-
European Archives of... Mar 2022Cleft palate children have a higher incidence of otitis media with effusion, more frequent recurrent acute otitis media episodes, and worse conductive hearing losses... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Cleft palate children have a higher incidence of otitis media with effusion, more frequent recurrent acute otitis media episodes, and worse conductive hearing losses than non-cleft children. Nevertheless, data on adenoidectomy for middle ear disease in this patient group are scarce, since many feared worsening of velopharyngeal insufficiency after the procedure. This review aims at collecting the available evidence on this subject, to frame possible further areas of research and interventions.
METHODS
A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed. Multiple databases were searched with criteria designed to include all studies focusing on the role of adenoidectomy in treating middle ear disease in cleft palate children. After duplicate removal, abstract and full-text selection, and quality assessment, we reviewed eligible articles for clinical indications and outcomes.
RESULTS
Among 321 unique citations, 3 studies published between 1964 and 1972 (2 case series and a retrospective cohort study) were deemed eligible, with 136 treated patients. The outcomes were positive in all three articles in terms of conductive hearing loss improvement, recurrent otitis media episodes reduction, and effusive otitis media resolution.
CONCLUSION
Despite promising results, research on adenoidectomy in treating middle ear disease in the cleft population has stopped in the mid-Seventies. No data are, therefore, available on the role of modern conservative adenoidectomy techniques (endoscopic and/or partial) in this context. Prospective studies are required to define the role of adenoidectomy in cleft children, most interestingly in specific subgroups such as patients requiring re-tympanostomy, given their known risk of otologic sequelae.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Child; Cleft Palate; Humans; Middle Ear Ventilation; Otitis Media with Effusion; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34453572
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07035-6 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Dec 2021Clinical guidelines suggest adenoidectomy when enlarged adenoids are associated with nasal obstruction and other symptoms. Given that nasal obstruction is the leading... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Clinical guidelines suggest adenoidectomy when enlarged adenoids are associated with nasal obstruction and other symptoms. Given that nasal obstruction is the leading symptom of adenoid hypertrophy, it should be thoroughly explored. However, there is no consensus regarding what could be the best approach. This systematic review is designed with the objective of exploring the extent to which adenoidectomy can decrease nasal resistance through rhinomanometry.
REVIEW METHODS
3 authors members of the YO-IFOS rhinology study group independently analyzed the data sources (Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO) for papers assessing the change in nasal resistance and/or nasal airflow in rhinomanometry after adenoidectomy in pediatric patients.
RESULTS
A total of 9 studies with a total population of 423 participants (323 patients excluding healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. All of them found decreased nasal resistance after adenoidectomy. 5 studies could be combined in a metanalysis, which revealed a statistically significant difference of 0.52 Pa in basal conditions, and 0.64 Pa in rhinomanometry under nasal decongestion. 4 authors explored changes in nasal airflow. All of them found a statistically significant increase in nasal airflow after adenoidectomy. However, their results could not be merged in a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the existence of a systematic decrease in nasal resistance and increase in nasal airflow with and without nasal decongestant after adenoidectomy. The available evidence suggests that rhinomanometry with nasal decongestant could help in intermediate cases of adenoid hypertrophy, in order to identify the presence of nasal obstruction and, when present, the possibility of other causes for it rather than enlarged adenoids, mainly turbinate hypertrophy.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Adenoids; Child; Humans; Hypertrophy; Nasal Obstruction; Rhinomanometry
PubMed: 34781112
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110969 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Sep 2022Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common indication for adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy in children. Traditional practice involves overnight admission to monitor for... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common indication for adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy in children. Traditional practice involves overnight admission to monitor for respiratory complications. However, there is a shift towards same-day discharge in selected patients. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate day-case criteria and safety in children with OSA undergoing adenotonsillectomy.
DESIGN
We performed a systematic search of EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane library. All data collected were independently validated for accuracy. Quality assessment of included articles was performed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies were included (10 731 patients). There was heterogeneity in methods used to ascertain OSA, day-case discharge criteria and lack of prospective discharge protocol. The proportion of children considered for planned day-case surgery ranged from 28.7%-100% based on individual criteria, with an average rate of successful same-day discharge of 96.1% in these patients. The reported rates of post-operative respiratory adverse events and need for airway intervention were 0%-27.3% and 0.4%-6.8%, respectively. There was no reported mortality. The studies were considered low to medium on quality assessment.
