-
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023While vancomycin remains a widely prescribed antibiotic, it can cause ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, both of which are concentration-associated. Overtreatment can...
While vancomycin remains a widely prescribed antibiotic, it can cause ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, both of which are concentration-associated. Overtreatment can occur when the treatment lasts for an unnecessarily long time. Using a model-informed precision dosing scheme, this study aims to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) model for vancomycin to determine the optimal dosage regimen and treatment duration in order to avoid drug-induced toxicity. The data were obtained from electronic medical records of 542 patients, including 40 children, and were analyzed using NONMEM software. For PK, vancomycin concentrations were described with a two-compartment model incorporating allometry scaling. This revealed that systemic clearance decreased with creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels, history of diabetes and renal diseases, and further decreased in women. On the other hand, the central volume of distribution increased with age. For PD, C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations were described by transit compartments and were found to decrease with the presence of pneumonia. Simulations demonstrated that, given the model informed optimal doses, peak and trough concentrations as well as the area under the concentration-time curve remained within the therapeutic range, even at doses smaller than routine doses, for most patients. Additionally, CRP levels decreased more rapidly with the higher dose starting from 10 days after treatment initiation. The developed R Shiny application efficiently visualized the time courses of vancomycin and CRP concentrations, indicating its applicability in designing optimal treatment schemes simply based on visual inspection.
PubMed: 37876732
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1252757 -
Current Biology : CB Aug 2023Antibiotic resistance often confers a fitness cost to the resistant cell and thus raises key questions of how resistance is maintained in the absence of antibiotics and,...
Antibiotic resistance often confers a fitness cost to the resistant cell and thus raises key questions of how resistance is maintained in the absence of antibiotics and, if lost, whether cells are genetically primed for re-evolving resistance. To address these questions, we have examined vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) strains that arise during vancomycin therapy. VISA strains harbor a broad spectrum of mutations, and they are known to be unstable both in patients and in the laboratory. Here, we show that loss of resistance in VISA strains is correlated with a fitness increase and is attributed to adaptive mutations, leaving the initial VISA-adaptive mutations intact. Importantly, upon a second exposure to vancomycin, such revertants evolve significantly faster to become VISA, and they reach higher resistance levels than vancomycin-naive cells. Further, we find that sub-lethal concentrations of vancomycin stabilize the VISA phenotype, as do the human β-defensin 3 (hBD-3) and the bacteriocin nisin that both, like vancomycin, bind to the peptidoglycan building block, lipid II. Thus, factors binding lipid II may stabilize VISA both in vivo and in vitro, and in case resistance is lost, mutations remain that predispose to resistance development. These findings may explain why VISA infections often are re-occurring and suggest that previous vancomycin adaptation should be considered a risk factor when deciding on antimicrobial chemotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin; Vancomycin Resistance; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Staphylococcal Infections
PubMed: 37494936
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.082 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023has emerged as a critical human pathogen, and a number of isolated reports have described the successful treatment of infections with vancomycin, a drug that is...
has emerged as a critical human pathogen, and a number of isolated reports have described the successful treatment of infections with vancomycin, a drug that is typically used to target Gram-positive bacteria. This study employed in vitro broth microdilution checkerboard and time-kill assays, as well as in vivo zebrafish animal models to evaluate the individual and combination antimicrobial effects of vancomycin and rifampin against . The minimum inhibitory concentration ranges of vancomycin and rifampin against 167 isolates of were 16-256 mg/L and 0.06-128 mg/L, respectively. The checkerboard assay results revealed a synergistic effect between vancomycin and rifampin in 16.8% (28/167) of the isolates. Time-kill assays were implemented for 66 isolates, and the two-drug combination had a synergistic interaction in 57 (86.4%) isolates. In vivo zebrafish studies revealed that treatment with vancomycin monotherapy, rifampin monotherapy, or vancomycin-rifampin combination therapy yielded a higher survival rate than the control group treatment with 0.9% saline. The results of this study support the use of vancomycin to treat infections.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Vancomycin; Rifampin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Zebrafish; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 38069334
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317012 -
Jornal de Pediatria 2024To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old.
