-
JTCVS Open Dec 2023There is significant interest in exploring new technologies to improve efficiency and work-life quality for nurses. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a remote video...
OBJECTIVE
There is significant interest in exploring new technologies to improve efficiency and work-life quality for nurses. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a remote video monitoring (RVM) solution that provides continuous in-hospital patient audio-video (AV) monitoring by technicians.
METHODS
The RVM system that we developed, consisting of 2-way AV communication and a continuous O saturation monitoring device, has been deployed in all inpatient units within our hospital network, including 3 acute care hospitals and 2 rehabilitation facilities. Data were collected before and after implementation on safety measures including fall rates and adverse events, along with device utilization and number of escalation events requiring nursing intervention. Nurse job satisfaction was assessed with surveys.
RESULTS
Data were collected from April 2020 to May 2022. A total of 2087 patients were monitored at 5 hospital sites. The technicians identified 54,716 safety concerns that required them to intervene remotely and address with the patient. Of these, 46,289 required escalation of nursing staff, who were called to the bedside through the RVM alerting technology. Importantly, 8427 safety concerns were managed solely by the technicians without the need for nursing intervention, resulting in 8427 avoided nursing visits to the bedside. The surveyed nurses reported that the RVM technology provided reassurance that additional support was available to assist them in managing their patients. Patients and their families also expressed high degree of satisfaction. Since implementation, the rates of falls and other adverse events have been reduced, with the greatest impact in patients on high-flow oxygen. Code blue and mortality rates decreased from 7% to 1%.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of RVM has proven to be a successful innovation at our hospital and has led to improved patient safety. RVM was able to reduce 8427 individual nurse visits to the bedside, allowing nurses to manage the care of patients more effectively while improving both patient and staff satisfaction.
PubMed: 38204626
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.09.014 -
PloS One 2023Patient safety is a global concern. Safe and effective care can shorten hospital stays and prevent or minimize unintentional harm to patients. Therefore, it is necessary...
BACKGROUND
Patient safety is a global concern. Safe and effective care can shorten hospital stays and prevent or minimize unintentional harm to patients. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously monitor and improve patient safety in all medical environments. This study is aimed at improving patient safety in gastroenterology departments.
METHODS
The study was carried out as action research. The participants were patients, nurses and doctors of the gastroenterology department of Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital in Tehran in 2021-2022. Data were collected using questionnaires (medication adherence tool, patient education effectiveness evaluation checklist, and medication evidence-based checklist), individual interviews and focus groups. The quantitative data analysis was done using SPSS (v.20) and qualitative data analysis was done through content analysis method using MAXQDA analytic pro 2022 software.
RESULTS
The majority of errors were related to medication and the patient's fault due to their lack of education and prevention strategy were active supervision, modification of clinical processes, improvement of patient education, and promotion of error reporting culture. The findings of the research showed that the presence of an active supervisor led to the identification and prevention of more errors (P<0.01). Regarding the improvement of clinical processes, elimination of reworks can increase satisfaction in nurses (P<0.01). In terms of patient education, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.01); however, the mean medication adherence score was significantly different (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The improvement strategies of patient safety in Gastroenterology department included the modification of ward monitoring processes, improving/modification clinical processes, improvement of patient education, and development of error reporting culture. Identifying inappropriate processes and adjusting them based on the opinion of the stakeholders, proper patient education regarding self-care, careful monitoring using appropriate checklists, and presence of a supervisor in the departments can be effective in reducing the incidence rate. A comprehensive error reporting program provides an opportunity for employees to report errors.
Topics: Humans; Patient Safety; Gastroenterology; Iran; Hospital Departments; Health Services Research
PubMed: 37582075
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289511 -
BMJ Open Quality May 2024Patient safety is crucial in dentistry, yet it has received delayed recognition compared with other healthcare fields. This literature review assesses the current state... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patient safety is crucial in dentistry, yet it has received delayed recognition compared with other healthcare fields. This literature review assesses the current state of patient safety in dentistry, investigates the reasons for the delay, and offers recommendations for enhancing patient safety in dental practices, dental schools, and hospitals.
METHODS
The review incorporates a thorough analysis of existing literature on patient safety in dentistry. Various sources, including research articles, guidelines and reports, were reviewed to gather insights into patient safety definitions, challenges and best practices specific to dentistry.