CONCLUSION
There is a lack of prospective data on day-case criteria and systematic assessment of post-operative complications in children with OSA undergoing adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. However, current literature suggests that day-case surgery is safe in carefully selected patients. Better characterisation of patient-specific risk factors is needed to develop an optimal criteria-based timeline for safe discharge. This has the potential to improve confidence and uptake across units.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Child; Humans; Patient Discharge; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 35603525
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13946 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Jun 2023This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of (adeno)tonsillectomy (AT) for uncomplicated pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of (adeno)tonsillectomy (AT) for uncomplicated pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across different age groups. Four electronic databases were searched until April 2022, and 93 studies (9087 participants) were selected, including before-after studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials. It has been suggested that age, disease severity, and length of follow-up are associated with surgical effects. Compared with older children (>7 years), patients receiving AT surgery before the age of 7 exhibited a significantly greater release of disease severity, as well as a greater decrease in hypoxemic burden, improvement in sleep quality, and better cardiovascular function. Cognitive/behavioral performance also improved after AT, although it was more related to the length of follow-up than the age at surgery. Notably, the surgical complication rate was considerably higher in patients younger than 3 years old. Overall, we suggest that the age of 3-7 years might be optimal for AT in polysomnography-diagnosed uncomplicated OSA to maximize potential benefits for both disease and comorbidities and balance the risks of surgery.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adolescent; Child, Preschool; Tonsillectomy; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Polysomnography; Adenoidectomy
PubMed: 37121134
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101782 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. When persistent,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. When persistent, it may lead to developmental delay, social difficulty and poor quality of life. Management of OME includes watchful waiting, autoinflation, medical and surgical treatment. Adenoidectomy has often been used as a potential treatment for this condition.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of adenoidectomy, either alone or in combination with ventilation tubes (grommets), for OME in children.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 20 January 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years with unilateral or bilateral OME. We included studies that compared adenoidectomy (alone, or in combination with ventilation tubes) with either no treatment or non-surgical treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes (determined following a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise): 1) hearing, 2) otitis media-specific quality of life, 3) haemorrhage.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
1) persistence of OME, 2) adverse effects, 3) receptive language skills, 4) speech development, 5) cognitive development, 6) psychosocial skills, 7) listening skills, 8) generic health-related quality of life, 9) parental stress, 10) vestibular function, 11) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method to assess hearing, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 10 studies (1785 children). Many of the studies used concomitant interventions for all participants, including insertion of ventilation tubes or myringotomy. All included studies had at least some concerns regarding the risk of bias. We report results for our main outcome measures at the longest available follow-up. We did not identify any data on disease-specific quality of life for any of the comparisons. Further details of additional outcomes and time points are reported in the review. 1) Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) versus no treatment/watchful waiting (three studies) After 12 months there was little difference in the proportion of children whose hearing had returned to normal, but the evidence was very uncertain (adenoidectomy 68%, no treatment 70%; risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.46; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 50; 1 study, 42 participants). There is a risk of haemorrhage from adenoidectomy, but the absolute risk appears small (1/251 receiving adenoidectomy compared to 0/229, Peto odds ratio (OR) 6.77, 95% CI 0.13 to 342.54; 1 study, 480 participants; moderate certainty evidence). The risk of persistent OME may be slightly lower after two years in those receiving adenoidectomy (65% versus 73%), but again the difference was small (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00; NNTB 13; 3 studies, 354 participants; very low-certainty evidence). 2) Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) versus non-surgical treatment No studies were identified for this comparison. 3) Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes versus bilateral ventilation tubes (four studies) There was a slight increase in the proportion of ears with a return to normal hearing after six to nine months (57% adenoidectomy versus 42% without, RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.89; NNTB 7; 1 study, 127 participants (213 ears); very low-certainty evidence). Adenoidectomy may give an increased risk of haemorrhage, but the absolute risk appears small, and the evidence was uncertain (2/416 with adenoidectomy compared to 0/375 in the control group, Peto OR 6.68, 95% CI 0.42 to 107.18; 2 studies, 791 participants). The risk of persistent OME was similar for both groups (82% adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes compared to 85% ventilation tubes alone, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07; very low-certainty evidence). 4) Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube versus unilateral ventilation tube (two studies) Slightly more children returned to normal hearing after adenoidectomy, but the confidence intervals were wide (57% versus 46%, RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.96; NNTB 9; 1 study, 72 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Fewer children may have persistent OME after 12 months, but again the confidence intervals were wide (27.2% compared to 40.5%, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.29; NNTB 8; 1 study, 74 participants). We did not identify any data on haemorrhage. 5) Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes versus no treatment/watchful waiting (two studies) We did not identify data on the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing. However, after two years, the mean difference in hearing threshold for those allocated to adenoidectomy was -3.40 dB (95% CI -5.54 to -1.26; 1 study, 211 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be a small reduction in the proportion of children with persistent OME after two years, but the evidence was very uncertain (82% compared to 90%, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.01; NNTB 13; 1 study, 232 participants). We noted that many children in the watchful waiting group had also received surgery by this time point. 6) Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes versus non-surgical treatment No studies were identified for this comparison.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
When assessed with the GRADE approach, the evidence for adenoidectomy in children with OME is very uncertain. Adenoidectomy may reduce the persistence of OME, although evidence about the effect of this on hearing is unclear. For patients and carers, a return to normal hearing is likely to be important, but few studies measured this outcome. We did not identify any evidence on disease-specific quality of life. There were few data on adverse effects, in particular postoperative bleeding. The risk of haemorrhage appears to be small, but should be considered when choosing a treatment strategy for children with OME. Future studies should aim to determine which children are most likely to benefit from treatment, rather than offering interventions to all children.
