-
Dermatology and Therapy Jun 2020Cyclosporine is commonly used in treatment for alopecia areata. It can be administered as a monotherapy or in combination with systemic corticosteroids, with various... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Cyclosporine is commonly used in treatment for alopecia areata. It can be administered as a monotherapy or in combination with systemic corticosteroids, with various outcomes.
METHODS
Efficacy of cyclosporine with and without systemic corticosteroids for alopecia areata was evaluated by a systematic review. Cochrane, EBSCOhost, Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. Only studies published before January 2020 were included.
RESULTS
A total of 2104 studies were initially examined, of which 14 were eligible for the systematic review. Among 340 reported cases, 213 had focal, multifocal or ophiasis form of alopecia areata, 60 were diagnosed with alopecia totalis and 67 with alopecia universalis. The mean response rate in the whole group of patients at the end of treatment was 65.00% (221/340; range 25-100%). Hair regrowth rate was higher in the group with cases of alopecia areata limited to scalp (124/165; mean 75.15%; range 40-100%) than in the cases with alopecia totalis (30/46; mean 65.22%; range 25-100%) or alopecia universalis (24/52; mean 46.15%; range 25-100%). The combined therapy with systemic corticosteroids was superior to the monotherapy (152/219; mean 69.41%; 0-80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67-100%) and had a lower recurrence rate (39/108; mean 36.11% vs. 34/46; mean 73.91%, respectively). The combined treatment with methylprednisolone was significantly more effective when compared to the cyclosporine monotherapy (124/183; mean 67.76%; range 0-80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67-100%). The mean time of treatment was 6.75 months (range 2-36).
LIMITATIONS
Limitations of our study were the retrospective character of included studies, differences in doses of prescribed drugs, and duration of the treatment and follow-up times.
CONCLUSION
Cyclosporine in combination with oral systemic corticosteroids is more effective than in monotherapy for severe alopecia areata.
PubMed: 32270396
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00370-2 -
The British Journal of Dermatology Feb 2024Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to a high psychiatric, economic, and systemic disease burden. A comprehensive understanding of AA...
BACKGROUND
Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to a high psychiatric, economic, and systemic disease burden. A comprehensive understanding of AA epidemiology is essential for evaluating healthcare source utilization; however, there is a lack of systematic approach for summarizing epidemiologic data on AA.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically investigate the global, regional, and national incidence and prevalence of AA.
METHODS
A structured search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO, and Korean journal databases from their inception date to October 4, 2023. Studies that reported the prevalence or incidence of AA were included. We used a Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model to analyse the prevalence estimates. The primary outcomes of our study were the global, regional, and national prevalence of physician-diagnosed AA for overall population, adults, and children. The incidence data were summarised descriptively.
RESULTS
In total, 88 studies from 28 countries were included in the analysis. The reported incidence of alopecia areata tended to be higher in adults aged 19-50 years, and this trend was consistent with its estimated prevalence. The reported prevalence in overall population tended to be higher in men compared to in women. The estimated lifetime prevalence of AA was 0.10% (95% credible intervals, 0.03%-0.39%) in the general population worldwide, 0.12% (95% credible intervals, 0.02%-0.52%) in adults, and 0.03% (95% credible intervals, 0.01%-0.12%) in children. The estimated prevalence was highest in the Asian region and lowest in the African region.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, 48% of the total Global Burden of Disease regions had insufficient data reporting the prevalence or incidence of AA. Further studies are needed to provide epidemiological information on middle- and low-income countries. Our study can serve as a crucial reference in terms of healthcare policy decisions.
