-
Nature Medicine Aug 2023Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a deadly illness with no proven treatments to reverse core symptoms and no medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Novel...
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a deadly illness with no proven treatments to reverse core symptoms and no medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Novel treatments are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes. In this open-label feasibility study, 10 adult female participants (mean body mass index 19.7 kg m; s.d. 3.7) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for AN or pAN (partial remission) were recruited to a study conducted at an academic clinical research institute. Participants received a single 25-mg dose of synthetic psilocybin in conjunction with psychological support. The primary aim was to assess safety, tolerability and feasibility at post-treatment by incidences and occurrences of adverse events (AEs) and clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory tests, vital signs and suicidality. No clinically significant changes were observed in ECG, vital signs or suicidality. Two participants developed asymptomatic hypoglycemia at post-treatment, which resolved within 24 h. No other clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values. All AEs were mild and transient in nature. Participants' qualitative perceptions suggest that the treatment was acceptable for most participants. Results suggest that psilocybin therapy is safe, tolerable and acceptable for female AN, which is a promising finding given physiological dangers and problems with treatment engagement. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04661514 .
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Psilocybin; Anorexia Nervosa; Feasibility Studies; Body Mass Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37488291
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02455-9 -
Blood Advances Jul 2023Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Overall, 153 IDH1 inhibitor-naive patients...
Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Overall, 153 IDH1 inhibitor-naive patients with mIDH1R132 relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received olutasidenib monotherapy 150 mg twice daily in the pivotal cohort of this study. The median age of participants was 71 years (range, 32-87 years) and the median number of prior regimens received by patients was 2 (1-7). The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was 35%, and the overall response rate was 48%. Response rates were similar in patients who had, and who had not, received prior venetoclax. With 55% of patients censored at the time of data cut-off, the median duration of CR/CRh was 25.9 months. The median duration of overall response was 11.7 months, and the median overall survival was 11.6 months. Of 86 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, a 56-day transfusion independence was achieved in 29 (34%), which included patients in all response groups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%) were febrile neutropenia and anemia (n = 31; 20% each), thrombocytopenia (n = 25; 16%), and neutropenia (n = 20; 13%). Differentiation syndrome adverse events of special interest occurred in 22 (14%) patients, with 14 (9%) grade ≥3 and 1 fatal case reported. Overall, olutasidenib induced durable remissions and transfusion independence with a well-characterized and manageable side effect profile. The observed efficacy represents a therapeutic advance in this molecularly defined, poor-prognostic population of patients with mIDH1 R/R AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02719574.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Pyridines; Quinolines; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Prognosis; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
PubMed: 36724515
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009411 -
Blood Advances Oct 2023Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for whom autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) had failed experienced...
Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for whom autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) had failed experienced frequent and durable responses to nivolumab in the phase 2 CheckMate 205 trial. We present updated results (median follow-up, ∼5 years). Patients with R/R cHL who were brentuximab vedotin (BV)-naive (cohort A), received BV after auto-HCT (cohort B), or received BV before and/or after auto-HCT (cohort C) were administered with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in cohort C with complete remission (CR) for 1 year could discontinue nivolumab and resume upon relapse. Among 243 patients (cohort A, n = 63; B, n = 80; and C, n = 100), the objective response rate (ORR) was 71.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.1-76.8); the CR rate was 21.4% (95% CI, 16.4-27.1). Median duration of response, CR, and partial remission were 18.2 (95% CI, 14.7-26.1), 30.3, and 13.5 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 months (95% CI, 11.3-18.5). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; OS at 5 years was 71.4% (95% CI, 64.8-77.1). In cohort C, all 3 patients who discontinued in CR and were subsequently re-treated achieved objective response. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified. This 5-year follow-up of CheckMate 205 demonstrated favorable OS and confirmed efficacy and safety of nivolumab in R/R cHL after auto-HCT failure. Results suggest patients may discontinue treatment after persistent CR and reinitiate upon progression. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02181713.
Topics: Humans; Nivolumab; Hodgkin Disease; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Brentuximab Vedotin; Immunoconjugates; Chronic Disease
PubMed: 37530622
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010334 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Dec 2023Clinical trials have shown promising results for interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. The drugs have been used in clinical practice since 2017.