Topics: Child; Humans; Child, Preschool; Otitis Media with Effusion; Adenoidectomy; Quality of Life; Otitis Media; Hemorrhage
PubMed: 37870083
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015252.pub2 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Jan 2022When to order an echocardiogram in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is debated. Studies evaluating the utility of pre-operative standard echocardiography are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
When to order an echocardiogram in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is debated. Studies evaluating the utility of pre-operative standard echocardiography are inconsistent. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is an additional technique that quantifies the velocity of myocardial motion to assess cardiac function. The utility of TDI in pediatric OSA remains unclear.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies of echocardiographic findings using TDI in children with polysomnogram confirmed OSA before and after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) were included. 1,423 studies were screened, and 4 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of echocardiographic findings was performed.
RESULTS
Data from 560 children were analyzed. Study groups included pre- and post-T&A children with OSA and non OSA controls. Pre-T&A S' wave at the tricuspid annulus (S' RV) was decreased with a mean difference of -1.04 [95% CI -1.57, -0.52, p < 0.001] and E'/A' ratio at the mitral annulus (E'/A' LV) was decreased with a mean difference of -0.74 [95% CI -0.85, -0.64, p < 0.001] when compared to controls. These variables were not statistically different when comparing post-T&A to controls.
CONCLUSIONS
TDI appears to successfully detect subclinical changes in cardiac function in children with OSA. However, echocardiography parameters of post-T&A and non OSA control children were similar. Further prospective studies stratified by OSA severity are needed with both TDI and standard echocardiography to define the utility of pre-operative cardiac imaging.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Child; Echocardiography, Doppler; Humans; Prospective Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 34894539
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111002 -
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck... Mar 2023There is a lack of robust evidence in regards to whether the intra and post-operative safety and efficacy of conventional curettage adenoidectomy is better than those of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
There is a lack of robust evidence in regards to whether the intra and post-operative safety and efficacy of conventional curettage adenoidectomy is better than those of other available surgical techniques. Therefore, this study was conducted as a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of comparing the safety and efficacy of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with all other available adenoidectomy techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search of published articles was performed in 2021 using databases such as PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library. All RCTs that compared conventional curettage adenoidectomy with other surgical techniques and were published in English between 1965 and 2021 were included. The quality of the included RCTs have been assessed using Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool.
RESULTS
After screening 1494 articles, 17 were identified for comparing several adenoidectomy techniques and were eligible for quantitative analysis. Of those, 9 RCTs were analyzed for intraoperative blood loss, and 6 articles were included for post-operative bleeding. Furthermore; 14, 10, and 7 studies were included for surgical time, residual adenoid tissue, and postoperative complications respectively. Endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy yielded a statistically significantly greater estimate of intraoperative blood loss compared with conventional curettage adenoidectomy (mean difference [MD], 92.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.3-157.1), suction diathermy (MD, 117.1; 95% CI 37.2-197.1). Suction diathermy had the highest cumulative probability of being the preferred technique because it was estimated to result in the least intraoperative blood loss. Electronic molecular resonance adenoidectomy was estimated to be more likely to result in the shortest surgical time (mean rank, 2.2). Participants in the intervention group were 97% less likely to have residual adenoid tissue than children in the conventional curettage group (odds ratio 0.03; 95% CI 0.01-0.15); therefore, conventional curettage was not considered an appropriate technique for complete removal of adenoid tissue.
CONCLUSION
There is no single technique that can be considered best for all possible outcomes. Therefore, otolaryngologists should make an appropriate choice after critically reviewing the clinical characteristics of children requiring adenoidectomy. Findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis may guide otolaryngologists when making evidence-based decisions regarding the treatment of enlarged and symptomatic adenoids in children.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adenoidectomy; Blood Loss, Surgical; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36870974
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-023-00634-9 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Jun 2024Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of celecoxib compared with a placebo for managing post-tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy pain and other adverse events.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from inception until July 2023. Dichotomous outcomes have been reported as risk ratios (RR) while continuous outcomes were reported using mean differences (MD). A funnel plot was drawn to investigate publication bias.