DATA SOURCES
This is a systematic review in which five randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin, involving a total of 429 children with nosocomial infections, were evaluated. They were searched in scientific databases: PubMed, Bvs, and SciELO.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The main nosocomial infections that affected children were bacteremia, skin, and soft tissue infections followed by nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which all studies showed infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains being isolated. Both linezolid and vancomycin showed high therapeutic efficacy against different types of nosocomial infections, ranging from 84.4% to 94% for linezolid and 76.9% to 90% for vancomycin. Patients receiving linezolid had lower rates of rash and red man syndrome compared to those receiving vancomycin. However, despite the adverse reactions, antimicrobials can be safely administered to children to treat nosocomial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria.
CONCLUSION
Both linezolid and vancomycin showed good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria in hospitalized children. However, linezolid stands out regarding its pharmacological safety. Importantly, to strengthen this conclusion, further clinical trials are needed to provide additional evidence.
Topics: Humans; Linezolid; Cross Infection; Vancomycin; Child; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Child, Preschool; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Infant; Staphylococcal Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 38145631
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.08.011 -
Effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid in Kuwait: A retrospective cohort study.Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ :... Nov 2023The effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait are unknown. This study assessed the...
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait are unknown. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
This retrospective study included adult patients who were prescribed antibiotics (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid) for the treatment of gram-positive infections at five hospitals in Kuwait. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the effectiveness and safety outcomes. A cost analysis was performed on the patients hospitalised for gram-positive infections.
RESULTS
Among 116 patients, 42.2 % (n = 49) received glycopeptides (vancomycin [n = 45] and teicoplanin [n = 4]) or linezolid (n = 67). Clinical cure was achieved in 100 patients without significant intergroup differences (p = 0.34). Thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury occurred in 19 and 20 patients (p = 0.82 and 0.96), respectively, and their incidence was similar with all the studied agents. The average cost per patient was USD 983.70. The estimated total direct medical costs were USD 894,570.6, the cost was highest for linezolid (USD 469,682.30) and vancomycin (USD 370,342.5), and lowest for teicoplanin (USD 20,799.9).
CONCLUSIONS
Glycopeptides and linezolid were highly effective. Linezolid was the most frequently prescribed agent; its effectiveness and safety were similar according to the antibiotic class. However, treatment with linezolid and vancomycin were associated with considerable costs.
PubMed: 37860688
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101813 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic widely used in cases of suspected sepsis in premature neonates. While appropriate and potentially lifesaving in this setting,...
Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic widely used in cases of suspected sepsis in premature neonates. While appropriate and potentially lifesaving in this setting, early-life antibiotic exposure alters the developing microbiome and is associated with an increased risk of deadly complications, including late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Recent studies show that neonatal vancomycin treatment disrupts postnatal enteric nervous system (ENS) development in mouse pups, which is in part dependent upon neuroimmune interactions. This suggests that early-life antibiotic exposure could disrupt these interactions in the neonatal gut. Notably, a subset of tissue-resident intestinal macrophages, muscularis macrophages, has been identified as important contributors to the development of postnatal ENS. We hypothesized that vancomycin-induced neonatal dysbiosis impacts postnatal ENS development through its effects on macrophages. Using a mouse model, we found that exposure to vancomycin in the first 10 days of life, but not in adult mice, resulted in an expansion of pro-inflammatory colonic macrophages by increasing the recruitment of bone-marrow-derived macrophages. Single-cell RNA sequencing of neonatal colonic macrophages revealed that early-life vancomycin exposure was associated with an increase in immature and inflammatory macrophages, consistent with an influx of circulating monocytes differentiating into macrophages. Lineage tracing confirmed that vancomycin significantly increased the non-yolk-sac-derived macrophage population. Consistent with these results, early-life vancomycin exposure did not expand the colonic macrophage population nor decrease enteric neuron density in CCR2-deficient mice. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that early-life vancomycin exposure alters macrophage number and phenotypes in distinct ways compared with vancomycin exposure in adult mice and results in altered ENS development.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Vancomycin; Dysbiosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Macrophages; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Neurons; Sepsis
PubMed: 37901245
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1268909 -
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Nov 2023Increasing incidence of Enterococcus faecium resistant to key antimicrobials used in therapy of hospitalized patients is a worrisome phenomenon observed worldwide. Our...
