-
Transplant International : Official... Dec 2021The use of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) in adoptive immunotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients with... (Review)
Review
The use of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) in adoptive immunotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness. EBV-CTLs might also be the effective treatment of refractory PTLD of solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Two independent assessors searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to November 2020. Eleven studies with 76 patients (42, 55% male) were included. We extracted the data and completed the quality assessments. Most of the studies were from Europe and the USA. Liver and kidney transplantation accounted for most of the transplant types. Thirty-five (46.1%) patients were diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, and B lymphocyte type was the most common. All the patients received primary treatment for PTLD while it was ineffective. CTLs included autologous EBV-CTLs (15/76, 22%) and HLA-matched third-party EBV-CTLs (61/76, 78%). The response rate for EBV-CTL treatment of refractory PTLD was 66%. Of 50 patients, 36 achieved complete remission and 14 achieved partial remission. EBV-DNA level decreased in 39 patients. Adverse reactions were rare and mild. We conclude that adoptive therapy with EBV-specific CTLs is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in PTLD.
Topics: Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Female; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Male; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic
PubMed: 34510581
DOI: 10.1111/tri.14107 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Different from surgery, chemical therapy, radio-therapy and target therapy, Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cells, a novel adoptive immunotherapy strategy,...
Different from surgery, chemical therapy, radio-therapy and target therapy, Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cells, a novel adoptive immunotherapy strategy, have been used successfully against both hematological tumors and solid tumors. Although several problems have reduced engineered CAR-T cell therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials for the treatment of thoracic malignancies, including the lack of specific antigens, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, a low level of CAR-T cell infiltration into tumor tissues, off-target toxicity, and other safety issues, CAR-T cell treatment is still full of bright future. In this review, we outline the basic structure and characteristics of CAR-T cells among different period, summarize the common tumor-associated antigens in clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapy for thoracic malignancies, and point out the current challenges and new strategies, aiming to provide new ideas and approaches for preclinical experiments and clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapy for thoracic malignancies.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; T-Lymphocytes; Thoracic Neoplasms; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 35911706
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871661 -
Journal of Autoimmunity Nov 2023This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL (February 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Checklist for Case Reports and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomised Studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 1104 participants. There was considerable methodological heterogeneity with differing study designs (e.g., cohort studies, clinical trials, case studies, a qualitative interview, and a focus group), measures of cognition (e.g., self-report, neuropsychological measures, clinician assessed/neurological examinations), and longest follow-up time points (i.e., five days to five years).
DISCUSSION
Results of the studies were heterogenous with studies demonstrating stable, improved, or reduced cognition across differing time points. Overall, cognitive symptoms are common particularly in the acute stage (<2 weeks) post-infusion. Most deficits that arise in the acute stage resolve within one to two weeks, however, there is a subset of patients who continue to experience and self-report persistent deficits in the subacute and chronic stages. Future studies are needed to comprehensively analyse cognition using a combination of self-report and psychometric measures following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the acute, subacute, and chronic settings.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Cognition; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37837807
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103126 -
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Apr 2020T cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare mature T cell tumor. Available treatment options in this aggressive disease are largely inefficient and patient outcomes...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
T cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare mature T cell tumor. Available treatment options in this aggressive disease are largely inefficient and patient outcomes are highly dissatisfactory. Current therapeutic strategies mainly employ the CD52-antibody alemtuzumab as the most active single agent. However, sustained remissions after sole alemtuzumab-based induction are exceptions. Responses after available second-line strategies are even less durable. More profound disease control or rare curative outcomes can currently only be expected after a consolidating allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in best first response. However, only 30-50% of patients are eligible for this procedure. Major advances in the molecular characterization of T-PLL during recent years have stimulated translational studies on potential vulnerabilities of the T-PLL cell. We summarize here the current state of "classical" treatments and critically appraise novel (pre)clinical strategies.
RECENT FINDINGS
Alemtuzumab-induced first remissions, accomplished in ≈ 90% of patients, last at median ≈ 12 months. Series on allo-HSCT in T-PLL, although of very heterogeneous character, suggest a slight improvement in outcomes among transplanted patients within the past decade. Dual-action nucleosides such as bendamustine or cladribine show moderate clinical activity as single agents in the setting of relapsed or refractory disease. Induction of apoptosis via reactivation of p53 (e.g., by inhibitors of HDAC or MDM2) and targeting of its downstream pathways (i.e., BCL2 family antagonists, CDK inhibitors) are promising new approaches. Novel strategies also focus on inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway with the first clinical data. Implementations of immune-checkpoint blockades or CAR-T cell therapy are at the stage of pre-clinical assessments of activity and feasibility. The recommended treatment strategy in T-PLL remains a successful induction by infusional alemtuzumab followed by a consolidating allo-HSCT in eligible patients. Nevertheless, long-term survivors after this "standard" comprise only 10-20%. The increasingly revealed molecular make-up of T-PLL and the tremendous expansion of approved targeted compounds in oncology represent a "never-before" opportunity to successfully tackle the voids in T-PLL. Approaches, e.g., those reinstating deficient cell death execution, show encouraging pre-clinical and first-in-human results in T-PLL, and urgently have to be transferred to systematic clinical testing.
