-
Frontiers in Immunology 2023As the most common type of refractive error, myopia has become one of the leading causes of visual impairment. With the increasing prevalence of myopia, there is a... (Review)
Review
As the most common type of refractive error, myopia has become one of the leading causes of visual impairment. With the increasing prevalence of myopia, there is a growing need to better understand the factors involved in its development. Inflammation, one of the most fundamental pathophysiological processes in humans, is a rapid response triggered by harmful stimuli and conditions. Although controlled inflammatory responses are necessary, over-activated inflammation is the common soil for many diseases. The impact of inflammation on myopia has received rising attention in recent years. Elevated inflammation may contribute to myopia progression either directly or indirectly by inducing scleral remodeling, and myopia development may also increase ocular inflammation. This article provides a comprehensive review of the interplay between inflammation and myopia and the potential biological mechanisms, which may present new targets for understanding the pathology of myopia and developing myopia therapies.
Topics: Humans; Myopia; Prevalence
PubMed: 37849748
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1260592 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2023Myopia has significantly risen in East and Southeast Asia, and the pathological outcomes of this condition, such as myopic maculopathy and optic neuropathy linked to... (Review)
Review
Myopia has significantly risen in East and Southeast Asia, and the pathological outcomes of this condition, such as myopic maculopathy and optic neuropathy linked to high myopia, have emerged as leading causes of irreversible vision loss. Addressing this issue requires strategies to reduce myopia prevalence and prevent progression to high myopia. Encouraging outdoor activities for schoolchildren and reducing near-work and screen time can effectively prevent myopia development, offering a safe intervention that promotes healthier habits. Several clinical approaches can be employed to decelerate myopia progression, such as administering low-dose atropine eye drops (0.05%), utilizing orthokeratology lenses, implementing soft contact lenses equipped with myopia control features, and incorporating spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets. When choosing an appropriate strategy, factors such as age, ethnicity, and the rate of myopia progression should be considered. However, some treatments may encounter obstacles such as adverse side effects, high costs, complex procedures, or limited effectiveness. Presently, low-dose atropine (0.05%), soft contact lenses with myopia control features, and orthokeratology lenses appear as promising options for managing myopia. The measures mentioned above are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and researchers are increasingly exploring their combined effects. By advocating for a personalized approach based on individual risk factors and the unique needs of each child, this review aims to contribute to the development of targeted and effective myopia prevention strategies, thereby minimizing the impact of myopia and its related complications among school-aged children in affected regions.
Topics: Humans; Child; Atropine; Ethnicity; Myopia; Research Personnel
PubMed: 37655278
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226438 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Nov 2023The prevalence of myopia is estimated to be 2.6 billion people worldwide and the percentage of individuals with sight-threatening high myopia (≤ -6 diopters) is... (Review)
Review
The prevalence of myopia is estimated to be 2.6 billion people worldwide and the percentage of individuals with sight-threatening high myopia (≤ -6 diopters) is increasing. Myopia is primarily caused by excessive axial elongation of the eyeball, and treatment modalities attempt to reduce this progression. While increased outdoor time is known to delay myopia onset, new pharmacological and optical interventions aim to reduce myopia progression. This review finds that these promising interventions are expected to significantly decrease the future prevalence of sight-threatening high myopia.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adolescent; Disease Progression; Myopia; Prevalence
PubMed: 38018731
DOI: No ID Found -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Sep 2023To investigate myopia control efficacy in children who continued wearing spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) or switched from spectacle lenses with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
To investigate myopia control efficacy in children who continued wearing spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) or switched from spectacle lenses with slightly aspherical lenslets (SAL) and single-vision spectacle lenses (SVL) to HAL for 1 year after a 2-year myopia control trial.
DESIGN
This was a 1-year extension of a randomized clinical trial.
