-
JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in patients with schizophrenia. However, no comprehensive review and network meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the efficacy of treatments for AIA.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy associated with AIA treatments.
DATA SOURCES
Three databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched by multiple researchers for double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing active drugs for the treatment of AIA with placebo or another treatment between May 30 and June 18, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Selected studies were RCTs that compared adjunctive drugs for AIA vs placebo or adjunctive treatment in patients treated with antipsychotics fulfilling the criteria for akathisia, RCTs with sample size of 10 patients or more, only trials in which no additional drugs were administered during the study, and RCTs that used a validated akathisia score. Trials with missing data for the main outcome (akathisia score at the end points) were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data extraction and synthesis were performed, estimating standardized mean differences (SMDs) through pairwise and network meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the severity of akathisia measured by a validated scale at the last available end point.
RESULTS
Fifteen trials involving 492 participants compared 10 treatments with placebo. Mirtazapine (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -1.20; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.58), biperiden (6 mg/d for ≥14 days; SMD, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.34), vitamin B6 (600-1200 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.57 to -0.26), trazodone (50 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.14), mianserin (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.19), and propranolol (20 mg/d for ≥6 days; SMD, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.22) were associated with greater efficacy than placebo, with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 34.6%; 95% CI, 0.0%-71.1%). Cyproheptadine, clonazepam, zolmitriptan, and valproate did not yield significant effects. Eight trials were rated as having low risk of bias; 2, moderate risk; and 5, high risk. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed the results for all drugs except for cyproheptadine and propranolol. No association between effect sizes and psychotic severity was found.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, mirtazapine, biperiden, and vitamin B6 were associated with the greatest efficacy for AIA, with vitamin B6 having the best efficacy and tolerance profile. Trazodone, mianserin, and propranolol appeared as effective alternatives with slightly less favorable efficacy and tolerance profiles. These findings should assist prescribers in selecting an appropriate medication for treating AIA.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Biperiden; Cyproheptadine; Gallopamil; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trazodone; Vitamin B 6; Akathisia, Drug-Induced
PubMed: 38451521
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1527 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023We aimed to systematically evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of adverse events associated with the adaptogens and antidepressant drug interactions in...
We aimed to systematically evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of adverse events associated with the adaptogens and antidepressant drug interactions in a retrospective chart review. A total of 1,816 reports of adverse events were evaluated. Cases were included in the analysis if the pharmacoepidemiological analysis showed the presence of a high probability of a causal relationship between an adaptogen and antidepressant interaction and the occurrence of adverse events. The following data were extracted from the reports: age, sex, antidepressant, plant products containing adaptogens, other concomitant medications, and clinical consequences of the interactions and their possible mechanisms. Adaptogens were involved in 9% of adverse events associated with the concomitant use of antidepressants and other preparations. We identified 30 reports in which side effects presented a causal relationship with the use of antidepressants and adaptogens. Here, we present the list of adaptogens with the corresponding antidepressants and the side effects caused by their interactions: : reboxetine (testicle pain and ejaculatory dysfunctions), sertraline (severe diarrhea), escitalopram (myalgia, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, restless legs syndrome, and severe cough), and paroxetine (generalized myalgia, ophthalmalgia, and ocular hypertension); : duloxetine (upper gastrointestinal bleeding), paroxetine (epistaxis), sertraline (vaginal hemorrhage), and agomelatine (irritability, agitation, headache, and dizziness); : bupropion (arthralgia and thrombocytopenia), amitriptyline (delirium), and fluoxetine (dysuria); : citalopram (generalized pruritus), escitalopram (galactorrhea), and trazodone (psoriasis relapse); : mianserin (arrhythmias), mirtazapine (edema of lower limbs and myalgia), and fluoxetine (gynecomastia); : mianserin (restless legs syndrome), paroxetine (gynecomastia and mastalgia), and venlafaxine (hyponatremia); : agomelatine (back pain and hyperhidrosis) and moclobemide (myocardial infarction); : duloxetine (back pain); : sertraline (upper gastrointestinal bleeding); : mianserin (restless legs syndrome); and : bupropion (seizures). Clinicians should monitor the adverse events associated with the concomitant use of adaptogens and antidepressant drugs in patients with mental disorders. Aggregation of side effects and pharmacokinetic interactions (inhibition of CYP and p-glycoprotein) between those medicines may result in clinically significant adverse events.
