-
Clinical Rheumatology Oct 2021Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, rapidly progressive neutrophilic dermatosis commonly associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. We aimed to characterize the...
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, rapidly progressive neutrophilic dermatosis commonly associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. We aimed to characterize the association of PG and inflammatory arthritis, as little is known outside of case reports and small cohort studies.
METHOD
We performed a systematic review in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to present using the terms arthritis and pyoderma gangrenosum. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics and stratified analysis were used to compare factors of interest by type of arthritis.
RESULTS
A total of 1399 articles were screened, and 129 patients with inflammatory arthritis and PG were included in the review. The most common types of arthritis were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (50.4%), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated arthritis (10.9%), and psoriatic arthritis (8.5%). In the vast majority of cases, joint symptoms preceded PG, by a median of 10 years (inter-quartile range [IQR] 5-16). Corticosteroid monotherapy and biologic therapies, used alone or in combination, resulted in improvement or complete resolution of ulcers 71.4% and 67.3% of the time, respectively. Within the latter, infliximab, adalimumab, and anakinra were most successful in inducing remission overall. RA and non-RA did not differ significantly in treatment success or healing time.
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that PG is frequently preceded by inflammatory arthritis, most commonly RA. Clinicians used a wide variety of treatment regimens with variable outcomes. While larger studies are needed to standardize the treatment of inflammatory arthritis-associated PG, this study suggests that in addition to systemic corticosteroids, biologic medications can be effective treatment options for these patients.
KEY POINTS
• Inflammatory arthritis, most commonly rheumatoid arthritis, often precedes rather than follows pyoderma gangrenosum. • Other forms of arthritis associated with PG included IBD-associated arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. • Biologic therapies, such as infliximab, adalimumab, and anakinra, were largely successful in treating arthritis-associated pyoderma gangrenosum and may play an important role in corticosteroid-sparing therapy or in a maintenance regimen for this subset of patients. • The type of inflammatory arthritis associated with pyoderma gangrenosum may not be a helpful treatment guide as it was not significantly associated with treatment outcomes or healing time.
Topics: Adalimumab; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Infliximab; Pyoderma Gangrenosum
PubMed: 34002351
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05768-7 -
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2024To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological treatments for adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological treatments for adult-onset Still disease (AOSD).
METHODS
Six databases, 2 trial registries, and conference abstracts were searched from January 2012 to February 2023 for studies of pharmacological interventions in people with AOSD. Outcomes were rates of remission and response, discontinuation of concurrent treatments, complications of AOSD, and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for case series.
RESULTS
Forty-four studies evaluated treatments, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). For bDMARDs, tocilizumab (TCZ), anakinra (ANK), and canakinumab (CNK) had the most available data. Although 3 randomized controlled trials did not show statistically significant benefits of bDMARDs, metaanalyses showed high rates of complete remission and CS discontinuation. Complete remission was 80% (95% CI 59-92%, 36%), 73% (95% CI 58-84%, 66%), and 77% (95% CI 29-97%, 82%) and CS discontinuation was 57% (95% CI 29-81%, 66%), 47% (95% CI 18-78%, 79%), and 34% (95% CI 6-81%, 59%), respectively, for TCZ, ANK, and CNK. Studies with a higher proportion of patients previously treated with bDMARDs showed a trend toward lower rates of CS discontinuation ( = 0.05). The analyses had high clinical heterogeneity, largely because treatments were prescribed as different lines of therapy.