RESULTS
From 1394 records identified, 6 randomised double-blind trials comprising 591 participants undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. A high dose (400 mg) of celecoxib was effective in decreasing the pain score for 'worst pain' after the procedure (MD: -10.98, [95% CI: -11.53, -10.42], p < .01, I = 0%) while a low dose (200 mg) was not significantly effective (p = 0.31). For managing other outcomes such as vomiting (RR: 1.37 [95% CI: 0.69, 2.68], p = 0.37, I = 67%), diarrhoea (RR: 1.41, [95% CI: 0.75, 2.64], p = .29, I = 42%), dizziness/drowsiness (RR: 0.90, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.15], p = .48, I = 0%), functional recovery time (p = .74), and headache (p = .91), there was no significant difference between the group on celecoxib and the placebo group regardless of dosage. Finally, there was no significant difference (RR: 1.02, [95% CI: 0.91, 1.15], p = .69, I = 0%) in the effect of the intervention on minimum bleeding, moderate bleeding, and profuse bleeding.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides robust evidence pooled from high-quality trials and raises questions about the efficacy of celecoxib for tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, challenging existing perceptions.
PubMed: 38877737
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14177 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Dec 2021adenoidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedure in pediatric otolaryngology practice. Clinical guidelines (such as the Spanish or American) suggest... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
adenoidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedure in pediatric otolaryngology practice. Clinical guidelines (such as the Spanish or American) suggest adenoidectomy when the enlargement of the adenoids is associated with nasal obstruction. Nasal endoscopy and cephalograms are adequate methods to estimate the size of the adenoids. However, they do not measure nasal patency. This systematic review is designed with the objective of exploring the relationship between adenoid size and nasal ventilation through rhinomanometry.
REVIEW METHODS
3 authors members of the YO-IFOS rhinology study group independently analyzed the data sources (Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO) for papers assessing both nasal resistance and/or nasal airflow in rhinomanometry and adenoid size by any method (endoscopy, cephalogram, direct examination).
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies with a total population of 969 participants met the inclusion criteria. 5 authors explored the size of the adenoids through endoscopy. 4 authors explored the adenoids through lateral cephalograms. Finally, a further 2 authors explored adenoid size studying the resected tissue. Five studies explored the correlation between adenoid size and nasal resistance in rhinomanometry, which ranged from 0.20 to 0.84. Finally, 5 studies used nasal decongestant. It was found higher sensitivity and specificity, a higher area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve, and higher correlation with adenoid size for rhinomanometry under nasal decongestion.
CONCLUSION
Up to now, there is no ideal diagnostic method for adenoid hypertrophy. Therefore, it seems prudent to use a combination of all currently available tools, as they provide complementary, rather than supplementary information. Available evidence suggests that rhinomanometry combined with nasal decongestant could help to elucidate the existence of nasal obstruction in intermediate cases of adenoid hypertrophy, as well as throw light on other possible causes for nasal obstruction, mainly turbinate hypertrophy.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Adenoids; Child; Endoscopy; Humans; Hypertrophy; Nasal Obstruction; Rhinomanometry
PubMed: 34537548
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110895 -
European Archives of... Dec 2023To evaluate the effects of adenotonsillectomy on improving central sleep apnea events in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effects of adenotonsillectomy on improving central sleep apnea events in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
METHODS
We searched four online databases for relevant articles published from inception until October 2022. We included studies that measured the number of central apnea events per sleep and central apnea-hypopnea index (CAHI) or central apnea index (CAI) scores in children with OSA before and after adenotonsillectomy. Our primary outcomes were changes in CAI scores, the number of central apnea events per sleep, and CAHI scores after surgery. Our secondary outcomes were changes in total and mixed apnea events, improvement of sleep outcomes, and differences in oxygen or carbon dioxide saturation during sleep. We performed meta-analyses by pooling the mean changes of all included studies with a 95% confidence interval using Stata 17. Subsequently, we performed subgroup analyses based on the presence of comorbidities.
RESULTS
We included 22 studies comprising 1287 patients. Central and total sleep apnea parameters, except for CAHI and mixed apnea index scores, showed significant improvements after surgery. In addition, all respiratory parameters and second and third stages of non-rapid eye movement sleep showed significant postsurgical improvements. Patients with comorbidities showed significant improvements only in the total apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and minimal oxygen saturation.
CONCLUSION
Adenotonsillectomy improves central apnea events in patients with OSA but not in those with comorbidities.
Topics: Child; Humans; Sleep Apnea, Central; Adenoidectomy; Tonsillectomy; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Oxygen
PubMed: 37642712
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08202-7