-
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Mar 2024The pathogenesis of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) is multifactorial. Critical shoulder angle (CSA), which represents the lateral extension of the acromion over the cuff, has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The pathogenesis of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) is multifactorial. Critical shoulder angle (CSA), which represents the lateral extension of the acromion over the cuff, has been proposed as an extrinsic risk factor. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the available literature regarding the correlation between RCT and CSA.
METHODS
A review was carried out in accordance with the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines on July 17, 2023, using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Reviews. The following keywords were used: "critical shoulder angle," "rotator cuff tears," and "rotator cuff lesions." The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the MINORS SCORE.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies were included. The average CSA among the 2110 patients with full-thickness RCT was 36.7 degrees, whereas the same value among the 2972 controls was 33.1 degrees. The average CSA in the 348 patients with partial-thickness RCT was 34.6 degrees, whereas it was 38.1 degrees in the 132 patients with massive RCT. The average MINORS score was 15.6.
CONCLUSIONS
CSA values were significantly higher in patients with RCT compared with the asymptomatic population. In addition, it appears that CSA values increase with the severity of rotator cuff involvement.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Risk Factors; Acromion; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 38695502
DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000397 -
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related... Jan 2022Rotator cuff tears are common. A previous systematic review reported on factors associated with rotator cuff tears; however, it included relatively few studies and few... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Rotator cuff tears are common. A previous systematic review reported on factors associated with rotator cuff tears; however, it included relatively few studies and few variables, and in addition, it had considerable heterogeneity. To identify the factors associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears and to help guide clinicians to potentially modifiable factors, we felt a broader and more inclusive meta-analysis would be useful.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we asked what (1) demographic, (2) disease, and (3) imaging factors are associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears?
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched, and the search period were from the inception of each database through February 2021. The keywords included "risk factor," "rotator cuff injury," "rotator cuff tears," and "rotator cuff tendinitis." All comparative studies on symptomatic rotator cuff tears were included. We considered that the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear could be made by any imaging tool (MRI or ultrasound). We considered either partial- or full-thickness tears to be a rotator cuff tear. No language restrictions were applied. Twenty-six articles from 14 countries involving 9809 individuals, consisting of 3164 patients and 6645 controls, were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) scale were used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies, and the highest scores were 9 and 11, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for retrospective comparative studies, and the AHRQ was used to evaluate prospective comparative studies. The eight retrospective comparative studies we included were scored from 4 to 9. The quality score of the 18 prospective comparative studies ranged from 6 to 9. Publication bias was explored using the Egger test. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I2 value. If there was no heterogeneity (I2 ≤ 50%), a fixed-effects model was used to determine the overall effect size; if there was heterogeneity (I2 > 50%), a random-effects model was used to merge the effect values. A meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3, and the risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference of related factors were calculated.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis identified the following demographic factors associated with an increased risk of rotator cuff tears: older age (mean difference 3.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 4.8]; p < 0.001), greater BMI (mean difference 0.77 [95% CI 0.37 to 1.17]; p < 0.001), smoking (RR 1.32 [95% CI 1.17 to 1.49]; p < 0.001), dominant arm (RR 1.15 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.24]; p < 0.001), greater height (mean difference 0.9 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.4]; p < 0.001), and heavier weight (mean difference 2.24 [95% CI 0.82 to 3.66]; p = 0.002). Regarding disease factors, we found that traumatic events (RR 1.91 [95% CI 1.40 to 2.54]; p < 0.001) and hypertension (RR 1.50 [95% CI 1.32 to 1.70]; p < 0.001) were associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Regarding imaging factors, we found that the following three factors were associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears: greater acromion index (mean difference 0.11 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.16]; p < 0.001), greater critical shoulder angle (mean difference 1.9 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.3]; p < 0.001), and smaller glenoid version angle (mean difference -1.3 [95% CI -1.9 to -0.8]; p < 0.001). We found no association between the patient's sex or the presence or absence of thyroid disease and the likelihood of a rotator cuff tear being present.