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials have shown promising results for interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. The drugs have been used in clinical practice since 2017.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the drug survival and effectiveness of interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a real-world setting.
METHODS
The study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated with either guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab at the Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, during the period from June 11 2018, to July 14 2021.
RESULTS
A total of 80 patients were included. During the study, 19 patients discontinued treatment with an interleukin-23 inhibitor, and mean treatment duration (SD) was 61.4 weeks (43.7). Seventy-six patients (95%) had previous use of ≥1 biologic. One-year drug survival was 81.0%. Among patients, 64.3% achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 at weeks 12-17; 61.3%, at weeks 40-60. There was no statistically significant difference between the drugs regarding the chance of achieving PASI ≤ 2 (>.05). Twenty-two patients (27.5%) had PsA. Among these, 40.9% and 36.4% achieved complete remission and partial remission, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Interleukin-23 inhibitors appear to have high and similar drug survival and effectiveness in patients with difficult-to-treat psoriasis and PsA.
Topics: Humans; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Psoriasis; Interleukin Inhibitors; Severity of Illness Index; Interleukin-23
PubMed: 36200762
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2133531 -
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy Dec 2023Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated clinical response in treating both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Although instances of rapid...
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated clinical response in treating both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Although instances of rapid tumor remissions have been observed in animal models and clinical trials, tumor relapses occur with multiple therapeutic resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, while the mechanisms underlying the long-term therapeutic resistance are well-known, short-term adaptation remains less understood. However, more views shed light on short-term adaptation and hold that it provides an opportunity window for long-term resistance. In this study, we explore a previously unreported mechanism in which tumor cells employ trogocytosis to acquire CAR molecules from CAR-T cells, a reversal of previously documented processes. This mechanism results in the depletion of CAR molecules and subsequent CAR-T cell dysfunction, also leading to short-term antigen loss and antigen masking. Such type of intercellular communication is independent of CAR downstream signaling, CAR-T cell condition, target antigen, and tumor cell type. However, it is mainly dependent on antigen density and CAR sensitivity, and is associated with tumor cell cholesterol metabolism. Partial mitigation of this trogocytosis-induced CAR molecule transfer can be achieved by adaptively administering CAR-T cells with antigen density-individualized CAR sensitivities. Together, our study reveals a dynamic process of CAR molecule transfer and refining the framework of clinical CAR-T therapy for solid tumors.
Topics: Animals; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; T-Lymphocytes; Antigenic Drift and Shift; Trogocytosis; Neoplasms
PubMed: 38143263
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01708-w -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Sep 2023Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long been the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B...
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long been the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has caused a paradigm shift in the management of R/R DLBCL patients, especially with the recent approval of CD19-directed CAR-T therapy in the second-line setting in high-risk groups (primary refractory and early relapse [≤12 months]). Consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT and cellular therapies in DLBCL is lacking; therefore, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines undertook this project to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 20 consensus statements with a few key statements as follows: (1) in the first-line setting, there is no role for auto-HCT consolidation for patients achieving complete remission (CR) following R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone) or similar therapy in non-double-hit/triple-hit cases (DHL/THL) and in DHL/THL cases receiving intensive induction therapies, but auto-HCT may be considered in eligible patients receiving R-CHOP or similar therapies in DHL/THL cases; (2) auto-HCT consolidation with thiotepa-based conditioning is standard of care for eligible patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma achieving CR with first-line therapy; and (3) in the primary refractory and early relapse setting, the preferred option is CAR-T therapy, whereas in late relapse (>12 months), consolidation with auto-HCT is recommended for patients achieving chemosensitivity to salvage therapy (complete or partial response), and CAR-T therapy is recommended for those not achieving remission. These clinical practice recommendations will serve as a tool to guide clinicians managing patients with newly diagnosed and R/R DLBCL.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Rituximab; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Cyclophosphamide; Vincristine; Prednisone; Doxorubicin; Recurrence
PubMed: 37419325
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.06.012 -
Renal Failure Dec 2023The treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS) is full of challenges and the role of rituximab (RTX) is not well-established, thus this study aims to demonstrate...
