-
JAMA Jul 2023Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug...
IMPORTANCE
Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events.
RESULTS
All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Meropenem; Shock, Septic; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Sepsis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Monobactams; Hypersensitivity
PubMed: 37326473
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.10598 -
Annals of Intensive Care Jul 2023Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.
METHODS
A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.
RESULTS
These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.
CONCLUSIONS
New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.
PubMed: 37462830
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01153-6 -
Nature Communications Aug 2023The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) presents unique restrictions to antibiotic penetration. As a consequence,...
The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) presents unique restrictions to antibiotic penetration. As a consequence, Bcc species are notorious for causing recalcitrant multidrug-resistant infections in immunocompromised individuals. Here, we present the results of a genome-wide screen for cell envelope-associated resistance and susceptibility determinants in a Burkholderia cenocepacia clinical isolate. For this purpose, we construct a high-density, randomly-barcoded transposon mutant library and expose it to 19 cell envelope-targeting antibiotics. By quantifying relative mutant fitness with BarSeq, followed by validation with CRISPR-interference, we profile over a hundred functional associations and identify mediators of antibiotic susceptibility in the Bcc cell envelope. We reveal connections between β-lactam susceptibility, peptidoglycan synthesis, and blockages in undecaprenyl phosphate metabolism. The synergy of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is primarily mediated by inhibition of the PenB carbapenemase. In comparison with ceftazidime, avibactam more strongly potentiates the activity of aztreonam and meropenem in a panel of Bcc clinical isolates. Finally, we characterize in Bcc the iron and receptor-dependent activity of the siderophore-cephalosporin antibiotic, cefiderocol. Our work has implications for antibiotic target prioritization, and for using additional combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors that can extend the utility of current antibacterial therapies.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Meropenem; beta-Lactamases; Drug Combinations; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37558695
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40494-5 -
The New Microbiologica Sep 2023Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an increasing threat to global public health. Treatment of CPE isolates, like New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM),...
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an increasing threat to global public health. Treatment of CPE isolates, like New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), is limited and often necessitates combination therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the synergistic meropenem/fosfomycin combination against K.pneumoniae-producing NDM isolates. Fosfomycin/meropenem, fosfomycin/colistin and meropenem/colistin were tested alone and in combination, using e-test and time-kill assay against 20 clinical carbapenemase-producing K. pneumonia (CPKp NDM) isolates collected from September 2022 to December 2022. K. pneumoniae strains were resistant to meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozano/tazobactam, 75% and 80% of isolates were susceptible for cefiderocol and for colistin respectively. Fosfomycin/meropenem combination was synergic in 95% (n=19) strains. Fosfomycin/colistin and colistin/meropenem combination showed only 10% synergistic combination strains. In 16 isolates (80%) indifference action for fosfomycin/colistin and colistin/meropenem was reported. For 0.8% of CpKP NDM isolates colistin/meropenem and fosfomycin/colistin combinations found to be antagonistic. In this study, time kill assay showed combination therapies action versus K.pneumoniae metallo-b-lactamase producing (NDM) strains and confirmed the synergistic action of fosfomycin/meropenem combination. In vitro synergy testing should be routinely performed in multidrug resistance infections and combo therapies can be used as a possible alternative in targeted patients with the goal of reducing overall antibiotic costs.
Topics: Humans; Meropenem; Fosfomycin; Colistin; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
PubMed: 37747471
DOI: No ID Found -
Pharmaceutics Aug 2023Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic widely employed for serious bacterial infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy to optimize dosing, especially in...
BACKGROUND
Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic widely employed for serious bacterial infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy to optimize dosing, especially in critically ill patients. This study aims to show how TDM influences the management of meropenem in a real-life setting, not limited to intensive care units.
METHODS
From December 2021 to February 2022, we retrospectively analyzed 195 meropenem serum concentrations (Css). We characterized patients according to meropenem exposure, focusing on the renal function impact.
RESULTS
A total of 36% ( = 51) of the overall observed patients ( = 144) were in the therapeutic range (8-16 mg/L), whereas 64% ( = 93) required a meropenem dose modification (37 patients (26%) underexposed; 53 (38%) overexposed). We found a strong relationship between renal function and meropenem concentrations (correlation coefficient = -0.7; -value < 0.001). We observed different dose-normalized meropenem exposure (Css/D) among renal-impaired (severe and moderate), normal, and hyperfiltrating patients, with a median (interquartile range) of 13.1 (10.9-20.2), 7.9 (6.1-9.5), 3.8 (2.6-6.0), and 2.4 (1.6-2.7), respectively (-value < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Meropenem TDM in clinical practice allows modification of dosing in patients inadequately exposed to meropenem to maximize antibiotic efficacy and minimize the risk of antibiotic resistance, especially in renal alterations despite standard dose adaptations.
PubMed: 37765207
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092238 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Dec 2023Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam...
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam inhibit serine-based β-lactamases, the comparative potency of the novel β-lactam (BL)/BLI combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is unknown.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime, imipenem/relebactam, imipenem, meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against serine β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.
METHODS
Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were collated through the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials against Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ERACE-PA) Global Surveillance. Isolates positive for serine-based carbapenemases were assessed. MICs were determined by broth microdilution to each novel BL/BLI and BL alone.