PubMed: 37829299
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1271776 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Oct 2023MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA (ccf-mtDNA) have attracted interest as biological markers of affective disorders. In response to stress,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA (ccf-mtDNA) have attracted interest as biological markers of affective disorders. In response to stress, it is known that miRNAs in mitochondria diffuse out of the cytoplasm alongside mtDNA; however, this process has not yet been identified. We hypothesized that miRNAs derived from specific cell nuclei cause mitochondrial damage and mtDNA fragmentation under MDD-associated stress conditions.
METHODS
A comprehensive analysis of the plasma miRNA levels and quantification of the plasma ccf-mtDNA copy number were performed in 69 patients with depression to determine correlations and identify genes and pathways interacting with miRNAs. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or mirtazapine. Their therapeutic efficacy over four weeks was evaluated in relation to miRNAs correlated with ccf-mtDNA copy number.
RESULTS
The expression levels of the five miRNAs showed a significant positive correlation with the ccf-mtDNA copy number after correcting for multiple testing. These miRNAs are involved in gene expression related to thyroid hormone synthesis, the Hippo signaling pathway, vasopressin-regulated water reabsorption, and lysine degradation. Of these five miRNAs, miR-6068 and miR-4708-3p were significantly associated with the SSRI and mirtazapine treatment outcomes, respectively.
LIMITATIONS
This study did not show comparison with a healthy group.
CONCLUSIONS
The expression levels of specific miRNAs were associated with ccf-mtDNA copy number in untreated depressed patients; moreover, these miRNAs were linked to antidepressant treatment outcomes. These findings are expected to lead to the elucidation of new pathological mechanism of depression.
Topics: Humans; MicroRNAs; DNA, Mitochondrial; Depressive Disorder, Major; Mirtazapine; Depression; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Mitochondria; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 37467797
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.073 -
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports Dec 2023Stress is a disturbance in homeostasis caused by psychological, physiological, or environmental factors. Prolonged reactions to chronic stress can be detrimental,... (Review)
Review
Stress is a disturbance in homeostasis caused by psychological, physiological, or environmental factors. Prolonged reactions to chronic stress can be detrimental, resulting in various metabolic abnormalities, referred to as metabolic syndrome (MS). There is a reciprocal increased risk between MS and major depressive disorder. Recent studies established an association between inflammation and insulin signaling in type 2 diabetes mellitus with depression. In the present review, we discuss chronic low-grade inflammation, pathways of insulin resistance, and brain glucose metabolism in the context of neuroinflammation and depression. Specific attention is given to psychotropic drugs such as bupropion, mirtazapine, and nefazodone, anti-inflammatory drugs like Celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor), Etanercept, adalimumab, IL-4Ra antagonist, Anti-IL- 17A antibody (Ixekizumab) and lifestyle modifications including exercise, dietary changes, and sleep hygiene. These therapeutic solutions offer potential in treating depression by targeting metabolic conditions like insulin resistance and inflammatory pathways. The article further explains the significance of a nutrition and antioxidants-rich diet, emphasizing the role of omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, zinc, and polyphenols, to improve immunity and activate anti-inflammatory signaling pathways.