Topics: Alemtuzumab; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Diffusion of Innovation; Forecasting; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Leukemia, Prolymphocytic, T-Cell; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32034661
DOI: 10.1007/s11899-020-00566-5 -
International Immunopharmacology Dec 2021Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver neoplasm with high morbidity and mortality. Tumor immunotherapy might be promising adjuvant therapy for HCC after...
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver neoplasm with high morbidity and mortality. Tumor immunotherapy might be promising adjuvant therapy for HCC after surgery. To better develop HCC immunotherapy, comprehensive understanding of cell-cell interactions between immune effector cells and HCC cells remains crucial.
AIM
To review the existing studies to summarize the cell-cell interactions between major immune effector cells and HCC cells providing new data for HCC immunotherapy.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed database covering all papers published in recent five years up to January 2020. The guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews were firmly followed.
RESULTS
There are 9 studies researching the interactions between CD8 T lymphocytes and HCC cells and 22 studies researching that between natural killer (NK) cells and HCC cells. Among the 9 studies, 6 studies reported that CD8 T lymphocytes showed cytotoxicity towards HCC cells while 3 studies found CD8 T lymphocytes were impaired by HCC cells. Among the 22 studies, 20 studies presented that NK cells could inhibit HCC cells. Two studies were found to report NK cell dysfunction in HCC.
CONCLUSION
Based on the systematic analysis, we concluded that CD8 T lymphocytes and NK cells can inhibit HCC cells. While in turn, HCC cells can also result in the dysfunction of those effector cells through various mechanisms. Organoids and direct contact cell co-culture with primary HCC cells and TILs should be the most innovative way to investigate the interactions and develop novel immunotherapy.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Communication; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Coculture Techniques; Hepatectomy; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Killer Cells, Natural; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Primary Cell Culture; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 34673334
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108220 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Dec 2021Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel adoptive immunotherapy that is revolutionising the treatment of haematological malignancies and solid tumours....
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel adoptive immunotherapy that is revolutionising the treatment of haematological malignancies and solid tumours. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status and implementing nutrition support interventions have been shown to improve certain patient outcomes in standard anti-cancer therapies; however, guidance for nutrition support interventions in CAR T cell therapy are lacking. The primary aim of this review was to determine the impact of nutrition support interventions on patient-centred outcomes for adult CAR T cell therapy haematology and oncology patients. The patient-centred outcomes of interest included nutritional status and dietary intake, morbidity, functional status, and mortality. Our secondary aim was to describe the nutrition implications that have been acknowledged (but not fully evaluated) in CAR T cell therapy, and to guide future research and practice.
METHODS
Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and CINAHL) were searched to January 2021, with additional records identified through handsearching and snowballing. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were randomised control trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs, cohort and observational studies, assessing nutrition support interventions (oral, enteral and/or parenteral) in adult haematology and oncology patients receiving CAR T cell therapy or adoptive immunotherapy. No publication status, year or language restrictions were applied.
RESULTS
Two authors reviewed the title and abstracts of 1181 retrieved records; however no studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review.
CONCLUSIONS
We are currently unable to identify if there is an association between nutrition support interventions and outcomes in CAR T cell therapy for adults with haematological malignancies or solid tumours. Lower quality clinical studies and animal models were identified that permitted us to qualitatively describe the risks for poor nutritional status in this population. This empty review confirms the need for research into the potential impact of nutrition support in CAR T cell therapy, including well-designed RCTs.
