-
Head and Neck Pathology Mar 2022The 5 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Head and Neck Tumours (2022) comes out only five years after the previous edition, however it...
The 5 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Head and Neck Tumours (2022) comes out only five years after the previous edition, however it presents important updates that run in parallel with the rapid progression involving the increasingly sophisticated molecular investigation and its interpretation, some of which already have therapy-related impact. This manuscript provides an overview of the leading changes introduced in the classification of Odontogenic and Maxillofacial Bone Tumours that encompasses cysts of the jaws, odontogenic tumours, giant cell lesions and bone cysts, and bone and cartilage tumours. This is the first edition that Essential and Desirable Diagnostic Features were added for each entity, so that the most important clinical, microscopic and/or radiologic features were encapsulated and briefly highlighted. Surgical ciliated cyst was added to the group of odontogenic cysts, adenoid ameloblastoma was a newly recognized benign epithelial odontogenic tumour, and segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia was introduced in the group of fibro-osseous tumours and dysplasia. In addition, rhabdomyosarcoma with TFCP2 rearrangement, was introduced into the group of malignant jawbone tumours. The unique genetic aberrations distinguish it from other types of rhabdomyosarcomas. On the other hand, melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy and osteoid osteoma were deleted from the benign bone and cartilageneous tumours, as was the hematolymphoid tumour of solitary plasmacytoma of bone. We systematically reviewed each entity in this chapter and provided important updated findings for selected topics that can further aid in the diagnostic process for challenging cases, broaden insights on the logic of the present classification, and finally, emphasize the potential that some of the molecular results may have in the near future to set new treatment approaches.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; DNA-Binding Proteins; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Odontogenic Cysts; Odontogenic Tumors; Transcription Factors; World Health Organization
PubMed: 35312978
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-021-01404-7 -
Oral Diseases Oct 2019The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of radical and conservative treatment approaches of solid/multicystic and unicystic ameloblastoma in terms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of radical and conservative treatment approaches of solid/multicystic and unicystic ameloblastoma in terms of recurrence rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA statement. Search was performed using PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for articles published from January 1969 until March 2018. Quality assessment of the selected articles was conducted using the Quality Appraisal of Case Series Studies Checklist. The meta-analysis was performed using the MedCalc program.
RESULTS
The search strategy yielded 6,984 articles; 20 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled recurrence rate of solid/multicystic ameloblastomas following radical treatment was 8%, while conservative treatment caused recurrences in 41%. For unicystic ameloblastomas, these values were 3% and 21%, respectively. The risk of recurrences in both types of ameloblastomas following radical treatment was lower than following conservative treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study showed statistically significant differences in recurrence favoring radical treatment for both unicystic and solid/multicystic ameloblastoma. The solid/multicystic type showed more recurrences than the unicystic type. Unfortunately, since only retrospective studies were available, the evidence is less strong as wished for.
Topics: Ameloblastoma; Checklist; Conservative Treatment; Humans; Jaw Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Netherlands; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30548549
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13014 -
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal Aug 2023Papilliferous keratoameloblastoma (PKA) is a rare entity, and not much is known about its clinicodemographic features or biological nature. This review aimed to provide... (Review)
Review
Papilliferous keratoameloblastoma (PKA) is a rare entity, and not much is known about its clinicodemographic features or biological nature. This review aimed to provide clarity regarding the characterisation of the demographic, clinical, radiological and histopathological features of PKA. Case reports of PKA were identified through a systematic search across multiple databases. The search yielded a total of 10 cases, half of which were of Indian origin. All the cases invariably occurred in the mandibular posterior region and involved the right side; only one case primarily involved the left side of the mandible. PKA should be considered a variant of the conventional ameloblastoma that is towards the more aggressive end of the spectrum. It tends to occur in older individuals (in their fifth decade or older), with a marked propensity to occur in the right mandibular posterior region. Surgical resection with diligent follow-up is warranted in the treatment of PKA.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Ameloblastoma; Mandible; Thorax
PubMed: 37655071
DOI: 10.18295/squmj.5.2023.021 -
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal Aug 2022This article aimed to collectively present the demographic, clinical, radiographic and histopathological features as well as the treatment performed along with its... (Review)
Review
This article aimed to collectively present the demographic, clinical, radiographic and histopathological features as well as the treatment performed along with its outcome for all the cases of adenoid ameloblastoma with dentinoid (AAD) reported in scientific literature till date. Ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumours are the most common odontogenic neoplasms. However, AAD, a hybrid variant of the two lesions, is found to be extremely rare. The lesion comprises of characteristic histopathological features of ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumour and shares certain clinical characteristics with either of the entities. AAD may be considered to be present at the more aggressive end of spectrum of benign odontogenic neoplasms. Owing to the frequent tendency of the lesions to be underdiagnosed, careful histopathological screening of submitted biopsies is warranted. With the increase in number of reported cases in the recent years, it is likely to be included as a separate entity in the upcoming World Health Organization classification.
