-
BMC Medical Imaging Sep 2023Accurate preoperative fistula diagnostics in male anorectal malformations (ARM) after colostomy are of great significance. We reviewed our institutional experiences and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Accurate preoperative fistula diagnostics in male anorectal malformations (ARM) after colostomy are of great significance. We reviewed our institutional experiences and explored methods for improving the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fistulas in males with ARMs after colostomy.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed on males with ARMs after colostomy admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to June 2022. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-pressure colostogram (HPC) before anorectal reconstruction. Patients with no fistula as diagnosed by both modalities underwent a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). General information, imaging results and surgical results were recorded.
RESULTS
Sixty-nine males with ARMs after colostomy were included. Age at the time of examination was 52 ~ 213 days, and the median age was 89 days. The Krickenbeck classification according to surgical results included rectovesical fistula (n = 19), rectoprostatic fistula (n = 24), rectobulbar fistula (n = 19) and no fistula (n = 7). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and HPC for different types of ARMs. For determining the location of the fistula, compared to surgery, HPC (76.8%, 53/69) performed significantly better than MRI (60.9%, 42/69) (p = 0.043). Sixteen patients diagnosed as having no fistula by MRI or HPC underwent a VCUG, and in 14 patients, the results were comfirmed. However, there were 2 cases of rectoprostatic fistula that were not correctly diagnosed.
CONCLUSION
High-pressure colostogram has greater accuracy than MRI in the diagnosis of fistula type in males with ARMs after colostomy. For patients diagnosed with no fistula by both methods, VCUG reduces the risk of false-negative exclusion, and rectoprostatic fistula should be considered during the operation.
Topics: Humans; Male; Infant; Anorectal Malformations; Retrospective Studies; Colostomy; Rectal Fistula; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 37749545
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01105-3 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Oct 2023Currently, the anal fistula treatment which optimises healing and preserves bowel continence remains unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the relative efficacy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Currently, the anal fistula treatment which optimises healing and preserves bowel continence remains unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the relative efficacy of different surgical treatments for AF through a network meta-analysis.
METHODS
Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases up to October 2022 identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical treatments for anal fistulae. Fistulae were classified as simple (inter-sphincteric or low trans-sphincteric fistulae crossing less than 30% of the external anal sphincter (EAS)) and complex (high trans-sphincteric fistulae involving more than 30% of the EAS). Treatments evaluated in only one trial were excluded from the primary analyses to minimise bias. The primary outcomes were rates of success in achieving AF healing and bowel incontinence.
RESULTS
Fifty-two RCTs were included. Of the 14 treatments considered, there were no significant differences regarding short-term (6 months or less postoperatively) and long-term (more than 6 months postoperatively) success rates between any of the treatments in patients with both simple and complex anal fistula. Ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) ranked best for minimising bowel incontinence in simple (99.1% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 70 patients) and complex anal fistula (86.2% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 102 patients).
CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence in existing RCTs to recommend one treatment over another regarding their short and long-term efficacy in successfully facilitating healing of both simple and complex anal fistulae. However, LIFT appears to be associated with the least impairment of bowel continence, irrespective of AF classification.
Topics: Humans; Fecal Incontinence; Network Meta-Analysis; Wound Healing; Anal Canal; Ligation; Rectal Fistula; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37460830
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02845-8 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Oct 2023In the study of the mechanism of wound healing after anal fistula surgery, how to scientifically and efficiently promote wound healing is of great significance. At...
In the study of the mechanism of wound healing after anal fistula surgery, how to scientifically and efficiently promote wound healing is of great significance. At present, modern medical treatment of wounds after anal fistula surgery mostly focuses on physical therapy intervention, new wound dressing and packing, and external application of growth factors. However, these therapies have many problems, and there is still no consensus on their clinical use. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has several methods to promote wound healing, such as oral administration, rubbing, and fumigation, which have a long history and obvious efficacy, but research in this area is relatively scattered and lacks classification and summarizing. Therefore, this paper analyzes and summarizes the existing research on TCM for promotion of wound healing after anal fistula surgery, carries out targeted analyses according to different clinical syndromes and treatment methods, and analyzes the defects in current research and anticipates future research trends in order to provide theoretical support for the advantages of TCM in promoting wound healing after anal fistula surgery.
Topics: Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Administration, Oral; Wound Healing; Rectal Fistula
PubMed: 37679994
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230630.002 -
Journal of Crohn's & Colitis Aug 2023Perianal lesion is a refractory phenotype of Crohn's disease [CD] with significantly diminished quality of life. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of perianal...
