-
British Journal of Anaesthesia Oct 2023Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major problem after surgery. Even with double prophylactic therapy including dexamethasone and a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major problem after surgery. Even with double prophylactic therapy including dexamethasone and a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, the incidence is still high in many at-risk patients. Fosaprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is an effective antiemetic, but its efficacy and safety in combination antiemetic therapy for preventing PONV remain unclear.
METHODS
In this randomised, controlled, double-blind trial, 1154 participants at high risk of PONV and undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were randomly assigned to either a fosaprepitant group (n=577) receiving fosaprepitant 150 mg i.v. dissolved in 0.9% saline 150 ml, or a placebo group (n=577) receiving 0.9% saline 150 ml before anaesthesia induction. Dexamethasone 5 mg i.v. and palonosetron 0.075 i.v. mg were each administered in both groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV (defined as nausea, retching, or vomiting) during the first 24 postoperative hours.
RESULTS
The incidence of PONV during the first 24 postoperative hours was lower in the fosaprepitant group (32.4% vs 48.7%; adjusted risk difference -16.9% [95% confidence interval: -22.4 to -11.4%]; adjusted risk ratio 0.65 [95% CI: 0.57 to 0.76]; P<0.001). There were no differences in severe adverse events between groups, but the incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher (38.0% vs 31.7%, P=0.026) and intraoperative hypertension (40.6% vs 49.2%, P=0.003) was lower in the fosaprepitant group.
CONCLUSIONS
Fosaprepitant added to dexamethasone and palonosetron reduced the incidence of PONV in patients at high risk of PONV undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Notably, it increased the incidence of intraoperative hypotension.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04853147.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Antiemetics; Palonosetron; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Saline Solution; Laparoscopy; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37423834
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.029 -
BMC Anesthesiology Nov 2023Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of dexamethasone and ramosetron on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in low-risk patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
BACKGROUND
Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics in patients at low risk of developing PONV.
METHODS
In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 177 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups. Patients allocated to group C (control group) received 2 mL of intravenous 0.9% saline, those allocated to group R (ramosetron group) received 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron, and those allocated to group DR (ramosetron plus dexamethasone group) received 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron.
RESULTS
Finally, 174 patients completed the study, and the types of surgeries were orthopedic (n = 80), rhinologic (n = 47), urologic (n = 29), and others (n = 18). The incidence of PONV up to 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in group DR than in group C. The incidence of PONV up to 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. The usage pattern of rescue antiemetics was consistent with the incidence of PONV. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of dexamethasone and ramosetron demonstrated a superior effect in preventing PONV for 48 h after surgery under general anesthesia than saline in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Compared with saline injections, ramosetron injections yielded better outcomes for the incidence of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical trial registration number: [email protected], KCT0006749.
Topics: Humans; Analgesics; Antiemetics; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 37936053
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02334-3 -
Experience of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study from Türkiye.Turkish Journal of Haematology :... Dec 2023This study aimed to evaluate patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who underwent daratumumab (DARA) therapy.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who underwent daratumumab (DARA) therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This multicenter retrospective study included 134 patients who underwent at least two courses of DARA from February 1, 2018, to April 15, 2022. Epidemiological, disease, and treatment characteristics of patients and treatment-related side effects were evaluated. Survival analysis was performed.
RESULTS
The median age at the start of DARA was 60 (range: 35-88), with 56 patients (41.8%) being female and 48 (58.2%) being male. The median time to initiation of DARA and the median follow-up time were 41.2 (5.1-223) and 5.7 (2.1-24.1) months, respectively. The overall response rate after DARA therapy was 75 (55.9%), and very good partial response or better was observed in 48 (35.8%) patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients were 11.6 (7.8-15.5) and 8.0 (5.1-10.9) months, respectively. OS was higher for patients undergoing treatment with DARA and bortezomib-dexamethasone (DARA-Vd) compared to those undergoing treatment with DARA and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DARA-Rd) (16.9 vs. 8.3 months; p=0.014). Among patients undergoing DARA-Rd, PFS was higher in those without extramedullary disease compared to those with extramedullary disease (not achieved vs. 3.7 months; odds ratio: 3.4; p<0.001). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (1-8). Initiation of DARA therapy in the early period provided an advantage for OS and PFS, although it was statistically insignificant. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 18 (13.4%) patients. All reactions occurred during the first infusion and most reactions were of grade 1 or 2 (94.5%). The frequency of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was higher in the DARA-Rd group (61.9% vs. 24.7%, p<0.001 and 42.9% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Our study provides real-life data in terms of DARA therapy for patients with RRMM and supports the early initiation of DARA therapy.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37961952
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2023.0029 -
Nature Medicine Feb 2024Due to evolving treatment standards for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, many patients will be triple-class exposed after initial relapses and have poor survival. Novel...
