-
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta.... Aug 2023Membrane trafficking is essential to maintain the spatiotemporal control of protein and lipid distribution within membrane systems of eukaryotic cells. To achieve their... (Review)
Review
Membrane trafficking is essential to maintain the spatiotemporal control of protein and lipid distribution within membrane systems of eukaryotic cells. To achieve their functional destination proteins are sorted and transported into lipid carriers that construct the secretory and endocytic pathways. It is an emerging theme that lipid diversity might exist in part to ensure the homeostasis of these pathways. Sphingolipids, a chemical diverse type of lipids with special physicochemical characteristics have been implicated in the selective transport of proteins. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge about how sphingolipids modulate protein trafficking through the endomembrane systems to guarantee that proteins reach their functional destination and the proposed underlying mechanisms.
Topics: Sphingolipids; Biological Transport; Protein Transport; Membranes
PubMed: 37201864
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2023.159334 -
The Journal of Biological Chemistry Sep 2023Maintaining a functional proteome under different environmental conditions is challenging for every organism, in particular for unicellular organisms, such as bacteria.... (Review)
Review
Maintaining a functional proteome under different environmental conditions is challenging for every organism, in particular for unicellular organisms, such as bacteria. In order to cope with changing environments and stress conditions, bacteria depend on strictly coordinated proteostasis networks that control protein production, folding, trafficking, and degradation. Regulation of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis are cornerstones of this cellular adaptation in all domains of life, which is rationalized by the high energy demand of both processes and the increased resistance of translationally silent cells against internal or external poisons. Reduced protein synthesis ultimately also reduces the substrate load for protein transport systems, which are required for maintaining the periplasmic, inner, and outer membrane subproteomes. Consequences of impaired protein transport have been analyzed in several studies and generally induce a multifaceted response that includes the upregulation of chaperones and proteases and the simultaneous downregulation of protein synthesis. In contrast, generally less is known on how bacteria adjust the protein targeting and transport machineries to reduced protein synthesis, e.g., when cells encounter stress conditions or face nutrient deprivation. In the current review, which is mainly focused on studies using Escherichia coli as a model organism, we summarize basic concepts on how ribosome biogenesis and activity are regulated under stress conditions. In addition, we highlight some recent developments on how stress conditions directly impair protein targeting to the bacterial membrane. Finally, we describe mechanisms that allow bacteria to maintain the transport of stress-responsive proteins under conditions when the canonical protein targeting pathways are impaired.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Proteins; Heat-Shock Proteins; Protein Biosynthesis; Protein Transport
PubMed: 37586589
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105163 -
Science Advances Mar 2024Stressed cells secret misfolded proteins lacking signaling sequence via an unconventional protein secretion (UcPS) pathway, but how misfolded proteins are targeted...
Stressed cells secret misfolded proteins lacking signaling sequence via an unconventional protein secretion (UcPS) pathway, but how misfolded proteins are targeted selectively in UcPS is unclear. Here, we report that misfolded UcPS clients are subject to modification by a ubiquitin-like protein named ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (UFM1). Using α-synuclein (α-Syn) as a UcPS model, we show that mutating the UFMylation sites in α-Syn or genetic inhibition of the UFMylation system mitigates α-Syn secretion, whereas overexpression of UFBP1, a component of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated UFMylation ligase complex, augments α-Syn secretion in mammalian cells and in model organisms. UFM1 itself is cosecreted with α-Syn, and the serum UFM1 level correlates with that of α-Syn. Because UFM1 can be directly recognized by ubiquitin specific peptidase 19 (USP19), a previously established UcPS stimulator known to associate with several chaperoning activities, UFMylation might facilitate substrate engagement by USP19, allowing stringent and regulated selection of misfolded proteins for secretion and proteotoxic stress alleviation.