PubMed: 37965066
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101571 -
Cureus Aug 2023Public health efforts to reduce the opioid overdose epidemic and treat opioid use disorder (OUD) have met with challenges associated with current non-standardized... (Review)
Review
Public health efforts to reduce the opioid overdose epidemic and treat opioid use disorder (OUD) have met with challenges associated with current non-standardized approaches to managing opioid withdrawal symptoms, such as itching, jitteriness, anxiety, depression, craving, vomiting, diarrhea, insomnia, and anorexia. These symptoms pose substantial obstacles to the safe initiation of medications for OUD, maintenance of long-term sobriety, and prevention of relapse. In clinical practice, multiple medications (polypharmacy) are prescribed to manage these withdrawal symptoms, including ondansetron and promethazine for vomiting and nausea, loperamide and Lomotil for diarrhea, hydroxyzine and doxepin for pruritus, benzodiazepines, the Z-drugs, and melatonin for insomnia, and benzos, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and various serotonergic agents for anxiety. This polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events, increased medical costs, and increased odds of medication non-adherence and relapse. We propose an alternative single medication, mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic receptor antagonist, that can be used for myriad symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Case series, clinical studies, and clinical trials have shown mirtazapine to be effective for treating nausea and vomiting resulting from multiple etiologies, including hyperemesis gravidarum and chemotherapy-induced emesis. Other evidence supports the salutary effects of mirtazapine on itching and craving. Research findings support mirtazapine's beneficial effects on diarrhea and anxiety, a consequence of its modulating effects on serotonergic receptors mediating mood and gastrointestinal symptoms. There is also evidence supporting its efficacy as a potent and non-addictive sleep aid, which presents itself as a solution for insomnia associated with opioid withdrawal. The current review presents evidence from extant literature supporting mirtazapine as a one-drug strategy to treat the variety of symptoms of opioid withdrawal. This one-drug strategy has much potential to decrease polypharmacy, adverse drug events, relapse, and healthcare cost and increase the likelihood of prolonged sobriety and better quality of life for people living with OUD.
PubMed: 37736438
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43821 -
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of... May 2024Mirtazapine (MTZ) is an antidepressant drug with an exceptional pharmacological profile. It also has an excellent safety and tolerability profile. The present review... (Review)
Review
Mirtazapine (MTZ) is an antidepressant drug with an exceptional pharmacological profile. It also has an excellent safety and tolerability profile. The present review provides a pharmacological update on MTZ and summarizes the research findings of MTZ's effects on different diseases. MTZ is hypothesized to have antidepressant effects because of the synergy between noradrenergic and serotonergic actions and is effective in treating major depressive disorder and depression associated with epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory disease. In cancer patients, MTZ significantly reduced sadness, nausea, sleep disruption, and pain and improved quality of life. Also, it has promising effects on Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, dysthymia, social anxiety disorder, alcohol dependency, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, pain syndromes, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and sleep disorders. Additionally, MTZ is potentially therapeutic in different situations associated with depression, such as liver, kidney, cardiovascular, respiratory, infertility, heavy metal-induced neurotoxicity, and pruritus. Potent antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic bioactivities mediate these promising effects. These positive outcomes of the scientific investigations motivate more and more clinical trials for a golden exceptional antidepressant in different conditions.
Topics: Humans; Mirtazapine; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
PubMed: 37943296
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-023-02818-6 -
Health Technology Assessment... Oct 2023Agitation is common and impacts negatively on people with dementia and carers. Non-drug patient-centred care is first-line treatment, but we need other treatment when... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial to assess the safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of mirtazapine and carbamazepine in people with Alzheimer's disease and agitated behaviours: the HTA-SYMBAD trial.
BACKGROUND
Agitation is common and impacts negatively on people with dementia and carers. Non-drug patient-centred care is first-line treatment, but we need other treatment when this fails. Current evidence is sparse on safer and effective alternatives to antipsychotics.
OBJECTIVES
To assess clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine and carbamazepine in treating agitation in dementia.
DESIGN
Pragmatic, phase III, multicentre, double-blind, superiority, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of mirtazapine over 12 weeks (carbamazepine arm discontinued).
SETTING
Twenty-six UK secondary care centres.
PARTICIPANTS
probable or possible Alzheimer's disease, agitation unresponsive to non-drug treatment, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score ≥ 45.