Due to evolving treatment standards for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, many patients will be triple-class exposed after initial relapses and have poor survival. Novel therapies and combinations are therefore required to improve outcomes. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted biologics have emerged as an important new area of therapeutics for relapsed multiple myeloma. The two-part ALGONQUIN trial evaluated various doses and schedules of the anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients who are lenalidomide refractory and proteosome inhibitor exposed. The primary endpoints, including evaluating dose-limiting toxicities, establishing the recommended Part 2 dose (RP2D) and overall response rate for patients treated at the RP2D, were met. Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Patients treated on study (N = 87) had a median of three previous regimens and 55.2% were triple-class refractory. At the RP2D the most common adverse events were decrease in best-corrected visual acuity (71.1%), keratopathy (65.8%), fatigue (57.9%), infection (47.4%; 7.9% grade ≥3), neutropenia (39.5%) and thrombocytopenia (39.5%). For RP2D patients (n = 38), the overall response rate was 85.3%, ≥very good partial response 75.7% and estimated two-year progression-free survival 52.8% (95% confidence interval, 33.9% to 82.4%), at a median follow-up of 13.9 months. The RP2D schedule was associated with manageable antibody-drug conjugate-associated corneal adverse events and improved tolerability without compromising efficacy. Belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone induced durable responses with promising overall survival in relapsed multiple myeloma, the results of which are yet to be confirmed in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03715478 .
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Treatment Outcome; Dexamethasone; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Immunoconjugates; Thalidomide; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 38177852
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02703-y -
Haematologica Mar 2024Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study.
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Dexamethasone; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms, Plasma Cell; Neutropenia; Phenylalanine; Proteasome Inhibitors; Transplantation, Autologous; United States; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37646660
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283509 -
Blood Advances Oct 2023We conducted a phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and KPd with daratumumab (Dara-KPd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The...
We conducted a phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and KPd with daratumumab (Dara-KPd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The primary end points were identification of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of KPd for phase 1, and rates of overall response (ORR) and near complete response (nCR) after 4 cycles of KPd and Dara-KPd, respectively, for phase 2. The MTD for KPd was carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (cycles 1-8) and days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for cycles 9 and beyond; oral pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21; and oral dexamethasone 40 mg weekly in 28-day cycles. Sixty-six patients received KPd, including 34 at the MTD. The ORR after 4 cycles of KPd at the MTD was 27/34 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-91%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months and overall survival (OS) 44 months. Twenty-eight patients received Dara-KPd. The rate of nCR or better after 4 cycles was 11/28 (39%; 95% CI, 22%-59%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. As the best response to Dara-KPd, the ORR was 25/28 (89%) and the rate of measurable residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (10-5) was 17/26 (65%). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the median PFS and OS for Dara-KPd were not reached. Dara-KPd induced deeper and more durable responses than KPd without compromising safety in a predominantly high-risk, lenalidomide-refractory population, warranting further evaluation of this quadruplet. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01665794.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 36763537
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008866 -
European Journal of Medical Research Jul 2023COVID-19 has adversely affected global healthcare infrastructure since 2019. Currently, there are no large-scale published reports on the efficacy of combination therapy...
IMPORTANCE
COVID-19 has adversely affected global healthcare infrastructure since 2019. Currently, there are no large-scale published reports on the efficacy of combination therapy of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and tocilizumab on COVID-19 patients.
OBJECTIVES
Is the combination therapy of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and tocilizumab superior to other treatments on hospitalized COVID-19 patients?
DESIGN
This is a retrospective, comparative effectiveness study.
SETTING
Single-center study PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTIONS: We analyzed different inpatient COVID-19 treatment options available in the United States and their impact on hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Hospitalized COVID-19 were categorized as "mild," "moderate" and "severe'' based on the highest level of oxygen required; room air, nasal cannula, or high flow/PAP/intubation, respectively. Patients were treated in accordance with the availability of medications and the latest treatment guidelines.
MAIN OUTCOMES
The endpoints of the study are hospital discharges and death during hospitalization.
