-
Journal of Ovarian Research Jun 2023Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. We launched a prospective study of women receiving...
BACKGROUND
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. We launched a prospective study of women receiving RRSO, including those with mutations in genes beyond BRCA1/2.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
80 women were enrolled for RRSO with sectioning and extensively examining the fimbriae (SEE-FIM) protocol between October 2016 and June 2022. The majority of participants had inherited susceptibility gene mutations or a family history suggesting ovarian cancer risk, while patients with isolated metastatic high-grade serous cancer of unknown origin were also included.
RESULTS
Overall, two patients had isolated metastatic high-grade serous cancer with unknown origin, and four patients had family histories but refused to take genetic tests. The rest 74 patients harbored deleterious susceptible gene, including 43 (58.1%) with BRCA1 mutation, and 26 (35.1%) with BRCA2 mutation, respectively. Other mutated genes included ATM (1), BRIP1(1), PALB2(1), MLH1(1) and TP53 (1) in each patient. Among the 74 mutation carriers, three (4.1%) cancers were recognized, one (1.4%) was found to have serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), and five patients (6.8%) was diagnosed with serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STILs). P53 signature was recognized in 24 patients (32.4%). For other genes, MLH1 mutation carrier had endometrial atypical hyperplasia and p53 signature in fallopian tubes. The germline TP53 mutation carrier had STIC in the surgical specimens. Evidence for precursor escape was also recognized in our cohort.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated clinic-pathological findings of patients at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer, and expand the clinical application of SEE-FIM protocol.
Topics: Female; Humans; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; East Asian People; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Salpingo-oophorectomy; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 37386498
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01222-1 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jan 2024This study aimed to provide an up-to-date systematic review of "the long-term outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy" and perform a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to provide an up-to-date systematic review of "the long-term outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy" and perform a meta-analysis for the reported associations.
DATA SOURCES
Our study updated a previous systematic review by searching the literature using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for publications between January 2015 and August 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Our study included studies of women who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs women who had a hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or no surgery.
METHODS
The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Adjusted hazard ratios were extracted and combined to obtain fixed effect estimates.
RESULTS
Compared with hysterectomy or no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in young women was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.84) but with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.47). In addition, it was associated with an increased risk of total cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart disease, and stroke with hazard ratios of 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.25), 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.25), and 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.31), respectively. Compared with no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before the age of 50 years was associated with an increased risk of hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.65), diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.24), hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.20), dementia (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.69), and depression (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.60). The evidence on the association with all-cause mortality in young women showed substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I=85%; P<.01).
CONCLUSION
Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with multiple long-term outcomes. The benefits of the addition of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to hysterectomy should be balanced against the risks.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Salpingo-oophorectomy; Ovariectomy; Hysterectomy; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37364803
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.043 -
BMC Women's Health Sep 2023Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare and specific type of smooth muscle tumor that is histologically benign but has a malignant biological behavior. It is commonly...
BACKGROUND
Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare and specific type of smooth muscle tumor that is histologically benign but has a malignant biological behavior. It is commonly associated with a history of uterine leiomyomas.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 36-year-old woman, G1P1, presented to the hospital with left lower abdominal pain for 2 months and she has accepted hysteroscopic myomectomy about 1 year ago. Ultrasound venography, echocardiography and computed tomography venography (CTV) of inferior vena cava were performed, which revealed IVL located in left intramural myometrium walls growing along the left ovarian vein reaching the level of the lumbar 5-sacral 1 disc. Laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomyis were scheduled. The IVL in the left ovarian vein and parauterine venous plexus were detected and excised completely during surgery. IVL was diagnosed by postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry. The patient recovered well after surgery. No surgical-related or anesthesia-related complications occurred.The 3-month follow-up CTV of inferior vena cava and echocardiography examination revealed normal.
CONCLUSIONS
The cause of IVL is unknown, this observation demonstrates that hysteroscopic myomectomy might lead to the occurrence of IVL.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adult; Leiomyomatosis; Abdominal Pain; Echocardiography; Myometrium; Pelvis
PubMed: 37697329
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02618-3 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Aug 2023Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy. In the past, it was classified based on its hormone sensitivity. However, The Cancer Genome... (Review)
Review
Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy. In the past, it was classified based on its hormone sensitivity. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas has categorized EC into four groups, which offers a more objective and reproducible classification and has been shown to have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Hormonally driven EC arises from a precursor lesion known as endometrial hyperplasia, resulting from unopposed estrogen. EC is usually diagnosed through biopsy, followed by surgical staging unless advanced disease is expected. The typical staging consists of a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsies, with a preference placed on a minimally invasive approach. The stage of the disease is the most significant prognostic marker. However, factors such as age, histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, peritoneal cytology, hormone receptor status, ploidy and markers, body mass index, and the therapy received all contribute to the prognosis. Treatment is tailored based on the stage and the risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy is primarily used in the early stages, and chemotherapy can be added if high-grade histology or advanced-stage disease is present. The risk of EC recurrence increases with advances in stage. Among the recurrences, vaginal cases exhibit the most favorable response to treatment, typically for radiotherapy. Conversely, the treatment of widespread recurrence is currently palliative and is best managed with chemotherapy or hormonal agents. Most recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for advanced and recurrent EC.
