-
Annals of Medicine Dec 2023Excessive oxygen free radicals and toxic substances are generated in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) process. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a common anesthetic and sedative...
Excessive oxygen free radicals and toxic substances are generated in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) process. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a common anesthetic and sedative drug, can considerably boost glutathione (GSH), which has anti-copper influx effects. Focusing on cuproptosis, the mechanism of DEX in the I/R was revealed. Using the I/R rat model, the effects of DEX and the copper chelator D-penicillamine on cerebral infarct volume, copper levels, mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential, GSH content, and enrichment of cuproptosis functional proteins were examined. The involvement of ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) in the DEX regulatory pathway was verified by overexpressing FDX1 . DEX could significantly reduce cerebral infarction in rats, reduce copper levels, maintain mitochondrial functions, increase GSH, and reduce the content of key proteins related to cuproptosis. These aspects were replicated and revealed that FDX1 overexpression partially reversed the impacts of DEX. Together, cuproptosis occurs in the brain I/R process and DEX can enhance cell survival by blocking the primary pathway mediated by FDX1.KEY MESSAGESDexmedetomidine reduces cerebral infarction in the I/R rat models.Dexmedetomidine reduces cuproptosis in the I/R rat models.FDX1, an upstream of protein fatty acylation, mediates regulation of Dexmedetomidine.
Topics: Animals; Rats; Apoptosis; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Infarction; Dexmedetomidine; Ferredoxins; Homeostasis; Reperfusion; Reperfusion Injury
PubMed: 37162502
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2209735 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Aug 2023Patients often experience severe pain after scoliosis correction surgery. Esketamine and dexmedetomidine each improves analgesia but can produce side-effects. We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients often experience severe pain after scoliosis correction surgery. Esketamine and dexmedetomidine each improves analgesia but can produce side-effects. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improves analgesia.
METHODS
Two hundred male and female adults having scoliosis correction surgery were randomised to patient-controlled sufentanil analgesia (4 μg kg in normal saline) with either a combined supplement (esketamine 0.25 mg ml and dexmedetomidine 1 μg ml) or placebo. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 72 h, defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS: 0=no pain and 10=worst pain) score ≥4 at any of seven time points. Amongst secondary outcomes, subjective sleep quality was assessed with an NRS score (0=best sleep and 10=worst sleep) for the first five postoperative nights.
RESULTS
There were 199 subjects included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean infusion rates were 5.5 μg kg h for esketamine and 0.02 μg kg h for dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome incidence was lower with the combined supplement (65.7% [65/99]) than with placebo (86.0% [86/100]; relative risk 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90; P=0.001). Subjects given the combined supplement had lower pain intensity at rest at five time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.005), lower pain intensity with movement at six time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.001), and better subjective sleep quality for the first 5 postoperative nights (median difference -2 to -1 points; P<0.001). Adverse events did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improved analgesia and subjective sleep quality after scoliosis correction surgery.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04791059.
Topics: Humans; Ketamine; Dexmedetomidine; Analgesia; Pain, Postoperative; Scoliosis; Double-Blind Method; Male; Female; Adult
PubMed: 37302963
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.001 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Sep 2023Sleep loss and its associated conditions (e.g. cognitive deficits) represent a large societal burden, but the underlying mechanisms of these cognitive deficits remain...
BACKGROUND
Sleep loss and its associated conditions (e.g. cognitive deficits) represent a large societal burden, but the underlying mechanisms of these cognitive deficits remain unknown. This study assessed the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on cognitive decline induced by sleep loss.
METHODS
C57BL/6 mice were subjected to chronic sleep restriction (CSR) for 20 h (5 pm-1 pm the next day) daily for 7 days, and cognitive tests were subsequently carried out. The neuromolecular and cellular changes that occurred in the presence and absence of DEX (100 μg kg, i.v., at 1 pm and 3 pm every day) were also investigated.
RESULTS
CSR mice displayed a decline in learning and memory by 12% (P<0.05) in the Y-maze and by 18% (P<0.01) in the novel object recognition test; these changes were associated with increases in microglial activation, CD68+ microglial phagosome counts, astrocyte-derived complement C3 secretion, and microglial C3a receptor expression (all P<0.05). Synapse elimination, as indicated by a 66% decrease in synaptophysin expression (P=0.0004) and a 45% decrease in postsynaptic density protein-95 expression (P=0.0003), was associated with the occurrence of cognitive deficits. DEX activated astrocytic α adrenoceptors and inhibited astrocytic complement C3 release to attenuate synapse elimination through microglial phagocytosis. DEX restored synaptic connections and reversed cognitive deficits induced by CSR.
CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrate that complement pathway activation associated with synapse elimination contributes to sleep loss-related cognitive deficits and that dexmedetomidine protects against sleep deprivation-induced complement activation. Dexmedetomidine holds potential for preventing cognitive deficits associated with sleep loss, which warrants further study.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Sleep Deprivation; Complement C3; Dexmedetomidine; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Complement Activation; Cognition; Hippocampus; Microglia
PubMed: 37517957
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.044 -
BMC Pediatrics Aug 2023The sedative dexmedetomidine has been shown to reduce mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis, but it is not known whether children benefit. This study explored...
BACKGROUND
The sedative dexmedetomidine has been shown to reduce mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis, but it is not known whether children benefit. This study explored the effects of dexmedetomidine on the outcomes of children with severe sepsis with mechanical ventilation.
METHODS
In this retrospective cohort study, children with severe sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation from 2016 to 2020 were categorized as dexmedetomidine and non-dexmedetomidine group. The propensity score matching was performed to match cases in both groups. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, ventilator-free days, lengths of PICU and hospital stays. The Kaplan-Meier method and was the log-rank test used to estimate the 28-day mortality rate and assess between-group differences.
RESULTS
In total, 250 patients were eligible patients: 138 in the dexmedetomidine group and 112 in the non-dexmedetomidine group. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 61 children in each group. dexmedetomidine group showed more lower 28-day mortality (9.84% vs. 26.23%, P = 0.008). During the 7-day observation period after PICU admission, the dexmedetomidine group showed significantly lower neurological and renal sub-scores at day 7 and serum creatinine level at day 3 and day 7. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of acute kidney injury, ventilator-free days, lengths of PICU and hospital stays between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
dexmedetomidine treatment in children with severe sepsis is associated with better outcomes and should therefore be considered for the sedation strategy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Respiration, Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Acute Kidney Injury; Anesthesia; Sepsis
PubMed: 37596542
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04232-6 -
JAMA Network Open Nov 2023Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in premature infants. However, the off-label use of... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
IMPORTANCE
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in premature infants. However, the off-label use of dexmedetomidine in premature infants has increased 50-fold in the past decade. Currently, there are no large studies characterizing dexmedetomidine use in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) or comparing the use of dexmedetomidine vs opioids in infants.
OBJECTIVES
To describe dexmedetomidine use patterns in the NICU and examine the association between dexmedetomidine and opioid use in premature infants.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted from November 11, 2022, to April 4, 2023. Participants were inborn infants born between 22 weeks, 0 days, and 36 weeks, 6 days, of gestation at 1 of 383 Pediatrix Medical Group NICUs across the US between calendar years 2010 and 2020.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE
Exposure to medications of interest defined as total days of exposure, timing of use, and changes over time.
RESULTS
A total of 395 122 infants were included in the analysis. Median gestational age was 34 (IQR, 32-35) weeks, and median birth weight was 2040 (IQR, 1606-2440) g. There were 384 infants (0.1% of total; 58.9% male) who received dexmedetomidine. Infants who received dexmedetomidine were born more immature, had lower birth weight, longer length of hospitalization, more opioid exposure, and more days of mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine use increased from 0.003% in 2010 to 0.185% in 2020 (P < .001 for trend), while overall opioid exposure decreased from 8.5% in 2010 to 7.2% in 2020 (P < .001 for trend). The median postmenstrual age at first dexmedetomidine exposure was 31 (IQR, 27-36) weeks, and the median postnatal age at first dexmedetomidine exposure was 3 (IQR, 1-35) days. The median duration of dexmedetomidine receipt was 6 (IQR, 2-14) days.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
The findings of this multicenter cohort study of premature infants suggest that dexmedetomidine use increased significantly between 2010 and 2020, while overall opioid exposure decreased. Future studies are required to further examine the short- and long-term effects of dexmedetomidine in premature and critically ill infants.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Analgesics, Opioid; Birth Weight; Cohort Studies; Dexmedetomidine; Infant, Premature
PubMed: 37921767
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41033 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia May 2024Dexmedetomidine improves intrapulmonary shunt in thoracic surgery and minimizes inflammatory response during one-lung ventilation (OLV). However, it is unclear whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Dexmedetomidine improves intrapulmonary shunt in thoracic surgery and minimizes inflammatory response during one-lung ventilation (OLV). However, it is unclear whether such benefits translate into less postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Our objective was to determine the impact of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of PPCs after thoracic surgery.
