-
The New England Journal of Medicine Jul 2023Pelvic radiation plus sensitizing chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine (chemoradiotherapy) before surgery is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Pelvic radiation plus sensitizing chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine (chemoradiotherapy) before surgery is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) can be used in lieu of chemoradiotherapy is uncertain.
METHODS
We conducted a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX (with chemoradiotherapy given only if the primary tumor decreased in size by <20% or if FOLFOX was discontinued because of side effects) as compared with chemoradiotherapy. Adults with rectal cancer that had been clinically staged as T2 node-positive, T3 node-negative, or T3 node-positive who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery were eligible to participate. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Noninferiority would be claimed if the upper limit of the two-sided 90.2% confidence interval of the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death did not exceed 1.29. Secondary end points included overall survival, local recurrence (in a time-to-event analysis), complete pathological resection, complete response, and toxic effects.
RESULTS
From June 2012 through December 2018, a total of 1194 patients underwent randomization and 1128 started treatment; among those who started treatment, 585 were in the FOLFOX group and 543 in the chemoradiotherapy group. At a median follow-up of 58 months, FOLFOX was noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.92; 90.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.14; P = 0.005 for noninferiority). Five-year disease-free survival was 80.8% (95% CI, 77.9 to 83.7) in the FOLFOX group and 78.6% (95% CI, 75.4 to 81.8) in the chemoradiotherapy group. The groups were similar with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.44) and local recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.44 to 3.16). In the FOLFOX group, 53 patients (9.1%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 8 (1.4%) received postoperative chemoradiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were eligible for sphincter-sparing surgery, preoperative FOLFOX was noninferior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with respect to disease-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; PROSPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01515787.).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anal Canal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease-Free Survival; Fluorouracil; Leucovorin; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Organ Sparing Treatments; Oxaliplatin; Rectal Neoplasms; Preoperative Care; Preoperative Period
PubMed: 37272534
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303269 -
Gastroenterology Aug 2023Tumor genetic testing is indispensable in the management of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the indications for genomics-guided precision medicine...
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Tumor genetic testing is indispensable in the management of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the indications for genomics-guided precision medicine and immunotherapy must be better understood and defined.
METHODS
We prospectively sequenced tumors from 869 Chinese patients with CRC by a large panel and evaluated the clinical significance of single-gene somatic mutations and co-occurring events in metastatic CRC, as well as their functional effects and tumorigenic mechanisms. We systematically assessed the heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment in different genomic contexts through the combined analysis of Immunoscore, multiplex immunostaining, whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome, and single-cell sequencing.
RESULTS
Single-gene somatic mutations in BRAF or RBM10 were associated with shorter progression-free survival in patients with metastatic CRC. Functional studies suggested RBM10 acts as a tumor suppressor in CRC development. Co-mutations of KRAS/AMER1 or KRAS/APC were enriched in the metastatic cohort, which had poor progression-free survival and did not benefit from bevacizumab due to accelerated drug metabolism. Forty patients (4.6%) carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline alterations in the DNA damage repair pathway and 37.5% of these tumors had secondary-hit events with loss of heterozygosity or biallelic alterations. A high tumor insertion or deletion burden with high microsatellite instability suggested immunogenicity with numerous activated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, whereas polymerase epsilon exonuclease mutation with ultrahigh tumor mutation burden indicated a relatively quiescent immunophenotype. The heterogeneous genomic-immunologic interactions were reflected in the divergent neoantigen presentation and depletion, immune checkpoint expression, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, and T-cell responsiveness to pembrolizumab.
CONCLUSIONS
Our integrated analysis provides insights into CRC prognostic stratification, drug response, and personalized genomics-guided targeted and immunotherapies.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Colorectal Neoplasms; Prognosis; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Mutation; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Microsatellite Instability; Tumor Microenvironment; RNA-Binding Proteins
PubMed: 37146911
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.029 -
Biosensors & Bioelectronics Jul 2023Current in-vitro 2D cultures and animal models present severe limitations in recapitulating human physiopathology with striking discrepancies in estimating drug efficacy... (Review)
Review
Current in-vitro 2D cultures and animal models present severe limitations in recapitulating human physiopathology with striking discrepancies in estimating drug efficacy and side effects when compared to human trials. For these reasons, microphysiological systems, organ-on-chip and multiorgans microdevices attracted considerable attention as novel tools for high-throughput and high-content research to achieve an improved understanding of diseases and to accelerate the drug development process towards more precise and eventually personalized standards. This review takes the form of a guide on this fast-growing field, providing useful introduction to major themes and indications for further readings. We start analyzing Organs-on-chips (OOC) technologies for testing the major drug administration routes: (1) oral/rectal route by intestine-on-a-chip, (2) inhalation by lung-on-a-chip, (3) transdermal by skin-on-a-chip and (4) intravenous through vascularization models, considering how drugs penetrate in the bloodstream and are conveyed to their targets. Then, we focus on OOC models for (other) specific organs and diseases: (1) neurodegenerative diseases with brain models and blood brain barriers, (2) tumor models including their vascularization, organoids/spheroids, engineering and screening of antitumor drugs, (3) liver/kidney on chips and multiorgan models for gastrointestinal diseases and metabolic assessment of drugs and (4) biomechanical systems recapitulating heart, muscles and bones structures and related diseases. Successively, we discuss technologies and materials for organ on chips, analyzing (1) microfluidic tools for organs-on-chips, (2) sensor integration for real-time monitoring, (3) materials and (4) cell lines for organs on chips. (Nano)delivery approaches for therapeutics and their on chip assessment are also described. Finally, we conclude with a critical discussion on current significance/relevance, trends, limitations, challenges and future prospects in terms of revolutionary impact on biomedical research, preclinical models and drug development.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Lab-On-A-Chip Devices; Biosensing Techniques; Drug Development; Microphysiological Systems; Liver
PubMed: 37060819
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115271 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023The therapeutic landscape in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has undergone a significant paradigm shift in recent years with the rising adoption of total... (Review)
Review
The therapeutic landscape in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has undergone a significant paradigm shift in recent years with the rising adoption of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). This comprehensive approach entails administering chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy. To establish and deliver the optimal tailored treatment regimen to the patient, it is crucial to foster collaboration among a multidisciplinary team comprising healthcare professionals from various specialties, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, and pathology. This review aims to provide insights into the current state of TNT for LARC and new emerging strategies to identify potential directions for future research and clinical practice, such as circulating tumor-DNA, immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors, and nonoperative management.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Rectal Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Rectum; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 37569532
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512159