RESULTS
The review underscores the importance of prioritising patient safety in dentistry at all levels of healthcare. It identifies key definitions and factors contributing to the delayed focus on patient safety in the field. Additionally, it emphasises the significance of establishing a patient safety culture and discusses approaches such as safety plans, incident management systems, blame-free cultures and ethical frameworks to enhance patient safety.
CONCLUSION
Patient safety is vital in dentistry to ensure high-quality care and patient well-being. The review emphasises the importance of prioritising patient safety in dental practices, dental schools and hospitals. Through the implementation of recommended strategies and best practices, dental organisations can cultivate a patient safety culture, enhance communication, mitigate risks and continually improve patient safety outcomes. The dissemination of knowledge and the active involvement of all stakeholders are crucial for promoting patient safety and establishing a safe dental healthcare system.
Topics: Humans; Patient Safety; Dentistry
PubMed: 38719522
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002502 -
BMJ Open Jan 2024Globally, one of the measures of high performing healthcare facilities is the compliance of patient safety culture, which encompasses the ability of health institutions...
BACKGROUND
Globally, one of the measures of high performing healthcare facilities is the compliance of patient safety culture, which encompasses the ability of health institutions to avoid or drastically reduce patient harm or risks. These risks or harm is linked with numerous adverse patient outcomes such as medication error, infections, unsafe surgery and diagnosis error.
OBJECTIVES
The general objective of this study was to investigate into the impact of patient safety culture practices experienced on patient satisfaction among patients who attend the Kwesimintsim Government Hospital in the Takoradi municipality.
METHODS
This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study and a consecutive sampling technique was used to select 336 respondents for the study. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and processed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, V.21. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out and result were presented using figures and tables.
RESULTS
The study found that the overall patient safety compliance level observed by the respondents was poor (29.2%). The prevalence of adverse events experienced among the respondents was high (58%). The leading adverse events mentioned were medication errors, followed by wrong prescriptions and infections. The consequences of these adverse events encountered by the respondents were mentioned as increased healthcare costs (52%), followed by hospitalisation (43%), worsening of health conditions (41%) and contraction of chronic health conditions (22%). Patient safety cultural practices such as teamwork (β=0.17, p=0.03), response to error (β=0.16, p=0.005), communication openness (β=0.17, p=0.003) and handoffs and information exchange (β=0.17, p=0.002) were found to positively influence patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION
The poor general compliance of the patient safety culture in the facility is unfortunate, and this can affect healthcare outcomes significantly. The study therefore entreats facility managers and various stakeholders to see patient safety care as an imperative approach to delivering quality essential healthcare and to act accordingly to create an environment that supports it.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Patient Safety; Ghana; Attitude of Health Personnel; Patient Satisfaction; Safety Management; Personal Satisfaction
PubMed: 38296299
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073190 -
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Jan 2024To identify employee burn-out and assess its impact on patient safety culture.
OBJECTIVES
To identify employee burn-out and assess its impact on patient safety culture.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was carried out amongst healthcare providers (HCP) of Tehsil Head Quarter Manawan Hospital, Lahore from April 1 till 30, 2023, who had been working for at least one year and directly involved in patient care. Two questionnaires were used; the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess level of burnout, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety culture survey. After obtaining informed consent, 59 participants were enrolled in this study.
RESULTS
High degree of occupational exhaustion (OE) 42.9% was seen amongst doctors and 57.1% had low degree of personal accomplishment (PA) compared to all other health care providers. Significant association was observed between two sub-scales of MBI (p<0.05). No significant association was observed in working hours, designated positions and burnout (p>0.05). Statistically weak correlation existed between burnout and patient safety culture (r=0.075, p=0.580). Awareness on incident reporting was in 43.3% of participants; of which 31% had reported at least one event in last 12 months. Overall, 76% employees consider their work unit reliable for providing safe patient care.
CONCLUSIONS
Burnout was observed in employees, particularly high degree in attending physicians. However, team work, high level of personal accomplishment and incident reporting culture, served as protective factors for patient safety and safe working environment and culture.
PubMed: 38328661
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.2(ICON).8970 -
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung... Dec 2023The transition between different care contexts, especially during discharge from inpatient treatment to home, is associated with risks for patient safety....