PubMed: 38332643
DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljae058 -
Dermatitis : Contact, Atopic,... 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between atopic Dermatitis® (AD) and alopecia areata (AA). A comprehensive search was conducted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between atopic Dermatitis® (AD) and alopecia areata (AA). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from the inception of each database to November 10, 2022 for relevant studies. As there is a potential bilateral association between the 2 diseases, we assessed the prevalence/incidence of AA in patients with AD and the prevalence/incidence of AD in patients with AA. A total of 29 studies involving 11,233,448 participants were included in this analysis. AA was the exposure factor in 23 studies, AD in 7 studies, and both in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of AD was 11.2% (7.7%-15.1%) in patients with AA, and the prevalence of AA was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0%-11.5%) in patients with AD. The incidence of AD in AA patients was found to vary with age ( = 0.07). Based on 7 studies, there was a significant association between AD and AA when AA was the exposure factor [odds ratio, OR, = 4.537 (95% CI: 2.409-8.544)]; based on 10 studies, there was also a significant association between AD and AA when AD was the exposure factor [OR = 2.643 (95% CI: 1.737-3.995)]. In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrated the 2-way association between AD and AA, providing a clinical reference for disease prevention and control.
Topics: Alopecia Areata; Humans; Dermatitis, Atopic; Prevalence; Incidence
PubMed: 37471232
DOI: 10.1089/derm.2023.0114 -
Dermatology and Therapy Oct 2020To investigate the associations of alopecia areata (AA) with serum vitamin D and calcium levels. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
To investigate the associations of alopecia areata (AA) with serum vitamin D and calcium levels.
METHODS
A systematic review of all relevant articles published up to February 2020 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Primary endpoints were serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and vitamin D deficiency, and the secondary endpoint was serum calcium level. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI across studies were analyzed.
RESULTS
Data on 1585 patients with AA and 1114 controls from 16 case-control studies and three cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis. A pooled meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model because of inter-study heterogeneity (vitamin D level, I = 87.90%; vitamin D deficiency, I = 81.10%; serum calcium level, I = 83.80%). A combined analysis revealed that patients with AA had significantly lower mean serum 25(OH)D level compared with control (WMD - 9.08, 95% CI - 11.65, - 6.50, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have vitamin D deficiency (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.34, 7.35, p < 0.001). However, the pooled analysis revealed that patients with AA did not have significantly lower serum calcium levels compared with control (WMD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.40, 0.06, p = 0.143). Subgroup analysis suggested that matched control, mean age, and country might contribute to the heterogeneity of serum vitamin D level, while study design, matched control, and country might contribute to the heterogeneity of vitamin D deficiency.
CONCLUSION
Deficiency of serum 25(OH)D level, rather than calcium level, was present in patients with AA. Screening for vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with AA.
PubMed: 32772238
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00433-4 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Sep 2019Alopecia areata (AA) is a complex immune and polygenic inflammatory disease that causes hair loss on some or all areas of the body; extent, severity and progression vary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Alopecia areata (AA) is a complex immune and polygenic inflammatory disease that causes hair loss on some or all areas of the body; extent, severity and progression vary widely among individuals. Alopecia areata, considered one of the most frequently occurring immune diseases, affects 0.2% of the world population at any given time. Uncertainty prevails about the most appropriate intervention for AA. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of over 80 interventions for AA, including minoxidil - one of the most promising interventions for patchy AA in children and adults of both sexes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An extensive search was conducted of international medical literature involving randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of AA interventions. RCTs were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively according to the previously published protocol and for seven specific outcomes.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis involving 5% minoxidil vs. placebo presented a significant difference in favor of 5% minoxidil with the moderate quality of evidence in children and adults with patchy AA (RR 8.37 [3.16-22.14], 95% CI). No severe adverse event was reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment of patchy AA with 5% minoxidil proved effective, and clinically and statistically safe in studies with limited sample size; quality of evidence was moderate. Further studies with sound methodological quality, more participants and outcome observations lasting longer than 6 months are needed to address remaining uncertainties.
