cc). Balb/c male mice were administered these antidepressants intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 14 days following intrasplenic injections of C26 colon carcinoma cells. Desipramine and fluoxetine, but not mirtazapine, significantly increased the number of tumor foci and total volume of the tumor in liver tissue. This effect was associated with a decrease in the ability of splenocytes to produce interleukin (IL)-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ and an increase in their ability to produce interleukin (IL)-10. Similar changes were observed in plasma IL-1β, IFN-γ, and IL-10 levels. The current study demonstrates that the stimulatory effect of desipramine and fluoxetine, but not mirtazapine, on experimental colon cancer liver metastasis is associated with a suppression of immune defenses against the tumor.
Topics: Male; Mice; Animals; Fluoxetine; Mirtazapine; Desipramine; Cytokines; Antidepressive Agents; Liver Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Colonic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37409130
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1160977 -
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Dec 2023The main purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different medications used to treat bulimia nervosa (BN). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The main purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different medications used to treat bulimia nervosa (BN).
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from published sources through searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to November 2022. Primary outcomes were changes in the frequency of binge eating episodes and vomiting episodes from baseline to endpoint. Secondary outcomes were differences in the improvement of scores in depressive symptoms, tolerability (dropout due to adverse events) and weight change.
RESULTS
The literature search ultimately included 11 drugs, 33 studies and 6 types of drugs, 8 trials with TCAs (imipramine, desipramine), 14 with SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine), 6 with MAOIs (phenelzine, moclobemide and brofaromine), 3 with antiepileptic drugs (topiramate), 1 with mood stabilizers (lithium), and 1 with amphetamine-type appetite suppressant (fenfluramine). The reduction in binge eating episodes was more likely due to these drugs than the placebo, and the SMD was -0.4 (95% CI -0.61 ~ -0.19); the changes in the frequency of vomiting episodes (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI -0.3 ~ -0.03); weight (WMD = -3.05, 95% CI -5.97 ~ -0.13); and depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.32, 95% CI -0.51 ~ -0.13). However, no significant difference was found in dropout due to adverse events (RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.14 ~ 2.41).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis indicates that most pharmacotherapies decreased the frequency of binge-eating and vomiting episodes, body weight, and depressive symptoms in BN patients, but the efficacy was not significant. In each drug the efficacy is different, treating different aspects, different symptoms to improve the clinical performance of bulimia nervosa.
Topics: Humans; Bulimia Nervosa; Bulimia; Fluoxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Vomiting
PubMed: 38042827
DOI: 10.1186/s40360-023-00713-7 -
Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces Feb 2024The antidepressant drug imipramine, and its metabolite desipramine show different extents of interaction with, and passive permeation through, cellular membrane models,...
HYPOTHESIS
The antidepressant drug imipramine, and its metabolite desipramine show different extents of interaction with, and passive permeation through, cellular membrane models, with the effects depending on the membrane composition. Through multimodal interrogation, we can observe that the drugs have a direct impact on the physicochemical properties of the membrane, that may play a role in their pharmacokinetics.
EXPERIMENTS
Microcavity pore-suspended lipid bilayers (MSLBs) of four different compositions, each with a different headgroup charge namely; zwitterionic dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), mixed DOPC and negatively charged dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol (DOPG) (3:1), mixed DOPC and positively charged dioleoyltrimethylammoniumpropane (DOTAP) (3:1), and with increasing complex composition mimicking blood-brain-barrier (BBB) were prepared on gold and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates using a Langmuir-Blodgett-vesicle fusion method. The molecular interaction and permeation of antidepressants, imipramine, and its metabolite desipramine with the lipid bilayers were evaluated using highly sensitive label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Drug-induced membrane packing/fluidity alterations were assessed using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) and fluorescence lifetime correlation spectroscopy (FLCS) of MSLB over microfluidic PDMS array.
FINDINGS
Using EIS to evaluate in real-time membrane admittance changes, we found that imipramine greatly increases the ion permeability of negatively charged DOPC:DOPG (3:1) membranes. The effect was observed also at neutral (DOPC) and to a lesser extent at positively charged DOPC:DOTAP(3:1) membranes. In contrast, desipramine had a much weaker impact on ion permeability across all bilayer compositions. Temporal capacitance data show that desipramine intercalates at negatively charged membrane thereby increasing the thickness of the membrane. The overall kinetics of the imipramine permeation is higher than that of desipramine. This was confirmed using SERS, which also provides an evaluation of drug passive permeation based on arrival time across the membrane. Using FLCS, we found that imipramine increases the lipid membrane fluidity, whereas desipramine lowers it, with the exception of the negatively charged membrane. A translocation rate pharmacokinetics model was established for the first time at the MSLB platform by real-time monitoring of the variation in membrane resistance of pristine DOPC and blood-brain-barrier (BBB) membrane.