INTERVENTIONS
Mirtazapine (target 45 mg), carbamazepine (target 300 mg) and placebo.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score 12 weeks post randomisation. incremental cost per six-point difference in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score at 12 weeks, from health and social care system perspective. Data from participants and informants at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Long-term follow-up Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory data collected by telephone from informants at 6 and 12 months.
RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING
Participants allocated 1 : 1 : 1 ratio (to discontinuation of the carbamazepine arm, 1 : 1 thereafter) to receive placebo or carbamazepine or mirtazapine, with treatment as usual. Random allocation was block stratified by centre and residence type with random block lengths of three or six (after discontinuation of carbamazepine, two or four). Double-blind, with drug and placebo identically encapsulated. Referring clinicians, participants, trial management team and research workers who did assessments were masked to group allocation.
RESULTS
Two hundred and forty-four participants recruited and randomised (102 mirtazapine, 102 placebo, 40 carbamazepine). The carbamazepine arm was discontinued due to slow overall recruitment; carbamazepine/placebo analyses are therefore statistically underpowered and not detailed in the abstract. placebo-mirtazapine (-1.74, 95% confidence interval -7.17 to 3.69; = 0.53). The number of controls with adverse events (65/102, 64%) was similar to the mirtazapine group (67/102, 66%). However, there were more deaths in the mirtazapine group ( = 7) by week 16 than in the control group ( = 1). Post hoc analysis suggests this was of marginal statistical significance ( = 0.065); this difference did not persist at 6- and 12-month assessments. At 12 weeks, the costs of unpaid care by the dyadic carer were significantly higher in the mirtazapine than placebo group [difference: £1120 (95% confidence interval £56 to £2184)]. In the cost-effectiveness analyses, mean raw and adjusted outcome scores and costs of the complete cases samples showed no differences between groups.
LIMITATIONS
Our study has four important potential limitations: (1) we dropped the proposed carbamazepine group; (2) the trial was not powered to investigate a mortality difference between the groups; (3) recruitment beyond February 2020, was constrained by the COVID-19 pandemic; and (4) generalisability is limited by recruitment of participants from old-age psychiatry services and care homes.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest mirtazapine is not clinically or cost-effective (compared to placebo) for agitation in dementia. There is little reason to recommend mirtazapine for people with dementia with agitation.
FUTURE WORK
Effective and cost-effective management strategies for agitation in dementia are needed where non-pharmacological approaches are unsuccessful.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This trial is registered as ISRCTN17411897/NCT03031184.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 27, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Carbamazepine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Mirtazapine; Pandemics; Quality of Life; Technology Assessment, Biomedical
PubMed: 37929672
DOI: 10.3310/VPDT7105 -
Therapeutic Advances in... 2023This review presents a comprehensive guide for optimizing medication management in older adults with depression within an outpatient setting. Medication optimization... (Review)
Review
This review presents a comprehensive guide for optimizing medication management in older adults with depression within an outpatient setting. Medication optimization involves tailoring the antidepressant strategy to the individual, ensuring the administration of appropriate medications at optimal dosages. In the case of older adults, this process necessitates not only adjusting or changing antidepressants but also addressing the concurrent use of inappropriate medications, many of which have cognitive side effects. This review outlines various strategies for medication optimization in late-life depression: (1) Utilizing the full dose range of a medication to maximize therapeutic benefits and strive for remission. (2) Transitioning to alternative classes (such as a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor [SNRI], bupropion, or mirtazapine) when first-line treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] proves inadequate. (3) Exploring augmentation strategies like aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression. (4) Implementing measurement-based care to help adjust treatment. (5) Sustaining an effective antidepressant strategy for at least 1 year following depression remission, with longer durations for recurrent episodes or severe presentations. (6) Safely discontinuing anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines by employing a tapering method when necessary, coupled with counseling about the benefits of stopping them. Additionally, this article explores favorable medications for depression, as well as alternatives for managing anxiety, insomnia, allergy, overactive bladder, psychosis, and muscle spasm in order to avoid potent anticholinergics and benzodiazepines.
PubMed: 38022834
DOI: 10.1177/20451253231212327