Topics: Hematology; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Nutritional Support; Parenteral Nutrition; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34857249
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.10.015 -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer Dec 2022The potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells to successfully treat hematological cancers is widely recognized. Multiple CAR-T cell therapies are currently... (Review)
Review
The potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells to successfully treat hematological cancers is widely recognized. Multiple CAR-T cell therapies are currently under clinical development, with most in early stage, during which dose selection is a key goal. The objective of this review is to address the question of dose-dependent effects on response and/or toxicity from available CAR-T cell clinical trial data. For that purpose, systematic literature review of studies published between January 2010 and May 2022 was performed on PubMed and Embase to search clinical studies that evaluated CAR-T cells for hematological cancers. Studies published in English were considered. Studies in children (age <18 years), solid tumors, bispecific CAR-T cells and CAR-T cell cocktails were excluded. As a result, a total of 74 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-nine studies tested multiple dose levels of CAR-T cells with at least >1 patient at each dose level. Thirteen studies observed dose-related increase in disease response and 23 studies observed dose-related increase in toxicity across a median of three dose levels. Optimal clinical efficacy was seen at doses 50-100 million cells for anti-CD19 CAR-T cells and >100 million cells for anti-BCMA CAR-T cells in majority of studies. The findings suggest, for a given construct, there exists a dose at which a threshold of optimal efficacy occurs. Dose escalation may reveal increasing objective response rates (ORRs) until that threshold is reached. However, when ORR starts to plateau despite increasing dose, further dose escalation is unlikely to result in improved ORR but is likely to result in higher incidence and/or severity of mechanistically related adverse events.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adolescent; T-Lymphocytes; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Hematologic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36549782
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005678 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients...
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety.
METHOD
Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used.
RESULTS
Ten studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy.
CONCLUSION
Secondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological Products; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 34290712
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.693200 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Aug 2020The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the rapid identification of non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells. Neoantigens are mutated...
BACKGROUND
The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the rapid identification of non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells. Neoantigens are mutated peptides derived from somatic mutations not present in normal tissues that may result in the presentation of tumour-specific peptides capable of eliciting antitumour T-cell responses. Personalised neoantigen-based cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies have been shown to prime host immunity against tumour cells and are under clinical trial development. However, the optimisation and standardisation of neoantigen identification, as well as its delivery as immunotherapy are needed to increase tumour-specific T-cell responses and, thus, the clinical efficacy of current cancer immunotherapies.
METHODS
In this recommendation article, launched by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), we outline and discuss the available framework for neoantigen prediction and present a systematic review of the current scientific evidence.
RESULTS
A number of computational pipelines for neoantigen prediction are available. Most of them provide peptide major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity predictions, but more recent approaches incorporate additional features like variant allele fraction, gene expression, and clonality of mutations. Neoantigens can be predicted in all cancer types with high and low tumour mutation burden, in part by exploiting tumour-specific aberrations derived from mutational frameshifts, splice variants, gene fusions, endogenous retroelements and other tumour-specific processes that could yield more potently immunogenic tumour neoantigens. Ongoing clinical trials will highlight those cancer types and combinations of immune therapies that would derive the most benefit from neoantigen-based immunotherapies.
CONCLUSIONS
Improved identification, selection and prioritisation of tumour-specific neoantigens are needed to increase the scope of benefit from cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies. Novel pipelines are being developed to resolve the challenges posed by high-throughput sequencing and to predict immunogenic neoantigens.
Topics: Humans; Antigens, Neoplasm; Cancer Vaccines; Immunotherapy; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; Precision Medicine; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 32610166
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.008 -
Virology Journal May 2024Multiple studies have provided evidence of suboptimal or poor immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Immunologic responses to the third and fourth doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in cell therapy recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Multiple studies have provided evidence of suboptimal or poor immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy compared to healthy individuals. Given the dynamic nature of SARS-CoV2, characterized by the emergence of many viral variations throughout the general population, there is ongoing discussion regarding the optimal quantity and frequency of additional doses required to sustain protection against SARS-CoV2 especially in this susceptible population. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the immune responses of HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients to additional doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the study involved a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Cochrane Biorxiv and medRxiv, focusing on the serological responses to the third and fourth vaccine doses in HSCT and CAR-T cell patients.
RESULTS
This study included 32 papers, with 31 qualifying for the meta-analysis. Results showed that after the third dose, the seroconversion rate in HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients who didn't respond to the second dose was 46.10 and 17.26%, respectively. Following the fourth dose, HSCT patients had a seroconversion rate of 27.23%. Moreover, post-third-dose seropositivity rates were 87.14% for HSCT and 32.96% for CAR-T cell therapy recipients. Additionally, the seropositive response to the fourth dose in the HSCT group was 90.04%.
CONCLUSION
While a significant portion of HSCT recipients developed antibodies after additional vaccinations, only a minority of CAR-T cell therapy patients showed a similar response. This suggests that alternative vaccination strategies are needed to protect these vulnerable groups effectively. Moreover, few studies have reported cellular responses to additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in these patients. Further studies evaluating cellular responses are required to determine a more precise assessment of immunogenicity strength against SARS-CoV-2 after additional doses.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Antibodies, Viral; Vaccination; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 38702752
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02375-1