CONCLUSION
This study identified several factors associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears, including blood glucose, blood pressure, weight, and smoking. Clinicians may seek to modify these factors, possibly in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears, but also in symptomatic patients who have not yet been diagnosed with rotator cuff tears because there would be no harm or risk associated with modifying any of the factors we identified. Future research should further study whether addressing these factors can delay the progression and size of rotator cuff tears.Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.
Topics: Age Factors; Humans; Risk Factors; Rotator Cuff Injuries
PubMed: 34424222
DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001949 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Monitoring shoulder kinematics, including the scapular segment, is of great relevance in the orthopaedic field. Among wearable systems, magneto-inertial measurement... (Review)
Review
Monitoring shoulder kinematics, including the scapular segment, is of great relevance in the orthopaedic field. Among wearable systems, magneto-inertial measurement units (M-IMUs) represent a valid alternative for applications in unstructured environments. The aim of this systematic literature review is to report and describe the existing methods to estimate 3D scapular movements through wearable systems integrating M-IMUs. A comprehensive search of PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science was performed, and results were included up to May 2023. A total of 14 articles was included. The results showed high heterogeneity among studies regarding calibration procedures, tasks executed, and the population. Two different techniques were described, i.e., with the x-axis aligned with the cranial edge of the scapular spine or positioned on the flat surface of the acromion with the x-axis perpendicular to the scapular spine. Sensor placement affected the scapular motion and, also, the kinematic output. Further studies should be conducted to establish a universal protocol that reduces the variability among studies. Establishing a protocol that can be carried out without difficulty or pain by patients with shoulder musculoskeletal disorders could be of great clinical relevance for patients and clinicians to monitor 3D scapular kinematics in unstructured settings or during common clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Biomechanical Phenomena; Scapula; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Range of Motion, Articular; Wearable Electronic Devices
PubMed: 37571723
DOI: 10.3390/s23156940 -
British Medical Bulletin Jul 2020The present systematic review compared arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) and latissimus dorsi transfer (ALDT) for the management of massive...
INTRODUCTION
The present systematic review compared arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) and latissimus dorsi transfer (ALDT) for the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff lesions.
SOURCES OF DATA
We performed a systematic review searching the literature on Medline, Cochrane and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
AREAS OF AGREEMENT
We included a total of 20 articles, 10 on ASCR and 10 on ALDT (12 retrospective and 8 prospective studies), all published between 2013 and 2019.
AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
ASCR and ALDT are technical demanding procedures. When compared to each other, they do not produce significantly different improvements in clinical outcome.
GROWING POINTS
Both ASCR and ALDT are valid options for surgical management of MIRCLs. Although ALDT has shown a greater complication rate and a less improvement in acromion-humeral distance, its clinical outcomes overlap those obtained with ASCR.
AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH
Further comparative prospective and retrospective studies with longer follow-up could confirm which surgical procedure can lead to better outcomes with a lower complication rate.
Topics: Arthroplasty; Arthroscopy; Humans; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Joint; Tendon Transfer
PubMed: 32507891
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa014 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Jun 2024This study aims to systematically assess the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with or without concomitant acromioplasty... (Review)
Review
Lower Reoperation Rate and Superior Patient-reported Outcome Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Concomitant Acromioplasty: An Updated Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
PURPOSE
This study aims to systematically assess the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with or without concomitant acromioplasty through a rigorous systematic review of randomized controlled trial s (RCTs).
METHODS
This systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, aimed to identify RCTs comparing clinical outcomes of patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty versus those without at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2). Meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes with at least three studies reporting, with pooled effect estimates calculated using either fixed-effect or random-effects models based on heterogeneity levels. Results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For outcomes with fewer than three studies reporting, a Fisher exact test was conducted, with continuity correction applied if necessary. Primary outcomes include rates of retear and reoperation, while secondary outcomes included improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion (ROM), and complication rate.