CONCLUSION
Evidence supports TCZ, ANK, and CNK therapy for AOSD. However, the magnitude of effect and comparative effectiveness of treatments is uncertain.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Biological Products; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Remission Induction; Still's Disease, Adult-Onset; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38302170
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0995 -
The Lancet. Psychiatry Apr 2023Immune system dysfunction is considered to play an aetiological role in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, with substantial alterations in the concentrations of specific... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Alteration patterns of peripheral concentrations of cytokines and associated inflammatory proteins in acute and chronic stages of schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Immune system dysfunction is considered to play an aetiological role in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, with substantial alterations in the concentrations of specific peripheral inflammatory proteins, such as cytokines. However, there are inconsistencies in the literature over which inflammatory proteins are altered throughout the course of illness. Through conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis, this study aimed to investigate the patterns of alteration that peripheral inflammatory proteins undergo in both acute and chronic stages of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, relative to a healthy control population.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 31, 2022, for published studies reporting peripheral inflammatory protein concentrations in cases of people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and healthy controls. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational or experimental design; (2) a population consisting of adults diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders with a specified indicator of acute or chronic stage of illness; (3) a comparable healthy control population without mental illness; (4) a study outcome measuring the peripheral protein concentration of a cytokine, associated inflammatory marker, or C-reactive protein. We excluded studies that did not measure cytokine proteins or associated biomarkers in blood. Mean and SDs of inflammatory marker concentrations were extracted directly from full-text publshed articles; articles that did not report data as results or supplementary results were excluded (ie, authors were not contacted) and grey literature and unpublished studies were not sought. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were done to measure the standardised mean difference in peripheral protein concentrations between three groups: individuals with acute schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, individuals with chronic schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, and healthy controls. This protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022320305.
FINDINGS
Of 13 617 records identified in the database searches, 4492 duplicates were removed, 9125 were screened for eligibility, 8560 were excluded after title and abstract screening, and three were excluded due to limited access to the full-text article. 324 full-text articles were then excluded due to inappropriate outcomes, mixed or undefined schizophrenia cohorts, or duplicate study populations, five were removed due to concerns over data integrity, and 215 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 24 921 participants were included, with 13 952 adult cases of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and 10 969 adult healthy controls (descriptive data for the entire cohort were not available for age, numbers of males and females, and ethnicity). Concentration of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and C-reactive protein were consistently elevated in both individuals with acute schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and chronic schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, relative to healthy controls. IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ were significantly elevated in acute schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, while IL-4, IL-12, and IFN-γ were significantly decreased in chronic schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses revealed that study quality and a majority of the evaluated methodological, demographic, and diagnostic factors had no significant impact on the observed results for most of the inflammatory markers. Specific exceptions to this included: methodological factors of assay source (for IL-2 and IL-8), assay validity (for IL-1β), and study quality (for transforming growth factor-β1); demographic factors of age (for IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-12), sex (for IFN-γ and IL-12), smoking (for IL-4), and BMI (for IL-4); and diagnostic factors including diagnostic composition of schizophrenia-spectrum cohort (for IL-1β IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α), antipsychotic-free cases (for IL-4 and IL-1RA), illness duration (for IL-4), symptom severity (for IL-4), and subgroup composition (for IL-4).
INTERPRETATION
Results suggest that people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders have a baseline level of inflammatory protein alteration throughout the illness, as reflected by consistently elevated pro-inflammatory proteins, hypothesised here as trait markers (eg, IL-6), while those with acute psychotic illness might have superimposed immune activity with increased concentrations of hypothesised state markers (eg, IFN-γ). Further research is required to determine whether these peripheral alterations are reflected within the central nervous system. This research facilitates an entry point in understanding how clinically relevant inflammatory biomarkers might one day be useful to the diagnosis and prognostication of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Male; Adult; Female; Humans; Cytokines; Schizophrenia; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Network Meta-Analysis; Interleukin-6; C-Reactive Protein; Interleukin-2; Interleukin-4; Interleukin-8; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Interleukin-12; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36863384
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00025-1 -
Reviews in Medical Virology May 2022As the pandemic progresses, the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is becoming clearer and the potential for immunotherapy is increasing. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
