-
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy Jun 2023Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a severe condition with an extremely high disability rate. The challenges of SCI repair include its complex pathological mechanisms and... (Review)
Review
Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a severe condition with an extremely high disability rate. The challenges of SCI repair include its complex pathological mechanisms and the difficulties of neural regeneration in the central nervous system. In the past few decades, researchers have attempted to completely elucidate the pathological mechanism of SCI and identify effective strategies to promote axon regeneration and neural circuit remodeling, but the results have not been ideal. Recently, new pathological mechanisms of SCI, especially the interactions between immune and neural cell responses, have been revealed by single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptome analysis. With the development of bioactive materials and stem cells, more attention has been focused on forming intermediate neural networks to promote neural regeneration and neural circuit reconstruction than on promoting axonal regeneration in the corticospinal tract. Furthermore, technologies to control physical parameters such as electricity, magnetism and ultrasound have been constantly innovated and applied in neural cell fate regulation. Among these advanced novel strategies and technologies, stem cell therapy, biomaterial transplantation, and electromagnetic stimulation have entered into the stage of clinical trials, and some of them have already been applied in clinical treatment. In this review, we outline the overall epidemiology and pathophysiology of SCI, expound on the latest research progress related to neural regeneration and circuit reconstruction in detail, and propose future directions for SCI repair and clinical applications.
Topics: Humans; Axons; Nerve Regeneration; Spinal Cord Injuries; Neurons; Stem Cells
PubMed: 37357239
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01477-6 -
European Review For Medical and... Sep 2023This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of women with postmenopausal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Drug efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to April 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.1.3 software, and quality evaluation was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
51 RCTs containing 39,095 patients met our selection criteria. The efficacy results indicated that teriparatide was more effective than ibandronic acid in reducing vertebral fractures [relative risk (RR) = 0.536; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.266, 0.998)]. Denosumab [mean difference (MD) = -4.19; 95% CI (-8.03, -0.355)] and teriparatide [MD = 4.64; 95% CI (1.60, 7.72)] showed better efficacy than ibandronic acid in improving spine bone mineral density (BMD). Denosumab showed better efficacy than teriparatide in improving radius BMD [MD = -4.14; 95% CI (-6.72, -1.54)], hip bone mineral density (BMD) [MD = -2.01; 95% CI (-3.80, -0.162)], and one-third radius BMD [MD = -3.63; 95% CI (-7.04, -0.151)]. Denosumab was associated with the greatest benefit in increasing radius BMD [the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.999], hip BMD [surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.979], femoral neck BMD (SUCRA = 0.971), one-third radius BMD (SUCRA = 0.994) and preventing vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.806). Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing non-vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.927) and improving spine BMD (SUCRA = 0.899). The safety results indicated that teriparatide was safer than zoledronic acid regarding the risk of adverse events [RR = 0.958; 95% CI (0.919, 0.988)]. Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing adverse events (SUCRA = 0.908) and serious adverse events (SUCRA = 0.813).
CONCLUSIONS
Our current results suggested that when considering both safety and efficacy, denosumab or teriparatide might be a better choice for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Denosumab; Ibandronic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spinal Fractures; Teriparatide; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 37750653
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33586 -
Endocrinology and Metabolism (Seoul,... Dec 2023Since our discovery in 2006 that acromegaly is associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures, many authors have confirmed this finding in both cross-sectional... (Review)
Review
Since our discovery in 2006 that acromegaly is associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures, many authors have confirmed this finding in both cross-sectional and prospective studies. Due to the high epidemiological and clinical impact of this newly discovered comorbidity of acromegaly, this topic has progressively become more important and prominent over the years, and the pertinent literature has been enriched by new findings on the pathophysiology and treatment. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss these novel findings, integrating them with the seminal observations, in order to give the reader an updated view of how the field of acromegaly and bone is developing, from strong clinical observations to a mechanistic understanding and possible prevention and treatment.
Topics: Humans; Acromegaly; Bone Density; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 38164073
DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2023.601