INTRODUCTION
Increasing incidence of Enterococcus faecium resistant to key antimicrobials used in therapy of hospitalized patients is a worrisome phenomenon observed worldwide. Our aim was to characterize a tigecycline-, linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolate with the vanA and vanB genes, originating from a hematoma of a patient hospitalized in an intensive care unit in Poland.
METHODS
Antimicrobial susceptibility (a broad panel) was tested using gradient tests with predefined antibiotic concentrations. The complete genome sequence was obtained from a mixed assembly of Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore's MinION reads. The genome was analyzed with appropriate tools available at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology, PubMLST and GenBank. Transferability of oxazolidinone, tigecycline and vancomycin resistance genes was investigated by conjugation, followed by PCR screen of transconjugants for antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmid rep genes characteristic for the donor and genomic sequencing of selected transconjugants.
RESULTS
The isolate was resistant to most antimicrobials tested; susceptibility to daptomycin, erythromycin and chloramphenicol was significantly reduced, and only oritavancin retained the full activity. The isolate represented sequence type 18 (ST18) and carried vanA, vanB, poxtA, fexB, tet(L), tet(M), aac(6')-aph(2''), ant(6)-Ia and ant(6')-Ii. The vanA, poxtA and tet(M) genes located on ~ 40-kb plasmids were transferable by conjugation yielding transconjugants resistant to vancomycin, linezolid and tigecycline. The substitutions in LiaS, putative histidine kinase, SulP, putative sulfate transporter, RpoB and RpoC were potential determinants of an elevated daptomycin MIC. Comparative analyses of the studied isolate with E. faecium isolates from other countries revealed its similarity to ST18 isolates from Ireland and Uganda from human infections.
CONCLUSIONS
We provide the detailed characteristics of the genomic determinants of antimicrobial resistance of a clinical E. faecium demonstrating the concomitant presence of both vanA and vanB and resistance to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and several other compounds and decreased daptomycin susceptibility. This isolate is a striking example of an accumulation of resistance determinants involving various mechanisms by a single hospital strain.
PubMed: 37821741
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00881-3 -
BMC Health Services Research Jul 2023Currently, the detection rates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) in the blood cultures of...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Currently, the detection rates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) in the blood cultures of neonates with sepsis exceed the national average drug resistance level, and vancomycin and linezolid are the primary antibacterial drugs used for these resistant bacteria according to the results of etiological examinations. However, a comprehensive evaluation of their costs and benefits in late-onset neonatal sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has not been conducted. This study aimed to compare the cost and effectiveness of vancomycin and linezolid in treating neonatal sepsis in the NICU.
METHODS
A cost-effectiveness analysis of real-world data was carried out by retrospective study in our hospital, and the cost and effectiveness of vancomycin and linezolid were compared by establishing a decision tree model. The drug doses in the model were 0.6 g for linezolid and 0.5 g for vancomycin. The cost break down included cost of medical ward, NICU stay, intravenous infusion of vancomycin or linezolid, all monitoring tests, culture tests and drugs. The unit costs were sourced from hospital information systems. The effectiveness rates were obtained by cumulative probability analysis. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to analyze uncertain influencing factors.
RESULTS
The effectiveness rates of vancomycin and linezolid in treating neonatal sepsis in the NICU were 89.74% and 90.14%, respectively, with no significant difference. The average cost in the vancomycin group was ¥12261.43, and the average cost in the linezolid group was ¥17227.96. The incremental cost effectiveness was ¥12416.33 cost per additional neonate with treatment success in the linezolid group compared to vancomycin group at discharge. Factors that had the greatest influence on the sensitivity of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were the price of linezolid and the effectiveness rates.