METHODS
Major databases were used to identify randomized trials that compared dexmedetomidine versus placebo during thoracic surgery in terms of PPCs. Our primary outcome was atelectasis within 7 days after surgery. Other specific PPCs included hypoxemia, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Secondary outcome included intraoperative respiratory mechanics (respiratory compliance [Cdyn]) and postoperative lung function (forced expiratory volume [FEV1]). Random effects models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR).
RESULTS
Twelve randomized trials, including 365 patients in the dexmedetomidine group and 359 in the placebo group, were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group were less likely to develop postoperative atelectasis (2.3% vs 6.8%, OR 0.42, 95%CI 0.18-0.95, P = 0.04; low certainty) and hypoxemia (3.4% vs 11.7%, OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10-0.68, P = 0.01; moderate certainty) compared to the placebo group. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia (3.2% vs 5.8%, OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.25-1.26, P = 0.17; moderate certainty) or ARDS (0.9% vs 3.5%, OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.07-2.08, P = 0.27; moderate certainty) was comparable between groups. Both intraoperative Cdyn and postoperative FEV1 were higher among patients that received dexmedetomidine with a mean difference of 4.42 mL/cmHO (95%CI 3.13-5.72) and 0.27 L (95%CI 0.12-0.41), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Dexmedetomidine administration during thoracic surgery may potentially reduce the risk of postoperative atelectasis and hypoxemia. However, current evidence is insufficient to demonstrate an effect on pneumonia or ARDS.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; One-Lung Ventilation; Thoracic Surgery; Lung; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Pneumonia; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Postoperative Complications; Hypoxia
PubMed: 37988813
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111345 -
PloS One 2023Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is a widely practiced neuroprotective strategy for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Induced hypothermia is associated with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is a widely practiced neuroprotective strategy for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Induced hypothermia is associated with shivering, cold pain, agitation, and distress.
OBJECTIVE
This scoping review determines the breadth of research undertaken for pain and stress management in neonates undergoing hypothermia therapy, the pharmacokinetics of analgesic and sedative medications during hypothermia and the effect of such medication on short- and long-term neurological outcomes.
METHODS
We searched the following online databases namely, (i) MEDLINE, (ii) Web of Science, (iii) Cochrane Library, (iv) Scopus, (v) CINAHL, and (vi) EMBASE to identify published original articles between January 2005 and December 2022. We included only English full-text articles on neonates treated with TH and reported the sedation/analgesia strategy used. We excluded articles that reported TH on transport or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, did not report the intervention strategies for sedation/analgesia, and reported hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in which hypothermia was not applied.
RESULTS
The eligible publications (n = 97) included cohort studies (n = 72), non-randomized experimental studies (n = 2), pharmacokinetic studies (n = 4), dose escalation feasibility trial (n = 1), cross-sectional surveys (n = 5), and randomized control trials (n = 13). Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (NPASS) is the most frequently used pain assessment tool in this cohort. The most frequently used pharmacological agents are opioids (Morphine, Fentanyl), benzodiazepine (Midazolam) and Alpha2 agonists (Dexmedetomidine). The proportion of neonates receiving routine sedation-analgesia during TH is center-specific and varies from 40-100% worldwide. TH alters most drugs' metabolic rate and clearance, except for Midazolam. Dexmedetomidine has additional benefits of thermal tolerance, neuroprotection, faster recovery, and less likelihood of seizures. There is a wide inter-individual variability in serum drug levels due to the impact of temperature, end-organ dysfunction, postnatal age, and body weight on drug metabolism.
CONCLUSIONS
No multidimensional pain scale has been tested for reliability and construct validity in hypothermic encephalopathic neonates. There is an increasing trend towards using routine sedation/analgesia during TH worldwide. Wide variability in the type of medication used, administration (bolus versus infusion), and dose ranges used emphasizes the urgent need for standardized practice recommendations and guidelines. There is insufficient data on the long-term neurological outcomes of exposure to these medications, adjusted for underlying brain injury and severity of encephalopathy. Future studies will need to develop framework tools to enable precise control of sedation/analgesia drug exposure customized to individual patient needs.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain; Hypothermia; Reproducibility of Results; Pain; Analgesia; Hypothermia, Induced
PubMed: 38060481
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291170 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a detrimental disease, resulting in high morbidity and mortality globally. In this study, we aimed to investigate the...
