-
Pediatric Dentistry Nov 2023to update the 2016 systematic review evidence for vital pulp therapy (VPT) for primary teeth affected by caries or trauma. The population, intervention, comparison,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
to update the 2016 systematic review evidence for vital pulp therapy (VPT) for primary teeth affected by caries or trauma. The population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study (PICOS) design inclusion/exclusion was used for multiple databases. Risk of bias, meta-analyses using RevMan, and certainty of evidence was created. A total of 299 studies were included; no trauma was found. Indirect pulp treatment (IPT) resulted in 97 percent success. Two calcium silicate cement (CSC) pulpotomies' success using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine were 94 percent and 90 percent, respectively, greater than for direct pulp capping (DPC; 86 percent) and other pulpotomies (moderate certainty). The success of IPT versus pulpotomy at 24 months showed no significant difference (P=0.31). Different liners or capping agents did not affect the success of IPT (P=0.79) or DPC at 24 months (P=0.24). The two CSC pulpotomies were not significantly different based on 24-month success (P=0.34). The formocresol pulpotomy success at 24 months was significantly lower than for MTA (P=0.02). Ferric sulfate had a significant lower success at 24 months than MTA pulpotomy (69 percent versus 92 percent; P=0.03). Zinc oxide eugenol, as a singular pulpotomy, had low success (65 percent). Selective/stepwise caries removal did significantly better at avoiding pulp exposures than complete excavation (P<0.001). Complete, selective, and no caries removal (Hall technique [HT], steel crown placement with no caries removal) had no significant difference in pulp vitality success for deep caries at 24 months (P=0.29). For deep caries affecting vital incisors, pulpotomy had significantly greater success than pulpectomy (P=0.002). The following had no significant effect on MTA pulpotomy success: coronal pulp removal methods; irrigation solution; method to control hemorrhage; base over MTA; treatment in one or two visits; and anterior or posterior teeth. Vital pulp therapy success of indirect pulp treatment or two calcium silicate cement pulpotomies demonstrated improved success over direct pulp capping and other pulpotomies based on 24-month evidence with moderate certainty. The Hall technique did not significantly reduce pulp vitality success versus caries removal.
Topics: Humans; Calcium Compounds; Silicates; Dental Care; Dental Cements; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement; Dental Pulp Capping; Pulpotomy; Glass Ionomer Cements; Tooth, Deciduous; Oxides; Drug Combinations; Treatment Outcome; Aluminum Compounds
PubMed: 38129755
DOI: No ID Found -
Operative Dentistry Jan 2021The literature reviewed suggests that airborne particle abrasion has no negative effects on the bond strength of resin-based materials to dentin and that a positive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The literature reviewed suggests that airborne particle abrasion has no negative effects on the bond strength of resin-based materials to dentin and that a positive influence on dentin bond strength was only achieved in specific air-abrasion conditions.
SUMMARY
In this systematic review the authors investigated how airborne-particle abrasion (APA) using aluminum oxide affects the bond strength of resin-based materials to dentin. The search was performed in three databases. In vitro studies (Type of study) comparing the bond strength of resin-based materials (Outcome) to air-abraded (Intervention) compared with non-air-abraded (Comparison) human dentin (Population) were included (the PICOT elements are given parenthetically). From 5437 unique articles, 65 were read in full, 33 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 32 were included in the meta-analysis. Methodologic quality and risk of bias were assessed. Comparisons were performed between air-abraded and control dentin groups by adopting a random-effects model (α=0.05). Additional analyses were carried out for the different parameters used in APA: type of surface treatment in the control group, particle size, air pressure, and APA duration. The bond strength to air-abraded dentin was favored only when the control surface was treated with a hand excavator. For particle size, APA was favored when the particle size was >30 μm and the controls were no treatment or hand excavator or when the particle size was ≤30 μm and the control was bur. In addition, the results favored air-abraded groups only when the pressure was > 5 bar and bur was used in the control group. No significant differences were observed for duration of APA. No comparison on bond strength considering the presence of aging conditions was possible in the included studies due to the low number of studies that aged the specimens. In conclusion, APA had no negative effects on the bond strength of resin-based materials to dentin and was able to improve the dentin bond strength only when the particle size was > 30 μm and air pressure was > 5 bar. PROSPERO registration protocol: CRD42018096128.
