-
Med (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2024Recent outbreaks of avian influenza and ongoing virus reassortment have drawn focus on spill-over infections. The increase in human infections with highly pathogenic...
BACKGROUND
Recent outbreaks of avian influenza and ongoing virus reassortment have drawn focus on spill-over infections. The increase in human infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N6 virus and its high fatality rate posed a potential threat, necessitating the search for a more effective treatment.
METHODS
Longitudinal clinical data and specimens were collected from five H5N6 patients after admission. All patients received antiviral treatment of either sequential monotherapy of oseltamivir and baloxavir or the two drugs in combination. Severity of illness; viral load in sputum, urine, and blood; and cytokine levels in serum and sputum were serially analyzed.
FINDINGS
All patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and viral sepsis within 1 week after disease onset. When delayed oseltamivir showed poor effects, baloxavir was administered and rapidly decreased viral load. In addition, levels of IL-18, M-CSF, IL-6, and HGF in sputum and Mig and IL-18 in serum that reflected ARDS and sepsis deterioration, respectively, were also reduced with baloxavir usage. However, three patients eventually died from exacerbation of underlying disease and secondary bacterial infection. Nonsurvivors had more severe extrapulmonary organ dysfunction and insufficient H5N6 virus-specific antibody response.
CONCLUSIONS
For critical human cases of H5N6 infection, baloxavir demonstrated effects on viral load and pulmonary/extrapulmonary cytokines, even though treatment was delayed. Baloxavir could be regarded as a first-line treatment to limit continued viral propagation, with potential future application in avian influenza human infections and poultry workers exhibiting influenza-like illness.
FUNDING
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81761128014).
Topics: Animals; Humans; Influenza in Birds; Oseltamivir; Influenza A Virus, H5N6 Subtype; Interleukin-18; Influenza, Human; Influenza A virus; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Sepsis; Dibenzothiepins; Morpholines; Pyridones; Triazines
PubMed: 38070511
DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2023.11.001 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Jul 2023Widespread resistance of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor or polymerase inhibitor, baloxavir, is a major public health concern. The amino acid mutations...
OBJECTIVES
Widespread resistance of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor or polymerase inhibitor, baloxavir, is a major public health concern. The amino acid mutations R152K in NA and I38T in polymerase acidic (PA) are responsible for resistance to NA inhibitors and baloxavir, respectively.
METHODS
We generated recombinant A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses possessing NA-R152K, PA-I38T or both mutations by using a plasmid-based reverse genetics system, characterized their virological properties in vitro and in vivo, and examined whether oseltamivir, baloxavir and favipiravir are effective against these mutant viruses.
RESULTS
The three mutant viruses showed similar or superior growth kinetics and virulence to those of wild-type virus. Although oseltamivir and baloxavir blocked the replication of the wild-type virus in vitro, oseltamivir and baloxavir failed to suppress the replication of the NA-R152K and PA-I38T viruses in vitro, respectively. Mutant virus possessing both mutations grew in the presence of oseltamivir or baloxavir in vitro. Baloxavir treatment protected mice from lethal infection with wild-type or NA-R152K virus, but failed to protect mice from lethal infection with PA-I38T or PA-I38T/NA-R152K virus. Favipiravir treatment protected mice from lethal infection with all viruses tested, whereas oseltamivir treatment did not protect at all.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that favipiravir should be used to treat patients with suspected baloxavir-resistant virus infection.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Humans; Oseltamivir; Neuraminidase; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; Antiviral Agents; Pyridones; Enzyme Inhibitors; Triazines; Guanidines; Influenza, Human; Drug Resistance, Viral
PubMed: 37209424
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad145 -
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Nov 2023miniSTONE-2 (NCT03629184) was a global, phase 3, randomized, controlled study that investigated the safety and efficacy of single-dose baloxavir marboxil in otherwise...
BACKGROUND
miniSTONE-2 (NCT03629184) was a global, phase 3, randomized, controlled study that investigated the safety and efficacy of single-dose baloxavir marboxil in otherwise healthy children 1-<12 years of age and showed a positive risk-benefit profile. This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of baloxavir versus oseltamivir in children 5-11 years old with influenza.
METHODS
Children received single-dose baloxavir or twice-daily oseltamivir for 5 days. Safety was the primary objective. Efficacy and virological outcomes included time to alleviation of symptoms, duration of fever and time to cessation of viral shedding by titer. Data were summarized descriptively.