RESULTS
Five high-quality RCTs, with low bias risk, involving 409 patients, revealed demographics of 58.4% males, mean age 58.4 years, and acromion types: 12.2% type I, 70.7% type II, and 17.1% type III. Mean follow-up was 52.2 months. Retear (12.5% versus 16.1%, P = 0.536) and complication rates (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.31-30.73; P=0.33) were comparable between the two groups. However, reoperation rate (5.3% versus 15.9%, P < 0.001) and improvement in ASES score (WMD, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.00-6.99; P=0.009) favored the acromioplasty group. Both groups showed significant improvements in ROM, but insufficient data prevented a comparison.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty demonstrated similar rates of retear and complications, but a significantly lower reoperation rate and superior improvement in ASES score. The available data were insufficient to draw a definitive conclusion regarding ROM. This conclusion is fragile due to a limited sample size.
PubMed: 38876445
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.026 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Dec 2019Scapular anatomy, as measured by the acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), and glenoid inclination (GI), has emerged as a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Anatomic shoulder parameters and their relationship to the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Scapular anatomy, as measured by the acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), and glenoid inclination (GI), has emerged as a possible contributor to the development of degenerative shoulder conditions such as rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the published literature on influences of scapular morphology on the development of degenerative shoulder conditions.
METHODS
A systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases was performed to identify published studies on the potential influence of scapular bony morphology on the development of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The studies were reviewed by 2 authors. The findings were summarized for various anatomic parameters. A meta-analysis was completed for parameters reported in more than 5 related publications.
RESULTS
A total of 660 unique titles and 55 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed with 30 published articles identified for inclusion. The AI, CSA, LAA, and GI were the most commonly reported bony measurements. Increased CSA and AI correlated with rotator cuff tears, whereas lower CSA appeared to be related to the presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Decreased LAA correlated with degenerative rotator cuff tears. Five articles reported on the GI with mixed results on shoulder pathology.
DISCUSSION
Degenerative rotator cuff tears appear to be significantly associated with the AI, CSA, and LAA. There does not appear to be a significant relationship between the included shoulder parameters and the development of osteoarthritis.
Topics: Acromion; Glenoid Cavity; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Scapula; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 31353303
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.008 -
Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2024This study aimed to investigate the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior cervical triangle, especially in relation to adjacent anatomical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to investigate the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior cervical triangle, especially in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks, along with a systematic review of the current literature with a meta-analysis of the data. Overall, 22 cadaveric and three prospective intraoperative studies, with a total of 1346 heminecks, were included in the analysis. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the posterior border of the SCM muscle (PBSCM) were found to be the mastoid apex, the great auricular point (GAP), the nerve point (NP), and the point where the PBSCM meets the upper border of the clavicle. The SAN was reported to enter the posterior cervical triangle above GAP in 100% of cases and above NP in most cases (97.5%). The mean length of the SAN along its course from the entry point to its exit point from the posterior triangle of the neck was 4.07 ± 1.13 cm. The SAN mainly gave off 1 or 2 branches (32.5% and 31%, respectively) and received either no branches or one branch in most cases (58% and 23%, respectively) from the cervical plexus during its course in the posterior cervical triangle. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the anterior border of the TPZ muscle (ABTPZ) were found to be the point where the ABTPZ meets the upper border of the clavicle and the midpoint of the clavicle, along with the mastoid apex, the acromion, and the transverse distance of the SAN exit point to the PBSCM. The results of the present meta-analysis will be helpful to surgeons operating in the posterior cervical triangle, aiding the avoidance of the iatrogenic injury of the SAN.
Topics: Humans; Accessory Nerve; Prospective Studies; Cadaver; Neck; Neck Muscles
PubMed: 37767816
DOI: 10.1002/ca.24119 -
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Dec 2019The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and clinical and radiological outcomes...
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and clinical and radiological outcomes of treatment of the fracture.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify studies that reported the results of treatment of acromial fractures after RTSA. A literature search was conducted by two investigators using four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline).