INTRODUCTION
The transition between different care contexts, especially during discharge from inpatient treatment to home, is associated with risks for patient safety. Internationally established, the Care Transitions Measure (CTM) is used to assess the quality and safety of this transition from the patients' perspective. A systematic and standardized assessment of quality and safety in the discharge process from the patients' perspective has not been possible in German-speaking countries due to the lack of a German adaptation and validation of the CTM. This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the CTM for use in German-speaking countries METHODS: The German version of the CTM was developed based on internationally accepted recommendations for translating and adapting questionnaires. Patients of all departments (except pediatric departments) of a German university hospital who were discharged home after at least three days of inpatient treatment received the questionnaire by mail between May and August 2022. A total of 806 patients participated in the survey. The validity of the CTM was tested by factor analyses. For this purpose, different factor models were compared. In addition, the measurement invariance of the instrument was examined.
RESULTS
The construct validity of the long version of the CTM (15items) with a two-factorial model structure was confirmed with good model fit indices. The two subscales had excellent internal consistency. In addition, the one short version with four items achieved excellent model fit indices and high internal consistency. For the long version of the CTM, measurement invariance was confirmed for all sociodemographic, care-related, and survey response characteristics examined. The measurement invariance of the short version was only partially confirmed.
DISCUSSION
The validity and reliability of the German version of the CTM were confirmed. In its long version, the instrument is measurement invariant across various characteristics and thus allows valid interpretation of group differences. The short version is partially measurement invariant and is suitable as a screening instrument for assessing the quality and safety of discharge processes due to its high validity and reliability.
CONCLUSIONS
With a validated and standardized German version of the CTM, an instrument is now available to assess the quality and safety of the discharge process from the patients' perspective. Thus, this study provides an essential tool for systematically investigating and optimizing patient safety in the discharge process.
Topics: Child; Humans; Patient Transfer; Reproducibility of Results; Psychometrics; Germany; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 37951720
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.002 -
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Jul 2023Prisoners use healthcare services three times more frequently than the general population with poorer health outcomes. Their distinct healthcare needs often pose...
OBJECTIVES
Prisoners use healthcare services three times more frequently than the general population with poorer health outcomes. Their distinct healthcare needs often pose challenges to safe healthcare provision. This study aimed to characterise patient safety incidents reported in prisons to guide practice improvement and identify health policy priorities. We carried out an exploratory multi-method analysis of anonymised safety incidents from prisons.
SETTING
Safety incidents had been reported to the National Reporting and Learning System by prisons in England between April 2018 and March 2019.
PARTICIPANTS
Reports were reviewed to identify any unintended or unexpected incident(s) which could have, or did, lead to harm for prisoners receiving healthcare.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Free-text descriptions were examined to identify the type and nature of safety incidents, their outcomes and harm severity. Analysis was contextualised with subject experts through structured workshops to explain relationships between the most common incidents and contributory factors.
RESULTS
Of 4112 reports, the most frequently observed incidents were medication-related (n = 1167, 33%), specifically whilst administering medications (n = 626, 54%). Next, were access-related (n = 559,15%), inclusive of delays in patients accessing healthcare professionals (n = 236, 42%) and managing medical appointments (n = 171, 31%). The workshops contextualised incidents involving contributing factors (n = 1529, 28%) into three key themes, namely healthcare access, continuity of care and the balance between prison and healthcare priorities.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the importance of improving medication safety and access to healthcare services for prisoners. We recommend staffing level reviews to ensure healthcare appointments are attended, and to review procedures for handling missed appointments, communication during patient transfers and medication prescribing.
Topics: Humans; Patient Safety; Prisons; England; Prisoners; Health Services Accessibility
PubMed: 37196674
DOI: 10.1177/01410768231166138 -
BMC Health Services Research Jul 2023Patient safety in a healthcare setting is now a major global concern. Millions of people suffer disabling injuries or death directly related to medical care errors,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Patient safety culture and associated factors among health care providers in government and private hospitals, Bahir Dar City Northwest, Ethiopia, 2022: a comparative cross-sectional study.
