-
Human Gene Therapy Mar 2023Dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential solution for overcoming antigen escape during anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential solution for overcoming antigen escape during anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this novel treatment in patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We systematically searched relevant literature based on databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane) and conference abstracts. The primary outcomes measured were the best objective response rate (ORR) or complete response (CR), 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and neurotoxicity. Fifteen registered prospective open-label clinical trials were included. Among the 260 patients with B-NHL, the pooled best ORR and CR were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.82) and 52% (95% CI: 0.40-0.63), respectively, and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 54.0% (95% CI: 0.47-0.61) and 66.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), respectively. In the 159 patients with B-ALL, the combined best CR was observed to be 92% (95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 65.0% (95% CI: 0.51-0.77) and 73.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.92), respectively. Moreover, in B-NHL patients, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 14.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.29) of these patients, and 5.0% (95% CI: 0.02-0.08) showed grade ≥3 neurotoxicity; in the case of B-ALL patients, grade ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity occurred in 11.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.19) and 2.0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06), respectively. This study demonstrates the safety and clinical efficacy of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapies in B cell malignancies. Further, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to establish the role of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in patients with B cell malignancies.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Prospective Studies; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; B-Lymphocytes; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Antigens, CD19
PubMed: 36734417
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2022.183 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Nov 2022Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Four databases were searched for relevant studies. Among patients treated with donor-derived CAR T-cell therapy, ALL patients had a complete remission (CR) rate of 80 % and a 1-year overall survival rate of 51 %. The graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) rate was 4 %, cytokine release syndrome was 69 %, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 8 %. For off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy, the CR rate for ALL was 70 %, and for NHL, it was 52 %. The objective response rate for NHL was 72 %. The pooled GvHD of off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for ALL and NHL combined was 0 %. Allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are effective and safe for treating R/R ALL and NHL. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: All datasets generated in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 36087853
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103807 -
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Nov 2022Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Underlying and treatment-related variables may contribute to the development of infectious complications.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of overall and severe (grade ≥3) infection in patients with hematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cells. Secondary outcomes included the specific rates of bacterial, viral and invasive fungal infection (IFI), and infection-related mortality. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 27 May 2022. Sensitivity analysis were performed according to the type of malignancy and study design (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] or observational studies).
RESULTS
Forty-five studies (34 RCTs) comprising 3,591 patients were included. The pooled incidence rates of overall and severe infection were 33.8% (I = 96.31%) and 16.2% (I = 74.41%). The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection. Most events were bacterial or viral, whereas the occurrence of IFI was rare. The pooled attributable mortality was 1.8% (I = 43.44%).
CONCLUSIONS
Infection is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Further research should address specific risk factors in this population.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Antigens, CD19; Hematologic Neoplasms; Neoplasms
PubMed: 36148506
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2128762 -
Experimental Hematology & Oncology Aug 2023Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR,... (Review)
Review
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR, which enables the recognition of the specific tumour antigen of interest. To date, CAR-T cell therapies approved for commercialisation are designed to treat haematological malignancies, showing impressive clinical efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced-stage tumours. However, since they all use the patient´s own T cells as starting material (i.e. autologous use), they have important limitations, including manufacturing delays, high production costs, difficulties in standardising the preparation process, and production failures due to patient T cell dysfunction. Therefore, many efforts are currently being devoted to contribute to the development of safe and effective therapies for allogeneic use, which should be designed to overcome the most important risks they entail: immune rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This systematic review brings together the wide range of different approaches that have been studied to achieve the production of allogeneic CAR-T cell therapies and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of every strategy. The methods were classified in two major categories: those involving extra genetic modifications, in addition to CAR integration, and those relying on the selection of alternative cell sources/subpopulations for allogeneic CAR-T cell production (i.e. γδ T cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), umbilical cord blood T cells, memory T cells subpopulations, virus-specific T cells and cytokine-induced killer cells). We have observed that, although genetic modification of T cells is the most widely used approach, new approaches combining both methods have emerged. However, more preclinical and clinical research is needed to determine the most appropriate strategy to bring this promising antitumour therapy to the clinical setting.