Topics: Aged; Aluminum Oxide; Composite Resins; Dental Bonding; Dentin; Humans; Materials Testing; Resin Cements; Shear Strength; Surface Properties
PubMed: 32926155
DOI: 10.2341/19-216-L -
Clinical Oral Investigations Sep 2023The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the comparative clinical success and survival of intracoronal indirect restorations using gold, lithium... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the comparative clinical success and survival of intracoronal indirect restorations using gold, lithium disilicate, leucite, and indirect composite materials.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. The protocol for this study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021233185). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases and sources, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and gray literature. A total of 7826 articles were screened on title and abstract. Articles were not excluded based on the vitality of teeth, the language of the study, or the observation period. The risk difference was utilized for the analyses, and a random-effects model was applied. All analyses were conducted with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The calculated risk differences were derived from the combined data on restoration survival and failures obtained from each individual article. The presence of heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic, and if present, the heterogeneity of the data in the articles was evaluated using the non-parametric chi-squared statistic (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
A total of 12 eligible studies were selected, which included 946 restorations evaluated over a minimum observation period of 1 year and a maximum observation period of 7 years. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that intracoronal indirect resin composite restorations have an 18% higher rate of failure when compared to intracoronal gold restorations over 5-7 years of clinical service (risk difference = - 0.18 [95% CI: - 0.27, - 0.09]; p = .0002; I = 0%). The meta-analysis examining the disparity in survival rates between intracoronal gold and leucite restorations could not be carried out due to methodological differences in the studies.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the currently available evidence, medium-quality data indicates that lithium disilicate and indirect composite materials demonstrate comparable survival rates in short-term follow-up. Furthermore, intracoronal gold restorations showed significantly higher survival rates, making them a preferred option over intracoronal indirect resin-composite restorations. Besides that, the analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between leucite and indirect composite restorations. The short observation period, limited number of eligible articles, and low sample size of the included studies were significant limitations.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Bearing in mind the limitations of the reviewed literature, this systematic review and meta-analysis help clinicians make evidence-based decisions on how to restore biomechanically compromised posterior teeth.
Topics: Dental Porcelain; Aluminum Silicates; Composite Resins; Gold
PubMed: 37597003
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05050-x -
The Japanese Dental Science Review Dec 2023The use of graphecs excellent mechanical properties. However, it is necessary to evaluate the biological effects of this material. This systematic review aimed to... (Review)
Review
The use of graphecs excellent mechanical properties. However, it is necessary to evaluate the biological effects of this material. This systematic review aimed to observe and understand through studies the current state of the art regarding osseointegration, antimicrobial capacity, and the cytotoxicity of graphene coating applied to the surface of dental implant materials. Searches in PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were conducted between June and July 2021 and updated in May 2022 using the keywords: graphene, graphene oxide, dental implants, zirconium, titanium, peek, aluminum, disilicate, methyl-methacrylate, cytotoxicity, osseointegration, and bone regeneration. The criteria included in vivo and in vitro studies that evaluated antimicrobial capacity and/or osseointegration and/or cytotoxicity of dental implant materials coated with graphene compounds. The risk of bias for in vitro studies was assessed by the JBI tool, and for in vivo studies, Syrcle's risk of bias tool for animal studies was used. The database search resulted in 176 articles. Of the 18 articles selected for full reading, 16 remained in this systematic review. The use of graphene compounds as coatings on the surface of implant materials is promising because it promotes osseointegration and has antimicrobial capacity. However, further studies are needed to ensure its cytotoxic potential.
PubMed: 37680613
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.08.005 -
Clinical Oral Implants Research Sep 2023In patients with dental implants, what is the effect of transmucosal components made of materials other than titanium (alloys) compared to titanium (alloys) on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
In patients with dental implants, what is the effect of transmucosal components made of materials other than titanium (alloys) compared to titanium (alloys) on the surrounding peri-implant tissues after at least 1 year?
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review included eligible randomized controlled trials identified through an electronic search (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) comparing alternative abutment materials versus titanium (alloy) abutments with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and including at least 10 patients/group. Primary outcomes were peri-implant marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD), these were evaluated based on meta-analyses. Abutment survival, biological and technical complications and aesthetic outcomes were the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2-tool. This review is registered in PROSPERO with the number (CRD42022376487).