Diagnosis and Clinical Features of Perianal Lesions in Newly Diagnosed Crohn's Disease: Subgroup Analysis from Inception Cohort Registry Study of Patients with Crohn's Disease (iCREST-CD).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Perianal lesion is a refractory phenotype of Crohn's disease [CD] with significantly diminished quality of life. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of perianal lesions in newly diagnosed CD patients and the impact of perianal lesions on the quality of life in Japanese patients with CD.
METHODS
Patients newly diagnosed with CD after June 2016 were included between December 2018 and June 2020 from the Inception Cohort Registry Study of Patients with CD [iCREST-CD].
RESULTS
Perianal lesions were present in 324 [48.2%] of 672 patients with newly diagnosed CD; 71.9% [233/324] were male. The prevalence of perianal lesions was higher in patients aged <40 years vs ≥40 years, and it decreased with age. Perianal fistula [59.9%] and abscess [30.6%] were the most common perianal lesions. In multivariate analyses, male sex, age <40 years and ileocolonic disease location were significantly associated with a high prevalence of perianal lesions, whereas stricturing behaviour and alcohol intake were associated with low prevalence. Fatigue was more frequent [33.3% vs 21.6%] while work productivity and activity impairment-work time missed [36.3% vs 29.5%] and activity impairment [51.9% vs 41.1%] were numerically higher in patients with than those without perianal lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
At the time of CD diagnosis, approximately half of the patients had perianal lesions; perianal abscesses and perianal fistulas were the most common. Young age, male sex, disease location and behaviour were significantly associated with the presence of perianal lesions. The presence of perianal lesion was associated with fatigue and impairment of daily activities.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY
University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry System [UMIN-CTR, UMIN000032237].
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Crohn Disease; Quality of Life; Constriction, Pathologic; Anus Diseases; Abscess; Rectal Fistula; Registries
PubMed: 36869815
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad038 -
BMC Surgery Aug 2023Trans-sphincteric fistula management is very challenging and everyday new techniques are introduced to reach the safest and the most effective technique. In this study... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A comparative study between high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract via lateral Approach Versus Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty in High Trans-Sphincteric Fistula-in-Ano: a randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND
Trans-sphincteric fistula management is very challenging and everyday new techniques are introduced to reach the safest and the most effective technique. In this study two of the most effective techniques are compared based on their post-operative outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract by lateral approach (modified LIFT) and Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) in the management of high trans-sphincteric fistula regarding their post-operative outcomes in the form of post-operative pain, time of wound healing in weeks, wound infection, incontinence and recurrence within one year.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The current study is single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial conducted from June 2020 to June 2022 in the colorectal surgical unit of Ain Shams University Hospitals, which included 80 patients presented with high trans-sphincteric perianal fistula 55 (68.75%) males and 25 (31.25%) including a one-year follow-up postoperative.
RESULTS
There were 80 patients in our study 40 patients in each group. The mean age of group (I) is 46.65 with standard deviation 6.6. while, in group (II) the mean age is 45.85 with standard deviation 6.07 (p = 0.576). From the included 80 patients 55(68.7%) were males and 25 (31.25%) were females (p = 0.469). Regarding, postoperative wound infection occurred in 2(5%) Patients in group (I) and 7(17.5%) patients in group (II) (p = 0.154). There were no cases of incontinence in group I. However, there were 6(15%) cases of incontinence to gases only scored by Wexner score 3/20 in group II (p = 0.026) and its significant difference between the two techniques. Postoperative pain was assessed for one week duration by the visual analogue score (VAS) from 0 to 10 in which, zero is the least and 10 is the maximum. In group (I) 18(45%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 20(50%) patients scored their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 2(5%) patients scored severe pain from 7 to 9. While, in group (II) 14(35%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 22(55%) patients their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 4(10%) patients scored their pain severe from 7 to 9 (p = 0.275). Recurrence in one-year follow-up occurred in 13(32.5%) patients in group (I) about 7 patients had recurrence in the form of inter-sphincteric fistula and 6 patients in the form of trans-sphincteric fistula. While, in group II recurrence occurred in 1 (2.5%) patient in the form of subcutaneous fistula at the healing site (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty is an effective and preferred technique for the trans-sphincteric fistula repair with high statistically significant lower incidence of recurrence in one-year follow-up as compared to modified LIFT technique. Although, there is higher incidence regarding incontinence to gases only post-operative. This work recommends fistulotomy and primary sphincter reconstruction procedure in high trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas to be more popular, to be implemented as a corner stone procedure along various and classic operations for such cases as it's easy, feasible.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Anal Canal; Rectal Fistula; Inflammation; Ligation; Pain; Recurrence; Fecal Incontinence
PubMed: 37559044
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02117-0 -
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences Jul 2023
Topics: Humans; Hemorrhoids; Anus Diseases; Fistula
PubMed: 37456202
DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2023.49356 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Dec 2023It is often stated that loose seton drainage results in distal migration of a fistula tract in perianal fistula. The aim of the present study was to assess this...