Topics: Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Endometrial Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Biopsy
PubMed: 37754489
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090574 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2023: The uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are tumors with pathological characteristics similar to leiomyosarcoma, but that do not... (Review)
Review
: The uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are tumors with pathological characteristics similar to leiomyosarcoma, but that do not satisfy histological criteria for leiomyoma. These are problematic lesions with intermediate morphologic features; thus, diagnosis and treatment are difficult. This narrative review aims to review data in the literature about STUMPs, particularly focusing on management and therapeutic options and strategies for women who desire to preserve fertility. : authors searched for "uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential" in PubMed and Scopus databases, from 2000 to March 2023. Pertinent articles were obtained in full-text format and screened for additional references. Only articles in English language were included. Studies including full case description of patients with histopathological diagnosis of STUMP in accordance with Stanford criteria were included. : The median age was 43 years old. Symptoms are similar to those of leiomyomas, with a mean diameter of 8.0 cm. Total hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the standard care for women if fertility desire is satisfied. Myomectomy alone can be considered for young patients. Although these tumors have not a high malignant potential, several studies described recurrence and metastases. : STUMPs are complex uterine smooth muscle tumors, with a rare but reasoned clinical-diagnostic management. Considering the high clinical and histological complexity of these tumors, high level of expertise is mandatory.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Databases, Factual; Leiomyoma; Smooth Muscle Tumor; Uterine Myomectomy; Uterus
PubMed: 37629661
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081371 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Aug 2023This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms.... (Review)
Review
This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms. Frequently, diagnosis is made after hysterectomy or myomectomy scheduled for presumed benign leiomyomas. The gold standard for surgical treatment of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. It is possible to adopt a fertility-sparing approach for those patients who wish to maintain their fertility. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy is controversial; in fact, removal of lymph nodes is only recommended in the case of radiological suspicion of nodal involvement. Use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of total recurrence, intra-abdominal recurrence and death. Advanced disease management should be customized based on the patient's performance status given the uncertain role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment of advanced or recurrent disease remains a subject of debate, but surgery is the best approach in terms of morbidity and mortality. There are few options for management of these uterine tumours, and further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patients with a first diagnosis of uterine sarcoma and patients with relapse of uterine sarcoma. No specific evidence supports the adoption of adjuvant therapy in uterine-confined disease, and molecular/genomic profiling may be useful to identify patients at risk of recurrence.
Topics: Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Sarcoma; Uterine Neoplasms; Leiomyoma; Pelvic Neoplasms; Hysterectomy
PubMed: 37348383
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.016 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Oct 2023This study aimed to assess the impact of risk-reducing surgery for breast cancer and ovarian cancer prevention on quality of life. We considered risk-reducing... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the impact of risk-reducing surgery for breast cancer and ovarian cancer prevention on quality of life. We considered risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy.
DATA SOURCES
We followed a prospective protocol (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42022319782) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We followed a PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) framework. The population included women at increased risk of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. We focused on studies reporting quality of life outcomes (health-related quality of life, sexual function, menopause symptoms, body image, cancer-related distress or worry, anxiety, or depression) after risk-reducing surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer.
METHODS
We used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) for study appraisal. Qualitative synthesis and fixed-effects meta-analysis were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 34 studies were included (risk-reducing mastectomy: 16 studies; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: 19 studies; risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy: 2 studies). Health-related quality of life was unchanged or improved in 13 of 15 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=986) and 10 of 16 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1617), despite short-term deficits (N=96 after risk-reducing mastectomy and N=459 after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy). Sexual function (using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire) was affected in 13 of 16 studies (N=1400) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in terms of decreased sexual pleasure (-1.21 [-1.53 to -0.89]; N=3070) and increased sexual discomfort (1.12 [0.93-1.31]; N=1400). Hormone replacement therapy after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with an increase (1.16 [0.17-2.15]; N=291) in sexual pleasure and a decrease (-1.20 [-1.75 to -0.65]; N=157) in sexual discomfort. Sexual function was affected in 4 of 13 studies (N=147) after risk-reducing mastectomy, but stable in 9 of 13 studies (N=799). Body image was unaffected in 7 of 13 studies (N=605) after risk-reducing mastectomy, whereas 6 of 13 studies (N=391) reported worsening. Increased menopause symptoms were reported in 12 of 13 studies (N=1759) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with a reduction (-1.96 [-2.81 to -1.10]; N=1745) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms. Cancer-related distress was unchanged or decreased in 5 of 5 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=365) and 8 of 10 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1223). Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (2 studies, N=413) led to better sexual function and menopause-specific quality of life.
CONCLUSION
Risk-reducing surgery may be associated with quality of life outcomes. Risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy reduce cancer-related distress, and do not affect health-related quality of life. Women and clinicians should be aware of body image problems after risk-reducing mastectomy, and of sexual dysfunction and menopause symptoms after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy may be a promising alternative to mitigate quality of life-related risks of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
PubMed: 37059410
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.045