RESULTS
From 5129 titles, 580 abstracts were selected, and 111 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 12 articles could be included. Concerning the primary outcomes (MBL and PD), no differences could be seen between titanium abutment and zirconia or alumina abutments, not after 1 year (MBL: zirconia: MD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.65 to 0.16, alumina: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.17) (PD: zirconia: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.30, alumina: MD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.38), nor after 5 years. Additionally, no differences were found concerning the biological complications and aesthetic outcomes. The most important technical finding was abutment fracture in the ceramic group and chipping of the veneering material.
CONCLUSIONS
Biologically, titanium and zirconia abutments seem to function equally up to 5 years after placement.
Topics: Humans; Titanium; Dental Implants; Alloys; Aluminum Oxide
PubMed: 37750527
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14159 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Aug 2022Which surface treatment provides the optimal bond strength (BS) for the repair of resin nanoceramics (RNCs) and polymer-infiltrated ceramics (PICs) is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Which surface treatment provides the optimal bond strength (BS) for the repair of resin nanoceramics (RNCs) and polymer-infiltrated ceramics (PICs) is unclear.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies was to determine the best surface treatment protocols for the repair of PICs and RNCs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched to select in vitro studies in English up to March 2020. Studies with fewer than 5 specimens, those that did not evaluate the BS of PICs or RNCs, and those with aging for fewer than 30 days and 5000 cycles were excluded. Data sets were extracted, and the mean differences were analyzed by using a systematic review software program.
RESULTS
Among 284 potentially eligible studies, 21 were selected for full-text analysis, and 9 were included in the systematic review, of which 6 were used in the meta-analysis. The meta-analyses were performed for each treatment surface versus their respective control group and their combinations according to material: RNCs and PICs. For RNCs, airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (AlO) treatment was statistically higher than tribochemical silica airborne-particle abrasion (CoJet) (P=.02, I=90%) and that in the hydrofluoric acid (HF) (P<.001, I=0%) groups and was statistically similar to diamond rotary instrument grinding (P=.40, I=54%). For PICs, the treatment with hydrofluoric acid (HF) was statistically significantly higher than with CoJet (P=.03, I=62%) and airborne-particle abrasion with AlO (P<.001, I=98%).
CONCLUSIONS
The best surface treatment protocol for repair varied according to the restorative material. HF followed by silanization is suggested for PICs, and airborne-particle abrasion with AlO or preparation with a diamond rotary instrument for RNCs.
Topics: Aluminum Oxide; Ceramics; Dental Bonding; Diamond; Hydrofluoric Acid; Materials Testing; Polymers; Resin Cements; Silanes; Surface Properties; Zirconium
PubMed: 33573835
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.009 -
Journal of Prosthodontic Research Apr 2022This systematic review set out to investigate the influence of chemical composition and specimen thickness of monolithic zirconia on its optical and mechanical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This systematic review set out to investigate the influence of chemical composition and specimen thickness of monolithic zirconia on its optical and mechanical properties. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analyzed the effects of variations in percentages of yttrium, aluminum, and specimen thickness of monolithic zirconia.
STUDY SELECTION
The review followed recommendations put forward in the PRISMA checklist. An electronic search for relevant articles published up to October 2019 was conducted in the Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, Scielo, and Web of Science databases, with no language limits and articles published in the last 10 years. From 167 relevant articles; applying inclusion criteria based on the review's PICO question, 26 articles were selected for qualitative synthesis (systematic review) and 24 for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). Experimental in vitro studies published were selected and their quality was assessed using the modified Consort scale for in vitro studies of dental materials.
RESULTS
The variables yttrium, aluminum and thickness were analyzed in random effects models, observing high heterogeneity (>75%), and finding statistically significant influences on the properties of monolithic zirconia (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Within the review's limitations, it may be concluded that variations in the percentage of yttrium and aluminum influence the optical and mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia, making it more or less esthetic and resistant in relation to each variable. The clinical implications of these findings can help select the most appropriate type of zirconia to meet the different clinical needs when restoring different regions (posterior or anterior).