RESULTS
1233 COVID-19 patients were admitted from 2020 to 2021. No treatment combinations showed a statistically significant decrease in hospital LOS in mild COVID-19 patients (p = 0.186). In moderate patients, the combination of remdesivir and dexamethasone slightly decreased LOS by 1 day (p = 0.007). In severe patients, the three-drug combination of remdesivir, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab decreased LOS by 8 days (p = 0.0034) when compared to nonviable treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma transfusion. However, it did not show any statistically significant benefit when compared to two-drug regimens (dexamethasone plus remdesivir) in severe COVID-19 (p = 0.116). No treatment arm appeared to show a statistically significant decrease in mortality for severe COVID-19 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that three-drug combination may decrease LOS in severe COVID-19 patients when compared to two-drug therapy. However, the trend was not supported by statistical analysis. Remdesivir may not be clinically beneficial for mild hospitalized COVID-19 patients; considering its cost, one could reserve it for moderate and severe patients. Triple drug therapies, while potentially reducing LOS for severe patients, do not affect overall mortality. Additional patient data may increase statistical power and solidify these findings.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Length of Stay; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Retrospective Studies; Blood Component Transfusion; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Serotherapy; Plasma; Dexamethasone; Hospitals
PubMed: 37400927
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01201-8 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Oct 2023The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with Kd. A post-hoc analysis of East Asian patients in IKEMA evaluated the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd in this population and was previously published.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to receive Isa-Kd or Kd. The primary endpoint was PFS, and key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Of the IKEMA overall population, 46 patients were of East Asian descent. This is an updated analysis of the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd in East Asian patients, including data through 14 January 2022.
RESULTS
Isa-Kd continued to demonstrate improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, with improved PFS, rate of ≥VGPR, CR rate, and MRD negativity, that was consistent with the overall IKEMA population. The rate of Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events was also consistent with the prior analysis and overall IKEMA population.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this analysis, Isa-Kd is a novel treatment option for East Asian patients with relapsed MM.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; East Asian People; Multiple Myeloma; Recurrence
PubMed: 37479547
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.011 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Dec 2023Our preclinical studies showed that the oncolytic reovirus formulation pelareorep (PELA) has significant immunomodulatory anti-myeloma activity. We conducted an...
PURPOSE
Our preclinical studies showed that the oncolytic reovirus formulation pelareorep (PELA) has significant immunomodulatory anti-myeloma activity. We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial to evaluate PELA in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) and bortezomib (BZ) and define the tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) in patients with multiple myeloma treated with this regimen.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (n = 14) were enrolled in a phase Ib clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02514382) of three escalating PELA doses administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Patients received 40 mg Dex and 1.5 mg/m2 BZ on Days 1, 8, and 15. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Pre- and posttreatment bone marrow specimens (IHC, n = 9; imaging mass cytometry, n = 6) and peripheral blood samples were collected for analysis (flow cytometry, n = 5; T-cell receptor clonality, n = 7; cytokine assay, n = 7).
RESULTS
PELA/BZ/Dex was well-tolerated in all patients. Treatment-emergent toxicities were transient, and no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Six (55%) of 11 response-evaluable patients showed decreased paraprotein. Treatment increased T and natural killer cell activation, inflammatory cytokine release, and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in bone marrow. Compared with nonresponders, responders had higher reovirus protein levels, increased cytotoxic T-cell infiltration posttreatment, cytotoxic T cells in significantly closer proximity to multiple myeloma cells, and larger populations of a novel immune-primed multiple myeloma phenotype (CD138+ IDO1+HLA-ABCHigh), indicating immunomodulation.
CONCLUSIONS
PELA/BZ/Dex is well-tolerated and associated with anti-multiple myeloma activity in a subset of responding patients, characterized by immune reprogramming and TiME changes, warranting further investigation of PELA as an immunomodulator.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Oncolytic Virotherapy; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Cytokines; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37812476
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0229 -
Cureus Apr 2024The muscle cells myocytes are differentiated for the purpose of contraction function, which plays a major role in body metabolism and energy haemostasis, through...
BACKGROUND
The muscle cells myocytes are differentiated for the purpose of contraction function, which plays a major role in body metabolism and energy haemostasis, through different metabolic pathways, such as glucose and protein metabolic pathways. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) plays a crucial role by reversibly catalysing transamination between alanine and a-ketoglutarate to form pyruvate and glutamate and by mediating the conversion of these four major intermediate metabolites. ALT plays important roles for energy homeostasis during fasting and prolonged exercise anaerobically, when muscle protein must first be broken down into its constituent amino acids.
METHODS
Mouse skeletal myoblast cell line C2C12 was cultured in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) growth medium, supplied with 2% horse serum supplemented with 1 uM insulin, 2 mM glutamine and penicillin and streptomycin antibiotics for seven days. The differentiation medium is refreshed every 24 hours. Then, C2C12 cells were treated with insulin and dexamethasone to examine their effects on myocytes' ALT activity.
RESULTS
In our study, we found an impact on ALT activity under different influences, including C2C12 differentiation, dexamethasone and insulin treatments, which shed light on the dynamic interplay between ALT activity, alanine metabolism, and cellular states, like differentiation and stress responses.
CONCLUSION
The study provides valuable insights into the dynamic regulation of ALT activity and alanine metabolism in C2C12 cells across differentiation and drug treatments. Further research is encouraged to explore the underlying mechanisms and their implications for muscle function, differentiation and potential therapeutic interventions in metabolic disorders.
PubMed: 38817503
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59331