-
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and... Aug 2021Wide controversy is still ongoing regarding efficiency of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This systematic review and meta-analysis, aims to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Wide controversy is still ongoing regarding efficiency of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This systematic review and meta-analysis, aims to identify the patient age group that benefits from PGT-A and the best day to biopsy.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Library up to May 2020. Eleven randomized controlled trials employing PGT-A with comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) on Day-3 or Day-5 were eligible.
RESULTS
PGT-A did not improve live-birth rates (LBR) per patient in the general population (RR:1.11; 95%CI:0.87-1.42; n=1513; I=75%). However, PGT-A lowered miscarriage rate in the general population (RR:0.45; 95%CI:0.25-0.80; n=912; I=49%). Interestingly, the cumulative LBR per patient was improved by PGT-A (RR:1.36; 95%CI:1.13-1.64; n=580; I=12%). When performing an age-subgroup analysis PGT-A improved LBR in women over the age of 35 (RR:1.29; 95%CI:1.05-1.60; n=692; I=0%), whereas it appeared to be ineffective in younger women (RR:0.92; 95%CI:0.62-1.39; n=666; I=75%). Regarding optimal timing, only day-5 biopsy practice presented with improved LBR per ET (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.03-1.82; I=72%).
CONCLUSION
PGT-A did not improve clinical outcomes for the general population, however PGT-A improved live-birth rates strictly when performed on blastocyst stage embryos of women over the 35-year-old mark.
Topics: Adult; Aneuploidy; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Genetic Testing; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pregnancy; Preimplantation Diagnosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34036455
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02227-9 -
Fertility and Sterility Jul 2023To date, recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has no clear definition and no clearly identified impaired function. Hence, the term RIF is currently used somewhat... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
To date, recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has no clear definition and no clearly identified impaired function. Hence, the term RIF is currently used somewhat haphazardly, on the basis of clinicians' judgment.
OBJECTIVE
International experts in reproductive medicine met on July 1, 2022, in Lugano, Switzerland, to review the different facets of RIF and define the diagnosis and its appropriate management.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A systematic review without meta-analysis of studies published in English from January 2015 to May 2022.
FINDINGS
Data indicated that RIF has been largely overevaluated, overdiagnosed, and overtreated without sufficient critical assessment of its true nature. Our analyses show that true RIF is extremely uncommon-occurring in <5% of couples with infertility-and that reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases of assisted reproductive technology (ART) failure. Although the true biologic determinants of RIF may exist in a small subset of people with infertility, they elude the currently available tools for assessment. Without identification of the true underlying etiology(ies), it is reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid blastocyst transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryo transfers, adjusted to the patient's age and corresponding euploidy rate). In addition, other factors should be ruled out that may contribute to her reduced odds of sustained implantation. In such cases, implantation failure should not be the only issue considered in case of ART failure because this may result from multiple other factors that are not necessarily repetitive or persistent. In reality, RIF impacting the probability of further ART success is a very rare occurrence.
CONCLUSION
True RIF is extremely uncommon, occurring in <5% of couples with infertility. Reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases. It would seem reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid embryo transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryos, adjusted to her age).
RELEVANCE
Given the number of internationally recognized experts in the field present at the Lugano meeting 2022, our publication constitutes a consensus statement.
Topics: Humans; Female; Embryo Implantation; Embryo Transfer; Infertility; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Aneuploidy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36822566
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.014 -
Human Reproduction Update Sep 2023A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.
SEARCH METHODS
A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).
OUTCOMES
We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Abortion, Spontaneous; Embryo Implantation; Blastocyst; Embryo Transfer; Genetic Testing; Retrospective Studies; Aneuploidy; Pregnancy Rate; Preimplantation Diagnosis
PubMed: 37192834
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad010 -
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal... Jul 2022Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population.
METHODS
Medline (PubMed) and Embase were used to identify studies examining detection of Down syndrome (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, copy number variants, and maternal conditions, as well as studies assessing the psychological impact of NIPS and the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled estimates of NIPS performance (P < .05). Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic odds ratios were significant (P < .0001) for T21, T18, and T13 for singleton and twin pregnancies. NIPS was accurate (≥99.78%) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies. Performance for rare autosomal trisomies and copy number variants was variable. Use of NIPS reduced diagnostic tests by 31% to 79%. Conclusions regarding psychosocial outcomes could not be drawn owing to lack of data. Identification of maternal conditions was rare.
CONCLUSION
NIPS is a highly accurate screening method for T21, T18, and T13 in both singleton and twin pregnancies.
Topics: Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Down Syndrome; Female; Humans; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Sex Chromosome Aberrations; Trisomy; Trisomy 13 Syndrome; Trisomy 18 Syndrome
PubMed: 35608568
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.019 -
Seizure Mar 2024Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is araredisorderwithan estimated prevalence being around 1 in 50,000 births. The syndrome is caused by the deletion of a critical region... (Review)
Review
Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is araredisorderwithan estimated prevalence being around 1 in 50,000 births. The syndrome is caused by the deletion of a critical region (Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome Critical region- WHSCR) on chromosome 4p16.3. WHS is clinically characterized by pre-and postnatal growth restriction, hypotonia, intellectual disability, craniofacial dysmorphismand congenital fusion anomalies. The clinical aspects are variable due to the deletion size.Consistently, epilepsy is one of the major concerns for parents and professionals caring for children with WHS. Seizures tend to occur in over 90% of patients, with onset within the first 3 years of life, and a peak incidence at around 6-12 months of age. Approximately 20% of patients had the first seizure onset within the first 6 months of age, almost 50% at 6 to 12 months of age and about 25% later than 12 months of age. The main types of epileptic seizures occurring in patients with WHS were generalized tonic-clonic seizures (around 70%). These were followed by tonic spasms (20%); focal seizures with impaired awareness (12%) and clonicseizures in 7% of patients.Seizures are often triggered by fever, followed by infections of various systems. Particularly, half of WHS patients experience status epilepticus in the first years of life, which can be fatal. Due to limited number of reports on the topic of EEG abnormalities in epilepsy among WHS patients, it is difficult to determine whether there are any characteristic deviations for WHS. Although more than 300 persons with WHS have been reported in the literature, there is sparse knowledge about epilepsy and methods of its anti-seizure medication (ASM) management with an assessment of their effectiveness. The purpose of this systematic review is to briefly summarize achievements and advances in the field of epilepsy in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.
Topics: Child; Humans; Infant; Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome; Epilepsy; Intellectual Disability; Status Epilepticus; Craniofacial Abnormalities; Chromosome Deletion; Phenotype
PubMed: 36526544
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.12.001 -
Fertility and Sterility Aug 2023Maternal age-related embryo aneuploidy is considered the most significant limiting factor for a favorable outcome after assisted reproduction technology (ART)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Maternal age-related embryo aneuploidy is considered the most significant limiting factor for a favorable outcome after assisted reproduction technology (ART) procedures. Thus, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies has been proposed as a strategy to genetically evaluate embryos before transfer to the uterus. However, whether embryo ploidy justifies all the aspects of age-related fertility decline remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of different maternal ages on ART success rates after transfer of euploid embryos.
DATA SOURCES
ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception until November 2021 using combinations of relevant keywords.
STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS
Observational and randomized controlled studies were included if they investigated the impact of maternal age on ART outcomes after the transfer of euploid embryos and reported frequencies of women achieving ongoing pregnancy or live birth.
MAIN OUTCOMES
The ongoing pregnancy rate or live birth rate (OPR/LBR) after euploid embryo transfer comparing women <35 vs. women ≥35 years old was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included implantation rate and miscarriage rate. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also planned to explore the sources of inconsistency among studies. The quality of studies was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and body of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation working group methodology.
RESULTS
A total of 7 studies were included (n = 11,335 ART embryo transfers of euploid embryos). A higher OPR/LBR (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.54; I = 40%) in women aged <35 years than in women ≥35 with a risk difference equal to 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.09) was found. In line, implantation rate was higher in the youngest group (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.32; I = 0%). A statistically significant higher OPR/LBR was also found comparing women aged <35 to women 35-37, 38-40, or 41-42. A gradient relationship between age and OPR/LBR could be observed in proportion meta-analysis, especially if restricted to studies with low risk of bias.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
Increasing maternal age is associated with a decline in ART success rates independent of embryo ploidy. This message contributes to an appropriate patient's counseling before starting preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies procedures.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021289760.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Adult; Maternal Age; Embryo Transfer; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Pregnancy Rate; Embryo Implantation; Live Birth; Aneuploidy; Blastocyst
PubMed: 36878347
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.036 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2020In in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), selection of the most competent embryo(s) for transfer is based on morphological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), selection of the most competent embryo(s) for transfer is based on morphological criteria. However, many women do not achieve a pregnancy even after 'good quality' embryo transfer. One of the presumed causes is that such morphologically normal embryos have an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), formerly known as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), was therefore developed as an alternative method to select embryos for transfer in IVF. In PGT-A, the polar body or one or a few cells of the embryo are obtained by biopsy and tested. Only polar bodies and embryos that show a normal number of chromosomes are transferred. The first generation of PGT-A, using cleavage-stage biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the genetic analysis, was demonstrated to be ineffective in improving live birth rates. Since then, new PGT-A methodologies have been developed that perform the biopsy procedure at other stages of development and use different methods for genetic analysis. Whether or not PGT-A improves IVF outcomes and is beneficial to patients has remained controversial.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PGT-A in women undergoing an IVF treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and two trials registers in September 2019 and checked the references of appropriate papers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on clinical outcomes in participants undergoing IVF with PGT-A versus IVF without PGT-A were eligible for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted study data. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR). Secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) after the first embryo transfer, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, proportion of women reaching an embryo transfer, and mean number of embryos per transfer.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 13 trials involving 2794 women. The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. The main limitations were imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of publication bias. IVF with PGT-A versus IVF without PGT-A with the use of genome-wide analyses Polar body biopsy One trial used polar body biopsy with array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH). It is uncertain whether the addition of PGT-A by polar body biopsy increases the cLBR compared to IVF without PGT-A (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.66, 1 RCT, N = 396, low-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that for the observed cLBR of 24% in the control group, the chance of live birth following the results of one IVF cycle with PGT-A is between 17% and 34%. It is uncertain whether the LBR after the first embryo transfer improves with PGT-A by polar body biopsy (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.79, 1 RCT, N = 396, low-quality evidence). PGT-A with polar body biopsy may reduce miscarriage rate (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.88, 1 RCT, N = 396, low-quality evidence). No data on ongoing pregnancy rate were available. The effect of PGT-A by polar body biopsy on improving clinical pregnancy rate is uncertain (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.16, 1 RCT, N = 396, low-quality evidence). Blastocyst stage biopsy One trial used blastocyst stage biopsy with next-generation sequencing. It is uncertain whether IVF with the addition of PGT-A by blastocyst stage biopsy increases cLBR compared to IVF without PGT-A, since no data were available. It is uncertain if LBR after the first embryo transfer improves with PGT-A with blastocyst stage biopsy (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.27, 1 RCT, N = 661, low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether PGT-A with blastocyst stage biopsy reduces miscarriage rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.54, 1 RCT, N = 661, low-quality evidence). No data on ongoing pregnancy rate or clinical pregnancy rate were available. IVF with PGT-A versus IVF without PGT-A with the use of FISH for the genetic analysis Eleven trials were included in this comparison. It is uncertain whether IVF with addition of PGT-A increases cLBR (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.01, 1 RCT, N = 408, low-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that for the observed average cLBR of 29% in the control group, the chance of live birth following the results of one IVF cycle with PGT-A is between 12% and 29%. PGT-A performed with FISH probably reduces live births after the first transfer compared to the control group (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91, 10 RCTs, N = 1680, I² = 54%, moderate-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that for the observed average LBR per first transfer of 31% in the control group, the chance of live birth after the first embryo transfer with PGT-A is between 16% and 29%. There is probably little or no difference in miscarriage rate between PGT-A and the control group (OR 1.03, 95%, CI 0.75 to 1.41; 10 RCTs, N = 1680, I² = 16%; moderate-quality evidence). The addition of PGT-A may reduce ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90, 5 RCTs, N = 1121, I² = 60%, low-quality evidence) and probably reduces clinical pregnancies (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.81, 5 RCTs, N = 1131; I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient good-quality evidence of a difference in cumulative live birth rate, live birth rate after the first embryo transfer, or miscarriage rate between IVF with and IVF without PGT-A as currently performed. No data were available on ongoing pregnancy rates. The effect of PGT-A on clinical pregnancy rate is uncertain. Women need to be aware that it is uncertain whether PGT-A with the use of genome-wide analyses is an effective addition to IVF, especially in view of the invasiveness and costs involved in PGT-A. PGT-A using FISH for the genetic analysis is probably harmful. The currently available evidence is insufficient to support PGT-A in routine clinical practice.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Aneuploidy; Bias; Biopsy; Birth Rate; Blastocyst; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Genetic Testing; Humans; Live Birth; Maternal Age; Polar Bodies; Pregnancy; Preimplantation Diagnosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
PubMed: 32898291
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3 -
Advances in Clinical and Experimental... Nov 2019Down syndrome (DS) is the most often diagnosed chromosomal disorder in newborns. The incidence is 1:792 live births. The article describes the irregularities and...
Down syndrome (DS) is the most often diagnosed chromosomal disorder in newborns. The incidence is 1:792 live births. The article describes the irregularities and characteristics found in trisomy 21, which greatly affect the functioning of the stomatognathic system. The most significant disorders include the following: false macroglossia, muscular hypotonia and gothic palate. These abnormalities affect articulation, breathing, food intake, and swallowing. We analyzed the morphological characteristics of the craniofacial region in children with DS based on the current literature review. The following databases were used for the analysis: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Infona, and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source. In the course of the study, 199 pieces of literature were analyzed; the analysis also included 18 articles on children and adults with DS. It also took into account the structure of the palate, dental and skeletal defects, size of the tongue, muscular hypotonia, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Down syndrome is still a current subject of research. Although macroglossia, hypotonia, malocclusion, and temporomandibular joint abnormalities are not features exclusive to DS, numerous dysfunctions and parafunctions as well as retarded psychomotor development greatly complicate the treatment. Therefore, interdisciplinary treatment of patients with trisomy 21 and early treatment in the first months of life with the use of the Castillo-Morales plate are very important, as they ensure better adaptation to the subsequently used apparatus and reduce the risk of disorders of the stomatognathic system.
Topics: Down Syndrome; Facial Muscles; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Macroglossia; Muscle Hypotonia; Tongue; Trisomy
PubMed: 31778604
DOI: 10.17219/acem/112785 -
Human Reproduction Update Dec 2021Human male infertility has a notable genetic component, including well-established diagnoses such as Klinefelter syndrome, Y-chromosome microdeletions and monogenic...
BACKGROUND
Human male infertility has a notable genetic component, including well-established diagnoses such as Klinefelter syndrome, Y-chromosome microdeletions and monogenic causes. Approximately 4% of all infertile men are now diagnosed with a genetic cause, but a majority (60-70%) remain without a clear diagnosis and are classified as unexplained. This is likely in large part due to a delay in the field adopting next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, and the absence of clear statements from field leaders as to what constitutes a validated cause of human male infertility (the current paper aims to address this). Fortunately, there has been a significant increase in the number of male infertility NGS studies. These have revealed a considerable number of novel gene-disease relationships (GDRs), which each require stringent assessment to validate the strength of genotype-phenotype associations. To definitively assess which of these GDRs are clinically relevant, the International Male Infertility Genomics Consortium (IMIGC) has identified the need for a systematic review and a comprehensive overview of known male infertility genes and an assessment of the evidence for reported GDRs.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
In 2019, the first standardised clinical validity assessment of monogenic causes of male infertility was published. Here, we provide a comprehensive update of the subsequent 1.5 years, employing the joint expertise of the IMIGC to systematically evaluate all available evidence (as of 1 July 2020) for monogenic causes of isolated or syndromic male infertility, endocrine disorders or reproductive system abnormalities affecting the male sex organs. In addition, we systematically assessed the evidence for all previously reported possible monogenic causes of male infertility, using a framework designed for a more appropriate clinical interpretation of disease genes.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed a literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines up until 1 July 2020 for publications in English, using search terms related to 'male infertility' in combination with the word 'genetics' in PubMed. Next, the quality and the extent of all evidence supporting selected genes were assessed using an established and standardised scoring method. We assessed the experimental quality, patient phenotype assessment and functional evidence based on gene expression, mutant in-vitro cell and in-vivo animal model phenotypes. A final score was used to determine the clinical validity of each GDR, across the following five categories: no evidence, limited, moderate, strong or definitive. Variants were also reclassified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines and were recorded in spreadsheets for each GDR, which are available at imigc.org.
OUTCOMES
The primary outcome of this review was an overview of all known GDRs for monogenic causes of human male infertility and their clinical validity. We identified a total of 120 genes that were moderately, strongly or definitively linked to 104 infertility phenotypes.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
Our systematic review curates all currently available evidence to reveal the strength of GDRs in male infertility. The existing guidelines for genetic testing in male infertility cases are based on studies published 25 years ago, and an update is far overdue. The identification of 104 high-probability 'human male infertility genes' is a 33% increase from the number identified in 2019. The insights generated in the current review will provide the impetus for an update of existing guidelines, will inform novel evidence-based genetic testing strategies used in clinics, and will identify gaps in our knowledge of male infertility genetics. We discuss the relevant international guidelines regarding research related to gene discovery and provide specific recommendations to the field of male infertility. Based on our findings, the IMIGC consortium recommend several updates to the genetic testing standards currently employed in the field of human male infertility, most important being the adoption of exome sequencing, or at least sequencing of the genes validated in this study, and expanding the patient groups for which genetic testing is recommended.
Topics: Animals; Chromosome Deletion; Genetic Testing; Genomics; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male
PubMed: 34498060
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab030 -
Exploring and exploiting genetics and genomics for sweetpotato improvement: Status and perspectives.Plant Communications Sep 2022Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is one of the most important root crops cultivated worldwide. Because of its adaptability, high yield potential, and nutritional... (Review)
Review
Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is one of the most important root crops cultivated worldwide. Because of its adaptability, high yield potential, and nutritional value, sweetpotato has become an important food crop, particularly in developing countries. To ensure adequate crop yields to meet increasing demand, it is essential to enhance the tolerance of sweetpotato to environmental stresses and other yield-limiting factors. The highly heterozygous hexaploid genome of I. batatas complicates genetic studies and limits improvement of sweetpotato through traditional breeding. However, application of next-generation sequencing and high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies to sweetpotato genetics and genomics research has provided new tools and resources for crop improvement. In this review, we discuss the genomics resources that are available for sweetpotato, including the current reference genome, databases, and available bioinformatics tools. We systematically review the current state of knowledge on the polyploid genetics of sweetpotato, including studies of its origin and germplasm diversity and the associated mapping of important agricultural traits. We then outline the conventional and molecular breeding approaches that have been applied to sweetpotato. Finally, we discuss future goals for genetic studies of sweetpotato and crop improvement via breeding in combination with state-of-the-art multi-omics approaches such as genomic selection and gene editing. These approaches will advance and accelerate genetic improvement of this important root crop and facilitate its sustainable global production.
Topics: Genomics; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Ipomoea batatas; Plant Breeding; Polyploidy
PubMed: 35643086
DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100332