OBJECTIVE
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a detrimental disease, resulting in high morbidity and mortality globally. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of Dex in mitigating cardiac I/R injury.
METHODS
H9c2 cells were treated with Dex (1 μM) for 24 h followed by oxygen-glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation (OGD/R). and mRNA of H9c2 cells and the LDH release were measured. Apoptosis of H9c2 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Mitochondrial membrane potential and superoxide production were detected by JC-1 staining and MitoSOX Red, respectively. Cell aerobic respiration was measured using Seahorse analysis. In vivo, mice were injected with Dex (25 μg/kg, i.p., once daily) for 5 days and then subjected to heart I/R. Heart function was analyzed by echocardiography. CK-MB and LDH were measured by Elisa. Infarct size was measured using TTC-Evans blue staining. Mitochondrial ultrastructure was observed using transmission electron microscopy. DHE staining, SOD activity, the content of MDA, and the content of GSH/GSSG of heart were measured to evaluate the oxidative stress. In addition, inflammatory cytokines were measured in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, AMPK, SIRT3, and autophagy-related protein expression in the heart were detected by Western blot.
RESULTS
Dex reduced the H9c2 cells injury exposed to OGD/R, accompanied by improved mitochondrial function and membrane potential. In vivo, Dex improved heart function, myocardial injury, and the mitochondria ultrastructure following I/R injury. Meanwhile, Dex inhibited myocardial oxidative stress and inflammation in the myocardial I/R. Furthermore, Compound C (an AMPK inhibitor) could inhibit Dex-induced autophagy in the I/R heart and the 3-MA (an autophagy inhibitor) could partially interfere with the effects of Dex on the protection of I/R heart.
CONCLUSION
Dex suppressed oxidative stress and inflammation by promoting autophagy through activating the AMPK/SIRT3 pathway, thus protecting the heart against the I/R injury.
Topics: Animals; Mice; AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Dexmedetomidine; Inflammation; Ischemia; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury; Reperfusion Injury; Signal Transduction; Sirtuin 3
PubMed: 37908314
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S428024 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Sep 2023The current study intended to delve into the mechanisms of dexmedetomidine (Dex) in regulating myocardial pyroptosis against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury...
The current study intended to delve into the mechanisms of dexmedetomidine (Dex) in regulating myocardial pyroptosis against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI). The rat MIRI models were induced by ligation/release of the coronary artery in vivo and Langendorff perfusion ex vivo. Hemodynamic parameters, infarction sizes, and histopathological changes were assessed to understand the effects of Dex on MIRI. We explored the mechanisms through functional experiments on an H9c2 cell hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) model. Cell viability and apoptosis were evaluated using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) and AV/PI dual staining respectively. The expressions of miR-665 and MEF2D mRNA were detected by qRT-PCR. Western blot was employed to determine the expression levels of pyroptosis- and signaling pathway- related proteins. The interplays between miR-665 and MEF2D were validated by Dual-luciferase reporter assays. Our findings indicated that Dex preconditioning dramatically attenuated hemodynamic derangements, infarct size, and histopathological damage in rats undergoing MIRI. Dex markedly augmented cell viability, while suppressing cell apoptosis and expressions of NLRP3, cleaved-caspase-1, ASC, GSDMD, IL-1β, and IL-18 in H9c2 cells subjected to H/R injury. MiR-665 was significantly upregulated, MEF2D and Nrf2 downregulated following H/R, whereas Dex preconditioning reversed these changes. MEF2D was validated to be a target gene of miR-665. Overexpression of miR-665 decreased the expression of MEF2D and blunted the protective effects of Dex in H9c2 cells. Moreover, the functional rescue experiment further verified that Dex regulated MEF2D/Nrf2 pathway via miR-665. In conclusion, Dex mitigates MIRI through inhibiting pyroptosis via regulating miR-665/MEF2D/Nrf2 axis.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury; Pyroptosis; Dexmedetomidine; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Cell Line; MicroRNAs; Apoptosis; Myocytes, Cardiac; Reperfusion Injury; MEF2 Transcription Factors
PubMed: 37549462
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115255