RESULTS
Ninety-four children 5-11 years old were included (61 baloxavir and 33 oseltamivir). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The incidence of adverse events was balanced and low in both treatment groups, with the most common being vomiting (baloxavir 5% vs. oseltamivir 18%), diarrhea (5% vs. 0%) and otitis media (0% vs. 5%). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Median (95% CI) time to alleviation of symptoms with baloxavir was 138.4 hours (116.7-163.4) versus 126.1 hours (95.9-165.7) for oseltamivir; duration of fever was comparable between groups [41.2 hours (23.5-51.4) vs. 51.3 hours (30.7-56.8), respectively]. Median time to cessation of viral shedding was shorter in the baloxavir group versus oseltamivir (1 vs. ≈3 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Safety, efficacy and virological results in children 5-11 years were similar to those from the overall study population 1-<12 years of age. Single-dose baloxavir provides an additional treatment option for pediatric patients 5-11 years old with influenza.
PubMed: 37595103
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004062 -
Antiviral Research Apr 2024While clinical trials have illuminated both the virological and clinical efficacy of baloxavir for influenza and post-treatment viral resistance, these aspects warrant... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
While clinical trials have illuminated both the virological and clinical efficacy of baloxavir for influenza and post-treatment viral resistance, these aspects warrant further study in real-world settings. In response, we executed a prospective, observational study of the Japanese 2022-2023 influenza season. A cohort of 73 A(H3N2)-diagnosed outpatients-36 treated with baloxavir, 20 with oseltamivir, and 17 with other neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs)-were analyzed. Viral samples were collected before and after administering an antiviral on days 1, 5, and 10, respectively. Cultured viruses were amplified using RT-PCR and sequenced to detect mutations. Fever and other symptoms were tracked via self-reporting diaries. In the baloxavir cohort, viral detection was 11.1% (4/36) and 0% (0/36) on day 5 and day 10, respectively. Two isolates from day 5 (5.6%, 2/36) manifested I38T/M-substitutions in the polymerase acidic protein (PA). For oseltamivir and other NAIs, viral detection rates were 60.0% (12/20) and 52.9% (9/17) on day 5, and 16.7% (3/18) and 6.3% (1/16) on day 10, respectively. No oseltamivir-resistant neuraminidase mutations were identified after treatment. Median fever durations for the baloxavir, oseltamivir, and other NAI cohorts were 27.0, 38.0, and 36.0 h, respectively, with no significant difference. Two patients harboring PA I38T/M-substitutions did not exhibit prolonged fever or other symptoms. These findings affirm baloxavir's virological and clinical effectiveness against A(H3N2) in the 2022-2023 season and suggest limited clinical influence of post-treatment resistance emergence.
Topics: Humans; Influenza, Human; Oseltamivir; Neuraminidase; Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype; Outpatients; Seasons; Prospective Studies; Antiviral Agents; Pyridones; Enzyme Inhibitors; Guanidines; Fever; Dibenzothiepins; Morpholines; Triazines
PubMed: 38430970
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105853 -
Viruses Jul 2023Influenza B virus (IBV) contributes to substantial influenza-mediated morbidity and mortality, particularly among children. Similar to influenza A viruses (IAV), the...
Influenza B virus (IBV) contributes to substantial influenza-mediated morbidity and mortality, particularly among children. Similar to influenza A viruses (IAV), the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) of IBV undergo antigenic drift, necessitating regular reformulation of seasonal influenza vaccines. NA inhibitors, such as oseltamivir, have reduced activity and clinical efficacy against IBV, while M2 channel inhibitors are only effective against IAV, highlighting the need for improved vaccine and therapeutics for the treatment of seasonal IBV infections. We have previously described a potent human monoclonal antibody (hMAb), 1092D4, that is specific for IBV NA and neutralizes a broad range of IBVs. The anti-viral activity of MAbs can include direct mechanisms such as through neutralization and/or Fc-mediated effector functions that are dependent on accessory cells expressing Fc receptors and that could be impacted by potential host-dependent variability. To discern if the in vivo efficacy of 1092D4 was dependent on Fc-effector function, 1092D4 hMAb with reduced ability to bind to Fc receptors (1092D4-LALAPG) was generated and tested. 1092D4-LALAPG had comparable in vitro binding, neutralization, and inhibition of NA activity to 1092D4. 1092D4-LALAPG was effective at protecting against a lethal challenge of IBV in mice. These results suggest that hMAb 1092D4 in vivo activity is minimally dependent on Fc-effector functions, a characteristic that may extend to other hMAbs that have potent NA inhibition activity.