RESULTS
Fifteen studies (2,857 shoulders) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The incidence of acromial fracture after RTSA was 4.0% (114 / 2,857). The mean age of the patients at the time of fracture was 72.9 years (range, 51 to 91 years). The mean time from RTSA to diagnosis of acromial fracture was 9.4 months (range, 1 to 94 months). One hundred shoulders (87.7%) were treated conservatively and 14 shoulders (12.3%) were treated surgically. The mean follow-up period after acromial fracture was 33.8 months. The overall union rate was 50.0% (43.8% for conservative treatment and 87.5% for operative treatment). The fracture incidence was significantly different among the medial glenoid and medial humerus prosthesis design (8.4%), the lateral glenoid and medial humerus design (4.0%), and the medial glenoid and lateral humerus design (2.8%). The mean values at final follow-up were as follows: visual analog scale score, 2.2; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59.1; Constant score, 59.7; and Simple Shoulder Test, 5.8. The mean forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 102.3°, 92.3°, and 25.8°, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Acromial fractures after RTSA are a complication neither uncommon nor negligible. In the absence of studies with high-level evidence, there is a controversy on the outcomes after treatment. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies with a long-term follow-up should be performed to ascertain the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of acromial fractures after RTSA.
Topics: Acromion; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 31788166
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.427 -
Surgical Technology International Nov 2020Treatment of post-surgical pain is predicated by an understanding of pain generators. The purpose of this review is to identify sensory dependent areas of the shoulder...
INTRODUCTION
Treatment of post-surgical pain is predicated by an understanding of pain generators. The purpose of this review is to identify sensory dependent areas of the shoulder and discuss their correlation in treating postoperative pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews were searched (key terms: "Nociception" or "sensory pain receptors" or "pain map" or "neuroanatomy and shoulder" or "rotator cuff") to identify studies in the current literature (1966-2018) regarding sensory innervation of the shoulder and rotator cuff. The search was limited to the English language, human studies, and publication types to reviews and clinical studies. Articles written in other languages besides English, animal studies, abstracts, and conference notes were excluded. Each search result was investigated for relevant physiological information of the nerve endings and nociceptors as well as pertinent information and figures that illustrated the location of the identified receptors.
RESULTS
A total of 12 articles were identified that addressed the sensory innervation of the shoulder. The shoulder capsule has the highest sensory nerve density. The attachment sites between the labrum and the capsule and glenoid rim were also found to be highly sensory dependent, in contrast to the peri-core zone at the capsulolabral junction, which was found to be less concentrated with fascicles and sensory nerve endings. The subacromial bursa is also a highly sensory dependent structure, with a more concentrated neural network on the coracoacromial side compared to other quadrants of the bursa. Cutaneous locations of sensory fibers on the shoulder are best defined by mapping the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of various locations on the shoulder. The most sensory dependent locations of the shoulder were found to be the posterior border of the acromion, the glenohumeral joint, the anterior deltoid, and the upper trapezius.
CONCLUSION
This review examined the origin of pain in the shoulder, the location of cutaneous pain receptors, and receptors in each major part of the shoulder. Providing analgesia to these densely innervated areas of the shoulder can potentially reduce pain associated with surgical trauma. In addition, knowledge of the sensory dependent areas of the shoulder may elicit consideration of alternative incision sites and surgical protocols to decrease the insult to nociceptors in these locations. These changes could possibly decrease the narcotic requirement in the postoperative period.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 33080040
DOI: No ID Found -
The Bone & Joint Journal Sep 2019The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical repair to conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
AIMS
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical repair to conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of chronic/degenerative tears of the rotator cuff.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane database, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2018. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality, and data were extracted for statistical analysis. The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. Surgical repair resulted in a statistically significantly better Constant-Murley Score (CMS) at one year compared with conservative treatment (mean difference 6.15; p = 0.002) and subacromial decompression alone (mean difference 5.81; p = 0.0004). In the conservatively treated group, 11.9% of patients eventually crossed over to surgical repair.
CONCLUSION
The results of this review show that surgical repair results in significantly improved outcomes when compared with either conservative treatment or subacromial decompression alone for degenerative rotator cuff tears in older patients. However, the magnitude of the difference in outcomes between surgery and conservative treatment may be small and the 'success rate' of conservative treatment may be high, allowing surgeons to be judicious in choosing those patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Cite this article: 2019;101-B:1100-1106.
Topics: Acromion; Arthroscopy; Chronic Disease; Conservative Treatment; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31474132
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1591.R1