Topics: Animals; Humans; alpha-Synuclein; Protein Transport; Endoplasmic Reticulum; Mammals; Endopeptidases
PubMed: 38489364
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2542 -
International Journal of Molecular... Aug 2023Gene expression in eukaryotes begins with transcription in the nucleus, followed by the synthesis of messenger RNA (mRNA), which is then exported to the cytoplasm for... (Review)
Review
Gene expression in eukaryotes begins with transcription in the nucleus, followed by the synthesis of messenger RNA (mRNA), which is then exported to the cytoplasm for its translation into proteins. Along with transcription and translation, mRNA export through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) is an essential regulatory step in eukaryotic gene expression. Multiple factors regulate mRNA export and hence gene expression. Interestingly, proteins from certain types of viruses interact with these factors in infected cells, and such an interaction interferes with the mRNA export of the host cell in favor of viral RNA export. Thus, these viruses hijack the host mRNA nuclear export mechanism, leading to a reduction in host gene expression and the downregulation of immune/antiviral responses. On the other hand, the viral mRNAs successfully evade the host surveillance system and are efficiently exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm for translation, which enables the continuation of the virus life cycle. Here, we present this review to summarize the mechanisms by which viruses suppress host mRNA nuclear export during infection, as well as the key strategies that viruses use to facilitate their mRNA nuclear export. These studies have revealed new potential antivirals that may be used to inhibit viral mRNA transport and enhance host mRNA nuclear export, thereby promoting host gene expression and immune responses.
Topics: Humans; Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Virus Diseases; Antiviral Agents; RNA Transport; Eukaryota; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 37628773
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612593 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2023
PubMed: 38143916
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1338852 -
Journal of Cell Science Sep 2023Chloroplasts conduct photosynthesis and numerous metabolic and signalling processes that enable plant growth and development. Most of the ∼3000 proteins in...
Chloroplasts conduct photosynthesis and numerous metabolic and signalling processes that enable plant growth and development. Most of the ∼3000 proteins in chloroplasts are nucleus encoded and must be imported from the cytosol. Thus, the protein import machinery of the organelle (the TOC-TIC apparatus) is of fundamental importance for chloroplast biogenesis and operation. Cytosolic factors target chloroplast precursor proteins to the TOC-TIC apparatus, which drives protein import across the envelope membranes into the organelle, before various internal systems mediate downstream routing to different suborganellar compartments. The protein import system is proteolytically regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), enabling centralized control over the organellar proteome. In addition, the UPS targets a range of chloroplast proteins directly. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we present mechanistic details of these different chloroplast protein targeting and translocation events, and of the UPS systems that regulate chloroplast proteins.
Topics: Ubiquitin; Chloroplasts; Photosynthesis; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Chloroplast Proteins; Protein Transport
PubMed: 37732520
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.241125 -
International Journal of Medical... 2023The members of the transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein (TMED) family are summarized in human as four subfamilies, α (TMED 4, 9), β (TMED 2), γ (TMED1, 3, 5,... (Review)
Review
The members of the transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein (TMED) family are summarized in human as four subfamilies, α (TMED 4, 9), β (TMED 2), γ (TMED1, 3, 5, 6, 7) and δ (TMED 10), with a total of nine members, which are important regulators of intracellular protein transport and are involved in normal embryonic development, as well as in the pathogenic processes of many human diseases. Here we systematically review the composition, structure and function of TMED family members, and describe the progress of TMED family in human diseases, including malignancies (head and neck tumors, lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, gastrointestinal tumors, urological tumors, osteosarcomas, etc.), immune responses, diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, mucin 1 nephropathy (MKD), and desiccation syndrome (SS). Finally, we discuss and prospect the potential of TMED for disease prognosis prediction and therapeutic targeting, with a view to laying the foundation for therapeutic research based on TMED family causative genes.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Membrane Proteins; Protein Transport; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Vesicular Transport Proteins
PubMed: 37928880
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.87272 -
Advanced Science (Weinheim,... Oct 2023Tissue-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) secrete various signaling molecules to establish paracrine communication within the inflammatory milieu. It is imperative to...