BACKGROUND
The treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS) is full of challenges and the role of rituximab (RTX) is not well-established, thus this study aims to demonstrate the role of RTX in RNS.
METHODS
This was a multicenter retrospective study of all adult patients receiving RTX for RNS. Patients enrolled were divided into two groups according to pathological pattern: 20 patients as a group of podocytopathy (including minimal change disease [MCD] and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS]), and 26 patients as membranous nephropathy (MN) group. The remission rate, relapse rate, adverse effects, and predictors of remission were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 75 patients received RTX for RNS and 48 were available for analysis after exclusion criteria. No significant difference in the remission rate at 6 or 12 months was observed between the MCD/FSGS and MN cases ( > 0.05). The median duration of the first complete remission (CR) was 1 month in the podocytopathy group and 12.5 months in the MN group. Three relapses were associated with infection as the ultimate outcome, and 6 out of 48 remained refractory representing a response rate of 87.5% in RNS. Clinical predictors of cumulative CR were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m and mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≤103 mmHg at the beginning of therapy in patients with MN. No serious adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
RTX appears to be effective in RNS across various clinical and pathological subtypes, exhibiting a low relapse rate and minimal significant side effects in the majority of patients.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Rituximab; Retrospective Studies; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Nephrotic Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; Nephrosis, Lipoid; Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; Recurrence; Chronic Disease; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 37482915
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2237124 -
Cureus Sep 2023Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is an autoimmune blistering disease limited to the superficial skin without mucosal involvement. It is clinically, histologically, and... (Review)
Review
Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is an autoimmune blistering disease limited to the superficial skin without mucosal involvement. It is clinically, histologically, and immunopathologically distinct from pemphigus vulgaris (PV). As data on pediatric PF is often merged with data on both pediatric and adult PV patients, isolating clinical outcomes in pediatric PF is not always possible. Therefore, the authors of this review analyzed clinical outcomes following therapy in pediatric PF patients only. A search of databases resulted in 33 pediatric patients with PF. In total, 19 (57.6%) patients were treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CISTs), which consisted of systemic corticosteroids and multiple immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). Further, 14 (42.4%) patients were treated with biologic agents, predominantly rituximab (RTX). The mean age of those treated with biologics was 12.8 years (range = 0.88-18 years) compared to 8.9 years (range = 0.92-15 years) of those treated with CIST (p = 0.01). Treatment with biologics was initiated significantly longer after the diagnosis of PF when compared to patients treated with CIST (p = 0.003). RTX was used in all patients who received biologic therapy. Two (6%) patients also received intravenous immunoglobulin. When clinical outcomes were compared between CIST and biologic therapy, rates of clinical remission, partial remission, and relapse, were not statistically significantly different between groups. When RTX was used, rates of relapse and adverse events were higher in those treated with the lymphoma protocol (375 mg/m once weekly for four weeks) compared to those treated with the rheumatoid arthritis protocol (two doses of 1,000 mg two weeks apart) (p < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events was statistically significantly higher in patients treated with CIST when compared to RTX (p = 0.003). These included both physical and psychological changes. The infection rate after treatment with RTX was 7.1%. These outcomes occurred during a follow-up of 12.5 months (range = 1-36 months) in the CIST group and 20.5 months (range = 6-67 months) in the biologic therapy group. The difference in the follow-up period was not statistically significant. The literature suggests that biologics are superior to CIST in treating pemphigus patients. The results of this review suggest similar responses to therapy in pediatric PF patients treated with biologics compared to CIST. This may have been due to a limited duration of follow-up and a lack of detailed treatment outcomes in pediatric PF patients. The data in this review strongly suggests that specific treatment protocols need to be developed and implemented for pediatric PF patients. These patients are at a critical phase in life where PF therapy can influence or affect physical growth, hormonal changes, psychosocial development, and essential education.
PubMed: 37779684
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45373 -
Rheumatology International Dec 2023Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New... (Review)
Review
Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature.
PubMed: 37650922
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05389-0