Topics: Adenoids; Ameloblastoma; Biopsy; Humans; Odontogenic Tumors
PubMed: 36072074
DOI: 10.18295/squmj.9.2021.127 -
Cancers Nov 2022The discovery that ameloblastoma has a high mutation incidence of V600E may enable a better investigation of pathophysiology. However, there is inconsistent evidence... (Review)
Review
The discovery that ameloblastoma has a high mutation incidence of V600E may enable a better investigation of pathophysiology. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding this mutation occurrence and its association with clinical information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool the overall mutation prevalence of V600E in reported ameloblastoma cases and to determine its association with patient demographic and clinicopathological features. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive article search was conducted through four databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science). Seventeen articles between 2014 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria with 833 ameloblastoma cases. For each included study, the significance of V600E on the outcome parameters was determined using odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis prevalence of V600E in ameloblastoma was 70.49%, and a significant meta-analysis association was reported for those younger than 54 years old and in the mandible. On the contrary, other factors, such as sex, histological variants, and recurrence, were insignificant. As a result of the significant outcome of V600E mutation in ameloblastoma pathogenesis, targeted therapy formulation can be developed with this handful of evidence.
PubMed: 36428683
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225593 -
Oral Diseases Oct 2023This systematic review aimed to incorporate published information about synchronous odontogenic tumors (SOTs) with an analysis of the demographic and clinical... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aimed to incorporate published information about synchronous odontogenic tumors (SOTs) with an analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics from the cases published in the literature. Case reports and case series of SOT were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Twenty-eight studies comprising 30 cases of SOTs were included. Considering all cases published, SOTs mostly occurred simultaneously in the maxilla and mandible (n = 19/63.3%). Lesions were bifocal in 13 (43.3% of all the 30 cases) and multifocal in 17 cases (56.7% of all the 30 cases). All SOTs available in the literature presented the same type of lesion, and two of them also involved another different SOT (n = 2/6.7% of all the 30 cases). Out of all published cases, the most frequent SOTs in the literature were odontomas (n = 10/33.3% of all the 30 cases), squamous odontogenic tumors (OTs) (n = 8/26.7% of all the 30 cases), calcifying epithelial OTs (n = 8/26.7% of all the 30 cases), and adenomatoid OTs (n = 2/6.7% of all the 30 cases). Considering all SOTs cases included, the overall recurrence was 13.3%. Inside a subgroup of the lesion, synchronous calcifying epithelial OT presented the highest (25%). Five cases (16.7% of all the 30 cases) had a previously associated syndrome, with two cases of Schimmelpenning syndrome being reported. Among published SOTs, odontomas were the most common. All SOTs available in the scientific literature showed the same type of OT and mainly affected both jaws simultaneously. Only a few of these cases were associated with a syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Odontoma; Odontogenic Tumors; Ameloblastoma; Maxilla; Mandible; Syndrome
PubMed: 36218070
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14401 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Nov 2022Ameloblastoma is regarded as the second most prevalent odontogenic tumor in the light of its prevalence, clinical characteristics, greater incidence of tumor recurrence,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Ameloblastoma is regarded as the second most prevalent odontogenic tumor in the light of its prevalence, clinical characteristics, greater incidence of tumor recurrence, and therapeutic challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the prevalence of ameloblastoma in the Indian subcontinent and to establish a national epidemiologic profile for these lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review was undertaken based on the PRISMA guidelines in search of epidemiologic studies concerning odontogenic tumors and ameloblastoma that are listed by PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar embracing the period from January 2010 to December 2021, to evaluate the prevalence rate in India. A total of 277 publications were retrieved, of which 27 articles were selected, based on the World Health Organization classification of odontogenic tumors.
RESULTS
The affected individuals were on average in the third decade of life, with a higher male predominance. The majority of the tumors were multilocular radiolucencies in the posterior mandible, with follicular and plexiform histopathological features. The most common type of malignant lesion is ameloblastic carcinoma. Over 60% of follicular ameloblastoma recurred more frequently than the other types of ameloblastoma.The random effect model shows overall point estimate of 4.83 with 95% confidence interval (4.44 -5.26).
CONCLUSION
The systematic study indicates a slight male predisposition to ameloblastoma, with a peak incidence in the third decade of life and the mandible as the preferred anatomical site. The solid/multicystic ameloblastoma is the most prevalent histopathologic pattern. More epidemiological research on the prevalence rate of ameloblastoma is required, particularly in India, in an effort to accurately determine the national epidemiological profile of ameloblastoma.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Ameloblastoma; Prevalence; India; Odontogenic Tumors; Genotype
PubMed: 36444570
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3601 -
Oral Diseases Jan 2020To evaluate the global incidence of ameloblastoma and to provide a profile of ameloblastoma patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the global incidence of ameloblastoma and to provide a profile of ameloblastoma patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for articles published from 1969 to 2018 for the global incidence and from 1995 to 2018 for the profile of ameloblastoma patients.
RESULTS
Seven studies on the incidence rate of ameloblastoma were included in the meta-analysis. These studies only covered Europe, Africa, and Australia. The pooled incidence rate was 0.92 per million person-years (95% CI: 0.57-1.49), with significant heterogeneity between studies. Forty-two articles provided profile data of 6,446 ameloblastoma patients. Mean age was 34 years and the peak age incidence in the third decade of life. In Europe and North America, ameloblastoma mostly occurred at an older age when compared to Africa and South America. A slight male preference (53%) was found, and the mandible appeared to be the preferred site. The most common type of ameloblastoma was multicystic. The histopathologic patterns were mostly follicular and plexiform.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study assessing the global incidence of ameloblastoma. The pooled incidence rate was determined to be 0.92 per million person-years.
Topics: Africa; Ameloblastoma; Australia; Europe; Humans; Incidence; Jaw Neoplasms; Mandible
PubMed: 30614154
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13031 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2023Sinonasal ameloblastoma (SNA) is considered to be a subtype of ameloblastoma. It differs from gnathic ameloblastoma in terms of clinicopathologic features, management... (Review)
Review
Sinonasal ameloblastoma (SNA) is considered to be a subtype of ameloblastoma. It differs from gnathic ameloblastoma in terms of clinicopathologic features, management and prognosis. Thus, the objective of the present review was to study the complications, survival, recurrence rate and outcomes following the management of SNA. The electronic search process was conducted on PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Google Scholar was used to search grey literature. Quality assessment of the case reports (CR) and case series (CS) was done based on CARE guidelines. The initial search resulted in 2111 articles. 15 studies (13 CR and 2 CS) were found to meet the eligibility criteria. The majority of the studies described histological features of SNA, which were consistent with ameloblastomas of gnathic origin. There were no SNA-related deaths reported in the included studies. Five studies described endoscopic surgeries to remove SNAs, and three SNAs were treated with post-surgery radiotherapy. Data from included studies suggest that sinonasal ameloblastomas are histologically similar to gnathic ameloblastomas, but their clinical presentation is different. They may cause complete or partial obstruction of the nasal cavity and the sinus. They appear to affect an older demographic, and their resection may be accompanied by the excision of a large portion of the maxilla, necessitating maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.
PubMed: 36615180
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010381 -
International Journal of Oral and... May 2022The aim of this review was to integrate the current literature into a comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary metastasizing ameloblastoma (MA). Related articles, published... (Review)
Review
The aim of this review was to integrate the current literature into a comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary metastasizing ameloblastoma (MA). Related articles, published since January 2000, were reviewed. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science databases were searched based on the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-four studies, including 28 case reports, met the eligibility criteria. The mean ± standard deviation disease-free interval after primary treatment was 12.1 ± 9.3 years. Adjuvant therapy (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) is considered appropriate for pulmonary MA patients presenting with rapid progression or apparent pulmonary symptoms. The proportion of patients undergoing simple follow-up (observation) has increased rapidly in the past 10 years. Meanwhile, among the three treatment groups (observation, surgery, and adjuvant therapy), no significant difference was found in the efficacy (P = 0.081) or progression-free survival (P = 0.263). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 72.4% and 52.8%, respectively. This study provides insights that could help surgeons with the management of patients presenting with pulmonary MA.
Topics: Ameloblastoma; Humans; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34462177
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.07.016