METHODS
Of 54 children who had worn HAL for 2 years, 52 continued wearing HAL (HAL1 group), and of the 53 and 51 children who had originally worn SAL or SVL, 51 and 48 switched to wearing HAL (HAL2 and HAL3 groups) in year 3, respectively. A new SVL (nSVL) group of 56 children was recruited, matched for age, sex, cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and axial length (AL) of the HAL3 group at extension baseline, and used for a comparison of third-year changes. SER and AL were measured every 6 months in year 3.
RESULTS
During year 3, the mean (SE) myopia progression in the nSVL group was -0.56 (0.05) diopters (D). Compared with nSVL, the changes in SER were less in HAL1 (-0.38 [0.05] D, P = .02), HAL2 (-0.36 [0.06] D, P = .01), and HAL3 (-0.33 [0.06] D, P = .005). The mean (SE) AL elongation in the nSVL group was 0.28 (0.02) mm. Compared with nSVL, the elongation in AL was less in the HAL1 (0.17 [0.02] mm, P < .001), HAL2 (0.18 [0.02] mm, P < .001), and HAL3 (0.14 [0.02] mm, P < .001) groups. Myopia progression and axial elongation were comparable in all 3 HAL groups (all P > .05) in year 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Myopia control efficacy has remained in children who wore HAL in the previous 2 years. Children who switched from SAL or SVL to HAL in year 3 had slower myopia progression and axial elongation than that in the control group.
Topics: Child; Humans; Follow-Up Studies; Eyeglasses; Disease Progression; Myopia; Refraction, Ocular
PubMed: 37040846
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.03.030 -
JAMA Network Open Nov 2023Several interventions exist for treating myopia progression in children. While these interventions' efficacy has been studied, their cost-effectiveness remains unknown...
IMPORTANCE
Several interventions exist for treating myopia progression in children. While these interventions' efficacy has been studied, their cost-effectiveness remains unknown and has not been compared.
OBJECTIVE
To determine cost-effective options for controlling myopia progression in children.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
In this cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov model was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of interventions for controlling myopia progression over 5 years from a societal perspective in a simulated hypothetical cohort of patients aged 10 years with myopia. Myopia interventions considered included atropine eye drops, 0.05% and 0.01%, defocus incorporated multiple segment spectacles, outdoor activity, soft contact lenses (daily disposable and multifocal), rigid gas-permeable contact lenses, progressive addition lenses, bifocal spectacle lenses, orthokeratology, highly aspherical lenslets (HALs), and red light therapy; all interventions were compared with single-vision lenses. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis determined the association of model uncertainties with the cost-effectiveness. Costs were obtained from the charges of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong and The Chinese University of Hong Kong Eye Center.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES
The mean costs (in US dollars) per child included the cost of hospital visits, medications, and optical lenses. The outcomes of effectiveness were the annual spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) reductions. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each strategy relative to single-vision lenses over a time horizon of 5 years.
RESULTS
Outdoor activity, atropine (0.05%), red light therapy, HALs, and orthokeratology were cost-effective. The ICER of atropine, 0.05%, was US $220/SER reduction; red light therapy, US $846/SER reduction; and HALs, US $448/SER reduction. Outdoor activity yielded a savings of US $5/SER reduction and US $8/AL reduction. Orthokeratology resulted in an ICER of US $2376/AL reduction.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that atropine eye drops, 0.05%, and outdoor activity are cost-effective for controlling myopia progression in children. Though more expensive, red light therapy, HALs, and orthokeratology may also be cost-effective. The use of these interventions may help to control myopia in a cost-effective way.
Topics: Humans; Child; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Myopia; Refraction, Ocular; Atropine; Ophthalmic Solutions
PubMed: 37917061
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40986 -
The British Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2023Mutations in the L/M cone opsin gene array cause abnormally high perceived retinal contrast and the development of myopia. Environmental factors may also lead to high... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Mutations in the L/M cone opsin gene array cause abnormally high perceived retinal contrast and the development of myopia. Environmental factors may also lead to high visual contrast and cause myopia. Diffusion optics technology (DOT) lenses are designed to reduce contrast signalling in the retina and slow myopia progression.