Topics: Lipid Bilayers; Imipramine; Desipramine; Phosphatidylcholines; Antidepressive Agents; Permeability; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated
PubMed: 38128360
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113688 -
Therapeutic Advances in... 2024Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remain widely prescribed for depression and many other conditions. There may be important differences between individual TCA in regard... (Review)
Review
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remain widely prescribed for depression and many other conditions. There may be important differences between individual TCA in regard to their overdose toxicity and their cardiac toxicity in clinical use. We conducted a systematic review to compare the toxicity of individual TCA in overdose and the risk of serious adverse cardiac events occurring with therapeutic doses. We used the fatal toxicity index (FTI) and case fatality ratio as markers of fatality in overdose, and hazard ratios or odds ratios for the risk of cardiovascular adverse events during normal clinical use. In all, 30 reports of mortality in overdose and 14 observational studies assessing the risk of cardiovascular adverse events in clinical use were included. FTI values were of the same order of magnitude (10-10) for all TCAs except lofepramine. Desipramine appears to be somewhat more likely than other TCAs to lead to death in overdose. Amitriptyline, clomipramine, dothiepin/dosulepin, doxepin, trimipramine and imipramine showed broadly similar toxicity and were usually reported to be less toxic than desipramine. Data on nortriptyline were contradictory. Lofepramine had the lowest risk of death in overdose. The rank order of overdose toxicity was broadly consistent between different FTI definitions and between markers used. With respect to the risk of cardiovascular events at clinically relevant exposure, amitriptyline, nortriptyline and lofepramine were associated with a greater risk of in-use cardiotoxicity. All measures of overdose toxicity were subject to external influences and confounding. The continued use of TCAs in depression and other conditions should be minimized when considering their undoubted toxicity in overdose and possible toxicity in normal clinical use.
PubMed: 38827015
DOI: 10.1177/20451253241243297 -
Sleep Medicine Mar 2024The hippocampus (HPC) plays a pivotal role in fear learning and memory. Our two recent studies suggest that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep via the HPC downregulates fear...
The hippocampus (HPC) plays a pivotal role in fear learning and memory. Our two recent studies suggest that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep via the HPC downregulates fear memory consolidation and promotes fear extinction. However, it is not clear whether and how the dorsal and the ventral HPC regulates fear memory differently; and how the HPC in wake regulates fear memory. By chemogenetic stimulating in the HPC directly and its afferent entorhinal cortex that selectively activated the HPC in REM sleep for 3-6 h post-fear-acquisition, we found that HPC activation in REM sleep consolidated fear extinction memory. In particular, dorsal HPC (dHPC) stimulation in REM sleep virtually eliminated fear memory by enhancing fear extinction and reducing fear memory consolidation. By contrast, chemogenetic stimulating HPC afferent the supramammillary nucleus (SUM) induced 3-hr wake with HPC activation impaired fear extinction. Finally, desipramine (DMI) injection that selectively eliminated REM sleep for >6 h impaired fear extinction. Our results demonstrate that the HPC is critical for fear memory regulation; and wake HPC and REM sleep HPC have an opposite role in fear extinction of respective impairment and consolidation.
Topics: Humans; Fear; Extinction, Psychological; Sleep; Learning; Hippocampus; Memory Consolidation
PubMed: 38367358
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.02.022 -
The American Journal of Case Reports Aug 2023BACKGROUND Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) drugs are a common cause of fatal poisoning because of their cardiotoxic and arrhythmogenic effects. Classic supportive...
BACKGROUND Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) drugs are a common cause of fatal poisoning because of their cardiotoxic and arrhythmogenic effects. Classic supportive management includes sodium bicarbonate, gastrointestinal chelating agents, and vasopressors. Recently, intravenous lipid emulsion (supported by a low evidence level) has also been used. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 55-year-old woman admitted to our Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with acute imipramine self-poisoning. She arrived at the emergency department 7 hours after imipramine ingestion; she had severe rhabdomyolysis upon admission, with creatine phosphokinase levels at about 52 500 IU/L (normal, <200 IU/L). She quickly developed cardiogenic shock and malign arrhythmia requiring veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with CytoSorb® (CytoSorbents, Monmouth Junction, New York, United Sates of America) was started 19 hours after admission. We performed serial blood measurements of imipramine and its active metabolite desipramine as well as viewing the levels on the CRRT-circuit monitor. Cardiac function improved and ECMO was explanted after 4 days. She also had severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, which resolved spontaneously. The neurologic outcome was favorable despite early myoclonus. The patient regained consciousness on the fifth day. Her clinical evolution was marked by acute ischemia of the lower left limb due to the arterial ECMO cannula. CONCLUSIONS These measurements document the efficacy of the CytoSorb® adsorber in removing a lipophilic drug from a patient's bloodstream. To our knowledge, this is the first published case of CytoSorb® extracorporeal blood purification therapy for acute TCA poisoning.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Shock, Cardiogenic; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Imipramine
PubMed: 37542369
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.939884