Topics: Child; Animals; Mice; Humans; Influenza, Human; Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies; Neuraminidase; Antibodies, Viral; Influenza A virus; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza B virus; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Receptors, Fc; Orthomyxoviridae Infections; Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus
PubMed: 37515226
DOI: 10.3390/v15071540 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver... Sep 2023
PubMed: 37774221
DOI: 10.15403/jgld-4925 -
MBio Aug 2023Obesity has been epidemiologically and empirically linked with more severe diseases upon influenza infection. To ameliorate severe disease, treatment with antivirals,...
Obesity has been epidemiologically and empirically linked with more severe diseases upon influenza infection. To ameliorate severe disease, treatment with antivirals, such as the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir, is suggested to begin within days of infection especially in high-risk hosts. However, this treatment can be poorly effective and may generate resistance variants within the treated host. Here, we hypothesized that obesity would reduce oseltamivir treatment effectiveness in the genetically obese mouse model. We demonstrated that oseltamivir treatment does not improve viral clearance in obese mice. While no traditional variants associated with oseltamivir resistance emerged, we did note that drug treatment failed to quench the viral population and did lead to phenotypic drug resistance . Together, these studies suggest that the unique pathogenesis and immune responses in obese mice could have implications for pharmaceutical interventions and the within-host dynamics of the influenza virus population. IMPORTANCE Influenza virus infections, while typically resolving within days to weeks, can turn critical, especially in high-risk populations. Prompt antiviral administration is crucial to mitigating these severe sequalae, yet concerns remain if antiviral treatment is effective in hosts with obesity. Here, we show that oseltamivir does not improve viral clearance in genetically obese or type I interferon receptor-deficient mice. This suggests a blunted immune response may impair oseltamivir efficacy and render a host more susceptible to severe disease. This study furthers our understanding of oseltamivir treatment dynamics both systemically and in the lungs of obese mice, as well as the consequences of oseltamivir treatment for the within-host emergence of drug-resistant variants.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Humans; Oseltamivir; Mice, Obese; Influenza, Human; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; Antiviral Agents; Neuraminidase; Drug Resistance, Viral
PubMed: 37341495
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00887-23 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Aug 2023: Baloxavir marboxil is a novel cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor prescribed for influenza treatment. Unlike neuraminidase inhibitors like oseltamivir, which impair...
: Baloxavir marboxil is a novel cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor prescribed for influenza treatment. Unlike neuraminidase inhibitors like oseltamivir, which impair viral release from infected host cells, baloxavir blocks influenza virus proliferation by inhibiting viral mRNA transcription. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of baloxavir and oseltamivir for the treatment of early childhood influenza. : Of 1410 patients diagnosed with influenza between 2015 and 2018 at a Japanese primary care outpatient clinic, 1111 pediatric patients aged 0-6 years who were treated with baloxavir ( = 555) or oseltamivir ( = 556) were enrolled retrospectively. The following clinical factors were compared between patients treated with baloxavir and oseltamivir: age, sex, time from fever onset to drug administration (<24 h or 24-48 h), time from drug administration to fever reduction, influenza type (A or B), and influenza vaccination before disease onset. The duration of the fever, which was used as an index of clinical effectiveness, was compared using the log-rank test. Clinical factors associated with fever duration were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. : Median age (3.0 vs. 2.5 years), influenza type A (99% vs. 47%), median duration from drug administration to fever resolution (1 day vs. 2 days), and influenza vaccination (done, 41% vs. not done, 65%) were significantly different between the baloxavir and oseltamivir groups ( < 0.001). The number of patients with a fever duration of one day was 553 (99.6%) in the baloxavir group and 6 (1.1%) in the oseltamivir group ( < 0.001). Baloxavir use was only significantly associated with fever duration in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 50,201, < 0.001). Apparent adverse effects were not observed in the baloxavir-treated group. : Baloxavir treatment resulted in a shorter fever duration than oseltamivir treatment in early childhood influenza.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Humans; Child; Oseltamivir; Influenza, Human; Retrospective Studies; Dibenzothiepins; Fever
PubMed: 37763660
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091543 -
Emerging Infectious Diseases Jul 2024Since May 2023, a novel combination of neuraminidase mutations, I223V + S247N, has been detected in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses collected in countries spanning 5...