METHODS
The ontrol of Mopia Using eripheal Diffusion Lenses fficacy and afety tudy (CYPRESS, NCT03623074) is a 36-month, multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-masked trial evaluating two investigational spectacle lenses versus control lenses in myopic children aged 6-10, with a planned interim analysis at 12 months. The primary endpoints are change from baseline in axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER).
RESULTS
256 children (58% female; mean age at screening, 8.1 years) were dispensed spectacles. Across all groups, baseline averages were AL 24.02 mm (SD±0.77 mm), SER -2.01 D (SD±0.9 D) using manifest refraction, and SER -1.94 D (SD±1.0 D) using cycloplegic autorefraction. At 12 months, mean difference in SER progression for test 1 versus control was -0.40 D (p<0.0001), representing a 74% reduction and -0.32 D for Test 2 (p<0.0001), representing a 59% reduction. The difference in AL progression for test 1 versus control was 0.15 mm (p<0.0001) and test 2 versus control was 0.10 mm (p=0.0018).
CONCLUSION
12-month results from this ongoing trial demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of DOT spectacles for reducing myopic progression.
Topics: Child; Humans; Female; Male; Cupressus; Eyeglasses; Myopia; Refraction, Ocular; Retina
PubMed: 36126105
DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2021-321005 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Mar 2024
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma; Myopia
PubMed: 38421288
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_170_24 -
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Oct 2023Myopia, including pathologic myopia, has seen a significant increase in prevalence in recent years. It is a significant cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide and... (Review)
Review
Myopia, including pathologic myopia, has seen a significant increase in prevalence in recent years. It is a significant cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide and prediction models demonstrate the substantial future impact on the population. With increased awareness and research, it is possible to prevent blindness on a large scale in the younger, productive age group affected by myopic maculopathy (MM). The vision-threatening manifestations of pathologic myopia include myopic choroidal neovascularization, macular atrophy, maculoschisis, macular hole, and retinal detachment. Myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) is a progressive manifestation of pathologic myopia and its treatment includes pars plana vitrectomy, macular buckle, or a combination. In this article we aim to review the diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment of MM with an emphasis on recent developments in the surgical management of MTM. We discuss commercially available macular buckles, along with potential advantages to the use of macular buckle in MM. We review the new MTM staging system and its role in determining surgical management of these complex cases.
Topics: Humans; Myopia, Degenerative; Visual Acuity; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Retinal Diseases; Macular Degeneration; Vision Disorders; Blindness
PubMed: 37870043
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.59844 -
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual... Jul 2023To investigate the association of genetically determined primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), myopic refractive error (RE), type 2 diabetes (T2D), blood pressure (BP),...
PURPOSE
To investigate the association of genetically determined primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), myopic refractive error (RE), type 2 diabetes (T2D), blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption with the risk of age-related cataract.
METHODS
To assess potential causal effects of clinical or behavioral factors on cataract risk, we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. Genetic instruments, based on common genetic variants associated with risk factors at genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8), were derived from published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). For age-related cataract, we used GWAS summary statistics from our previous GWAS conducted in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort (28,092 cataract cases and 50,487 controls; all non-Hispanic whites) or in the UK Biobank (31,852 cataract cases and 428,084 controls; all European-descent individuals). We used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as our primary source of Mendelian randomization estimates and conducted common sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
We found that genetically determined POAG and mean spherical equivalent RE were significantly associated with cataract risk (IVW model: odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08; P = 0.018; per diopter more hyperopic: OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93; P = 6.51 × 10-13, respectively). In contrast, genetically determined T2D, BP, BMI, cigarette smoking, or alcohol consumption were not associated with cataract risk (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide evidence that genetic risks for POAG and myopia may be causal risk factors for age-related cataract. These results are consistent with previous observational studies reporting associations of myopia with cataract risk. This information may support population cataract risk stratification and screening strategies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Genome-Wide Association Study; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Risk Factors; Myopia; Cataract; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 37459064
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.10.19