Tissue-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) secrete various signaling molecules to establish paracrine communication within the inflammatory milieu. It is imperative to identify molecular mediators that control this secretory phenotype of TINs. The present study uncovers a secretory neutrophil subset that exhibits increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production and enhanced migratory capacity which is highly related with periodontal pathogenesis. Further analysis identifies the OTU domain-containing protein 1 (OTUD1) plays a regulatory role in this secretory neutrophil polarization. In human and mouse periodontitis, the waning of inflammation is correlated with OTUD1 upregulation, whereas severe periodontitis is induced when neutrophil-intrinsic OTUD1 is depleted. Mechanistically, OTUD1 interacts with SEC23B, a component of the coat protein II complex (COPII). By removing the K63-linked polyubiquitin chains on SEC23B Lysine 81, the deubiquitinase OTUD1 negatively regulates the COPII secretory machinery and limits protein ER-to-Golgi trafficking, thus restricting the surface expression of integrin-regulated proteins, CD9 and CD47. Accordingly, blockade of protein transport by Brefeldin A (BFA) curbs recruitment of Otud1-deficient TINs and attenuates inflammation-induced alveolar bone destruction. The results thus identify OTUD1 signaling as a negative feedback loop that limits the polarization of neutrophils with secretory phenotype and highlight the potential application of BFA in the treatment of periodontal inflammation.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mice; Deubiquitinating Enzymes; Inflammation; Neutrophils; Periodontitis; Protein Transport; Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases
PubMed: 37639212
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202303207 -
Biological Chemistry Jul 2023Most mitochondrial proteins are nuclear-encoded and imported by the protein import machinery based on specific targeting signals. The proteins that carry an...
Most mitochondrial proteins are nuclear-encoded and imported by the protein import machinery based on specific targeting signals. The proteins that carry an amino-terminal targeting signal (presequence) are imported via the presequence import pathway that involves the translocases of the outer and inner membranes - TOM and TIM23 complexes. In this article, we discuss how mitochondrial matrix and inner membrane precursor proteins are imported along the presequence pathway in with a focus on the dynamics of the TIM23 complex, and further update with some of the key findings that advanced the field in the last few years.
Topics: Protein Transport; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Proteins; Mitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex Proteins
PubMed: 37155927
DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2023-0133 -
Blood Advances Jun 2023Selinexor (KPT-330) is a small molecule inhibitor of XPO1, which mediates the transport of tumor suppressor proteins, oncogene messenger RNAs, and other proteins...
Selinexor (KPT-330) is a small molecule inhibitor of XPO1, which mediates the transport of tumor suppressor proteins, oncogene messenger RNAs, and other proteins involved in governing cell growthfrom the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm. It is overexpressed in many cancer types. Because eukaryotic translation initiator factor 4E (eIF4E) plays a critical role in protein translation in cancer cells in multiple myeloma (MM), we evaluated the effectiveness of combined inhibition of protein translation and nuclear export in MM. Selinexor, an inhibitor of nuclear protein export, dose-dependently decreased eIF4E, IKZF1, and c-MYC protein levels. Using a doxycycline-inducible-pLKO-Tet-On vector, knockdown of eIF4E significantly enhanced the antiproliferative effects of selinexor, sensitized resistant MM cells to selinexor, and increased apoptosis in MM cells. Immunofluorescent analysis of MM cells showed that the combined treatment increased the localization of residual eIF4E to the nucleus compared with selinexor-only treatment. The overexpression of eIF4E at least partially rescued the effects of selinexor in MM cells by reducing G1 cell cycle arrest and increasing the selinexor-IC50 10-fold. Moreover, the combination of selinexor with pharmacologic inhibitors of protein translation showed synergistic anti-MM effects. These results suggest a synergistic anti-MM effect of selinexor combined with eIF4E inhibitors in vitro. Our work provides a better understanding of the potential mechanism of resistance to selinexor and a rationale for combining selinexor with eIF4E inhibitors for the treatment of MM.
Topics: Humans; Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Karyopherins; Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E; Apoptosis; Multiple Myeloma; Protein Biosynthesis
PubMed: 36827679
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006638