BACKGROUND
It is often stated that loose seton drainage results in distal migration of a fistula tract in perianal fistula. The aim of the present study was to assess this distalization of trans- and suprasphincteric perianal fistulas after a silicone seton has been inserted.
METHODS
Consecutive patients who underwent loose seton placement for the management of a transsphincteric or suprasphincteric fistula between January 2016 and December 2021 with a pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the present retrospective study. The height of the external anal sphincter (EAS) and the level of penetration of perianal fistula through the EAS or puborectal muscle (PRM) were determined on MRI. Primary outcome was migration of the fistula tract through the EAS and PRM.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight patients with perianal fistulas were included. Median height of the EAS was 28 (IQR 25-34) mm before seton placement and 27 (IQR 24-33) mm afterward. Median level of perforation was 32 (IQR 17-40) mm before seton placement and 28 (IQR 17-40) mm afterward (p = 0.37). One fistula (3%) was downgraded from mid to low transsphincteric and was laid open after 14.9 months of loose seton drainage.
CONCLUSIONS
No statistically significant distalization of complex fistula tracts after loose silicone seton drainage was found. Some complex fistulas may downgrade to a less complex fistula after long-term seton drainage. However, loose silicone seton drainage should not be offered to patients as a treatment option to downgrade a complex fistula to a simple one or even have the hope to heal it.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rectal Fistula; Anal Canal; Drainage; Inflammation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38097914
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02882-3 -
Updates in Surgery Dec 2023Anal fistula (AF) is a common disease with high prevalence and surgical operations are effective treatments in clinical work. There exist many well-known surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Anal fistula (AF) is a common disease with high prevalence and surgical operations are effective treatments in clinical work. There exist many well-known surgical techniques treating complex anal fistula (CAF), however, none is ideal. To compare the superiority of Anal fistula plug (AFP) and Endoanal advancement flap repair (EAFR) for complex anal fistula. We searched worldwide databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed from their inception to March 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes of AFP and EAFR were included according to the PICO principles. The indicators of the healing rate, recurrence rate, wound infection rate, and complication rate, et al. were extracted and compared between different surgical methods. 5 RCTS and 7 non-RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 847 patients (341 patients conducted with AFP and 506 patients with EAFR). By combining the total effect of the 12 articles, we found that there was a statistical difference reporting the healing rate of AFP 48.3% and EAFR 64.4% treating the CAF (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.30,1.55, P = 0.03), and EAFR has a better healing rate. However, there was no significant difference in terms of the recurrence rate (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.80,3.54, P = 0.17), the wound infection rate (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.95,3.52, P = 0.07), and the complication rate (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.70,1.61, P = 0.77) either in the 12 articles or in the subgroup. The meta-analysis indicated that the EAFR was superior to AFP in terms of the healing rate treating the CAF, however, there were no significant differences between the two groups when it came to the recurrence rate, the wound infection rate, and the complication rate. EAFR might be one initial treatment for the complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas compared with AFP.
Topics: Humans; alpha-Fetoproteins; Rectal Fistula; Treatment Outcome; Surgical Flaps; Fecal Incontinence; Wound Infection; Anal Canal
PubMed: 37882975
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01674-6 -
Frontiers in Nutrition 2023Symptomatic perianal disease is common in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), and perianal fistulas represent the primary form of anal involvement. This type of... (Review)
Review
Symptomatic perianal disease is common in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), and perianal fistulas represent the primary form of anal involvement. This type of involvement is associated with a poor prognosis and a disabling course. The treatment is challenging and involves both surgical and medical approaches. Despite combined therapy, a significant portion of patients may still require proctectomy to control the symptoms. Consequently, investigating factors that may influence the outcome of perianal disease remains a priority area of research in CD. Nutritional deficiencies are well documented among CD patients with luminal forms of involvement and are closely related to poor clinical outcomes, therapy response, and postoperative complications. As a result, leading guidelines recommend regular nutritional assessment and correction of nutritional deficiencies in patients requiring a surgical approach. Despite these recommendations and the high rate of surgeries among CD patients with perianal disease, there is a shortage of studies addressing the real impact of nutritional status on the course and outcomes of perianal disease. This knowledge gap underscores the importance of further research to understand better and improve the management of perianal CD. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of nutritional status assessment and the influence of nutritional status on the outcomes of patients with perianal CD.
PubMed: 37743921
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1271825 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Oct 2023
Topics: Humans; Anus Neoplasms; Rectal Fistula; Anal Canal; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37344312
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.085