Topics: Alopecia Areata; Humans; Minoxidil; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 30835901
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15545 -
Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical... Sep 2021Atopic dermatitis is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease and presents a major public health burden worldwide. Recent observational studies revealed the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease and presents a major public health burden worldwide. Recent observational studies revealed the potential association between atopic dermatitis with autoimmune disorders. However, there is no meta-analysis of the prevalence or incidence of autoimmune diseases in atopic dermatitis. Therefore, considering the potential clinical implications of these associations, we aimed to assess the risk of autoimmune diseases in patients with atopic dermatitis using this method.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October, 2020. Observational studies which provided estimate effects with 95% CI or raw data were included. The quality of selected studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratio and relative risks were pooled using a random effects model and expressed with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Fourteen observational studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effects meta-analysis of case-control and cross-sectional studies showed a significant association of atopic dermatitis with mutiple autoimmune diseases, including alopecia areata, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systematic lupus erythematosus, ulcerative colitis and vitiligo. Furthermore, pooling of the results of cohort studies showed that patients with atopic dermatitis were more likely to develop these autoimmune diseases.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis showed that patients with atopic dermatitis were at higher risk of multiple autoimmune diseases including alopecia areata, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systematic lupus erythematosus, ulcerative colitis and vitiligo. It is important for early detection of the affected group so that timely management can be initiated. Dermatologists and allergists should be aware of the autoimmune diseases in patients with atopic dermatitis and develop interventions if necessary. Also, limited by the present research, we still require more large-scale studies to further establish the association between atopic dermatitis and autoimmune diseases.
PubMed: 34563251
DOI: 10.1186/s13223-021-00597-4 -
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Apr 2024Non-scarring alopecia mainly includes androgenetic alopecia (AGA), female pattern hair loss (FPHL), alopecia areata (AA), telogen effluvium (TE), anagen effluvium (AE)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Non-scarring alopecia mainly includes androgenetic alopecia (AGA), female pattern hair loss (FPHL), alopecia areata (AA), telogen effluvium (TE), anagen effluvium (AE) and so on. Many studies had investigated the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and vitamin D deficiency of patients with these diseases, but opinions varied, and no conclusion was reached.
METHODS
Relevant articles were retrieved through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and other databases. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] levels and vitamin D deficiency were used as our primary outcome. The odds ratio (OR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval were both examined for vitamin D deficiency and levels.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis had included a total of 3374 non-scarring alopecia patients and 7296 healthy controls from 23 studies through the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. We found non-scarring alopecia had decreased serum 25(OH)D level (WMD -7.29; 95% CI -9.21, -5.38) and increased vitamin D deficiency incidence (OR 3.11 95% CI 2.29, 4.22), compared with healthy controls. This meta-analysis chose to conduct random-effect model and subgroup analysis, because of the high heterogeneity (serum 25(OH)D level: I 95%, vitamin D deficiency: I = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Patients with non-scarring alopecia (including AA, FPHL, AGA and TE) have insufficient serum level of 25(OH)D and increased incidence of vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D supplementation and monitoring for vitamin D deficiency may be helpful in treating non-scarring alopecia.
Topics: Humans; Female; Alopecia; Vitamin D; Alopecia Areata; Vitamin D Deficiency; Calcifediol
PubMed: 38010941
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16093 -
Lasers in Medical Science Feb 2023We aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of using laser and light combined with topical minoxidil for alopecia areata. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of using laser and light combined with topical minoxidil for alopecia areata. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP database, and Wanfang Data from their inception to September 18, 2022. The risk of bias of the included RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software were used to perform the statistical analysis. The GRADE system assessed the quality of evidence. Ten studies were enrolled finally. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with topical minoxidil alone, the 308-nm excimer laser/light or He-Ne laser combined with topical minoxidil could reduce the SALT (Severity of Alopecia Tool) score (MD= -5.88, 95% CI [-9.79, -1.98], P=0.003). Whether fractional CO laser (RR=1.29, 95% CI [1.14, 1.46], P<0.0001), 308-nm excimer laser/light (RR=1.32, 95% CI [1.12, 1.55], P=0.001), He-Ne laser (RR=1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], P=0.03), or NB-UVB (RR=1.35, 95% CI [1.07,1.70], P=0.01) combined with topical minoxidil may improve the treatment response rate, comparing with topical minoxidil only. The recurrence rate of laser and light combined with topical minoxidil was lower than that of the minoxidil alone group (RR=0.54, 95% CI [0.31, 0.93], P=0.03) when follow-up time was 1 year. In addition, the incidence of adverse events including irritant contact dermatitis, erythema, desquamation, pain, and pruritus was no significant difference between the two groups (RR=1.50, 95% CI [0.95, 2.36], P=0.08). The level of evidence for outcomes was classified as very low to moderate. Based on the available evidence, laser and light combined with topical minoxidil therapy may be effective and safe for alopecia areata. However, more high-quality trials are required for comprehensive analysis and further verification.
