-
Vascular Health and Risk Management 2022Venous thromboembolism is one of the major public health problems in the world. Though several studies were conducted to estimate common risk factors of venous... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolism is one of the major public health problems in the world. Though several studies were conducted to estimate common risk factors of venous thromboembolism and quality of anticoagulant therapy in Ethiopia, it is difficult to estimate the overall burdens of risk factors and quality of anticoagulant use because of the lack of a nationwide study.
OBJECTIVE
To assess magnitudes of risk factors of venous thromboembolism and quality of anticoagulant therapy in Ethiopia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic searching using PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Cochrane Database, Scopus, Hinari, Sci-Hub, African Journals Online Library, and Free-text Web Searches using Google Scholar was conducted from September, 15 to October 27, 2021. Each of the original studies was identified by Mesh terms and Boolean search technique using full title, various keywords and was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. The data were extracted using a format prepared in Microsoft Excel and exported to STATA 14.0 for the outcome analyses.
RESULTS
The database search delivered a total of 2118 studies. After articles were removed by duplications, titles, reading the abstract, and assessed for eligibility criteria, 12 articles were found suitable for the systematic review. Prolonged immobilization (41.30%) was the most commonly observed risk factor of venous thrombosis followed by acute infection (40.25%). The proportion of therapeutic range (INR = 2-3), sub-therapeutic range (INR <2), and supra-therapeutic range (INR >3) were 32.15%, 47.58%, and 17.62%, respectively. One hundred and thirty-eight patients (11.4%) have developed minor or major bleeding complications.
CONCLUSION
Prolonged immobilization and acute infection were the main risk factors for venous thromboembolism. The quality of anticoagulant therapy in Ethiopia was poor and bleeding complications were high. A strong effort is needed to improve the quality of anticoagulation and close monitoring of patients' international normalized ratio is required to improve treatment outcomes.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Ethiopia; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 35431550
DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S347667 -
Pediatric Blood & Cancer Jul 2022Thromboembolic disease rates are increasing in pediatric patients. Anticoagulation is prescribed for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease. While... (Review)
Review
Thromboembolic disease rates are increasing in pediatric patients. Anticoagulation is prescribed for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease. While nonadherence to anticoagulation regimens predicts poor health outcomes in adults, data in anticoagulated pediatric patients are limited. We systematically reviewed the rates, outcomes, and predictors of anticoagulation nonadherence in the pediatric population. Out of a total of 3581 unique articles identified for review, 17 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies primarily evaluated patients with cardiac disease treated with vitamin K antagonists. Overall nonadherence rates varied from 3% to 42%, based upon population, definition of adherence, and measurement strategy. Patient age, goal international normalized ratio (INR), and number of concurrent potentially interacting medications correlated with nonadherence. Data examining the relationship between nonadherence and health outcomes were included in only two studies. Limitations of current literature, as well as critical knowledge gaps that require future study, are discussed.
Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Child; Clinical Protocols; Health Services; Humans; International Normalized Ratio
PubMed: 35476901
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29698 -
PloS One 2023The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulants for the prevention of portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) in patients with cirrhosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulants for the prevention of portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) in patients with cirrhosis after splenectomy and explore the optimal time of anticoagulant administration.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM)databases, so as to screen out studies comparing the prognoses between cirrhotic post-splenectomy patients treated with and without anticoagulants. The parameters that were analyzed included the incidence of PVST and postoperative bleeding.
RESULTS
With a total of 592 subjects, we included 8 studies (6 observational and 2 randomized trials) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that the incidence of PVST was significantly lower in the anticoagulation group during the first 6 months of anticoagulant administration. And the largest difference in the incidence of PVST between the anticoagulation and control groups was observed at 3 months (odds ratio 0.17(0.11~0.27); P = 0.767; I2 = 0.0%) and 6 months (OR = 0.21(0.11~0.40); P = 0.714; I2 = 0.0%) postoperatively. The incidence of bleeding was not significantly higher in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio 0.71 (0.30~1.71); P = 0.580; I2 = 0.0%).
CONCLUSION
Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin can decrease the incidence of PVST in post-splenectomy cirrhotic patients without an increased risk of bleeding. And the optimal use time of warfarin is 6 months after splenectomy.