PubMed: 37605218
DOI: 10.1186/s40164-023-00435-w -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer....
Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer. Among different immunotherapies reaching clinical application during the last years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for cancer where different CAR T cells have already been approved. Yet their use against infectious diseases is an area still relatively poorly explored, albeit with tremendous potential for research and clinical application. Infectious diseases represent a global health challenge, with the escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This review aims to systematically evaluate the current applications of CAR immunotherapy in infectious diseases and discuss its potential for future applications. Notably, CAR cell therapies, initially developed for cancer treatment, are gaining recognition as potential remedies for infectious diseases. The review sheds light on significant progress in CAR T cell therapy directed at viral and opportunistic fungal infections.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Communicable Diseases
PubMed: 38352878
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1289303 -
Cytotherapy Sep 2022The existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between bridging therapy and outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma.
BACKGROUND
The existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is conflicting. Therefore, we reviewed all available evidence to examine the association between BT and CAR-T therapy outcomes by systematic review and meta-analysis approach.
METHODS
Two reviewers independently searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify all records that described BT for LBCL treated with CAR-T. We then applied a fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratio (RRs) for efficacy and safety endpoints and assessed differences across various BT modalities. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality.
RESULTS
Twenty-six reports from 24 studies involving 2014 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that patients requiring BT had significantly worse 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.85, P < 0.001), 1-year progression-free survival rate (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.69, P = 0.01), overall response rate (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95, P = 0.001), complete response rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005), and grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87, P = 0.007), and tended to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.99-2.02, P = 0.056) and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.92-2.75, P = 0.096). Prolonged cytopenias were the common toxicity event associated with BT. Radiotherapy may serve as a promising BT option that can provide safe and effective disease control for patients with LBCL before CAR-T infusion. The inconsistency of patient baselines in the current study hindered further comparisons between different BT modalities. Most of the available evidence was rated as low quality because of concerns over low comparability.
CONCLUSION
BT appears to be associated with comparatively poor efficacy and safety outcomes after CAR-T infusion. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity between the BT and non-BT cohorts at disease baseline, no definitive conclusions can be made for the true impact of BT on CAR-T until further randomized studies are conducted.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Progression-Free Survival; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35568624
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.03.009 -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer Apr 2023The number of clinical studies evaluating the benefit of cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an adoptive immunotherapy, for colorectal cancer (CRC) is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The number of clinical studies evaluating the benefit of cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an adoptive immunotherapy, for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. In many of these trials, CIK therapy was coadministered with conventional cancer therapy. The aim of this review is to systematically assess the available literature, in which the majority were only in Chinese, on CIK therapy for the management of CRC using meta-analysis and to identify parameters associated with successful CIK therapy implementation.
METHODS
Prospective and retrospective clinical studies which compared CIK therapy to non-CIK therapy in patients with CRC were searched for electronically on MEDLINE, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data databases. The clinical endpoints of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), OS and PFS rates, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were meta-analyzed using HR and relative ratio (RR), and subgroup analyses were performed using chi-square (χ) test and I-squared (I) statistics for study design, disease stage, cotherapy type, and timing of administration.
RESULTS
In total, 70 studies involving 6743 patients were analyzed. CIK therapy was favored over non-CIK therapy for OS (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.65), PFS (HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.63), and ORR (RR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.74) without increasing toxicity (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.16 to 2.25). Subgroup analyses on OS and PFS by study design (randomized vs non-randomized study design), disease stage (Stage I-III vs Stage IV), cotreatment with dendritic cells (DCs) (CIK vs DC-CIK therapy), or timing of therapy administration (concurrent vs sequential with coadministered anticancer therapy) also showed that the clinical benefit of CIK therapy was robust in any subgroup analysis. Furthermore, cotreatment with DCs did not improve clinical outcomes over CIK therapy alone.