Topics: Humans; Minoxidil; Alopecia Areata; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Phototherapy; Lasers
PubMed: 36800063
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03734-0 -
International Journal of Dermatology Apr 2020Several studies have investigated the oxidative stress parameters in alopecia areata (AA) patients with variable results. This study aims to analyze the association... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several studies have investigated the oxidative stress parameters in alopecia areata (AA) patients with variable results. This study aims to analyze the association between oxidative stress and AA based on current literature.
METHODS
A systematic review of the existing literature was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases by two authors independently. Mean and standard deviation values of oxidative stress parameters of AA patients and healthy controls were extracted for quantitative analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. Patients with AA had impaired oxidative balance with elevated levels of serum malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, and total oxidant capacity and lower levels of serum superoxide dismutase, paraoxonase, glutathione peroxidase, and total antioxidant capacity. Levels of oxidative parameters were significantly higher in severe AA compared to mild/moderate AA. Heterogeneity in the baseline characteristics of the included studies and limited available data for most parameters were the limitations of this study.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence suggests that AA is associated with oxidative stress. More studies are needed to strengthen this association. Moreover, studies evaluating the role of antioxidant use in AA may be rewarding.
Topics: Alopecia Areata; Antioxidants; Aryldialkylphosphatase; Glutathione Peroxidase; Humans; Malondialdehyde; Nitric Oxide; Oxidative Stress; Superoxide Dismutase
PubMed: 31875951
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14753 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the relative efficacy and safety of the latest JAK inhibitors for moderate-to-severe alopecia areata...
We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the relative efficacy and safety of the latest JAK inhibitors for moderate-to-severe alopecia areata (AA). 13 trials totaling 3,613 patients were included. Two low-dose groups of oral formulations (ritlecitinib 10mg and ivarmacitinib 2mg) and two topical formulations (delgocitinib ointment and ruxolitinib cream) appeared to be relatively ineffective against moderate-to-severe AA. Ranking analysis suggested that brepocitinib 30mg has the best relative effect in reducing the SALT score (sucra = 0.9831), and demonstrated comparable efficacy to deuruxolitinib 12mg (sucra = 0.9245), followed by deuruxolitinib 8mg (sucra = 0.7736). Regarding the SALT response, brepocitinib 30mg ranked highest (sucra = 0.9567), followed by ritlecitinib 50mg (sucra = 0.8689) and deuruxolitinib 12mg (sucra = 0.7690). For achieving the SALT response, deuruxolitinib 12mg had the highest probability (sucra = 0.9761), followed by deuruxolitinib 8mg (sucra = 0.8678) and brepocitinib 30mg (sucra = 0.8448). Deuruxolitinib 12mg might be the most effective therapy for patients with severe AA (sucra = 0.9395), followed by ritlecitinib 50mg (sucra = 0.8753) and deuruxolitinib 8mg (sucra = 0.8070). Deuruxolitinib 12mg/8mg demonstrated notable efficacy for moderate-to-severe AA, and is expected to be a new treatment option for AA. It was worth noting that deuruxolitinib exhibit a greater likelihood of causing adverse events in comparison to other JAK inhibitors. Ritlecitinib 50mg seemed to exhibit fewer adverse effects in the high-dose groups of oral JAK inhibitors and might be an optimal choice to balance safety and efficacy. The majority of JAK inhibitors exhibited acceptable short-term safety profiles. To enhance the applicability and accuracy of our research, further head-to-head trials with longer follow-up periods are needed. identifier [CRD42022368012].
PubMed: 38659584
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1372810