Topics: Humans; Warfarin; Portal Vein; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Splenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Venous Thrombosis; Anticoagulants; Liver Cirrhosis
PubMed: 37582105
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290164 -
International Journal of Clinical... Jun 2021Background Little is known with regards to the prognostic factors for patients with suspected or diagnosed Heparin-Induced Thromobocytopenia (HIT). The role of patient... (Review)
Review
Background Little is known with regards to the prognostic factors for patients with suspected or diagnosed Heparin-Induced Thromobocytopenia (HIT). The role of patient and therapy characteristics may play a role in predicting the outcome. Aim of the review To investigate the role of patient and therapy characteristics as potential prognostic factors for HIT-related complications (haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events), and mortality. Method The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. In September 2020, the main online databases were accessed: Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar. All the clinical trials concerning the management of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT were eligible. Studies evaluating the use of oral anticoagulants (e.g. vitamin K antagonists, Apixaban) were not considered, along with those comparing the use of heparin. For pairwise correlation, the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used. The final effect was evaluated according to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.Results Data from 33 clinical studies (4338 patients) were retrieved. The overall mean age was 62.3 ± 6.6 years old. Patients with HIT-related thromboembolism at the moment of diagnosis were associated with greater rate of haemorrhages (P > 0.0001), thromboembolism (P > 0.0001) and mortality (P = 0.001). Patients with more comorbidities at diagnosis were associated with a greater risk of haemorrhages (P = 0.07), thromboembolism (P = 0.002) and mortality (P = 0.002). Patients with longer duration of the therapy were associated with lower rate of mortality (P = 0.04). ConclusionsPatient comorbidities, presence of HIT-related thromboembolism on admission and shorter anticoagulant therapy were found to be negative prognostic factors. Thrombocythemia on admission, patients age and gender did not influence the overall outcome.
Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Heparin; Humans; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Thrombocytopenia; Thromboembolism
PubMed: 33044680
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01166-2 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research Dec 2022A systematic review was conducted to investigate prevalence, management and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with Serious Mental Illnesses (SMI) versus the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review was conducted to investigate prevalence, management and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with Serious Mental Illnesses (SMI) versus the general population.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for primary research written in English and published between 2004 and 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
A total of 1459 studies were identified in the initial search of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. Studies (n = 4) reporting on ischaemic stroke and major bleeding events were included in the meta-analysis.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Discrepancies were resolved by consulting a third reviewer.
RESULTS
Low rates of AF were reported among people with SMI suggesting under-recognition or recording gaps. People with SMI and AF were less likely to receive oral anticoagulation therapy compared to the general population. When receiving warfarin, those with bipolar disorder experienced poor anticoagulation control as measured by time in INR therapeutic range. Pooled analysis of risk estimates showed that in patients with identified AF, SMI was not significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke (HR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.85 to 1.40; I = 60%, p = 0.04) or major bleeding (HR: 1.11; 95%CI: 0.95 to 1.28; I = 57%, p = 0.03) when adjusted for underlying stroke and bleeding risks using the CHA2DS2VASc and HASBLED scales respectively.
CONCLUSION
More research is needed to examine the prevalence, management and outcomes of AF in this population, and to evaluate the effect of the introduction of the novel anti-coagulants on these metrics over time.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Stroke; Hemorrhage; Anticoagulants; Mental Disorders
PubMed: 36417811
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.11.002 -
The American Journal of Medicine Feb 2022Patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves are at high risk for thromboembolic events. The pooled efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves are at high risk for thromboembolic events. The pooled efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), as a class, relative to warfarin in this population is not well-known. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs relative to warfarin in patients with bioprosthetic valves or valve repair.
METHODS
We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves or valve repair. We pooled outcomes for stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding.
RESULTS
We included 4 trials with 1379 patients, of whom 723 (52.4%) received a NOAC. Mean follow-up ranged from 90 days to 2.8 years. In the pooled analysis, stroke or systemic embolism was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs (1.9%) compared with warfarin (3.7%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.85; P = .02). Ischemic stroke (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.18-2.93), hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-1.05), cardiovascular death (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.38-1.62), and all-cause mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.55-1.62) were not significantly different among groups. Major bleeding was significantly lower in patients treated with NOAC (2.8%) compared with warfarin (4.7%) (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves or valve repair, NOACs are associated with a reduced incidence of thromboembolic events and major bleeding as compared with warfarin. Thus, NOACs may be considered a preferred option for this patient population.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Vitamin K; Warfarin
PubMed: 34634252
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.026 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery. Venous and... May 2022Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication associated with surgical procedures. The implementation of thromboprophylaxis in this population has become a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication associated with surgical procedures. The implementation of thromboprophylaxis in this population has become a vital aspect of perioperative care to decrease VTE-associated morbidity and mortality risk. However, data assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing vascular surgery are sparse. Assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis by low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in vascular surgery.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2020, for randomized controlled trials assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis in vascular surgery.
RESULTS
Eight randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria, including 3130 patients, with a mean age of 55.35 years and 45% were females. Compared with placebo, anticoagulant use was associated with a decrease in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (risk ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-1.05; P = .06; I = 68%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.02-1.22; P = .08; I = 41%), but this trend did not attain statistical significance. There was no difference for bleeding outcomes between anticoagulants and placebo (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.05-15.01; P = .94; I = 76%). There was no significant difference in outcomes when low-molecular-weight heparin was compared directly with unfractionated heparin. In a sensitivity analysis, anticoagulant use was associated with a significant decrease in DVT or PE in patients undergoing venous surgeries, but was not associated with a significant decrease in DVT or PE in patients undergoing arterial surgeries, although this analysis was limited by the small number of studies in each group.