CONCLUSIONS
The cost for treatment success of one neonate in linezolid group was ¥5449.17 more than that in vancomycin group, indicating that vancomycin was more cost-effective. Therefore, these results can provide a reference for a cost effectiveness treatment scheme for neonatal sepsis in the NICU.
Topics: Vancomycin; Linezolid; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Neonatal Sepsis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Male; Female; Infant; Coagulase; Retrospective Studies; Drug Costs; Treatment Outcome; China
PubMed: 37468855
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09628-9 -
PloS One 2024Vancomycin, a commonly prescribed antibiotic particularly in the setting of multi-drug resistant infections, is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Despite its common...
INTRODUCTION
Vancomycin, a commonly prescribed antibiotic particularly in the setting of multi-drug resistant infections, is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Despite its common occurrence, much remains unknown on the clinicopathologic profile as well as the pathogenesis of vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Clinical studies included patients often with severe comorbidities and concomitant polypharmacy confounding the causal pathogenesis. Animal models cannot recapitulate this complex clinical situation. Kidney biopsy was not commonly performed.
METHODS
To address this limitation, we studied 36 patients who had renal biopsies for acute kidney injury (AKI) for suspicion of vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Detailed renal biopsy evaluation, meticulous evaluation of clinical profiles, and up-to-date follow-up allowed for a diagnostic categorization of vancomycin nephrotoxicity (VNT) in 25 patients and absence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity (NO-VNT) in 11 patients. For careful comparison of these two groups, we proceeded to compile a clinicopathologic and morphologic profiles characteristic for each group.
RESULTS
Patients with VNT had a characteristic clinical profile including a common clinical background, a high serum trough level of vancomycin, a rapidly developed and severe acute kidney injury, and a recovery of renal function often shortly after discontinuation of vancomycin. This clinical course was correlated with characteristic renal biopsy findings including acute tubulointerstitial nephritis of allergic type, frequent granulomatous inflammation, concomitant and pronounced acute tubular necrosis of nephrotoxic type, and vancomycin casts, in the absence of significant tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. This clinico-pathologic profile was different from that of patients with NO-VNT, highlighting its role in the diagnosis, management and pathogenetic exploration of vancomycin nephrotoxicity.
CONCLUSION
Vancomycin nephrotoxicity has a distinctive morphologic and clinical profile, which should facilitate diagnosis, guide treatment and prognostication, and confer pathogenetic insights.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Kidney; Nephritis, Interstitial; Acute Kidney Injury; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38452051
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295136 -
Przeglad Gastroenterologiczny 2024infection (CDI) poses a persistent challenge in healthcare, with substantial morbidity and mortality implications. This comprehensive review explores current CDI... (Review)
Review
infection (CDI) poses a persistent challenge in healthcare, with substantial morbidity and mortality implications. This comprehensive review explores current CDI management, emphasising guidelines from IDSA, SHEA, and ESCMID. Additionally, this study spotlights recent drug developments that have the potential to reshape CDI treatment paradigms. Within the current treatment landscape, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, bezlotoxumab, and faecal microbiota transplantation offer varied options, each with its unique strengths and limitations. Fidaxomicin, effective yet resource-constrained, presents a dilemma, with vancomycin emerging as a pragmatic alternative. Bezlotoxumab, though augmenting antibiotics, grapples with cost and safety concerns. Meanwhile, faecal microbiota transplantation, highly efficacious, confronts evolving safety considerations. The horizon of CDI treatment also features promising therapies such as SER-109 and Rebyota, epitomising the evolving paradigm. As CDI management advances, the critical role of standardised microbiome restoration therapies becomes evident, ensuring long-term safety and diversifying treatment strategies.
PubMed: 38571533
DOI: 10.5114/pg.2024.136237