Since May 2023, a novel combination of neuraminidase mutations, I223V + S247N, has been detected in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses collected in countries spanning 5 continents, mostly in Europe (67/101). The viruses belong to 2 phylogenetically distinct groups and display ≈13-fold reduced inhibition by oseltamivir while retaining normal susceptibility to other antiviral drugs.
Topics: Oseltamivir; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; Humans; Antiviral Agents; Influenza, Human; Neuraminidase; Drug Resistance, Viral; Phylogeny; Mutation
PubMed: 38916572
DOI: 10.3201/eid3007.240480 -
BMC Infectious Diseases May 2024Amidst limited influenza treatment options, evaluating the safety of Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil is crucial, particularly given their comparable efficacy. This...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Amidst limited influenza treatment options, evaluating the safety of Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil is crucial, particularly given their comparable efficacy. This study investigates post-market safety profiles, exploring adverse events (AEs) and their drug associations to provide essential clinical references.
METHODS
A meticulous analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data spanning the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2022 was conducted. Using data mining techniques like reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Multiple Gamma Poisson Shrinkage, AEs related to Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil were examined. Venn analysis compared and selected specific AEs associated with each drug.
RESULTS
Incorporating 15,104 Oseltamivir cases and 1,594 Baloxavir Marboxil cases, Wain analysis unveiled 21 common AEs across neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, dermatological, respiratory, and infectious domains. Oseltamivir exhibited 221 significantly specific AEs, including appendicolith [ROR (95% CI), 459.53 (340.88 ∼ 619.47)], acne infantile [ROR (95% CI, 368.65 (118.89 ∼ 1143.09)], acute macular neuroretinopathy [ROR (95% CI), 294.92 (97.88 ∼ 888.64)], proctitis [ROR (95% CI), 245.74 (101.47 ∼ 595.31)], and Purpura senile [ROR (95% CI), 154.02 (81.96 ∼ 289.43)]. designated adverse events (DMEs) associated with Oseltamivir included fulminant hepatitis [ROR (95% CI), 12.12 (8.30-17.72), n=27], ventricular fibrillation [ROR (95% CI), 7.68 (6.01-9.83), n=64], toxic epidermal necrolysis [ROR (95% CI), 7.21 (5.74-9.05), n=75]. Baloxavir Marboxil exhibited 34 specific AEs, including Melaena [ROR (95% CI), 21.34 (14.15-32.18), n = 23], cystitis haemorrhagic [ROR (95% CI), 20.22 (7.57-54.00), n = 4], ileus paralytic [ROR (95% CI), 18.57 (5.98-57.71), n = 3], and haemorrhagic diathesis [ROR (95% CI), 16.86 (5.43-52.40)), n = 3]. DMEs associated with Baloxavir Marboxil included rhabdomyolysis [ROR (95% CI), 15.50 (10.53 ∼ 22.80), n = 26].
CONCLUSION
Monitoring fulminant hepatitis during Oseltamivir treatment, especially in patients with liver-related diseases, is crucial. Oseltamivir's potential to induce abnormal behavior, especially in adolescents, necessitates special attention. Baloxavir Marboxil, with lower hepatic toxicity, emerges as a potential alternative for patients with liver diseases. During Baloxavir Marboxil treatment, focused attention on the occurrence of rhabdomyolysis is advised, necessitating timely monitoring of relevant indicators for those with clinical manifestations. The comprehensive data aims to provide valuable insights for clinicians and healthcare practitioners, facilitating an understanding of the safety profiles of these influenza treatments in real-world scenarios.
Topics: Humans; Dibenzothiepins; Triazines; United States; Oseltamivir; Antiviral Agents; United States Food and Drug Administration; Female; Male; Morpholines; Adult; Middle Aged; Pharmacovigilance; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Adolescent; Pyridones; Young Adult; Aged; Influenza, Human; Child; Triazoles; Thiepins; Pyrazines; Pyridines; Child, Preschool; Oxazines
PubMed: 38724914
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09339-4