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients undergoing vascular surgery, thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulants showed a trend toward a lesser incidence of VTE when compared with placebo, although this difference was not statistically significant. Bleeding outcomes were comparable between both treatment groups.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 34508872
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.019 -
The Clinical Respiratory Journal Feb 2023COVID-19 disease-related coagulopathy and thromboembolic complication, an important aspect of the disease pathophysiology, are frequent and associated with poor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation in hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
COVID-19 disease-related coagulopathy and thromboembolic complication, an important aspect of the disease pathophysiology, are frequent and associated with poor outcomes, particularly significant in hospitalized patients. Undoubtedly, anticoagulation forms a cornerstone for the management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the appropriate dosing has been inconclusive and a subject of research. We aim to review existing literature and compare safety and efficacy outcomes of prophylactic and therapeutic dose anticoagulation in such patients.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of prophylactic dose anticoagulation when compared with therapeutic dosing in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases from 2019 to 2021, without any restriction by language. We screened records, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. RCTs that directly compare therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulants dosing and are not placebo-controlled trials were included. Analyses of data were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird analysis). The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021265948).
RESULTS
We included three studies in the final quantitative analysis. The incidence of thromboembolic events in therapeutic anticoagulation was lower in comparison with prophylactic anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and reached statistical significance [RR 1·45, 95% CI (1.07, 1.97) I -0%], whereas major bleeding as an adverse event was found lower in prophylactic anticoagulation in comparison with therapeutic anticoagulation that was statistically significant [RR 0·42, 95% CI(0.19, 0.93) I -0%].
CONCLUSION
Our study shows that therapeutic dose anticoagulation is more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than prophylactic dose but significantly increases the risk of major bleeding as an adverse event. So, the risk-benefit ratio must be considered while using either of them.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Thromboembolism; Hospitals
PubMed: 36572657
DOI: 10.1111/crj.13568 -
Epilepsy Research May 2020Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban provides a safe and convenient...
Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban provides a safe and convenient alternative to the traditional anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists or heparin derivatives. Many patients receiving long-term seizure prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may require anticoagulation with NOACs. Providers caring for these patients need to be informed about potential interactions between AEDs and NOACs and the relevant clinical consequences. A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted to elucidate current knowledge on the clinically relevant interactions between AEDs and NOACs and highlight areas in which further research is needed. The systematic review protocol was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and SciFinder were searched. Of the 630 non-duplicate items identified by the search, 13 met eligibility criteria. These 13 items included 8 case reports, 2 letters to the editor and 3 nonrandomized studies. The majority of pharmacokinetic interactions between NOACs and first generation AEDs occurred via the induction of the hepatic enzyme system and competition for the P-glycoprotein transporter and lead to decreased NOAC plasma levels and consequent thrombotic events. Only one article, a case report, was identified that focused on interactions between the second generation AED and a NOAC. At the present time, the limited evidence suggests that enzyme-inducing or inhibiting AEDs reduce the effectiveness of anticoagulation produced by several NOACs. This information may help providers anticipate possible interactions and guide therapy appropriately.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans
PubMed: 32155540
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106304 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Nov 2020Cerebral venous sinus thromboses (CVST) occur in children with a variety of etiologies. However, no standard treatment paradigm is established. We sought to identify... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cerebral venous sinus thromboses (CVST) occur in children with a variety of etiologies. However, no standard treatment paradigm is established. We sought to identify what treatments have been applied, their outcomes, and the role of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with CVST.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted exploring all treatments of pediatric CVSTs using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for study design, aim, population, interventions, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Of 2946 resultant articles, 51 full-text articles were included. Management of infectious CVST included broad-spectrum antibiotics, surgery, and anticoagulation. Neoplastic and traumatic CVST treatment included anticoagulation. Treatment of CVSTs associated with metabolic abnormalities centered on correction of metabolic derangements, or supplementation where appropriate, and anticoagulation. Autoimmune, congenital, and thrombotic pathway CVSTs were treated with anticoagulation and treatment of the underlying disorder. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin were most commonly used and seen to be effective and safe. Uncommonly, endovascular interventions including venous thrombectomy and intravenous injection of thrombolytic therapy were used with varying success.
CONCLUSIONS
While conservative, medical, thombolytic, endovascular, and surgical treatment all have a role in in the treatment of pediatric CVSTs, anticoagulation is commonly applied and found to be safe and effective in pediatrics. Risks and benefits of anticoagulation must be considered on an individual basis as no randomized trials have established a standard of care. Based on our findings, we propose an approach to CVST treatment and look to future study aimed at more clearly delineating treatment dose, duration, and timing of re-evaluation in these patients.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Cranial Sinuses; Heparin; Humans; Pediatrics; Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial
PubMed: 32743709
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04829-7