As the pandemic progresses, the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is becoming clearer and the potential for immunotherapy is increasing. However, clinical efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants (including tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra) treatment in COVID-19 patients are not yet known. We searched PubMed, Embase Medline, Web of Science and MedRxiv using specific search terms in studies published from 1 January 2020 to 20 December 2020. In total, 33 studies, including 3073 cases and 6502 controls, were selected for meta-analysis. We found that immunosuppressant therapy significantly decreased mortality in COVID-19 patients on overall analysis (odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.57-0.89, p = 0.004). We also found that tocilizumab and anakinra significantly decreased mortality in patients without any increased risk of secondary infection. In addition, we found similar results in several subgroups. However, we found that tocilizumab therapy significantly increased the risk of fungal co-infections in COVID-19 patients. This represents the only systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and secondary infection risk of immunosuppressant treatment in COVID-19 patients. Overall, immunosuppressants significantly decreased mortality but had no effect on increased risk of secondary infections. Our analysis of tocilizumab therapy showed a significantly increased risk of fungal co-infections in these patients.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Coinfection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34558756
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2295 -
Infection & Chemotherapy Jun 2021This study aims to assess anakinra's safety and efficacy for treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Numerous electronic databases were searched and finally... (Review)
Review
This study aims to assess anakinra's safety and efficacy for treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Numerous electronic databases were searched and finally 15 studies with a total of 3,530 patients, 757 in the anakinra arm, 1,685 in the control arm were included. The pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mortality in the treatment arm was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 - 0.54, I² = 48%), indicating a significant association between anakinra and mortality. A significant association was found regarding mechanical ventilation requirements in anakinra group compared to the control group OR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49 - 0.95, I² = 50%). For the safety of anakinra, we evaluated thromboembolism risk and liver transaminases elevation. Thromboembolism risk was OR, 1.59 (95% CI, 0.65 - 3.91, I² = 0%) and elevation in liver transaminases with OR was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.61 - 3.03, I² = 76%). Both were not statistically significant over the control group. Anakinra is beneficial in lowering mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, these non-significant differences in the safety profile between the anakinra and control groups may have been the result of baseline characteristics of the intervention group, and further studies are essential in evaluating anakinra's safety profile.
PubMed: 34216117
DOI: 10.3947/ic.2021.0016 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023This scoping review explores the effectiveness of IL-1 pathway inhibitors in managing PSTPIP1-associated inflammatory diseases (PAID). These diseases are marked by...
INTRODUCTION
This scoping review explores the effectiveness of IL-1 pathway inhibitors in managing PSTPIP1-associated inflammatory diseases (PAID). These diseases are marked by abnormal IL-1 pathway activation due to genetic mutations.
METHODS
Our methodology adhered to a pre-published protocol and involved a thorough search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to February 2022, following the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The review included studies reporting on IL-1 pathway inhibitor use in PAID patients.
RESULTS
From an initial pool of 5,225 articles, 36 studies involving 43 patients were selected. The studies predominantly used observational designs and exhibited diversity in patient demographics, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Anakinra and canakinumab demonstrated promise in treating sterile pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne (PAPA) and PSTPIP1-associated myeloid-related-proteinemia inflammatory (PAMI) syndromes, with scant data on other syndromes. Notably, there was a paucity of information on the adverse effects of these treatments, necessitating cautious interpretation of their safety profile.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence on IL-1 pathway inhibitors for PAID is primarily from observational studies and remains limited. Rigorous research with larger patient cohorts is imperative for more definitive conclusions. Collaborative efforts among specialized research centers and international health initiatives are key to advancing this field.
Topics: Humans; Acne Vulgaris; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Infectious; Cytoskeletal Proteins; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Interleukin-1
PubMed: 38259483
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1339337 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Dec 2020The study systematically reviewed the existing literature on the management of autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The study systematically reviewed the existing literature on the management of autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED).
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
We performed a literature search of Embase, NCBI, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from April 1990 to April 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies that were retrospective or prospective in nature evaluating the treatment of AIED with audiometric data measuring hearing outcomes during treatment. Hearing improvement was the primary study outcome and improvement in vestibular symptoms was the secondary study outcome.
RESULTS
Sixteen of 412 candidate articles were included in our study. Systemic steroid treatment is most commonly described. Alternative treatment modalities included intratympanic steroid treatment, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, methylprednisolone, rituximab, and anakinra.
CONCLUSION
Systemic corticosteroids are the first line treatment of AIED. Intratympanic steroids are a potential adjuvant or alternative treatment for patients who cannot tolerate or become refractory to steroid treatment. Steroid nonresponders may benefit from biologic therapy. Alternative treatment modalities including nonsteroidal immunosuppressants and biologics have been studied in small cohorts of patients with varying results. Prospective studies investigating the efficacy of biologic and nonsteroidal therapy are warranted.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
2.
PubMed: 33364414
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.508 -
Genes Aug 2023PSTPIP1 (proline-serine-threonine phosphatase-interactive protein 1)-associated myeloid-related proteinemia inflammatory (PAMI) syndrome, previously known as... (Review)
Review
PSTPIP1 (proline-serine-threonine phosphatase-interactive protein 1)-associated myeloid-related proteinemia inflammatory (PAMI) syndrome, previously known as Hyperzincemia/Hypercalprotectinemia (Hz/Hc) syndrome, is a recently described, rare auto-inflammatory disorder caused by specific deleterious variants in the gene (p.E250K and p.E257K). The disease is characterized by chronic systemic inflammation, cutaneous and osteoarticular manifestations, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, and neutropenia. Increased blood levels of MRP 8/14 and zinc distinguish this condition from other PSTPIP1-associated inflammatory diseases (PAID). The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the disease phenotype, course, treatment, and outcome based on reported cases. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines (2020) for reporting. A literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, and Web of Science on 13 October 2022. The quality of the case reports and case series was assessed using the JBI checklists. Out of the 43 included patients with PAMI syndrome, there were 24 females and 19 males. The median age at onset was 3.9 years. The main clinical manifestations included anemia (100%), neutropenia (98%), cutaneous manifestations (74%), osteoarticular manifestations (72%), splenomegaly (70%), growth failure (57%), fever (51%), hepatomegaly (56%), and lymphadenopathy (39%). Systemic inflammation was described in all patients. Marked elevation of zinc and MRP 8/14 blood levels were observed in all tested patients. Response to treatment varied and no consistently effective therapy was identified. The most common therapeutic options were corticosteroids (N = 30), anakinra (N = 13), cyclosporine A (N = 11), canakinumab (N = 6), and anti-TNF (N = 14). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been recently reported to be successful in five patients. Our review highlights the key characteristics of PAMI syndrome and the importance of considering this disease in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with early-onset systemic inflammation and cytopenia.
Topics: Female; Male; Humans; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Neutropenia; Diagnosis, Differential; Cytoskeletal Proteins; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
PubMed: 37628706
DOI: 10.3390/genes14081655 -
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal... 2021The past decade has seen increasingly rapid advances in understanding the pathogenic nature of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) and its shared symptoms with the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The past decade has seen increasingly rapid advances in understanding the pathogenic nature of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) and its shared symptoms with the systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocking agents are key elements in the treatment. In this updated systematic review, we focus on studies on efficacy and safety of IL-1 blockers published in the past 5 years and review on latest available therapies.
METHODS
We conducted searches using Medline, Biosis, Embase, and Cochrane databases between 2016 and 2021 using the terms AOSD, IL1, IL-18, canakinumab, anakinra, tadekinig, and rilonacept and if applicable their trade names. Duplicates, case reports, and manuscripts with incomplete data were excluded.
RESULTS
Of the 1013 screened publications, 17 were eligible after careful selection. We only found two published randomized controlled studies in the past 5 years. Review manuscripts of rare diseases, like our work, usually rely on retrospective studies and case series. Anakinra and canakinumab can be successfully used as first- or further-line treatment in patients with AOSD refractory to steroids. A homogeneous outcome is not established yet. Thus, a combination of clinical and laboratory tests can support the experienced clinician in the decision-making process.
CONCLUSION
The approval of IL-1 inhibitors for AOSD brought us into a new era in the treatment of AOSD. The overall efficacy-safety profile of the IL-1 inhibitors is favorable reflecting a targeted approach as standard of care. We can expect that the successful treatment of AOSD with IL-1 inhibition will facilitate further clinical and basic research with impact on other auto-inflammatory and hyper-inflammatory conditions.
PubMed: 34868356
DOI: 10.1177/1759720X211059598 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2022Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine may potentially prevent FMF attacks. For people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab might be beneficial. This is an update of the review last published in 2018.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with FMF.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and four Chinese databases on in August 2021. We searched clinical trials registries and references listed in relevant reports. The last search was 17 August 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with FMF, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, thalidomide, tocilizumab, interferon-α and ImmunoGuard (herbal dietary supplement)) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed certainty of the evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 10 RCTs with 312 participants (aged three to 53 years), including five parallel and five cross-over designed studies. Six studies used oral colchicine, one used oral ImmunoGuard, and the remaining three used rilonacept, anakinra or canakinumab as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to eight months. There were inadequacies in the design of the four older colchicine studies and the two studies comparing a single to a divided dose of colchicine. However, the four studies of ImmunoGuard, rilonacept, anakinra and canakinumab were generally well-designed. We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis, adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack; but no study reported on the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis. Colchicine (oral) versus placebo After three months, colchicine 0.6 mg three times daily may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks (risk ratio (RR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.95; 1 study, 10 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study (20 participants) of colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily showed there may be no difference in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence), or in the number of days between attacks: (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, one study reported loose stools and frequent bowel movements and a second reported diarrhea (narrative summary; both very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on acute-phase response. Rilonacept versus placebo There is probably no difference in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.26; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence) or in the number of days between attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the rilonacept study reported there may be no differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertension, headache, respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions and herpes, compared to placebo (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). The study narratively reported there may be no differences in acute-phase response indicators after three months (low-certainty evidence). ImmunoGuard versus placebo The ImmunoGuard study observed there are probably no differences in adverse effects (moderate-certainty evidence) or in acute-phase response indicators after one month of treatment (moderate-certainty evidence). No data were reported for the number of people experiencing an attack, duration of attacks or days between attacks. Anakinra versus placebo A study of anakinra given to 25 colchicine-resistant participants found there is probably no difference in the number of participants experiencing an attack at four months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.07; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for duration of attacks or days between attacks. There are probably no differences between anakinra and placebo with regards to injection site reaction, headache, presyncope, dyspnea and itching (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, anakinra probably reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) after four months (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). Canakinumab versus placebo Canakinumab probably reduces the number of participants experiencing an attack at 16 weeks (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65; 1 study, 63 colchicine-resistant participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the duration of attacks or days between attacks. The included study reported the number of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years was probably 42.7 with canakinumab versus 97.4 with placebo among people with colchicine-resistant FMF (moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, canakinumab probably caused a higher proportion of participants to have a CRP level of 10 mg/L or less compared to placebo (68% with canakinumab versus 6% with placebo; 1 study, 63 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Colchicine single dose versus divided dose There is probably no difference in the duration of attacks at three months (MD -0.04 hours, 95% CI -10.91 to 10.83) or six months (MD 2.80 hours, 95% CI -5.39 to 10.99; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the number of participants experiencing an attack or days between attacks. There is probably no difference in adverse events (including anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting and elevated liver enzymes) between groups (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, there may be no evidence of a difference between groups (narrative summary; low- to moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There were limited RCTs assessing interventions for people with FMF. Based on the evidence, three times daily colchicine may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, colchicine single dose and divided dose may not be different for children with FMF, canakinumab probably reduces the number of people experiencing attacks, and anakinra or canakinumab probably reduce CRP in colchicine-resistant participants; however, only a few RCTs contributed data for analysis. Further RCTs examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in FMF can be drawn.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amyloidosis; Child; Child, Preschool; Colchicine; Familial Mediterranean Fever; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Middle Aged; Serum Amyloid A Protein; Young Adult
PubMed: 35349164
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010893.pub4