BACKGROUND
Patient safety in a healthcare setting is now a major global concern. Millions of people suffer disabling injuries or death directly related to medical care errors, particularly in developing countries. Evidence about patient safety culture in Ethiopia is limited. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the level of patient safety culture and associated factors among healthcare providers in government and private healthcare providers.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 30, 2022. Self-administered hospital survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) tool was used to select 448 study participants. Epi Data version 4.6 and SPSS version 26 were used for data entry and analysis. Chi-square test, Bi-variable, and multivariable logistic regressions were done to determine the association between the independent and outcome variable.
RESULT
A total of 448 healthcare providers with a response rate of 99.6% participated. The prevalence of good patient safety culture was 50.9%( 95%CI: 46.2, 55.6%). Patient safety culture difference was observed between government and private healthcare providers (× 2 = 22.6, df = 1, p = 0.000). Type of hospitals (AOR = 0.37(95% CI:(0.21, 0.68), profession (AOR = 2.16 (95% CI:(1.02,4.62), job satisfaction (AOR = 0.19,95%CI:(0.12,0.30), participated in patient safety programs(AOR = 2.69:(95%CI:1.53,4.75), providing necessary equipment and materials (AOR = 2.05(95%CI: 1.18,3.55%), and work shift (AOR = 0.47( 95%CI: 0.25,0.93) were found significantly associated with good patient safety culture among healthcare providers.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of good patient safety culture was relatively low. Patient safety culture difference is observed between government and private healthcare providers. Type of hospitals (public or private), profession, job satisfaction, participation in patient safety programs, providing necessary equipment and materials, and work shifts were associated factors for patient safety culture. Therefore, it is better to design patient safety improvement strategies for both government and private healthcare providers.
Topics: Patient Safety; Health Personnel; Hospitals, Private; Hospitals, Federal; Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ethiopia; Male; Female; Adult
PubMed: 37464411
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09770-4 -
Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem 2024To identify the factors associated with the omission of nursing care and patient safety climate.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the factors associated with the omission of nursing care and patient safety climate.
METHOD
A cross-sectional study developed at a university hospital in the Brazilian Center-West, between September and December 2022. The MISSCARE-Brazil and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire were applied to a convenience sample of 164 nursing professionals.
RESULTS
The most omitted care was walking three times a day or as prescribed (66.5%). The overall score of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire was 63,8 (SD: 12,6). The level of satisfaction (p<0.018) and the perception of professional adequacy (p<0.018) were associated with the omission of nursing care and the patient safety climate.
CONCLUSION
The study showed a high prevalence of omission of care and unfavorable perception of the patient safety climate, mainly associated with professional adequacy for work performance.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Patient Safety; Female; Male; Adult; Brazil; Middle Aged; Attitude of Health Personnel; Organizational Culture; Surveys and Questionnaires; Nursing Care; Young Adult; Nursing Staff, Hospital; Hospitals, University
PubMed: 38655928
DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230059.en -
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2024This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit (held November 8-10, 2021, at...
PURPOSE
This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit (held November 8-10, 2021, at Charleston, SC, and Bad Homburg, Germany) and aims to raise awareness concerning unresolved issues associated with the PN process and potential future directions, including a greater emphasis on patients' perspectives and the role of patient support.
SUMMARY
Ensuring that every patient in need receives adequate PN support remains challenging. It is important to have a standardized approach to identify nutritional risk and requirements using validated nutritional screening and assessment tools. Gaps between optimal and actual clinical practices need to be identified and closed, and responsibilities in the nutrition support team clarified. Use of modern technology opens up opportunities to decrease workloads or liberate resources, allowing a more personalized care approach. Patient-centered care has gained in importance and is an emerging topic within clinical nutrition, in part because patients often have different priorities and concerns than healthcare professionals. Regular assessment of health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, and/or overall patient well-being should all be performed for PN patients. This will generate patient-centric data, which should be integrated into care plans. Finally, communication and patient education are prerequisites for patients' commitment to health and for fostering adherence to PN regimes.
CONCLUSION
Moving closer to optimal nutritional care requires input from healthcare professionals and patients. Patient-centered care and greater emphasis on patient perspectives and priorities within clinical nutrition are essential to help further improve clinical nutrition.
Topics: Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Patient Safety; Patient-Centered Care; Quality Improvement; Quality of Life; Congresses as Topic
PubMed: 38869258
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae077