-
Current Cardiology Reviews 2021Aortic aneurysms are worrisome because of their predisposition to dissection and rupture. Beta-blockers are considered first-line therapy for aortic aneurysms. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Aortic aneurysms are worrisome because of their predisposition to dissection and rupture. Beta-blockers are considered first-line therapy for aortic aneurysms. The following meta-analysis assesses if beta-blockers diminish aortic aneurysm growth.
METHODS
A literature search was performed to collect information on clinical trials that have assessed aortic aneurysm growth between beta-blockers and placebo. The primary endpoint was aortic aneurysm growth rate per year. A forest plot with a random-effects model was used for analysis.
RESULTS
Eight clinical trials were included in the analysis. Beta-blockers showed a statistically non-significant effect on aortic aneurysm growth (standard mean difference -0.44; 95% CI [-0.44, 0.00]).
CONCLUSION
Beta-blockers do not significantly influence aortic aneurysm growth. Further studies are required to find a suitable medical therapy to reduce growth rates.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Humans
PubMed: 33143615
DOI: 10.2174/1573403X16999201102213619 -
Clinical Imaging Oct 2021To assess the efficacy and safety of abdominal aortic (AA) balloon occlusion versus internal iliac arteries (IIA) balloon occlusion in patients with placenta accreta... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety of prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus internal iliac arterial balloon occlusion for placenta accreta spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To assess the efficacy and safety of abdominal aortic (AA) balloon occlusion versus internal iliac arteries (IIA) balloon occlusion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.
METHODS
Databases of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to May 2020. The relevant literature was screened and the quality was assessed. RevMan software 5.3 was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
Six studies involving 239 patients in AA occlusion and 281 patients in IIA occlusion were included. The results demonstrated that the intraoperative hemorrhage volume (MD - 410.61 ml, 95% CI -779.74 to -41.47 ml, p < 0.001), balloon dilatation duration (MD -5.34 min, 95% CI -9.91 to -0.77 min, p = 0.02) and fetus radiation dose (MD-20.81 mGy, 95% CI -31.84 to -9.78 mGy, p < 0.001) were significantly less in AA occlusion compared to IIA occlusion. There was no significant difference in the rate of lower extremity thrombosis between AA occlusion and IIA occlusion (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.21, p = 0.19); similarly, no significant differences were found in blood transfusion volume (MD -344.50 ml, 95% CI -735.74 to 46.74 ml, p = 0.08), the rate of hysterectomy (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.44, p = 0.99) and other outcome variables.
CONCLUSION
The available data demonstrated AA occlusion was more effective in reducing intraoperative hemorrhage volume and fetus radiation dose compared with IIA occlusion in patients with PAS disorders. Larger studies or randomized controlled trials are needed to further assert this evidence.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Balloon Occlusion; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Iliac Artery; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34171597
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.020 -
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2022Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become more common for rapid evaluation. Applications are limited by lack of training of users, difficulty maintaining ultrasound... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become more common for rapid evaluation. Applications are limited by lack of training of users, difficulty maintaining ultrasound competencies, access to equipment for optimal imaging, and limitations in quality control. Such barriers exist in low-resource, underserved health care settings.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to explore the use of POCUS in under-resourced health care settings, such as rural and remote locations in Australia and other countries. Key variables include health outcomes, quality of care, service availability, examinations types performed, equipment used, who performs the examinations, and the ultrasound training received.
METHODS
Literature was identified via CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, plus grey literature. Recommended guidelines were followed, and only research-based articles were included, with searches limited to English language and 2010-present.
RESULTS
After screening, 23 articles were reviewed. No studies had low risk of bias and, overall, the quality was poor and only two studies used random sampling. The majority were from developing countries, with only one performed in Australia. Echocardiographic screening in schools was common. Others included emergency department (ED) patients, abdominal aorta screening, obstetric scans, and intensive care unit (ICU) management. Operators included ED doctors, medical students, nurses, community healthcare workers and general practitioners, who received limited training in protocol-driven scanning, often monitored by experts. In comparison to clinical assessment, standard ultrasound or other imaging, accuracy was of the order of 70-95%, depending on the condition, with high efficacy in improving patient care.
CONCLUSION
Lack of studies of POCUS in Australia and other developed countries suggests a need for further research. Current evidence supports use of limited ultrasound using portable machines in locations with limited access to diagnostic ultrasound performed by sonographers, which has the potential to improve health outcomes in under-resourced communities in Australia and elsewhere.
PubMed: 35378744
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S359084 -
Radiology Research and Practice 2022Typically, the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery branch off separately from the anterior aspect of the abdominal aorta. The celiacomesenteric trunk (CMT) is a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Typically, the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery branch off separately from the anterior aspect of the abdominal aorta. The celiacomesenteric trunk (CMT) is a rare variant in which those arteries share a common origin. We sought to compare the prevalence of CMT in the Caribbean with the global prevalence as calculated by a systematic review.
METHODS
In this study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who had multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scans at two major referral centres in the Caribbean from August 30, 2017, to September 1, 2019. In patients with a CMT, we recorded demographic and anatomic details. We then conducted a systematic literature search and retrieved raw data to calculate the global prevalence (number of individuals with a CMT divided by the sum total of study samples). We compared CMT prevalence in our sample with the global prevalence using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was considered to be present when the value was <0.05.
RESULTS
From 832 CTs, 665 scans met the inclusion criteria. There were 16 (2.41%) CMTs: 3 (0.45%) classic CMTs, 12 (1.8%) hepato-mesenteric trunks, and 1 (0.15%) hepato-spleno-mesenteric trunk. Forty-two studies reported on CMTs in a total of 74,320 persons. The global CMT prevalence was comparable (3.88%; = 0.054), but the incidence of hepato-mesenteric variants was significantly lower in our sample (1.8% vs. 3.24%; = 0.0352).
CONCLUSION
There was no difference in the prevalence of a classic CMT in the Caribbean compared to the global prevalence. However, the hepato-mesenteric trunk (incomplete CMT variant) was significantly less prevalent in the Caribbean. Advances in Knowledge: Healthcare professionals performing hepatobiliary interventions must be aware of these differences in order to minimize morbidity during their interventions.
PubMed: 36267126
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1715631 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery May 2022Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) therapy for Marfan syndrome (MFS), but the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) therapy for Marfan syndrome (MFS), but the existing evidence is limited and conflicting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different therapies.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to March 2021 to retrieve randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of ARB-related (including ARB-only and ARB+BB treatment) and BB-only treatment for treating patients with MFS. The revised risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the pooled effect size.
RESULTS
Fourteen reports of 9 trials involving 1,449 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding aortic root dilation, the ARB-related regimen has efficacy comparable with that of the BB-only regimen in patients with MFS (pooled SMD = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.33; 0.01]; P = 0.06), while in the ARB+BB vs. BB-only subgroup, a significant difference was observed (pooled SMD = -0.26; 95% CI [-0.40; -0.11]; P < 0.01). In addition, there were no significant differences in other aortic dilation-related measures (aortic root Z scores, ascending aorta, pulmonary artery, aortic annulus, sinotubular junction, aortic arch, thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta diameter change) or cardiovascular events (aortic dissection, aortic surgery, and death) between the 2 regimens.
CONCLUSION
Our results showed that the clinical efficacy of ARB-only therapy is not inferior to that of BB-only therapy. Moreover, ARB+BB therapy showed superior therapeutic effects without significant adverse effects.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aortic Diseases; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34998935
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.073 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery. Brief... Sep 2022Venous thrombosis has been widely described in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, arterial thrombosis has...
OBJECTIVES
Venous thrombosis has been widely described in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, arterial thrombosis has rarely been reported. This study aims to assess the incidence, risk factors, interventions, and outcomes of acute aortoiliac arterial thrombosis in patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infections.
METHODS
We present seven SARS-CoV-2-positive patients from our institution who acutely developed thrombi in the aortoiliac arterial system (7/2020-1/2021). A systematic review of the literature on aortoiliac arterial thrombosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was also performed. The available data from all reported cases in the literature and at our institution were analyzed.
RESULTS
Thirty published articles and journal correspondences, including 52 patients, were reviewed and analyzed in addition to our institution's 7 cases. In total, 59 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were found to have acute aortoiliac thrombosis. The abdominal aorta was the most frequent location for the development of a thrombus. Baseline demographics and medical comorbidities were not significantly different between the symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. Seventy-one percent of patients were symptomatic (lower limb ischemia: 75.0%, renal infarction: 20.0%, stroke: 12.5%, mesenteric ischemia: 10.0%). All patients with thrombus involving the ascending aorta, aortic bifurcation, or iliac artery developed thromboembolic or ischemic complications. All patients received systemic anticoagulation. Fifty-three percent of all patients were managed medically. Ninety-four percent of the asymptomatic patients were managed medically. One asymptomatic patient underwent endovascular aspiration of a mobile thrombus. Three (23.1%) deaths occurred in the asymptomatic cohort from hypoxic respiratory failure. Fourteen (36.8%) deaths occurred in the symptomatic cohort. The in-hospital mortality rate was 33.3% overall and 43.8% for patients with thrombi involving more than one aortoiliac segment.
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of thrombi in the aortoiliac arterial system appears to be a poor prognostic indicator for patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infections. Medical management of patients with asymptomatic aortoiliac thrombi may be considered. The presence of thrombi involving the ascending aorta, aortic bifurcation, or iliac artery may warrant consideration for operative intervention due to the risk for thromboembolic or ischemic complications. Further study is needed to fully delineate the risk factors, optimal treatment, and outcomes of arterial thrombosis in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
PubMed: 35821740
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsurg.2022.100105 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Mar 2023Studies on the mortality of blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) are rare and have yielded inconsistent results. In the present study, we aimed to quantitatively analyse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Studies on the mortality of blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) are rare and have yielded inconsistent results. In the present study, we aimed to quantitatively analyse the retrieved data to more accurately determine the hospital mortality of BAAI.
METHODS
The Excerpta Medica Database, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant publications without date restrictions. The overall hospital mortality (OHM) of BAAI patients was set as the primary outcome measure. English publications with data that met the selection criteria were included. The quality of all included studies was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the American Agency for Health Care Quality and Research's cross-sectional study quality evaluation items. After data extraction, a meta-analysis of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of data was performed using the Metaprop command in Stata 16 software. Heterogeneity was assessed and reported as a percentage using the I index value and as a P value using the Cochrane Q test. Various methods were used to determine the sources of heterogeneity and to analyse the sensitivity of the computation model.
RESULTS
Of the 2147 references screened, 5 studies that involved 1593 patients met the selection criteria and were included. There were no low-quality references after assessment. One study that only included 16 juvenile BAAI patients was excluded from the meta-analysis of the primary outcome measure due to high heterogeneity. Due to the low heterogeneity (I = 47.6%, P = 0.126 for Q test) that was observed after using the random effects model, the fixed model was subsequently used to pool the effect sizes of the remaining four studies, thus yielding an OHM of 28.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5-31.1%]. The stability of the model was verified by sensitivity analysis, and Egger's test (P = 0.339) indicated a low level of publication bias. In addition, we also performed meta-analyses and obtained a pooled hospital mortality of operation (13.5%, 95% CI 8.0-20.0%), a pooled hospital mortality of non-operation (28.4%, 95% CI 25.9-31.0%), and a pooled rate of aortic rupture (12.2%, 95% CI 7.0-18.5%) of BAAI.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study indicated that BAAI has an OHM of 28.8%, indicating that this disease deserves more attention and research.
Topics: Humans; United States; Hospital Mortality; Cross-Sectional Studies; Aorta, Abdominal; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 36991444
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00492-w -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Dec 2021The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.
METHODS
An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.
RESULTS
Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34197943
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032 -
Annals of Anatomy = Anatomischer... Sep 2019To provide a systematic literature review on effectiveness of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and Shunt (AVS) research animal models.
PURPOSE
To provide a systematic literature review on effectiveness of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and Shunt (AVS) research animal models.
BACKGROUND
Due to advancing human population age, there is increased incidence of patients suffering from vascular and renal diseases leading to dialysis access using AVF and/or AVS. During those interventions native venous or synthetic grafts are arterialized. Despite temporary good patency, complications are a consequence of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) development that contributes to patients' morbidity and mortality. Basic research attempts to elucidate the pathomechanisms, therefore the small and large animal models are becoming attractive.
METHODS
Medline search (within 1966-2018) was performed on AVF/AVS animal models. Studies fulfilled following criteria: (1) reported complete material-methods-results section, (2) included statistically significant number of animals, (3) provided statistically significant results. 55 articles were identified encompassing six animal species used.
RESULTS
Large animal models include creation of AVF and AVS in pig, sheep and dog. Porcine animal models use pelvic or femoral vessels, ovine use the common carotid artery (CCA) and jugular vein (JV). Canine animal models use the femoral vessels. Small animal models use rabbit (CCA/JV), rat (JV/CCA, abdominal aorta /Vena cava inferior and femoral artery/femoral vein) and mouse (aortocaval and supraortic AVF models).
CONCLUSIONS
Large animal models are best for haemodynamic shear stress studies and in vivo evaluation of new synthetic vascular grafts. Small animal models, especially the genetically manipulated ones, are ideal for analysis of molecular and cellular pathomechanisms. The selection of animal species to be used depends on the addressed research question.
Topics: Animals; Arteriovenous Fistula; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Dogs; Hyperplasia; Mice; Models, Animal; Neointima; Rabbits; Rats; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sheep; Swine; Vascular Access Devices; Vascular Diseases
PubMed: 31279868
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2019.06.002 -
Journal of the American Heart... Apr 2021Background Prior studies have suggested aortic peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) can estimate the rupture risk of an abdominal aortic aneurysm... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background Prior studies have suggested aortic peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) can estimate the rupture risk of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but whether these measurements have independent predictive ability over assessing AAA diameter alone is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to compare PWS and PWRI in participants with ruptured and asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar diameter. Methods and Results Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify studies assessing PWS and PWRI in ruptured and asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar diameter. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using inverse variance-weighted methods. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. Risk of bias was assessed using a modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers. Seven case-control studies involving 309 participants were included. Meta-analyses suggested that PWRI (standardized mean difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.70; =0.004) but not PWS (standardized mean difference, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.44; =0.418) was greater in ruptured than intact AAAs. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the findings were not dependent on the inclusion of any single study. The included studies were assessed to have a medium to high risk of bias. Conclusions Based on limited evidence, this study suggested that PWRI, but not PWS, is greater in ruptured than asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar maximum aortic diameter.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Aortography; Asymptomatic Diseases; Biomechanical Phenomena; Humans
PubMed: 33855866
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019772