RESULTS
GES was the most common carbapenemase identified (n = 59) followed by KPC (n = 8). Ceftazidime/avibactam had MIC50/MIC90 values of 4/8 mg/L and 91% of isolates were susceptible. Conversely, ceftazidime alone was active against only 3% of isolates. The MIC50/MIC90 of imipenem/relebactam were 16/>16 mg/L and 13% of all isolates were defined as susceptible. Of the KPC-producing isolates, 38% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, compared with 0% to imipenem. The meropenem/vaborbactam MIC50/MIC90 were >16/>16 mg/L, and 6% of isolates were susceptible, which was similar to meropenem alone (MIC50/90, >8/>8 mg/L; 3% susceptible) suggesting the addition of vaborbactam cannot overcome co-expressed, non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS
Among the novel BL/BLIs, ceftazidime/avibactam displayed better in vitro activity and thus is a rational treatment option for serine carbapenemase-harbouring P. aeruginosa. While imipenem/relebactam displayed some activity, particularly against isolates with blaKPC, meropenem/vaborbactam exhibited poor activity, with MICs similar to meropenem alone.
Topics: Meropenem; Ceftazidime; Carbapenems; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Lactams; Azabicyclo Compounds; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Imipenem; Drug Combinations; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37840005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad225 -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Oct 2023Recently, several studies have assessed the effects of therapeutic drug monitoring of frequently prescribed beta-lactam antibiotics, for which they were quantified in...
BACKGROUND
Recently, several studies have assessed the effects of therapeutic drug monitoring of frequently prescribed beta-lactam antibiotics, for which they were quantified in human plasma samples. Beta-lactams are considered unstable, leading to extra challenges in quantification. Therefore, to ensure sample stability and minimize sample degradation before analysis, stability studies are crucial. This study investigated the stability of 10 frequently used beta-lactam antibiotics in human plasma at relevant storage conditions for clinical use.
METHODS
Amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, flucloxacillin, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin were analyzed using ultraperformance convergence chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Their short-term and long-term stabilities were investigated by measuring quality control samples at low and high concentrations against freshly prepared calibration standards. Measured concentrations at each time point were compared with the concentrations at T = 0. Antibiotics were considered stable if recovery results were between 85% and 115%.
RESULTS
Short-term stability results indicated ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and meropenem to be stable up to 24 hours at room temperature. All evaluated antibiotics, except imipenem, were stable on ice in a cool box for 24 hours. Amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, and piperacillin were stable for 24 hours at 4-6°C. Cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, and meropenem were stable at 4-6°C up to 72 hours. Ceftriaxone and flucloxacillin were stable for 1 week at 4-6°C. Long-term stability results showed that all antibiotics were stable up to 1 year at -80°C, except imipenem and piperacillin, which were stable for 6 months at -80°C.
CONCLUSIONS
Plasma samples for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, flucloxacillin, and piperacillin may be stored for a maximum of 24 hours in a cool box. Refrigeration is suitable for plasma samples of amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, meropenem, and piperacillin for up to 24 hours and cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefuroxime for 72 hours. Plasma samples for imipenem should be frozen directly at -80°C. For long-term storage, plasma samples can be stored at -80°C for a maximum of 6 months for imipenem and piperacillin and 12 months for all other evaluated antibiotics.
Topics: Humans; Meropenem; Ceftazidime; Floxacillin; Cefuroxime; Ceftriaxone; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Piperacillin; Monobactams; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Imipenem; Cefotaxime; Amoxicillin
PubMed: 37199408
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001100 -
European Journal of Clinical... Sep 2023Carbapenemase-producing in Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a critical health concern worldwide, including in Switzerland, leading to very limited therapeutic options....
Carbapenemase-producing in Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a critical health concern worldwide, including in Switzerland, leading to very limited therapeutic options. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the susceptibility to the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam of CPE isolates recovered in Switzerland from 2018 to 2020. A total of 150 clinical CPE were studied including mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 61, 40.3%) and Escherichia coli (n = 53, 35.3%). The distribution of carbapenemases was as follows: KPC-like (32%), OXA-48-like (32%), NDM-like (24%), combinations of carbapenemases (10%), VIM-1 producers (n = 2), and a single IMI-1 producer. Overall, 77% of the strains were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam, 63% was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 62% susceptible to imipenem-relebactam. Those data may contribute to optimize the choice of first line therapy for treating infections due to CPE.
Topics: Humans; Meropenem; Switzerland; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; beta-Lactamases; Bacterial Proteins; Drug Combinations; Imipenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Klebsiella pneumoniae
PubMed: 37566365
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04647-0 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2023This comprehensive review examines the unique attributes, distinctions, and clinical implications of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM-VAB)... (Review)
Review
This comprehensive review examines the unique attributes, distinctions, and clinical implications of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM-VAB) against difficult-to-treat infections. Our manuscript explores these antibiotics' pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, antimicrobial activities, in vitro susceptibility testing, and clinical data. Moreover, it includes a meticulous examination of comparative clinical and microbiological studies, assessed and presented to provide clarity in making informed treatment choices for clinicians. Finally, we propose an expert opinion from a microbiological and a clinical point of view about their use in appropriate clinical settings. This is the first review aiming to provide healthcare professionals with valuable insights for making informed treatment decisions when combating carbapenem-resistant pathogens.
PubMed: 37887222
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101521 -
Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia :... Nov 2023This minireview describes some of the articles published in the last two years related to innovative technologies including CRISPR-Cas, surface-enhanced Raman... (Review)
Review
This minireview describes some of the articles published in the last two years related to innovative technologies including CRISPR-Cas, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, microfluidics, flow cytometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and artificial intelligence and their application to microbiological diagnosis, molecular typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In addition, some articles related to resistance to new antimicrobials (ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol) are also described.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Flow Cytometry; Drug Combinations; Ceftazidime; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; beta-Lactamases
PubMed: 37997875
DOI: 10.37201/req/s01.15.2023