Topics: Aluminum; Ceramics; Dental Materials; Materials Testing; Surface Properties; Yttrium; Zirconium
PubMed: 34176849
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00218 -
The Japanese Dental Science Review Nov 2021This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of acrylic denture repairs. The review was designed following PRISMA (Preferred... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of acrylic denture repairs. The review was designed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Database search was conducted involving articles published from 2000 to 2020 using the following keywords: PMMA/nanoparticles, denture repair/nanoparticles, and repair strength/nanoparticles. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EBSCOhost were used to find only those studies used repair resin reinforced with nanoparticles for denture repairs. Due to variations between nanoparticles types, sizes, and testing properties, the quantitative statistical meta-analysis couldn't be conducted. Therefore, a descriptive data analysis was applied. Out of 379 articles, 8 articles were included; three nanoparticles, zirconium oxide (nano-ZrO), silicon oxide (nano-SiO), and aluminum oxide (nano-AlO) nanoparticles were used as reinforcements to repair resin. Seven studies investigated the effects of 0.25-7.5 wt.% nano-ZrO on the mechanical properties of repaired denture bases and reported positive effects with high concentrations. Two studies study investigated 0.25-0.75 wt% nano-SiO and found that low % nano-SiO concentrations improved repair strength while, one study showed that 1 and 1.5 wt.% nano-AlO increased the flexural strength. Although nanoparticles offer positive effects on the properties of denture repair, inadequate studies exist. Therefore, further investigations are required. Prosthodontics.
PubMed: 33936326
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.12.004 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Nov 2023The union of the metal removable partial denture framework to the heat polymerized acrylic resin is related to prosthesis longevity. However, methods to enhance this... (Review)
Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The union of the metal removable partial denture framework to the heat polymerized acrylic resin is related to prosthesis longevity. However, methods to enhance this bond are not clear to clinicians and dental laboratory technicians.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify which metal surface treatments best increase the bond strength between heat polymerized acrylic resin and removable partial denture alloys.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022384926). Electronic searches were carried out independently, by 3 examiners in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and in the nonpeer-reviewed literature via ProQuest.
RESULTS
The electronic searches resulted in 4143 articles, with 4055 after removing duplicates. After reading the titles and abstracts, 37 articles were selected for reading in full-text version, from which 6 articles were included. All studies evaluated materials for conventional acrylic resin denture base (heat polymerized), processed by water bath, bonded to metal. For the metal framework alloys, cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloys were used in 2 studies, titanium (Ti) in 2 studies, and Co-Cr and Ti in the other 2 studies. Different metal surface treatments were used as airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (particle sizes of 50 µm, 110 µm, and 250 µm) followed by the primer application and the isolated use of the primer, compared to the absence of isolated intervention or airborne-particle abrasion of the metal surface. Among the different primers used, those based on 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) showed the highest acrylic resin-to-metal bond strength values.
CONCLUSIONS
Airborne-particle abrading the metal with AlO followed by applying a 10-MDP-based primer, increased the bond strength between metal framework alloys and heat polymerized acrylic resin denture base material.
PubMed: 37978008
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.009 -
Journal of Controlled Release :... Jan 2024Zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) is a biomaterial that has been increasingly studied in recent years. It has several applications such as bone regeneration,... (Review)
Review
Zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) is a biomaterial that has been increasingly studied in recent years. It has several applications such as bone regeneration, promotion of angiogenesis, drug loading, and antibacterial activity, and exerts multiple effects to deal with various problems in the process of bone regeneration. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the applications and effectiveness of ZIF-8 in bone regeneration. A search of papers published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases revealed 532 relevant studies. Title, abstract, and full-text screening resulted in 39 papers being included in the review, including 39 in vitro and 22 animal studies. Appropriate concentrations of nano ZIF-8 can promote cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation by releasing Zn and entering the cell, whereas high doses of ZIF-8 are cytotoxic and inhibit osteogenic differentiation. In addition, five studies confirmed that ZIF-8 exhibits good vasogenic activity. In all in vivo experiments, nano ZIF-8 promoted bone formation. These results indicate that, at appropriate concentrations, materials containing ZIF-8 promote bone regeneration more than materials without ZIF-8, and with characteristics such as promoting angiogenesis, drug loading, and antibacterial activity, it is expected to show promising applications in the field of bone regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This manuscript reviewed the use of ZIF-8 in bone regeneration, clarified the biocompatibility and effectiveness in promoting bone regeneration of ZIF-8 materials, and discussed the possible mechanisms and factors affecting its promotion of bone regeneration. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of the latest advances in the field of bone regeneration of ZIF-8, serves as a design guide, and contributes to the design of future experimental studies.
Topics: Animals; Osteogenesis; Zeolites; Bone Regeneration; Biocompatible Materials; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 38042375
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.11.049