CONCLUSION
Compared with standard therapy, patients who received additional CIK cell therapy had favorable outcomes without increased toxicity, warranting further investigation into CIK therapy for the treatment of CRC.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37117007
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006764 -
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2022To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer...
The Combined Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Adoptive Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Qualified randomized controlled trial (randomized controlled trial, RCT), or nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial (NRCCT), published in various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese journal full-text database, Medline, Cochrane database, and VIP Chinese database, and the Revman5. 0 software performed the data analysis.
RESULTS
We found the significantly different curative effect between the experimental and control groups (OR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.46, 2.58), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.59), effect of adoptive immunotherapy on the progression of disease (OR = 1.80, 95% CI (1.38, 2.35), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.33), adoptive immunotherapy on overall survival (OR = 2.19, 95% CI (1.60, 2.99), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.91), and adverse effects of adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.25, 2.48), = 0.001, = 0%, = 3.26).
CONCLUSION
Adoptive immunotherapy combined with microradiotherapy can decrease the recurrence of NSCLC and improve patient survival, as well as early patients can be benefited more significantly from immunotherapy.
PubMed: 35706510
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2731744 -
The Oncologist Jun 2023T-cell receptor (TCR-T) therapies are based on the expression of an introduced TCR targeting a tumor associated antigen (TAA) which has been studied in several trials in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
T-cell receptor (TCR-T) therapies are based on the expression of an introduced TCR targeting a tumor associated antigen (TAA) which has been studied in several trials in cutaneous melanoma. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the primary efficacy of TCR-based adoptive cell therapy in cutaneous melanoma.
METHODS
We searched through PubMed electronic database from its inception until May 21, 2022. Primary endpoints were pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify potential predictive factors for tumor response.
RESULTS
From 187 patients, 50 showed an objective response (pooled ORR 28%; 95% CI, 20%-37%) and a pooled DCR of 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%). Median PFS was 2, 9 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.1). A trend toward higher PFS was demonstrated for patients treated with cancer/testis antigens targeting TCR-T cells (HR 0.91 95% CI, 0.64-1.3, P = .61) among whom, patients treated with NYESO-1 targeting TCR-T showed a significantly higher PFS (HR 0.63 95% CI, 0.64-0.98, P = .03). In addition, the number of infused cells was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of tumor response (OR 6.61; 95% CI, 1.68-21.6; P = .007).
CONCLUSION
TCR-T therapy shows promising results in terms of antitumor activity and survival similar to those reported for TILs with a significantly higher benefit for cancer/testis antigens targeting cells. Since TCR-based therapy shows advantages of great potential over classic ACT strategies, further research in solid cancers is warranted (PROSPERO ID CRD42022328011).
Topics: Male; Humans; Melanoma; Skin Neoplasms; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
PubMed: 37036865
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad078 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2021The unprecedented successes of immunotherapies (IOs) including immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in patients with late-stage cancer...
The unprecedented successes of immunotherapies (IOs) including immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in patients with late-stage cancer provide proof-of-principle evidence that harnessing the immune system, in particular T cells, can be an effective approach to eradicate cancer. This instills strong interests in understanding the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT), an area that was actually investigated more than a century ago but had been largely ignored for many decades. With the "newly" discovered immunogenic responses from RT, numerous endeavors have been undertaken to combine RT with IOs, in order to bolster anti-tumor immunity. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well defined, which is a subject of much investigation. We therefore conducted a systematic literature search on the molecular underpinnings of RT-induced immunomodulation and IOs, which identified the IFN-JAK-STAT pathway as a major regulator. Our further analysis of relevant studies revealed that the signaling strength and duration of this pathway in response to RT and IOs may determine eventual immunological outcomes. We propose that strategic targeting of this axis can boost the immunostimulatory effects of RT and radiosensitizing effects of IOs, thereby promoting the efficacy of combination therapy of RT and IOs.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Immunotherapy; Interferons; Janus Kinases; Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; STAT Transcription Factors; Signal Transduction; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 34830176
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212295